Initial Mission Architecture Trade Space Fission Based Nuclear Power and Propulsion –Technologies – NTR, Bimodal NTR, NEP, Hybrids, etc. –Trajectories.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nanoparticle Electric Propulsion for Space Exploration Phys 483 Monday, March Team 1: Perry Young, Kiyoshi Masui, Mark Hoidas, Andrew Harris.
Advertisements

Concept Overview for 2 mt Case “2 mt case”: integrated payloads of no more than 2 mt can be landed on the surface of Mars; extension of current Mars EDL.
Larry Phillips MAY 13th-17th, 2002 Micro Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission: Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Launch Vehicle Information Final Version.
Presented by Marco Christov at the 11th Mars Society Annual Convention, 14 – 17 August 2008, Boulder Colorado. A Mars Heavy Transport.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS Orbital Mechanics and Hohmann Transfer Orbit Summary Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
Comparative Assessment of Human Missions to Mars Damon F. Landau Ph. D. Preliminary Exam September 13, 2005.
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
February 1, 2005HYPERION ERAU 1 Thermal Analysis of a Radiation Shield for Antimatter Rocketry Concepts Jon Webb Embry Riddle Aeronautical University.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
An Introduction to Rocket
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
Earth-Moon Transport Doroteo Garcia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
28 October st Space Glasgow Research Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Space Exploration: Should It Be Done? Nishith Patel.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Nuclear Power Fission and Radioisotope Presented to: Propulsion and Power Panel Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board National Research Council by Joseph.
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 12 Electric Propulsion Continued.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Oh, Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven: Fueling Up in Space with In-Situ Resource Utilization ASTE-527 Final Presentation Riley Garrett.
Future of Antiproton Triggered Fusion Propulsion Brice Cassenti & Terry Kammash University of Connecticut & University of Michigan.
February 18, 2006HYPERION ERAU 1 Interstellar Travel Now.
Comprehend the different types of rockets Comprehend the propulsion and flight of rockets Comprehend the types of launch vehicles Comprehend the factors.
The Electrodeless Lorentz Force (ELF) Thruster
Spacecraft Trajectories You Can Get There from Here! John F Santarius Lecture 9 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University.
VASIMR: The Future of Space Travel (?) Kevin Blondino 8 October 2012.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
ELECTRIC PROPULSION Introduction Classification of Electric Thrusters Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy Chairman.
Advanced Space Exploration LEO Propellant Depot: Space Transportation Impedance Matching Space Access 2010 April 8-10, 2010 Dallas Bienhoff Manager, In-Space.
SPACE PROPULSION BASED ON HIGH-BETA MAGNETIC FUSION ROCKET I. V. Romadanov, S. V. Ryzhkov Bauman Moscow State Technical University
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
FAST LOW THRUST TRAJECTORIES FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
Introduction to the Altair Project
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
IRNCLAM – InteRNational CisLunar Ascension Module Brian Anderson ASTE /11/23.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
Nuclear Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology M artian S urface R eactor Group Nuclear Reactors for The Moon and Mars Tyler Ellis.
Roadmap for Long Term Sustainable Space Exploration and Habitation Defining the Functional Requirements for Early Phase of Space Habitation AIAA 2015-????
Near-Term Mars Colonization -A DevelopSpace Project- May 4 th, 2008.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
Rocket Performance Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Parametric Design The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
1 The PISCES Project Don J. Pearson JSC/DM Flight Design & Dynamics Division May 2002
Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Robotic and Piloted Titan Missions Brice Cassenti University of Connecticut.
QTYUIOP THERMIONIC SPACE POWER THE EMERGING SOURCE OF SPACE POWER IN THE NEXT DECADE AUBURN UNIVERSITY AUGUST 17, 1999.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
February 18, 2006HYPERION ERAU 1 Thermal Engines for Launch Vehicle Configurations.
1 RASC / HOPE Transportation Revolutionary Aerospace System Concepts Human Outer Planet Exploration Mission Systems concepts and trade space NASA Design.
Callisto Mission LaRC Option
Space Tug Propellant Options AIAA 2016-vvvv
NASA Design Team January 31, 2003
Technical Resource Allocations
Future In-Space Operations (FISO) Telecon Colloquium
Deputy, Washington Operations
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Inputs on HPM EPS, SEP Stage Block II configuration, and comments on 10/2 presentation package Tim Sarver-Verhey 10/1/2001.
Vice President, Business Development
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Initial Mission Architecture Trade Space Fission Based Nuclear Power and Propulsion –Technologies – NTR, Bimodal NTR, NEP, Hybrids, etc. –Trajectories – Gravity assists, spiral, minimum energy, and any combination thereof –Mission – pre-deployment of Callisto assets if desired, maximize commonality and reusability if possible Plasma Propulsion –Technologies – Fission reactors coupled with VASIMR plasma propulsion, M2P2, etc. –Trajectories – Gravity assists, spiral, and any combination thereof. –Mission – pre-deployment of Callisto assets if desired, maximize commonality and reusability if possible, cycler option? Revolutionary Propulsion –Technologies – Fusion propulsion and Molten Salt Reactor (MSR), Magneto-Hydro-Dynamic (MHD) power conversion –Fusion: short trip time; all assets on single vehicle –MSR/LMR/MPD and Solid/MHD/MPD: Long trip time; split mission configuration 1

