Kevin Flood California Institute of Technology Physics Prospects for the SuperB Factory 18-22 June 2012 SSP 2012 KVI – Gronigen, the Netherlands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
Advertisements

Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
Electroweak b physics at LEP V. Ciulli INFN Firenze.
MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-
.. Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration APS/DPF Meeting Philadelphia, April 5 - 8, 2003 Cracking.
Prospects of rare B decays at high luminosity B factories Nobu Katayama KEK.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
David Hitlin Heavy Flavor Physics DPF July 29, Heavy Flavor Physics Experiment David Hitlin DPF 2009 July 29, 2009.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Summary of Recent Results on Rare Decays of B Mesons from BaBar for the BaBar Collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Chateau Lake Louise February.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
SuperB Physics Programme Adrian Bevan Strasbourg 23 rd September 2011
Rare Charm Decays Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 22 nd October 2011
QCD 与强子物理研讨会, 2010 年 8 月 4 - 10 日,威海 Prospects of Flavor Physics at the LHC 高原宁 清华大学高能物理研究中心 2010/8/61Y. Gao, Prospects of flavor physics at the LHC.
SuperB Physics Programme Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 21 st October 2011
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
28 Feb – 3 Mar, 2006 Discoveries in Flavour Physics Frascati, Italy 1 Why do we need a super tau/charm factory? David Asner Carleton University.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Charm Physics at Super B Factories after BESIII, Belle and B A B AR David Hitlin The Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP, Moscow July 24, 2006.
Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
27/September./2008Satellite Meeting on Super Tau-Charm Factory 1 Search for  ->  /e  at the Super-  -charm Factory [Comments from Belle experience]
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Status of the SuperB Project A major new European particle physics project Fergus Wilson, RAL/STFC On behalf of the SuperB Project Beauty 2011, April 8.
87 th Plenary ECFA Meeting July 2, 2010 SuperB update M.A.Giorgi INFN & Universita’ di Pisa.
SuperB Physics & Detector overview SuperB Miniworkshop, Oxford 18/19 th May 2011
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
At the Nicola Cabibbo Laboratory Tor Vergata, Italy Adrian Bevan: 1.
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
Flavour Physics Speaker: Andreas Hoecker Convener: Ewa Rondio Sc.Secretary: Ulrik Egede Orsay, 31’th January 2006.
2 nd workshop on SuperB 16.03,2006 LNF Marcello A Giorgi1 Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa and INFN Pisa Status of the art 2nd Workshop on SuperB.
SuperB Adrian Bevan Recontres de Moriond XLIV, La Thuile, Italy 7-14 th March 2009.
Only 20’ (used to be 30’): agendaagenda 12 June 2013 LHCC - Status LHCb Niels Tuning () PreviousPrevious LHCC:  13 Mar 2013 (T.Blake)13 Mar 2013  5 Dec.
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
1 G. Sciolla – M.I.T. Beauty in the Standard Model and Beyond Palm tree and CKM Beauty in the Standard Model and Beyond Gabriella Sciolla (MIT) CIPANP.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Future Colliders Gordon Watts University of Washington/Seattle APS NW Meeting May 12-14, 2016.
Belle and Belle II Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
The SuperB Project A major new particle physics centre Fergus Wilson, RAL/STFC On behalf of the SuperB Project STORI 2011, October 11 th 2011.
SuperB Physics Adrian Bevan 1 st SuperB Collaboration Meeting, London th Sept. 2011
Please check out: K. Ohmi et al., IPAC2014, THPRI003 & THPRI004 A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P. Piminov, IPAC2014, THPRI008 Work in progress FCC-ee accelerator.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa & INFN Pisa April 5, 2011 The Project Update April 5,20111M.A.Giorgi.
TDR and planning session
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Physics Progress and Plans Adrian Bevan
Semileptonic and Leptonic D0, D+, and Ds+ Decays at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO Collaboration XLIVth Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
Budker INP, Novosibirsk
SuperB Physics Elba 2011.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Hadron Fragmentation New Results from Belle
SuperKEKB Proto-collaboration
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Presentation transcript:

Kevin Flood California Institute of Technology Physics Prospects for the SuperB Factory June 2012 SSP 2012 KVI – Gronigen, the Netherlands

 SuperB at a Glance  Physics Prospects  Accelerator, Detector  Timeline, Funding  Further Reading 2 Overview June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD

Asymmetric e + e - collider E e-  7 GeV, E e+  4 GeV Clean e + e - initial state >90% 4  acceptance in CMS  80% polarized electrons Data-taking starting  2017 E CMS : psi(3770) up to Y(5S) psi(3770): coherent ccbar Y(4S): coherent bb (B u, B d ) Y(5S): coherent bb (B s ) all E CMS :  +  -, continuum light quark (udsc) production Luminosity  cm -2 s -1 Synchrotron light source? 3 SuperB at a Glance June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD psi(3770):  1 ab -1 (few months) Y(4S):  75 ab -1 (  6 years) Y(5S):  1 ab -1 (few months)

CKM Unitarity Triangle June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD * * **

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD CKM Unitarity Triangle

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD CKM Unitarity Triangle

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Status of the UT after LP2011 from the combination of all results The game is to over- constrain the UT by finding disagreement on the triangle’s closure by using independent measurements of the UT sides and angles The Babar/Belle physics program resulted in confirmation of the KM mechanism as the source of CPV in the SM 2008 Nobel Prize to KM CKM Unitarity Triangle Experimental Constraints

Physics Prospects: CKM Unitarity Triangle After SuperB June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD SuperB w/NP: no global overlap region SuperB w/SM only: high precision overlap LP 2011 Zoom in on the LP2011 UT first quadrant NB: Super B plots based on older UT results

Physics Prospects: Rare Decays, B +   +  June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Inclusive V ub B +   + Babar (~0.5 ab -1 ) B +   + 75 ab -1 SuperB 2  Excluded BB B SM+NP B SM rHrH lattice, CKM inputs 3  Excluded Atlas exclusion limit computed using arXiv: Final Babar B +   +   result using full dataset will be released in 1-2 weeks!

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Physics Prospects: Charm Physics ) Coherent production at charm threshold will allow precision measurements of mixing parameters (x,y) and strong phases (  ) y =  / 2  Babar x =  /  SuperB will measure charm UT, SM: x =  / 

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Physics Prospects: Tau Physics Courtesy of A. Lusiani, Pisa, as shown at the most recent SuperB Collaboration Meeting (Elba, 1-4 June 2012)

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Physics Prospects: Tau Physics SuperB will search for transitions and e - polarization can help in suppressing backgrounds in some modes Searches in final states with little-to-no back- ground can improve by more than two orders of magnitude over Babar Can hadron machines compete? No! according to LHCb upgrade projections Yes! according to W. Marciano’s talk yesterday ( – ) ? e  e  ’ KSKS eee 

Physics Prospects: Precision Electroweak Physics sin 2 θ W can be measured with polarised e − beam √s=ϒ(4S) is theoretically clean, c.f. Z pole b-fragmentation at LEP/SLC Simply need to measure event rates for left and right polarized beams SuperB Plot adapted from W. Marciano’s talk yesterday Measure LR asymmetry in Done at the ϒ(4S) to the same precision as LEP/SLC at the Z-pole, also can have point at charm threshold Precision is driven by the polarization measurement Complements lower energy measurements June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Complementarity: CKM Golden Modes, SuperB vs LHCb Can make a straightforward comparison of the relative precision of CKM observables measured at SuperB (75 ab -1 ) versus existing measurements, along with expectations from near-future LHCb (5 fb -1 ) and after the LHCb upgrade (50 fb -1 ) LHCb can only use ρπ β theory error B d β theory error B s Need e + e − environment to do high-precision measurements with semileptonic B decays ab -1 (2028) 50 fb -1

