Status Report of the Realignment for J-PARC 3GeV RCS N. Tani, H. Hotchi, M. Yamamoto, J. Kamiya, K. Horino, M. Kinsho J-PARC Center, JAEA 1 Outline 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure. Outline. Assembly procedure for tagger and vacuum chamber. Support stands. Alignment.
Advertisements

The Preassembling Installation Survey & Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Qu Huamin 2006 / 4 / 27.
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
Multipole Girders - Alignment & Stability (Multipole Girder Alignment technology & R&D) S. Sharma ASD: J. Skaritka, D. Hseuh, V. Ravindranath, G. Miglionico,
H. MAINAUD DURAND, A. HERTY, A. MARIN, M. ACAR PERMANENT MONITORING OF THE LHC LOW BETA TRIPLETS: LATEST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES.
September 15th 2009Olympus technical review at DESY, F.Brinker1 DORIS storage ring Olympus in the IP-region Beam optic, changes on the lattice Beam dimensions,
Status of ATF/ATF2 and machine schedule in this fall Impact of the earthquake Recovery status, alignment Schedule in this fall N. Terunuma, KEK.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
TAGGER MAGNET DESIGN Presented by Tim Whitlatch Hall D Tagger Magnet Design Review July 10,
1 Institute of High Energy Physics 13/09/2010 Comparison and Study in Measurement Accuracy of Height Difference between Laser Tracker and Level Men LingLing.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
1 T2K Beam Operation Summary (earthquake recovery and beamline survey) NBI 2012 T. Ishii (KEK) for the T2K beam group.
LINAC 4 Project L4T/L4Z Design Status J.Humbert / B.Riffaud on behalf of EN-MME design team 1 st September 2011 LINAC4 – BEAM COORDINATION COMMITTEE B.Riffaud.
Tilt meter fiducial Guide rail Abstract This poster covers the survey and alignment techniques selected for installation of the SPIRAL2 accelerator devices.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet and Girder Integration Lewis Doom, NSLS-II Project National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) will.
ELENA Support system 6/11/2014 Antti Kolehmainen on behalf of WP Support system
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Commissioning Status of Shintake Monitor (IP-BSM) T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kamiya, S. Komamiya (Univ. of Tokyo), T. Okugi, N. Terunuma,
Updated status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, B. Mikulec, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff,
Dmitry Gudkov BE-RF-PM CLIC Module Working Group Engineering design of the adjustable supporting system for DBQ.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Status of MAMI C Hans-Jürgen Arends CB-Meeting, Basel October 4-6, 2006.
Design of DC septum magnets based on measurements and 3D calculation of an R&D septum magnet for Rapid Cycle Synchrotron of J-PARC Masao Watanabe, Accelerator.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fiducials Requirements Fabien Rey ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group ACCELERATOR TECHNICAL BOARD 23/09/2015.
RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PETRA III, A New High Brilliant Light Source At DESY
COMET Task Force 16/Oct/2008 J-PARC PAC meeting Satoshi MIHARA.
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 12th International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment September 10-14, 2012 Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, U.S.A NSLS-II Girder.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
LHC Beampipes Ray Veness / AT-VAC FP XII 08Beam Vacuum- R.Veness.
The machine status and operating mechanism of BEPCII CAO, Jianshe Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS April 16, 2013 The 4th Accelerator.
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC Michigan State.
ICFA mini-Workshop on Beam Commissioning for High Intensity Accelerators Yasuhiro Watanabe (J-PARC / JAEA) Tracking between bending and quadrupole families.
After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 13th International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment October 13-17, 2014, IHEP, Beijing, China Smoothing Based on Best-fit.
Page 1 GSI, Hydraulic Actuators for PANDA Target Spectrometer Jost Lühning, GSI Darmstadt Functional Specifications for moving the TS: Two synchronous.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Survey for SPL Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP/SU. Outline 12/11/2008 Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP-SU, Survey for SPL 2  Scope & Main Parameters  Technical Description.
Alignment of Insertion Device at Siam Photon Source
The Alignment of DTL in CSNS Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS KE Zhiyong
The Super-FRS Multiplet, Magnetic and Cryogenic requirements
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
PETRA III, Status and Upgrade
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Status of HESR 18th March Gießen Dieter Prasuhn.
Alignment of VSC components along LSS 1&5
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
Status of ATF/ATF2 and machine schedule in this fall
The SPEAR3 Upgrade Project at SLAC
The SPEAR3 Upgrade Project at SLAC
Mechanical system of CEPC
XFEL Collimation and Beam Switchyard Vacuum Issues
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Alignment of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC)
Progress and plans, Mechanics system of CEPC
HESR for SPARC 25th November FAIR MAC Dieter Prasuhn.
Presentation transcript:

Status Report of the Realignment for J-PARC 3GeV RCS N. Tani, H. Hotchi, M. Yamamoto, J. Kamiya, K. Horino, M. Kinsho J-PARC Center, JAEA 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Misalignment caused by the earthquake 3. Strategy of the realignment 4. Results of the realignment 5. Summary

Introduction 2 J-PARC 3GeV RCS magnets suffered from the misalignment from designed beamline caused by the earthquake in March, As the result of the obit calculation showed that the beam loss was acceptable for beam operation at 300kW. Therefore, beam operation with the current placement was implemented until May, As beam loss increased at 1 MW operation, realignmnet of beamlines was necessary. In addition to realignment of magnets, alignment for ducts of vacuum devices was implemented in order to secure the ring acceptance. In this presentation the method and result of the realignment of RCS beamline implemented last year will be reported.

Placement of the beamline for RCS 3 Injetced beam energy : 400 MeV Extracted beam energy : 3 GeV Circumference : mm

Misalignment of RCS magnets before/after the earthquake Black dots are values taken before and red dots are values taken after the earthquake. The survey of the RCS magnets was carried out using a laser tracker and a digital level. It was about 3 mm displacement to horizontal direction before the earthquake. Expect for that, displacement was small. Horizontal direction moved largely from the extraction straight section to the injection straight section after the earthquake. As the result, it was found out that the maximum displacement from design value of magnets about 6.0 mm in horizontal direction, about 2.8 mm in vertical direction and about 2.8 mm in longitudinal direction. The circumference of RCS ring expanded by 10.4mm. Misalignment caused by the earthquake 4 Δx ; Δy ; Δs ; Measurement of the magnets

Measurement of the ceramic chambers 5 Ceramic chamber is used for a vacuum duct of RCS in order to reduce eddy current. The measurement of displacement for the ceramic chambers of dipole and quadrupole magnets was also carried out using a laser tracker and a measurement device of target in 2012 summer. Measurement of up/down stream parts of each ceramic chamber was implemented by attaching a measurement device on a titanium sleeve connecting ceramic part and flange part of a ceramic chamber.

6 Ceramic chambers of dipole magnetCeramic chambers of quadrupole magnet Alignment accuracy of ceramic chamber at the time of installation was within ±0.5 mm. Ceramic chamber shifted from the ideal position. It is considered this displacement was mainly caused by the earthquake. ⇒ This measurement date was used to evaluate the acceptance of the ceramic chamber. Accordingly, it was found out that for some ceramic chambers acceptance was not enough. Therefore realignment was necessary also for ceramic chambers.

Strategy of the realignment 7 The most difficult part was adjustment of magnets near the injection collimator, because this area has high radiation dose and workability was very low. Fortunately, relative displacement of all components at injection area was less than ±0.2mm. ⇒ Therefore, it was decided that magnets in the injection straight section would be fixed and the rest magnets would be adjusted. Height of the beam line was decided base on the magnets near the collimator (QDL4 and QFL5). The displacement is magnified by 1000 for convenience Before coordinate adjustment After coordinate adjustment Ring coordinate adjustment to keep injection section. Decision of the RCS ring coordinate

8 Displacement of magnets when converted into new ring coordinate The maximum displacement from new design value of magnets about 10.9 mm in horizontal direction, about 8.6 mm in longitudinal direction and about 2.8 mm in vertical direction. Displacement became bigger in the straight section between the extraction and RF due to the new coordinate. However this displacement can be adjusted sufficiently within the range of the magnets movement. Displacement of the vertical direction Displacement of the horizontal and longitudinal direction Δx ; Δs; ΔH ;

9 Acceptance including COD of 3mm and misaligment Acceptance including COD of 3mm Calculation conditions: ● Large β operation ● C.O.D. of 3 mm Acceptance (π mm mrad) Realignment of the ceramic chambers Ring acceptance must be secured to realize 1MW beam operation. Acceptance calculation was implemented in consideration of misalignment and COD of 3mm for the ceramic chambers. ⇒ Acceptance can’t be secured mainly for diapole and quadrupole magnets (QFN, QFX).