Power & Propulsion Technologies Focus – Magnetized Target Fusion (MTF) propulsion with auxiliary fission power system for hotel loads. Advanced technologies for fission propulsion are also considered as alternates. Heritage – Combination of inertial and magnetic confinement fusion techniques. Precursor experiments conducted by several DOE labs (Sandia, LaNL). Rationale – MTF propulsion offers the promise of direct single-vehicle round trip flights with short trip times and high payloads to the outer solar system. Direct drive propulsion offers higher efficiency than electric conversion systems. 2

MTF to Callisto Architectural Features -- Top Level Overview -- Spacecraft assembly and departure from Earth-Moon L1 station. Propellant tanks are launched full from Earth. Mission profile involves single piloted vehicle. The vehicle has artificial gravity capability used during non-thrusting segments. Vehicle uses MTF system for propulsion and SP-100 reactor with 4p shield for “hotel” power. D-D and D-He3 powered vehicles are considered. 30-day and 180-day stay times are considered. Vehicle payload includes TransHab, Surface Lab, ISRU plant and lander Other options considered is MSR-LMR-MPD and Solid-MHD-MPD split mission profiles 3

Projected performance –Specific power: 10 kW/kg to 100 kW/kg –Specific impulse: 50,000 s to 100,000 s Maturity/Feasibility –TRL: 1-2 (Physics principles demonstrated in Sandia  -  experiment; target formation demonstrated, theoretical foundation established by Kirkpatrick, Thio, etc.) –Experiments in progress: (1) LANL MTF experiment funded by DOE at Concept Exploration level. (2) MTF plasma liner experiment at MSFC. –Planned experiments: (1) Demonstration of fusion Q > 1 for electrical power by LANL by (2) Demonstration of fusion Q > 1 for propulsion by MSFC by 2012 (TRL-3). Operability –Fuel: D (1st-gen). D + He3 (2nd-gen) –Ability to Throttle: Power: continuously variable from 0 to max by varying pulse rate –Isp: continuously variable from 5000 s to max by mixing inert propellant (e.g. H, Li) with fusion plasma –By-products: He4; neutrons –Radiation: electromagnetic waves; neutrons (may be moderated by fusion plasma and shielded) Plasma jets are used to compress an FRC to produce fusion reactions. The fusion plasma pushes against current carrying coils to produce thrust. Magnetized Target Fusion Propulsion System Technical Characteristics 4

Physics Issues Compression dynamics of target and liner immediately preceding fusion. Currently at a high level computational model level. Detailed computational model results pending. Neutron attenuation by plasma liner at computational model level. Conservative estimate used for this study. Demonstration of predicted fusion gain of ~50. Technology Issues Development of plasma guns with the required timing precision (~ 10’s ns) and capable of delivering the required momentum flux (a few milligrams to approximately 250 km/s). Development of high-energy-density capacitors or other energy storage devices with matching impedance and required lifetime. Manufacturing of high current density super-conducting cables. Advanced composites needed to endure propulsive and space environment. Advanced composite neutron shields (filters) needed to moderate neutrons to appropriate energies. Capacitors, switches, conductors, and power electronics capable of withstanding high neutron flux. Engineering Issues High pointing accuracy for plasma guns in harsh thermal and radiation environment with high transient structural loads. Active refrigeration for “zero boil-off” cryogenic propellant storage system substantially larger than existing technology. Radiator areal densities are projected near/mid term technologies compensated for high temperature. Artificial gravity generation at g a = 0.25g E levels by vehicle rotation at  ~ 1.3 rpm for a rotation radius of ~70 m. All systems experience high rep rate cyclic thermal and structural loads. Components will have to operate in both micro and low gravity environments, depending on the mission phase. Physics / Technology / Engineering Issues for the MTF Propulsion System 5

D-D MTF mission with 32-day surface stay Total Mission Duration ~ 654 days Outbound Leg Departs 4/22/2045, ~331 day flight to Callisto Time in Callisto Orbit ~ 33 days Total time thrusting ~ 258 days Returns without Surface Habitat, ISRU, and Transport (120 mt total) Isp = 70,400 sec Jet Power = GW Propulsion System Specific Mass = kg/kW Initial Acceleration = g’s Final Acceleration = g’s TimeMass (days)(mT) Depart L1 Station0650 Thrust off51630 Thrust on Arrive Callisto Orbit Depart Callisto Orbit Thrust off Thrust on Arrive L1 Station

