Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 3 rd Grade Math 3 rd Grade Reading +6% +5%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Advertisements

North Santiam School District State Report Cards
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Norton Park Elementary Math Data Overview for 3 rd grade By: Amanda Gilbert.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
Two Accountability Systems This Year NCLB AZ Learns Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Yes / No Excelling, Highly- Performing, Performing, Underperforming.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
North Union Elementary School. One Outstanding Project MORE School Shares Its Success.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Gifted Indicator. Reported in 2014, counts as Indicator in 2015 Progress: Value-Added Performance Index Inputs.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Annual Student Performance Report September
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 18, 2013.
James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
1 Student Longitudinal Growth Project Jonathan Wiens Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Introduction to the New Washington State Achievement Index Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Board of Directors.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
Minnesota’s Proposed Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
School Improvement Plan Review Galloping to Success Minneola Elementary Presented by Mrs. Watts.
Every Student Matters Understanding the Indexes, the Tests, and Targeted Goal for STAAR 2016.
Millbrae Elementary School District
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report Including Challenge Index August, 2017.
Two Accountability Systems This Year
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report
Education Services October 3, 2017.
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
Edenton-Chowan Schools Preliminary Testing Results
AYP and Report Card.
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
Presentation transcript:

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 3 rd Grade Math 3 rd Grade Reading +6% +5%

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 4 th Grade Math 4 th Grade Reading +7% +2%

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 5 th Grade Math 5 th Grade Reading -11% -6%

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 6 th Grade Math 6 th Grade Reading -3%

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 7 th Grade Math 7 th Grade Reading +2%

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 8 th Grade Math 8 th Grade Reading -3% +11%

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 10 th Grade Math 10 th Grade Reading +9% +23%

Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding 10 th Grade Writing -4%

NVSD AYP Ratings AYP Designation –Elementary – Met AYP –Middle School – Did Not Meet AYP –High School – Did Not Meet AYP AYP Designation –Elementary – Met AYP –Middle/High School – Met AYP

NVSD Elementary Report Card MATH Achievement Index Student Groups: All Students Economically Disadvantaged ELL SPED Ethnicity

NVSD Elementary Report Card MATH Achievement Index ExceedsMeets Meets GrowthExceedsMeets Meets Growth Total Weight Total5,58613, ,315188, Yearly Index( ) / 244 = 77.4( ) / 340 = 78.3 Math Index( ) / 2 = 77.9

NVSD Elementary Report Card MATH Achievement Index ExceedsMeets Meets GrowthExceedsMeets Meets Growth Total Weight Total5,58613, ,31518, Yearly Index( ) / 244 = 77.4( ) / 340 = 78.3 Math Index( ) / 2 = 77.9

NVSD Elementary Report Card MATH Achievement Index ExceedsMeets Meets GrowthExceedsMeets Meets Growth Total Weight Total5,58613, ,31518, Yearly Index( ) / 244 = 77.4( ) / 340 = 78.3 Math Index( ) / 2 = 77.9

NVSD Elementary Report Card MATH Achievement Index ExceedsMeets Meets GrowthExceedsMeets Meets Growth Total Weight Total5,58613, ,31518, Yearly Index( ) / 244 = 77.4( ) / 340 = 78.3 Math Index( ) / 2 = 77.9

NVSD Elementary Report Card READING Achievement Index ExceedsMeets Meets GrowthExceedsMeets Meets Growth Total Weight Total7,44813, ,44317, Yearly Index( ) / 245 = 85.1( ) / 340 = 81.3 Reading Index( ) / 2 = 83.2

Elementary Achievement Index = (Math Index + Reading Index) / 2 ( ) / 2 = 80.6 RatingIn Need of ImprovementSatisfactoryOutstanding Index ScoreLess than Higher NVSD Elementary Achievement Index Rating: Satisfactory

NVSD JH/HS Report Card MATH Achievement Index ExceedsMeets Meets GrowthExceedsMeets Meets Growth Total Weight Total2662,00004,52210, Yearly Index( ) / 82 = 27.6( ) / 219 = 73.6 Math Index( ) / 2 = 50.6

NVSD JH/HS Report Card READING Achievement Index ExceedsMeets Meets GrowthExceedsMeets Meets Growth Total Weight Total1333,40004,12315, Yearly Index( ) / 82 = 43.1( ) / 219 = 89.1 Reading Index( ) / 2 = 66.1

JH/HS Achievement Index = (Math Index + Reading Index) / 2 ( ) / 2 = 58.4 RatingIn Need of ImprovementSatisfactoryOutstanding Index ScoreLess than Higher NVSD JH/HS Achievement Index Rating: Satisfactory* NVSD JH/HS Achievement Index Rating: Outstanding *Achievement Index Rating Raised Due to Improvement

NVSD Report Card Ratings Report Card Designation –Elementary – Satisfactory –Middle School – Satisfactory –High School – In Need of Improvement Report Card Designation –Elementary – Satisfactory –JH/HS - Outstanding

Math - % Not Meeting

Reading - % Not Meeting

*Proposed Cut Scores* Possible Cut Score Changes for Math GradeOld Cut Score"Proposed" Cut Score MeetExceedMeetExceed 3rd Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade HS

NVSD Math Data Using “Proposed” Cut Scores **This data reflects all students tested in minus Extended** GradeOld"Proposed" % Meet/Exceed 3rd Grade85%49% 4th Grade86%46% 5th Grade68%29% 6th Grade71%38% 7th Grade82%56% 8th Grade69%38% HS59%43%