ATLAS Group Introduction + TriggerMasahiro Morii20’ Muon Spectrometer + Upgrades João Guimarães da Costa25’ Cosmic Ray AnalysisAlberto Belloni20’ Physics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
L2 chains for single-beam menu Muon full reconstruction T2Calo starting from MBTS Ricardo Gonçalo, Denis Damazio.
Advertisements

03/31/2006 DOSAR Workshop at UTA Pat Skubic (OCHEP) OCHEP Physics Interests Pat Skubic, for the Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics Introduction Physics.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Muon Data Quality and Performance A. Belloni - G. Zevi Della Porta for the ATLAS Harvard Group DOE Site Visit
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
CMS ECAL Prompt Feedback Group Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology A Brief History: From GRUMM to First BeamThe Future of the ECAL PFG.
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
UCSB Top Quark Analyses On CDF J.Lamb, C.Hill, J. Incandela, C. Mills DOE Visit January 20, 2004.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
1 Techincolor and Heavy Top/B search Tulika Bose Meenakshi Narain (Brown University) Work done in the context of Les Houches 2007.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
 Carlos A. Chavez Barajas 22nd, May 2013 Latest work : Data Analysis Non-collision background estimation (SUSY searches) W+Jets cross section (data driven.
1 Trigger “box” and related TDAQ organization Nick Ellis and Xin Wu Chris Bee and Livio Mapelli.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
HLT Selection at Phase II John Baines. Assumptions Phase II: 5-7 x10 34 Much of what is currently done at Level-2 will now be done at Level-1, incl. –
US ATLAS T2/T3 Workshop at UTANovember 11, Profiling Analysis at Startup Jim Cochran Iowa State Outline: - Computing model status - Expected Early.
The Muon Spectrometer Commissioning and Upgrades Joao Guimaraes da Costa for the ATLAS Harvard Group DOE Site Visit
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
1 “Steering the ATLAS High Level Trigger” COMUNE, G. (Michigan State University ) GEORGE, S. (Royal Holloway, University of London) HALLER, J. (CERN) MORETTINI,
1 c. mills (Harvard U.) 20 September, 2010 W and Z Physics at ATLAS Corrinne Mills Harvard DOE Site Visit 20 September 2010.
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
TDAQ Upgrade Software Plans John Baines, Tomasz Bold Contents: Future Framework Exploitation of future Technologies Work for Phase-II IDR.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
14 Aug. 2008John Huth Harvard DOE Review Introduction: Harvard ATLAS Group John Huth.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE.
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.
ATLAS Trigger Development
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
Monitoring Muons; Physics 2: top,di-boson,SUSY,Dark Matter Melissa Franklin DOE Review 2009.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
TAGS in the Analysis Model Jack Cranshaw, Argonne National Lab September 10, 2009.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
DOE REVIEW AUGUST 2006: CDF GROUP AT HARVARD MELISSA FRANKLIN - PROF JOAO GUIMARAES DA COSTA---PROF 25% SEBASTIAN GRINSTEIN - POST-DOC DANIEL SHERMAN -
Introduction to FCC Software FCC Istanbul 11 March, 2016 Alice Robson (CERN/UNIGE) on behalf of / with thanks to the FCC software group.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
Marcel Vreeswijk (Nikhef/UvA-IoP) First Results of ATLAS at the LHC -- The rediscovery of the Standard Model-- Contents: Intro: The Standard Model Elementairy.
FNAL Users’ Meeting– June Fermilab Users’ Meeting CMS Physics from Early LHC Running Dan Green Fermilab For the CMS Collaboration.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
1/5/09 Jiri Masik1 Event Filter Tracking in the Inner Detector Jiri Masik EFID Trigger related work –Trigger bytestream –Event display.
Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
14 Aug. 08DOE Review John Huth Future Harvard ATLAS Plans John Huth.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
ATLAS Upgrade Program Sarah Demers, US ATLAS Fellow with BNL
The University of Manchester
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
Harvard ATLAS CERN LHC A general purpose detector designed to study proton-proton collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva,
Monitoring Muons; Physics 2: top,di-boson,SUSY,Dark Matter
J. Rutherfoord & P. Schacht 17 May 2004
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS Group Introduction + TriggerMasahiro Morii20’ Muon Spectrometer + Upgrades João Guimarães da Costa25’ Cosmic Ray AnalysisAlberto Belloni20’ Physics I + ComputingJohn Huth25’ Physics II + MonitoringMelissa Franklin25’ 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Harvard ATLAS Group PIs: Melissa Franklin, João Guimarães da Costa, John Huth, Masahiro Morii Postdocs: Kevin Black, Alberto Belloni, Corrinne Mills, Shulamit Moed + new hire Graduate Students: Lashkar Kashif (G7 in ’09–’10), Verena Martinez Outschoorn (G5), Srivas Prasad (G5), Ben Smith (G5), Michael Kagan (G4), Laura Jeanty (G3), Giovanni Zevi della Porta (G3), Kevin Mercurio (G2) + William Spearman (G1) Undergrads: Jack Kearney, Maria Baryakhtar, Jeewoo Park, Michael Fountaine, Curt Nehrkorn, Tomo Lazovich 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Physics First LHC run, E CM = 7 TeV –Crucial for understanding the machine, detector –Opportunities for early physics W, Z  Z + jets, WZ production Top quark production Future runs, E CM = 14 TeV –Link from early physics to discovery Z + Higgs, same-sign dilepton, multi-lepton BSM tt-bar resonance 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Muon Spectrometer Our primary responsibility and strength –Production of endcap MDT chambers and MDT front-end electronics –Vertical integration of MDT-related tasks Installation, commissioning, and operation DAQ software Online/offline data-quality monitoring Muon reconstruction software –Validate and debug using cosmic ray data Target: publication of μ + /μ − ratio 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