June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Complementarity: Golden Modes in General, SuperB vs LHCb A selection of other interesting modes/observables SuperB benefits from polarised e − beam Very precise with improved detector Stat. limited, angular obs. 75ab -1 Right handed currents SuperB measures many more modes Tagged analyses, low systematics Inclusive analyses only e + e - LHCb limited to  only SuperB exploits coherent production Theoretically clean b fragmentation limits interpretation (2028) 50 fb -1

The Accelerator Scheme June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD I.P. HER arc LER arc e- e+ RF FF l * ~ 0.5m LER arc HER arc HER Energy: 6.7 GeV LER Energy: 4.2 GeV Polarization 80% for e - General strategy: Very small emittance (ILC-DR) Small β* at IP Crab waist technique Large crossing angle Currents similar to present accelerators Advantages: Small collision area No parasitic crossings No synchro-betatron resonances Moderate backgrounds Possible to reuse many components from PEP-II

The Accelerator Complex at the Tor Vergata Campus (near Rome) June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD SR Beamlines 0 100m |--- | ---| IR, Detector Linac

The SuperB Detector June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Large pieces of BaBar will be reused in the SuperB detector: Barrel, FWD ECAL Solenoid Flux Return DCH ECAL Muon System New backward ECAL improves X sensitivity SVT New focusing RICH detector provides PID Baseline Proposed Improvements e- e+

The SuperB Timeline June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD

Funding in the INFN Multi-year Plan June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Fully allocated 22M€ allocated

Further Reading June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Conceptual Design Report: arXiv: Valencia Physics Workshop Report: arXiv: Detector White Paper: arXiv: Accelerator White Paper: arXiv: Physics White Paper: arXiv: Impact Document: arXiv: Recent Review: arXiv: Technical Design Report on target for completion in Sept-Oct 2012

BACKUP SLIDES 22 Feb 26 – Mar La Thuile 2012 Kevin Flood

The Projected SuperB Dataset June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Physics dictates 75 ab −1 at the ϒ(4S) ab −1 at/near ψ(3770) At ϒ(4S): ~75 x10 9 B, D and τ pairs Will also run at the ϒ(5S) and above, as well as off- resonance running ~80% e- polarization will improve S:B in studies of LFV in the tau sector At ψ(3770): few x 10 9 D pairs Also will run at nearby resonances Total 0.5 ab −1 collected in several months running

The quest for the final angle of the CKM matrix: β c The charm cu triangle has one unique element: β c Precision measurement of mixing phase in many channels (<2°) Constrain β c,eff using a Isospin analysis –Search for NP and constrain β c,eff ~ 1°. –Can only fully explore in an e + e − environment. –Data from the charm threshold region completes the set of 5 |V ij | to measure: needs SuperB to perform an indirect test of the triangle. Bevan, Inguglia, Meadows, PRD (2011)

A SuperB Innovation: The Crab Waist Final Focus June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD Crab‐sextupoles off: waist line is orthogonal to the axis of the beam Crab‐sextupoles on: waist moves parallel to the axis of other beam: maximum particle density in the overlap between bunches Make the final focus so that only a small fraction of one bunch collides with the other bunch –Large crossing angle –Long bunch length –No parasitic crossings Due to the large crossing angle the effective bunch length (the colliding part) is now very short so we can lower  y * by a factor of 50 The beams must have very low emittance, like present day light sources –The x size at the IP now sets the effective bunch length –In addition, by crabbing the magnetic waist of the colliding beams we greatly reduce the tune plane resonances enabling greater tune shifts and better tune plane flexibility Raimondi, Shatilov, Zobov

Luminosity Profile: SuperB vs. Super-Belle June 2012 SSP 2012 – KVI KEVIN FLOOD SuperB design and max instantaneous luminosity will exceed Belle-II SuperB: >10 36 Belle-II: ~ Both machines expect turn- on about By : SuperB: 75 ab -1 Belle-II: 50 ab -1 Belle-II uses up-date of current KEK machine, polarized beam, charm threshold running are not possible SuperB Belle-II