MCTF C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov 2009 1 New Ideas for Collider IR design: Flat Beams C. Johnstone and N. Mokhov, Fermilab MCD meeting November 11,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
D2 conceptual design and field quality optimization Ramesh Gupta, BNL Slide No. 1 Nov. 13, 2013 D2 Conceptual Design and Field Quality.
Advertisements

High Energy Muon Colliders C. Johnstone and P. Snopok Fermilab and UC Riverside FFAG10 October 25-31, 2010.
20-50 GeV Muon Storage Rings C. Johnstone and G. Rees MuTAC Meeting Fermilab March 16, 2006.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
IR Magnets for SuperKEKB KEK, Norihito Ohuchi 1.IR Magnets (ES, QCS, QC1) 2.Interference between Magnet-Cryostats and Belle 3.Summary SuperB.WS05.Hawaii.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
Considerations on Interaction Region design for Muon Collider Muon Collider Design Workshop JLab, December 8-12, 2008 Guimei Wang, Muons,Inc., /ODU/JLab.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
2 nd Muon Collider Design workshop, JLab, Newport News VA December 8-12, 2008 Update on the Muon Collider lattice design with chromatic correction in IR.
Muon Collider Design workshop, BNL, Upton NY December 3-7, 2007 Muon Collider lattice design with chromatic correction in IR Y.Alexahin & E.Gianfelice-Wendt.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
IR Magnets for Muon Collider Alexander Zlobin and Vadim Kashikhin Muon Collider Physics Workshop, Fermilab November 12, 2009.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
Choice of L* for FCCee: IR optics and DA A.Bogomyagkov, E.Levichev, P.Piminov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk HF2014, IHEP Beijing, 9-12.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Progress of SPPC lattice design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Muon Collider SR and IR Magnets
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Ion Collider Ring Chromatic Compensation and Dynamic Aperture
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
IR Beam Transport Status
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Presentation transcript:

MCTF C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov New Ideas for Collider IR design: Flat Beams C. Johnstone and N. Mokhov, Fermilab MCD meeting November 11, 2009

MCTF Introduction C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov One of the most serious technical issues in the design of a muon collider arises from muon decay. In the 2x2 TeV muon collider, with 2 x circulating muons, 2 x 10 5  e - + decays occur per meter. Immersed in strong magnetic fields, electromagnetic showers deposit ~2 kW/meter in the storage ring, several orders of magnitude more than in upstream systems. Below is a summary of the heat deposited in the different systems of a high-energy muon collider.

MCTF Heat Generation in Muon machines Heat Sources: –Muon synchrotron radiation –Muon decay: electrons, positrons and associated synchrotron radiation, and neutrinos –Muons from the primary beam that hit the vacuum chamber The breakdown of heat deposition shows that the SC magnet design is almost completely influenced by muon decay and synchrotron radiation from decay products C. Johnstone MCD meeting 10 Nov

MCTF Heat Generation in Muon machines LESS THAN 0.1% of the energy from muon decay products can be deposited on the SC coils or its surrounding support structure. Prior solutions for the heating problem include: –Thick tungsten radiation shield to reduce the deposited energy by three orders of magnitude –Separate the coils across the midplane – open midplane –Active (background sweep dipoles) and passive (tungsten collimators) inserted between the final focus quadrupoles to shadow/shield the SC. C. Johnstone NFMCC meeting 9 Jan

