Today’s Goals 1.To understand the manner in which the presence of others can influence an individual’s behavior. 2.To understand Milgram’s study on obedience to authority. 3.To understand the concepts of diffusion of responsibility, and the bystander effect. HW: 1. Work on unit project. Due 11/ Read and take notes on article (War, Peace, and the Role of Power), if not previously read. 3. Complete PsychSim tutorial and worksheet: Social Decision Making (textbook website) 4. Prep for FRQ
Milgram Research Study The maximum number of shocks that could be delivered to a “learner” was 30, starting at 15 Volts and going up to 450 Volts in 15-Volt increments.. (2009) Show later “The Germans are different!’
Watch video on the Milgram (1963) research study l4&feature=related (Human Behavior Experiments 1:06 start) l4&feature=related mpo&feature=related (full original) mpo&feature=related
Today’s Goals 1.To understand the manner in which the presence of others can influence an individual’s behavior. 2.To understand Milgram’s study on obedience to authority. 3.To understand the concepts of diffusion of responsibility, and the bystander effect. HW: 1. Work on unit project. Due 11/ Read and take notes on article (War, Peace, and the Role of Power), if not previously read. 3. Complete PsychSim tutorial and worksheet: Social Decision Making (textbook website) 4. Prep for FRQ
Quantitative Findings VoltageNumber of participants for whom this was maximum shock 0V-285V 0 300V 5 315V 4 330V V V
Milgram’s Further Findings Impact of the following circumstances on levels of obedience? – “Authority” not in room – 2 “authority” figures/conflicting instructions – No “authority” but peer giving orders – Dissenter – “Victim’s” actions All but one = less obedience
Fig Physical distance from the “learner” had a significant effect on the percentage of subjects obeying orders.
Would Milgram find the same results today? Zwk (BBC 2009) Zwk 7s8 (French TV 2010) 7s8 (Myers)