Mass Properties Breakout Component (in kg)Vehicle Payload163,933 Structural26,610 RCS12,946 Thermal51,391 Power17,370 Propulsion116,021 Mass Margin (30%)116,481 Total Dry Mass504,753 Main Propellant (+5%)106,000 RCS Propellant (+5%)34,063 IML1644,816 Closure Difference0.8% 7

Supporting Infrastructure Requirements for the MTF Propulsion Mission ETO Requirements: Payload vol. of 5.0 m (dia.) x 19.1 m long has been examined thus far with all payload elements ≤ 40 metric tons (t). LEO Facilities: Rendezvous of ETO package by OTV only. LEO-to-L1 Transportation: - Assumed OTV “fleet” will be needed to transport various vehicle components from the LEO to L1. L1 Facilities: - Habitation, electrical power, propellant storage & transfer, assembly and portable radiation shielding. - Payload attachment to MTF vehicle. - Robotic vehicle inspection and repair. - “Orbital tug” to maneuver vehicle away from L1 station before activating high neutron production propulsion systems. Lunar Facilities: (Supporting He3 production only - not required for baseline option) - Regolith mining of He3 propellant - Continuous, multi-MW e power (solar or nuclear) - Reusable lunar ascent/descent vehicles for propellant transport to and from LLO - OTV’s can also be used for L1 – LLO transportation. 8

D-D MTF, 32 day stay option SIDE VIEW 119 m 45 m 3 m 9

ParameterValue Total Dry Mass510mT Total Prop Mass140mT IML1650mT Total Mission Time654days Micro-g exposure258days Callisto exposure33days Artificial-g (.25g E ) exposure263days ISRU propellant required?No MTF Propulsion Mission to Callisto Basic Figures of Merit 10

MTF D-D 30-Day Vehicle Concept Surface Habitat Lander Transhab ISRU Two-Sided Crew/Avionics Radiators (150 m2 total area) Tripod RCS 500 lbf LOX/LH2 Thrusters (4 plcs) Tripod RCS 25 lbf LH2 Thrusters (4 plcs) Tripod RCS 25 lbf LH2 Thrusters (4 plcs) Tripod RCS 500 lbf LOX/LH2 Thrusters (4 plcs) RCS LH2 Tank (3.4 m dia.) (7 plcs) RCS LOX Tank (2.7 m dia.) (4 plcs) LH2 Tank (8.3 m long x 5.0 m dia.) (6 plcs) Two-Sided Med. Temp. Radiators ( m2 total area) Two-Sided High Temp. Radiators ( m2 total area) MTF Engine Radiation Shield H2O Tank (5.5 m long x 2.3 m dia.) SMES Envelope (1.8 m x 1.8 m x 2.4 m) SP-100 Reactor Deuterium-Tritium Tanks (1.7 m dia.) (4 plcs) 11

Manifest TransHab 6 Person Crew Small Lander, ISRU, Science Lab LOX/LH2 6 DOF RCS 5% margin Crew/ECLSS Radiators (150 m 2 ) 800K Radiators ( m 2 ) 1250K Radiators ( m 2 ) 13 LH2 Tanks (5.0 m x 16.4 m) 5% margin SP-100 Reactor (375 kWe) 30% Inert Mass Margin Propulsion D-D MTF Isp = 70,400 sec  = kg/kW Initial Acc = g’s Final Acc = g’s Jet Power = GW Vehicle Summary IML1 650 mT L1 Arrival 430 mT Length148 m Width82 m Mission Summary Outbound Leg331 day Surface Stay33 day Inbound Leg258 day Total Mission Time654 day MTF to Callisto Mission Summary 12

D-D MTF mission with 180-day surface stay Total Mission Duration ~ 652 days Outbound Leg Departs 4/26/2045, ~249 day flight to Callisto Time in Callisto Orbit ~ 183 days Total time thrusting ~ 212 days Returns without Surface Habitat, ISRU, and Transport (120 mt total) Isp = 70,400 sec Jet Power = GW Propulsion System Specific Mass = kg/kW Initial Acceleration = g’s Final Acceleration = g’s TimeMass (days)(mT) Depart L1 Station0750 Thrust off45717 Thrust on Arrive Callisto Orbit Depart Callisto Orbit Thrust off Thrust on Arrive L1 Station

