Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon 13-14 December 2007 David Wettergreen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roadway Development Operators’ Workshop ACARP project C18023 CM2010 – Continuous Miner automation Dr David Hainsworth Dr David C. Reid 3-6 March, 2009.
Advertisements

Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
Benoit Pigneur and Kartik Ariyur School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University June 2013 Inexpensive Sensing For Full State Estimation of Spacecraft.
Cognitive Colonization The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Bernardine Dias, Bruce Digney, Martial Hebert, Bart Nabbe, Tony Stentz, Scott.
Autonomy for Ground Vehicles Status Report, July 2006 Sanjiv Singh Associate Research Professor Field Robotics Center Carnegie Mellon University.
Autonomous Robot Navigation Panos Trahanias ΗΥ475 Fall 2007.
A Self-Supervised Terrain Roughness Estimator for Off-Road Autonomous Driving David Stavens and Sebastian Thrun Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab.
Situational Planning for the MIT DARPA Challenge Vehicle Thomas Coffee Image Credit: David Moore et al.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Communication and Navigation System Doro Gracia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Mysteries of Earth and Mars Mars Facts and Exploration.
Lunar Lander Phase B1 p. 0 9 th International Planetary Probe Workshop, Toulouse, June 21 th, 2012 Innovative Visual Navigation Solutions for ESA’s Lunar.
1. The Promise of MEMS to LBS and Navigation Applications Dr. Naser El-Shiemy, CEO Trusted Positioning Inc. 2.
An INS/GPS Navigation System with MEMS Inertial Sensors for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Masaru Naruoka The University of Tokyo 1.Introduction.
EE887 Special Topics in Robotics Paper Review Initial Results in the Development Guidance System of a Guidance System for a Powered Wheelchair
1 DARPA TMR Program Collaborative Mobile Robots for High-Risk Urban Missions Second Quarterly IPR Meeting January 13, 1999 P. I.s: Leonidas J. Guibas and.
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
Challenging Environment
Autonomous Surface Navigation Platform Michael Baxter Angel Berrocal Brandon Groff.
Development of Control for Multiple Autonomous Surface Vehicles (ASV) Co-Leaders: Forrest Walen, Justyn Sterritt Team Members: Andrea Dargie, Paul Willis,
Attitude Determination and Control System
Localisation & Navigation
Joint International Master Project Dennis Böck & Dirk C. Aumueller 1.
Cooperating AmigoBots Framework and Algorithms
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
TGI Friday’s Mistletoe Drone /12/10/mistletoe- quadcopter-draws- blood/
Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Entry, Descent, Landing, and Deployment.
AI in Space Exploration Stephen Dabideen Yizenia Mora.
Lunar Drilling and Driving Carnegie Mellon December 2007 Red Whittaker.
Outstanding Performance in Underwater Technology Tritech Positioning & RAMS™ USBL, MRU, INS & Integrity Monitoring.
Lunar SNAP Observatory. 2Overview What trade studies and modifications required to place SNAP on the moon? Trade Studies —Location Northern latitudes.
Carnegie Mellon Zoë Computing Design Design Review December 19, 2003 Michael Wagner 
Guidance, Navigation and Controls Subsystem Winter 1999 Semester Review.
Mars Exploration Rovers Entry, Descent, Landing and Deployment.
ICRA Planetary Rover Workshop / 19 May 2008 / D. Thompson / Carnegie Mellon University A Tale of Two Rovers: Mission Scenarios for Kilometer-Scale Site.
Dr David C. Reid Dr Mark Dunn RDTG Operator’s Workshops Sept 2010 ACARP project C18023 CM2010 – Continuous Miner Automation.
Seeker kick-off workshop “State of the art” Simon Lacroix Laboratoire d’Analyse et d’Architecture des Systèmes CNRS, Toulouse.
SFINX Surveying Flying IN-situ eXplorer Old Dominion University
Autonomy for General Assembly Reid Simmons Research Professor Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University.
Carnegie Mellon Zoë Vehicle Controller Design Design Review December 19, 2003 Michael Wagner 
The Third Moscow Solar System Symposium 8 – 12 October 2012, Moscow, Russia First Data from DAN Instrument onboard MSL Curiosity Rover M. Litvak and I.
Apollo 50 Lunar Mission Concept Goal: Initiate a series of lunar campaign missions, inspired by Apollo 11, to explore the potential of the Moon for science.
Visual Odometry for Ground Vehicle Applications David Nistér, Oleg Naroditsky, and James Bergen Sarnoff Corporation CN5300 Princeton, New Jersey
Carnegie Mellon Rover Concept of Operation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon.
1 Toward Autonomous Kilometer-Scale Site Survey by Planetary Rovers David R. Thompson Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University NASA.
Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.
Satellite Climatology - Orbits Geostationary orbits Sun synchroneous orbits Precessing orbit Discussion.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Rover Chassis Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stu Heys, Dimi.
MIT Dept of Aeronautics and Astronautics March 21, 2003 Graduate Open House Programming Cooperative Teams To Perform Global Science HOME TWO Enroute COLLECTION.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
Autonomy: Executive and Instruments Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nicola Muscettola NASA Ames Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon.
Basilio Bona DAUIN – Politecnico di Torino
Avatar Explore PROPOSAL NUMBERS Not available SCIENCE TEAM Erick Dupuis, Canadian Space Agency RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Demonstrate an operational and technical.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Attitude and Pointing Concepts for ISS Payload Operations NASA/JSC Marcella Mendoza Attitude & Pointing Office.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama Field Experiments 2004 David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute.
Localization Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Daniel Villa Carnegie Mellon Matthew Deans QSS/NASA Ames.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Software Architecture Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 David Wettergreen.
Autonomous Navigation of a
NASA Ames Research Center
Project and Workshop Objectives
Pursuit-Evasion Games with UGVs and UAVs
Navigation Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Dominic Jonak Carnegie Mellon.
Payload and Mobility Measure 15 samples in the dark and 5 samples in light. The Viking Lander did not move, but it used an SSRA with a boom, collector.
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Case Study Autonomous Cars 1/14/2019.
-Koichi Nishiwaki, Joel Chestnutt and Satoshi Kagami
Overview: Chapter 2 Localization and Tracking
Presentation transcript:

Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Mission Scenario Land in crater –Direct to floor, no crater wall descent –Minimal lander Communicate by polar orbiter relay Power from isotope source, no solar Navigate in darkness –Active sensing Operate with supervised autonomy Survey multiple locations –Characterize regolith composition and physical properties –Determine nature and abundance of hydrogen Survive 7 months –25 drill sites x (5 days/site, 3 days/traverse) = 200 days Mass kg

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Rover Capability Kilometer-Scale Traverse –Terrain modeling for obstacle detection –Path planning for obstacle avoidance –Position estimation for path tracking Resource Regulation –Power –Thermal Health Monitoring –Fault Detection and Recovery –Contingent Plan Execution

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Rover Architecture Health Monitor Rover Executive Vehicle Controller Mission Planner Far-field Evaluator Images Odometry Rover Interface Stop Navigator Curve & Speed State Observer State Instrument Controllers Near-field Detector Position Estimator State Telemetry Manager Inertial & Odometry ScansCommands Waypoints Telemetry Position State (All) FaultsPlans EvaluationEvalActions Specification Science Observer Instrument Manager Goal Manager Viewpoints Images Science Planner FeaturesGoals

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Autonomous Traverse Total daily traverse exceeding 10km is achievable Demonstrated averages m per command cycle

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Rover Architecture Health Monitor Rover Executive Vehicle Controller Mission Planner Far-field Evaluator Images Odometry Rover Interface Stop Navigator Curve & Speed State Observer State Instrument Controllers Near-field Detector Position Estimator State Telemetry Manager Inertial & Odometry ScansCommands Waypoints Telemetry Position State (All) FaultsPlans EvaluationEvalActions Specification Science Observer Instrument Manager Goal Manager Viewpoints Images Science Planner FeaturesGoals

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Terrain Model Aggregate Geometric Model Traversability Analysis Persistence

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Sensor Views

Laser Light Striping

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Path Execution Navigator evaluates –near-term driving options while –guiding the rover to its long-term goal Many possible actions considered each sensing cycle Terrain model accumulates

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Position Estimation Challenges –Skidding - wheel odometry inaccurate –Kinematics - vehicle model more complicated due to changing wheelbase and Approach –No wheel odometry –Optimal (Kalman) filtering –Inertial and optical sensing

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Position Estimation Inertial Measurement Unit –3-axis rotation (Honeywell HG1700 ring laser gyro) –3-axis acceleration Global Positioning System –Omnistar differential (0.1m accuracy) for ground-truth position –Can be used to correct gyro drift Kalman Filter –Integrates inertial with other motion sensing

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Position Estimation Optical velocity sensor Operates with ground lighting

Carnegie Mellon | 13 December Dark Traverse Demonstration Developments for Scarab –Integrated Laser Scanning –Integrated Inertial/Optical Position Estimation –Developed Vehicle Controller –Integrated Scarab Motion Planning Tonight –Goal is 1-kilometer of autonomous traverse in darkness Tomorrow –Outcome –Evaluation