ATLAS Trigger Developments Melissa Franklin, Corrinne Mills, Kevin Mercurio, Ben Smith, Masahiro Morii 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Introduction Goal: Give physics analysis access to detailed trigger information Harvard is a major contributor to the Trigger Core Software and Trigger Analysis Tools groups in ATLAS Physics Dataset Derived Dataset Trigger Efficiency Final Analysis Reduction Techniques Efficiency Measurement Database Access Trigger-Aware Analysis Navigation Slimming Trigger Offline Matching Efficiency Framework 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Navigation Slimming Trigger Navigation structure offers full information of the trigger decision process –Which algorithms were run, what their results were, and what algorithms they seeded –Backbone of trigger aware analysis –Represents large fraction (15%–30%) of total event size Ideal candidate for slimming –Derived dataset for each analysis needs only a subset of the Navigation tree Muon RoI Muon ID Muon MS Muon EF Muon RoI Muon ID Muon MS Calo RoI Tau Calo Tau Final Calo RoI egamma Calo egamma TRT Photon Final Initial Node 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Navigation Slimming — Status — Designed and implemented by B. Smith –Harvard will continue to develop & maintain the code Successfully tested by the Derived Physics Dataset (DPD) Group –In place for upcoming central DPD production for 7 TeV Monte Carlo samples –Will be used in the standard DPD production for colliding-beams data in /21/2009 ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii 8

Trigger/Offline Matching Associate trigger and offline objects –Which trigger did this object pass? –Properties (e.g. P T ) of the object according to trigger algorithms More detailed than the traditional event-level trigger decision information –Necessary, e.g., for measuring trigger efficiencies by tag-and- probe Must parse the Navigation structure Z p T : 20 GeV μ1μ1 μ2μ2 TrigDecision mu10: mu20: mu40: ✓ ✓ X Matching mu10: μ 1, μ 2 mu20: μ 1 mu40: none 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Trigger/Offline Matching — Status — Designed and implemented by B. Smith –Examples, documentation, and limited testing complete Initial deployment in progress –High-Level-Trigger (HLT) monitoring –Trigger efficiency measurements H → 4 lepton. Z → μμ tag and probe –Trigger fake rate studies (K. Mercurio) –Analysis tools (PhotonAnalysisUtils) Backbone for all future trigger-aware analyses 8/21/2009 ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii 10

InsituPerformance Framework InsituPerformance Framework stores object measurements of general interest: –Trigger and particle ID efficiencies, resolutions, and fake rates –Globally accessible, centrally maintained database Harvard works on trigger-specific implementation of the framework –Flexible definition of trigger efficiency –Validation and debugging of tools –Implementation of slice-specific tools 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

InsituPerformance Framework — Status — C. Mills coordinates experts for different trigger slices to develop efficiency measurement code –Missing E T, MinBias, and tau slices in progress –In contact with jet and b-jet experts –Muon and electron code developed separately Goal: Deploy for all slices with first colliding-beam data Remaining technical issues –Ideal database implementation –Validation/approval of entries into database –Linking entries with documentation C. Mills will take primary responsibility for the InsituPerformance Framework in September 8/21/ ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii

Summary and Future Plans Harvard Group focuses on making trigger-aware analysis possible in ATLAS –Navigation slimming –Trigger/offline matching –Trigger efficiency framework Active involvement in Trigger Core Software and Trigger Analysis Tools Groups –Incorporation of our tools in benchmark efficiency measurements for each slice –Development of user tools for quick access to trigger state and trigger configuration information in data 8/21/2009 ATLAS Intro + Trigger, M. Morii 13