10 In addition, bellows will be installed up/down stream of the ceramic chamber. Adjustment range of bellows is within 1mm. When there is a displacement of more than 1mm between bellows and flanges, vacuum ducts can’t be connected because of adjustment of bellows. Therefore ceramic chambers there have to be aligned. ComponentRealignmentTotal BM24 QM5360 SM18 Ext. Sept.23 Ext. kicker2 (8 kicker-mag. installed in 2 vacuum chambers) 2 RF Cavity11 and new 1 cavity installed12 Monitors, vacuum pumps, exciters, …. Connected flanges : 336 Ceramics chambers RealignmentTotal BM2024 QM2360 SM618 The amount of the realignment componentsRealignment ceramics chambers

11 Method of the realignment for the dipole magnet Alignment of magnets was carried out using a laser tracker and a digital clinometer. Generally magnets are adjusted first in the vertical direction and then in the horizontal direction. Magnets were adjusted within ±0.2 mm after repetition of adjustment in vertical and horizontal directions. Dipole magnets of RCS weigh 38 ton. ⇒ Normal adjustment can’t move them. To reduce weight and friction at the time of adjustment, 4 sets of hydraulic jack and roller plate were installed between the magnets and the girder. Hydraulic jack was used for adjustment in vertical direction. In order to adjust both in horizontal and longitudinal directions 2 roller plates were set. ⇒ These jigs made the very smooth adjustment of dipole magnets possible.

12 Method of the realignment for the dipole magnet ducts At the beginning of installation, duct alignment was carried out by separating diapole magnets into upper and lower part. This time magnets were not separated to save working time and space and a jig exclusively for alignment was made. First, a flange positioning jig was set on the side of duct sleeve in order to adjust a duct tilt. Then a reference bar was fixed on the fiducial point located on the upper part of a magnet. Alignment in the beam axis direction was implemented by hanging a plumb bob from the end the reference bar. Finally alignment in height and in horizontal direction was carried out with a caliper, hanging a plumb bar from the reference bar. ⇒ Therefore for ceramic chambers of dipole magnets, duct adjustment became possible with an accuracy of less than ±0.1mm.

13 Method of the realignment for the quadrupole magnet ducts As with the case of diapole magnets, a method not to separate magnets was considered for realignment of quadrupole and sextupole magnets. But with that method a working space would narrow and adjustment would become complicated. Therefore the magnets were separated into upper and lower parts. An alignment jig for ducts was set on the divided face of a lower iron core. A dial gauge of each axis set on a alignment jig was used for alignment in height and horizontal direction. However as the jig mounting surface inside the magnets was rough because of the adhesive seeped from a steel sheet, the installation accuracy of the alignment jig was not good. Therefore this ceramic chamber was relatively moved using the measured data of Laser Tracker. Measurement accuracy of this method was within ±0.5mm.

Results of the realignment 14 Displacement of magnets before/after realignment Magents and fiducial points on the wall were measured before the realignment. Using the fiducial points at that time, the realignment of magnets was carried out from August to September, The realigned magnets were adjusted within ±0.2mm compared with the design value. The measurement after the realignment found that the fiducial points on the wall and the magnets were contracted inward. As a result, the beam line of RCS was displaced inward by 0.5mm and its circumference shortened by 3.1mm.

15 Displacement of ceramic chambers before/after realignment The realignment of ceramic chambers was carried out from August to October, The ceramic chambers of BM were adjusted within ±0.2mm. The ceramic chambers of QM were adjusted within ±0.1mm. Alignment accuracy of the ceramic chambers is deemed to be about ±0.6mm at a maximum when installation accuracy of the mesurement device for a laser tracker measurement (±0.5mm) is considered.  Although alignment accuracy of the ceramic chambers exceeded the targeted value (±0.5mm), the value is well accepted. Ceramic chambers of dipole magnetCeramic chambers of quadrupole magnet

Summary The alignment of the RCS has been successfully completed within long shutdown period. Working period was 5 months from 22 June to 27 November The alignment procedure for RCS beamline equipment was confirmed for the first time by the realignment and it was carried out. The magnets of the beamline were adjusted to within ±0.2mm. The ceramic chambers were aimed to be adjusted within ±0.5mm. As a result, a sufficient ring acceptance to achieve the 1MW operation was secured. Beam commissioning started on January 30, RCS succeeded in injection of 400MeV beam from the upgraded Linac, and extraction of 3GeV beam to MLF. 16

Thank you for your attention!! 17