MCTF Tungsten liner By itself the thickness of a tungsten liner would be 65 mm to reduce the heat load from muon decay by three orders of magnitude. This implies –The warm bore required for 5  beam is 20 mm. –The tungsten liner increases the bore to 160 mm with severe impact on the final focus magnets, optics, and ring impedence. C. Johnstone MCD Meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Consequences of enlarged apertures in final focus Adding the 6 cm liner increases the difficulty of an already problematic design –The nonlinear dynamics dominated by the IR are strongly correlated to the strength of and beam size at the final focus quadrupoles* –The beam size at the quadrupole nearest the IP is 2 cm (2.5  ) and adding 6 cm to the aperture represents a factor of 4 decrease in quadrupole strength, a factor of 4 increase in length, with an approximate corresponding increase in the  function, (square root of the beam size) –First-order chromaticity has a linear dependence the peak  function and therefore increases almost linearly with the strength reduction –Nonlinear behavior associated with chromatic correction sextupoles can show orders of magnitude increase with severe impact on dynamic aperture *”Zeroth-Order Design Report for the Next Linear Collider”, SLAC-474, Proceeding os the Snowmass Workshop, June-July, C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Open midplane magnet design Another approach is to clear the midplane of SC coils –The coils are separated in the dipoles such that <0.1% of the energy from muon decay is deposited in the coils or its 4K surrounding support structure The iron return yoke would likely be cold with the heavy supports needed to counteract the attractive forces between coils. The remaining muon decay energy would be deposited in a separate, cooled radiation shield. –A corresponding separated coil quadrupole can be designed with T/m gradients. –The separated coil design clearly impacts detector design due to the larger-radius shielding required on the midplane C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Open midplane design drawbacks There are difficulties associated with achieving the desired optics using nonconventional magnets –Open mid-plane magnets as noted in this workshop have very poor field quality and cannot necessarily be modeled using conventional components exhibit high-order multipole content. –The muon collider lattice is extremely sensitive to end or fringe field and error effects. –Such effects would change and dominate completely the dynamics of the collider ring. –Accurate simulations would require the actual field map from TOSCA. Once a field map is required, optimization of parameters entirely within existing optical codes is not currently implemented nor is there a straightforward approach to implement a field map design and then reverse-engineer the magnet design. –As also noted in this workshop, open midplane magnets with large apertures introduce extreme support stressed, with the supports aggravated by large vertical apertures. C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Combined Approach By far the most effective approach is a combined passive and shielding design consisting of: –Tapered liners in final focus quads –Background sweep dipoles Positioned on either side of the final focus quadrupoles, a pair of 15-m long, 8.5T background dipoles had to be placed 1 m upstream of the final focus to remove background from the arcs and the long preceding drift. (This is a bucked pair of dipoles to keep the dispersion function under control in the long drift.) –Tungsten collimators sandwiched between quadrupoles 15-cm long with a 4  aperture to shadow completely the SC final focus quads with a 5  aperture. –Tungsten collimators within the detector with the aspect of the two nozzles on either side of the IP C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Results: Combined Approach The combined effect allowed the tungsten liner to be reduced to 2 cm –Promoting a factor of 2 decrease in linear chromaticity and sextupole strength –Higher order chromaticities which require higher-multipole correction dropped by two orders of magnitude. C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Results: Combined Approach continued… Top performing IR design and comparisons of dependence of heat dissipation in IR and shielding design approaches- C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Detectors… Central detector backgrounds… C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Neutrinos Serious problem with Bethe-Heitler pairs: 15 to 90 m from the IP is responsible for high muon fluxes in the calorimeter –Approaches include magnetized shielding across the entire tunnel cross section, timing cuts –Neutrino fluxes outside are also a problem – every meter may require a dipole or an oscillation of the guide field in time to move the beam within the accelerator C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11Nov

MCTF Impact on the Current Collider Work We have backgrounds for 50x50 GeV, 250x250 GeV, and 2 x 2 TeV Colliders The most serious problem was the 250x250 GeV collider. Backgrounds were never solved This implies the 750x750 GeV collider under design is likely to have more severe background issues than the 2x2 TeV collider extensively studied. C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF New Ideas: Flat Beams; Asymmetric Transverse emittances Conventional Magnetic components focus only in one plane and defocus in the other –Flat beams are naturally suited to quadrupole telescopes –Reduce both aperture requirements and nonlinearities Assume a factor of 4 difference in the low beta value for vertical and horizontal with 1 cm as the average. To preserve a round would require: for similar high-betas, this result in a larger vertical than horizontal aperture A flat beam, however, reduces vertical apertures AND nonlinearities due to beam divergence. Equalizing beam divergence requires: which translates into a much smaller vertical than horizontal aperture C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Example: Asymmetric IR Initial IR design has begun on an asymmetric low beta IR C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov A combined-function magnet was introduced as the first element to provide not only additional vertical focusing and aperture reduction, but also to provide background sweeping and dispersion for the IR quadrupoles The vertical aperture in this design is reduced from 20 mm to a 4 mm maximum in the IR quadrupoles mitigating the support issues

MCTF Superconducting C magnet Originally conceived for FFAG rings but would work certainly for Neutrino Factory magnets Unclear how to accommodate the cryostat in a MC IR “Open” on one side – inside of ring Exploits the asymmetric background and heat deposition from muon decays (factor of 4 inside/outside) C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov

MCTF Conclusions Magnet liners continue to be a problem Open midplane magnets have serious drawbacks particularly with large vertical apertures and support An open midplane magnet design is more feasible with small vertical apertures Small vertical apertures imply asymetric emittance and IR low beta design Advantage includes reduced nonlinear dynamics and error and fringe field impact Disadvantage is a factor of 2 decrease in luminosity relative to the round-beam IR C. Johnstone MCD meeting 11 Nov