Office of Measurement Services (OMS) Student Evaluation of Teaching June 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborating with the QAS Sandra Martinaitis & April Nix Observations at Georgia Virtual are designed around making YOU the best instructor you can be.
Advertisements

Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
AAFCS Annual Conference Research-to- Practice Session June 27, 2013 EMBRACE AND MANAGE ONLINE TEACHING METHODS.
TDG Project Web-based Learning for Building & Construction Laboratory and Site Works Vincent Siu & Albert Cheung Department of Building & Construction.
2008 History and Social Science Standards of Learning Resources and Teaching Strategies.
Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)
Kontos1 Principles of Quality Instruction in Web Classes George Kontos, Ed.D. Assistant Professor
Welcome to ComS 103 Podcasting Prof. Nick Burnett.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) Citizen Evaluation of Teaching (CET) Overview of SET/CET Faculty Senate Advancement of Teaching Committee.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Department Contact Training Updated: February 22, 2015.
is the online course management system used throughout the UW System. Each semester, all UW-Superior undergraduate courses and most graduate.
Final Report. Dev/Prototype Fall 2011 System Testing (Early) Spring 2012 Pilot Test w/ Selected Departments Spring 2012 Trainings for Academic Chairs.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Biology 475 Topics in Applied Microbiology. Biology 475 Official Course Description BIOL 475 LEC,SEM 0.50 Course ID: 1101 Topics in Applied Microbiology.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR.
+ Measuring Teaching Quality in the Online Classroom Ann H. Taylor Director, Dutton e-Education Institute College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.
Custom Faculty Development: Reach Faculty Where They Live Linda A. Leake, M. Ed. Instructional Designer/Blackboard Support Specialist University of Louisville.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
MIS 2000 Information Systems for Management Section A01, Bob Travica Introduction to Course Updated: May 2015.
Blackboard Strategies: Using Blackboard Pedagogically.
MCEA Gate I ADMISSION TO PROGRAM. Agenda  Define GATE I  Criteria for Admission  Reflection Narratives  Packet format.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
COURSE ADDITION CATALOG DESCRIPTION To include credit hours, type of course, term(s) offered, prerequisites and/or restrictions. (75 words maximum.) 4/1/091Course.
Mgt 20600: IT Management & Applications Introduction and Overview Tuesday August 30, 2005.
Mgt 20600: IT Management & Applications Introduction and Overview Thursday January 19, 2006.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Good News for the Masses Jonathan D. Lawrence SBL 11/22/04.
Raquel Bento EMPACTS Independent Study Fall 2008.
Understanding the Academic Structure of the US Classroom: Syllabus.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
1 Archdiocese of New York Academic Initiatives.
Global Textiles and Apparel Industries MDSE 4010 Spring 2014 Instructor: Lauren Vasquez Virtual Office Hours:Monday, Wednesday,
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Formative Peer Review at Ocean County College. Guiding Principle “Ideally, the peer review of teaching is a critically reflective and collaborative process.
Faculty Evaluation for Online Learning Institutional Standards and Emerging Practices Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University.
EDP 389H: Educational Disabilities in the Schools January 22nd, 2009.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Evidence-Based Teaching: Evaluative Strategies ED A SEPTEMBER 29, 2011 Dr. Anne Belcher, Dr. Linda Adamson, Instructors.
Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.
Do Easier Classes Make for Happier Students? Amanda J. Watson, PhD Murray State University Background Grade inflation has been of concern in higher education.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Evidence-Based Teaching: Evaluative Strategies ED B MARCH 13, 2012 Dr. Anne Belcher, Dr. Linda Adamson, Instructors.
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. PSY 6645 Evaluation and Assessment.
Summer Institute 2007 Facilitators: Brian Cafarella and Eric Kraus Building 11, Room
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
Information Seeking Behavior and Information Literacy Among Business Majors Casey Long Business Liaison Librarian University Library Georgia State University,
PSYC 2315: Psychology of Adjustment Madeleine E. Wright, Ph.D. CRN# Spring, 2016 SS 12 Weeks.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
ESET Timing Close Study Results Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment.
Using Streaming Videos and Blogs in Web-Enhanced Pharmacology
NTNU’s quality system for education
PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities.
Course Evaluation Committee
New Teacher Evaluation Process
The Greater Miami Valley EMS Council
Introducing the Numeracy continuum K-10
STUDENTS, WE VALUE YOUR INPUT!
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
The Systematic Vocabulary Instruction Project
ALEKS & College Algebra - A Journey to Finding the Best Model:
Administrative Issues
Learning Community II Survey
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
Presentation transcript:

Office of Measurement Services (OMS) Student Evaluation of Teaching June 2003

Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) Policy approved May 19, 1992 by University Senate Protocols approved April 1, 1993 by University Senate First administration of SETs – Fall Quarter 1993

OMS Role in Student Evaluation of Teaching Design/Print/Distribute scanable SET forms for Departments Analyze results and retain numerical data ( ) Provide instructor and department chair with a summary of the data; original questionnaires returned to instructor SET data which has “student release” permission is given to ONESTOP to be placed on the web for viewing Summary data is posted on OMS website at:

SET Standard Questionnaire Forms Form C – contains 5 required questions, student background info, space for six additional questions Form D – contains the same content as Form C plus 10 additional rated items, and a 12-item checklist on aspects of the course to be used for course improvement Form E – contains the same content as Form C but has 48, rather than six response spaces. The form is intended for use with a separate questionnaire. Form F – customized form contain required questions plus additional information requested by department

Required Questions (on all forms) How would you rate the instructor’s overall teaching ability? How would you rate the instructor’s knowledge of the subject matter? How would you rate the instructor’s respect and concern for students? How much would you say you learned in this course? How would you rate the physical environment in which you take this class, especially the classroom facilities, including your ability to see, hear, concentrate, and participate?

Ten Rating Items on Form D Instructor’s clarity in presenting or discussing course materials. Instructor’s rapport with you as a student. Instructor’s use of technology to enhance your learning experience in the course. Instructor’s success in getting you to think. Instructor’s attention to what helps you learn. Instructor’s respect for students’ individual differences. Overall quality of text(s) and handouts. Helpfulness of feedback given you about your performance. Degree to which exams and quizzes (or other evaluation procedures) measured your knowledge and understanding. Instructor’s encouragement of students to express their views.

Student Release Items The instructor provided a (Minimally/Moderately/Highly) structured learning environment. The instructor emphasized: a) covering fewer course topics in depth b) balancing breath and depth in course topics covered c) covering many course topics rather than a few The course Guide and course syllabus accurately described the learning activities that occurred during the term. Instructor stimulated me to think critically about the course material. Instructor set high expectations for student performance in the course. Instructor used a variety of teaching and learning strategies in the course. Instructor provided me with timely and helpful feedback about my performance. In-class learning activities contributed to my learning. I attended almost all the class sessions during the term. I would take another course with this instructor.

Administering SET Questionnaires University policy specifies that each course taught by a given instructor is to be evaluated at least once each year in which it is taught. Questionnaires are to be administered during the last two weeks of the term, without the instructor present. Questionnaires are returned directly to the department office for logging and transmission to the Office of Measurement Services.

SET Reports The class summary for the instructor contains frequencies and percentages of responses to all items, and means, medians, and standard deviations for all evaluation ratings. Bar diagrams show the results graphically. The class summary for the department contains the same information as the instructor’s summary for the required evaluation and student background items. With instructor approval, the complete class summary can be provided to the department in place of the abbreviated summary. The class summary, with instructor approval, provided on ONESTOP for students contains the 10 student release items.

Pilot test of web-based SET In Spring 2003, several departments were invited to participate using Online SETs The School of Nursing, the School of Public Health, and the Department of Physics agreed to participate. An evaluation of the success of the Online SET process is being completed in summer 2003.