Mec1224 EETT: From Telecommunications to Electronic Communications Athens, 28 March 2005 “Investment and competition in electronic communications services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of Type II Interconnection Policy Press Conference 6 July 2004.
Advertisements

1 Price squeeze tests in electronic communications: ARCEPs experience Competition Law and Electronic Communications Brussels, June 19, 2008.
The status of broadband FCC defines –High-speed lines that deliver services at speeds in excess of 200 kbps in at least one direction –Advanced services.
Regulation of the Unconditioned Local Loop Service (ULLS) Presentation to ACMA International Training program 2006 Michael Eady Communications Group Compliance.
LLU and Broadband Regulation in France July 2005 Autorité de Régulation des Communications Electroniques et des Postes.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Jerry Hausman (MIT) Greg Sidak (Georgetown)
The AT&T Divestiture: Was it Necessary? Was It a Success? Robert W. Crandall The Brookings Institution U.S. Department of Justice March 28, 2007.
Tele2 5 March 2008 EPP-ED Public Hearing Mikael Grape.
CEPS workshop: Promoting investment through competition ECTA European Competitive Telecoms Association.
Broadband to everybody!? Torstein Olsen Director Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority LLU Conference, Bucharest, 5 July 2005.
©Ofcom A regulatory perspective on FTTx deployments Chinyelu Onwurah, Head of Telecoms Technology, Ofcom 19 th June 2007 FTTx Summit.
©Ofcom Review of the Framework Some issues under discussion by regulators Jim Niblett International Policy Director 22 December 2005.
Ireland’s Broadband Performance and Policy Actions January 2010.
Open access to communications networks Ensuring competition in the provision of services Anil Patel.
Thank you.
Importance and development of broadband access in Lithuania Paulius Vaina Communications Regulatory Authority of the Republic of Lithuania ITU Regional.
1 Access regulation and incentives for investment in alternative broadband infrastructure* Harald Gruber Presentation for REGULATION AND COMPETITION SEMINAR.
1 mec ACCC 2004 Regulation Conference July, 2004 Competition in a IP World Martin Cave Warwick Business School
Page 1 15th ITS World Conference September 2004 Dr. Jan Krancke T-Mobile International Who is afraid of Market Dynamics ? The Regulatory Leviathan.
1 M H Au Director-General of Telecommunications, Hong Kong Regulation Evolving with Market and Technology.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
Development of BB markets Access markets (M4 & M5) and remedies applied Linda Paršova 10 TH BALTIC ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAL SERVICES REGULATORS’
Next Generation Access: A Global / Policy Perspective Maury D. Shenk 27 June 2007.
Module 4: Understanding Recent Trends in ICT Policy Dr Tim Kelly, Lead ICT Policy Specialist, infoDev/World Bank Sunday 8 March 2009.
Chp. 3 – Industry Overview Traditional Telephone Companies & Cable TV Providers Mobile Providers Smaller Competitors Internet Based Competitors Why Governments.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Confidential 1 MAP Value Proposition.
The Effects of Network-Sharing Regulation in Telecommunications in the EU and the United States Robert W. Crandall The Brookings Institution PFF/CEPS Conference.
1  2004 Level 3 Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Kevin J. O'Hara, President & COO Level 3 Communications.
12/09/2015 NGN Broadband Access: TIA Broadband Drivers, Principles, and VoIP Contact: David Thompson, TIA Dan Bart, TIA SOURCE:TIA, TITLE:NGN Broadband.
SHAPING A REGULATORY AGENCY IN A PERIOD OF CONVERGENCE OR EUROPEAN TELECOM SYSTEM FROM A COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE Dániel Pataki 2006 Annenberg-Oxford Summer.
Accessing Fixed Networks and Facilities to Speed Up Broadband Rollout Presented by Andrew Gorton CANTO 29th Annual Conference & Trade Exhibition 14 th.
© x8 Inc. (Nasdaq: EGHT) 1 The Next Generation of IP Communication Applications Bryan R. Martin January 24, 2007 Internet Telephony Conference &
Questions about broadband What do we do about broadband services? –Why didn’t the ILECs deploy DSL faster? Could regulation be to blame? –How do we get.
BT Transformation Working with the CWU. Defend Traditional Calls decline - 5 main factors Dial IP - Market declines, driven by Broadband Price - Market.