D-D 180 Day Stay Mass Properties Breakout Component (in kg)Vehicle Payload163,933 Structural34,785 RCS12,989 Thermal76,864 Power17,370 Propulsion121,333 Mass Margin (30%)128,182 Total Dry Mass555,457 Main Propellant (+5%)165,000 RCS Propellant (+5%)35,348 IML1755,805 Closure Difference0.8% 14

MTF D-D 180-Day Stay Vehicle Concept 135 m 82 m 3 m 15

ParameterValue Total Dry Mass550mT Total Prop Mass200mT IML1750mT Total Mission Time652days Micro-g exposure212days Callisto exposure183days Artificial-g (.25g E ) exposure257days ISRU propellant required?No MTF Propulsion Mission to Callisto D-D 180 Day Basic Figures of Merit 16

MTF D-D 180-Day Stay Vehicle Concept LH2 Tank (8.3 m long x 5.0 m dia.) (9 plcs) Two-Sided Med. Temp. Radiators ( m2 total area) Two-Sided High Temp. Radiators ( m2 total area) Deuterium-Tritium Tank (1.9 m dia.) (4 plcs) (Red Notations Indicate Deltas from the MTF D-D 30-Day Stay Baseline Vehicle Concept) Deuterium Tank (64.4 m3) 17

MTF D-D 180-Day Stay Vehicle Concept Manifest TransHab 6 Person Crew Small Lander, ISRU, Science Lab LOX/LH2 6 DOF RCS 5% margin Crew/ECLSS Radiators (150 m 2 ) 800K Radiators ( m 2 ) 1250K Radiators ( m 2 ) 9 LH2 Tanks (5.0 m dia x 8.3 m) 5% margin SP-100 Reactor (375 kWe) 30% Inert Mass Margin Propulsion D-D MTF Isp = 70,400 sec  = kg/kW Initial Acc = g’s Final Acc = g’s Jet Power = GW Vehicle Summary IML1 750 mT L1 Arrival 473 mT Length135 m Width45 m Mission Summary Outbound Leg249 day Surface Stay183 day Inbound Leg220 day Total Mission Time652 day 18

D-He 3 MTF mission with 180-day surface stay Total Mission Duration ~ 652 days Outbound Leg Departs 4/27/2045, ~249 day flight to Callisto Time in Callisto Orbit ~ 183 days Total time thrusting ~ 215 days Returns without Surface Habitat, ISRU, and Transport (120 mt total) Isp = 77,000 sec Jet Power = GW Propulsion System Specific Mass = kg/kW Initial Acceleration = g’s Final Acceleration = g’s TimeMass (days)(mT) Depart L1 Station0700 Thrust off46671 Thrust on Arrive Callisto Orbit Depart Callisto Orbit Thrust off Thrust on Arrive L1 Station

D-He3 180 Day Stay Mass Properties Breakout Component (in kg)Vehicle Payload163,933 Structural32,060 RCS12,976 Thermal51,306 Power17,370 Propulsion118,400 Mass Margin (30%)118,814 Total Dry Mass514,859 Main Propellant (+5%)142,000 RCS Propellant (+5%)34,676 IML1691,535 Closure Difference1.2% 20

MTF D-He3 180-Day Stay Vehicle Concept 135 m 45 m 3 m 21

ParameterValue Total Dry Mass514mT Total Prop Mass177mT IML1691mT Total Mission Time652days Micro-g exposure212days Callisto exposure183days Artificial-g (.25g E ) exposure257days ISRU propellant required?No MTF Propulsion Mission to Callisto D-He3 180 Day Basic Figures of Merit 22

MTF D-He3 180-Day Stay Vehicle Concept LH2 Tank (8.3 m long x 5.0 m dia.) (8 plcs) Two-Sided Med. Temp. Radiators ( m2 total area) Two-Sided High Temp. Radiators ( m2 total area) Deuterium-Tritium Tank (1.8 m dia.) (4 plcs) Deuterium-He3 Tank (289 m3) (Red Notations Indicate Deltas from the MTF D-D 30-Day Stay Baseline Vehicle Concept) 23

MTF D-He3 180-Day Stay Vehicle Concept Manifest TransHab 6 Person Crew Small Lander, ISRU, Science Lab LOX/LH2 6 DOF RCS 5% margin Crew/ECLSS Radiators (150 m 2 ) 800K Radiators ( m 2 ) 1250K Radiators ( m 2 ) 8 LH2 Tanks (5.0 m dia x 8.3 m) 5% margin SP-100 Reactor (375 kWe) 30% Inert Mass Margin Propulsion D-He3 MTF Isp = 77,000 sec  = kg/kW Initial Acc = g’s Final Acc = g’s Jet Power = GW Vehicle Summary IML1 700 mT L1 Arrival 445 mT Length135 m Width45 m Mission Summary Outbound Leg249 day Surface Stay183 day Inbound Leg220 day Total Mission Time652 day 24