1 The Ladder of Investment in Spain NEREC, FEDEA Madrid, March 17, 2009 Ángel L. López SP-SP Research Center, IESE Business School.
“Stepping Stones” or Stumbling Blocks”? – Mandatory Network Sharing in Telecom Robert W. Crandall The Brookings Institution and Criterion Economics GMU.
Property of TERA Consultants CONSULTANTS T E R A IDATE– Workshop Lessons from Tunis (22 November 2005) TERA Consultants 32 rue des Jeûneurs PARIS.
Market reviews in Oftel Elaine Axby 31 October 2002.
Market Analysis under the New EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications CLA European Conference 2005 Stockholm, October 27-28, 2005 Hogan &
Liberalisation of the Australian telecommunications industry Richard Home Senior Manager – Strategic Analysis & Development, Communications Group Australian.
Market trends, Industry metamorphosis & Regulation Closing keynote
DG Information Society 1 Liberalisation and regulation in Electronic Communications in the EU 2nd ICT Summit Istanbul, 3-6 September 2002 Hans-Peter Gebhardt.
To what extent is there competition in the markets where state-owned industries were privatised? To see more of our products visit our website at
1 Investment incentives in an environment of dwindling voice revenues* Harald Gruber Presentation for Conference “The Future of Voice” Geneva January.
Infrastructure for eInclusion – Regulation and Policy Initiatives Marianne Røgeberg Ministry of Transport and Communication Norway.
Liberalization of Telecommunications in Europe Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006 Verona.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.13-1 Natural Monopolies And Regulation.
Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.
Telecommunications Liberalisation: comparative overview within the EU and lessons to be learned ECTA’s view Innocenzo M. Genna, ECTA Chairman 2° International.
Telecommunications competition - a new entrant’s perspective on the UK experience Rickard Granberg 2 December 2008.
© 2007 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Confronting Tough Questions About.
DG Information Society Assessment of the competitive situation in the market for broadband access Leo Koolen DG Information Society European Commission.
This project is funded by the European Union EU regulatory framework for electronic communications - Access Directive Richard Harris Independent EU telecommunications.
Telecoms Review Institutional aspects European Parliament, 5 March 2008.
Effective regulatory regimes and impact on investments in the telecom sector: A perspective from ECTA European Competitive Telecommunications Association.
1 TINF 2010 Tuesday 30 November 2010 Present and Future Regulation of Electronic Communications Vesa Terävä European Commission Information Society & Media.
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
BTA Seminar The benefits and costs of liberalisation : how to go about liberalisation in Africa Bill Wigglesworth Gaborone, 31 January 2005.
Mohamed El Bashir Technical Affairs Dpt. Manager Communications Regulatory Authority The State of Qatar Telecom Laws and Regulations Forum Telecommunications.
David Flacher¹ & Hugues Jennequin¹, ² ¹ : Paris XIII University CEPN – CNRS UMR 7115 ² : Rouen University, CARE Liberalization of the telecommunications.
MARKET ANALYSIS IN SERBIA Workshop on EU telecommunications regulation, Belgrade, June Aleksandar Utjesinovic Market Analysis and Cost Accounting.
R.arghand.  It cannot be defined explicitly  broadband is a cluster of concepts, including: Always-on combined provision of voice, data and video at.
1 2008: A Regulatory Odyssey TUANZ After 5’s March 2008.
Economics of Telecom TC 310 May 15, Discussion Point Which serves telecom customers better?  Free Market?  Regulated Market? Does this apply to.
Broadband Workshop Facilitating Broadband Investment French regulatory framework Bertrand Vandeputte ARCEP European Commission – DG INFSO March 23rd, 2011.
Broadband regulation in Denmark 24. September 2009 TRIS workshop Tomas Skov Lauridsen National IT and Telecom Agency, Denmark.
©Ofcom EU Communications package : State of Implementation Kip Meek, Senior Partner, Content & Competition Brussels, 30 May 2005.
Regulation of NGA networks – the EU experience
Chapter 7: Strategy in High-Technology Industries
Presentation transcript:

mec1224 EETT: From Telecommunications to Electronic Communications Athens, 28 March 2005 “Investment and competition in electronic communications services markets: lessons from Europe and elsewhere” Martin Cave Warwick Business School, UK

2 mec The significance of current generation broadband Broadband can transform not only EU economies, but also the structure of the telecommunications industry. There are two paths: -Narrowband operators extend their dominance into broadband, or -Growing effective competition in broadband which then, via VoIP, eliminates current voice dominance and creates a competitive platform for next generation networks (both core and access)

3 mec Where will the competition come from? -Cable TV (not available in most member states) -Wireless (Wi-Max and other technologies untried; spectrum not always available; more expensive than fixed in many geographies) Apparent best strategy is to promote competitive infrastructure investment in DSL technolgies. But this cannot happen instantaneously.

4 mec The path to infrastructure Competition If the aim is to embed infrastructure competition in the network as deeply as possible, a step by step approach is necessary: ‘Competition would never be able to to develop, in the short term, if entrants were not able to gain access to the incumbent operator’s network to start offering services’ ‘In order to reconcile access-based and facilities-based competition it is necessary to take account of the time dimension. NRAs should provide incentives for competitors to seek access from the incumbent in the shorter term and to rely increasingly on building their own infrastructure in the longer term.’ Commissioner Monti, December 2003.

5 mec Similarly the ERG ‘…new entrants can decide on their investment in a step- by-step way and can establish a customer base (critical mass) before they go to the next step of deploying their own infrastructure. In those areas where infrastructure- based competition is feasible, such interventions have as their long-term objective the emergence of self- sustaining effective competition and the ultimate withdrawal of regulatory obligations.’ Regulators need to encourage firms to ‘climb the ladder’ of investment

6 mec Where should investment be encouraged? Competitors have to be encouraged progressively to install assets which are replicable, where replicability is governed by the interaction of cost and demand conditions -costs: economies of scale and scope, degree to which costs are sunk -demand: growth projections of the final services and availability of competing infrastructures. Assets involved in telecommunications value chains are likely to exhibit different degree of replicability - e.g. core network, backhaul, access network, etc. This implies use of regulation which creates incentives to build up competition via intermediate products such as bitstream.

7 mec What not to do: local competition in the USA -The 1996 Communications Act allowed competitors access to the Bell Companies’ local networks -Initially, competitors installed their own switches (replicable) and leased unbundled loops (non-replicable) at low rates -The FCC then allowed large operators such as AT&T and MCI to lease all assets at discounted prices, enabling them to undercut local competitors -Eventually the court over-turned the FCC’s decisions. The result- -no significant replication of local assets -9 years of effort wasted.

8 mec An example : ladder of investment in broadband services Local loop DSLAMs Backhaul IP Network Retailing Later, use pricing to encourage competitors to climb the ladder to here Initially mandate access here Most replicable Bitstream Wholesale broadband product Least replicable

9 mec Conclusions The ‘ladder of investment’ is designed to maximise sustainable infrastructure competition through: -identifying feasible investment opportunities, based on empirical evidence. -ensuring timely and equivalent access at the appropriate points to the incumbent’s infrastructure, where it benefits consumers. -withdrawing or worsening the terms of such access as replication becomes practicable. -approximating regulation increasingly to competition law.