SIP 101 Kristin Patton SIP Project Manager, Air Quality Division Presented to Environmental Trade Fair and Conference May 3, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Southern Environmental Law Center Georgia Air Summit May 4, 2006.
Advertisements

“Cleaner Air Sooner” South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Bureau of Air Quality.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
How meeting the 2007 Standard & Reducing Variable Emissions will Help Attain the Hour Standard? Guy Donaldson EPA.
Planning for Clean Air:
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
1 Air Planning Section EPA Region 6. ActionTarget Date EPA Letter to Governors on Designations (120-day letters) December 21, 2011 Designations and.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
Colorado: An Air Quality History WESTAR SPRING BUSINESS MEETING MAR CH 29 – 30, 2010.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Update on the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Federal Air Quality Standards Kasey Savanich and Brian Foster Air Quality Division 2015 Environmental.
David A. Ramirez Area Director for Border and Permian Basin Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Border to Border Transportation Conference November.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
SIP Development and Implementation in New Mexico - and Why it Matters to Tribes Rita Bates Planning Section Chief Air Quality Bureau New Mexico Environment.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Planning for Clean Air and Conformity: Connecting the SIP to the Transportation System Jeff Riley Houston, TX May 30, 2007.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
1 Non-Attainment NSR Program Donald Law EPA Region 8.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Overview/Update Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Planning for Clean Air: An Introduction to the “SIP Process” SIP 101.
1 Designations & Classifications for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Air Quality Update Regional Council February 28, 2007.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Ozone NAAQS Implementation WESTAR Fall Meeting September 29, 2010 Scott Mathias, Associate Director Air Quality Policy Division.
PSD/Nonattainment Applicability Arturo J. Garza Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Update on the 2015 Ozone Standard Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair May 3, 2016.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Ozone Redesignation Substitutes for the HGB and DFW Areas
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
EPA’s 2014 Draft RIA EPA’s 2104 Draft RIA continues to rely heavily on PM2.5 co-benefits:
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

SIP 101 Kristin Patton SIP Project Manager, Air Quality Division Presented to Environmental Trade Fair and Conference May 3, 2016

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 2 Agenda What is a SIP? What are the NAAQS? What are the types of SIP revisions? How are SIP revisions developed?

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 3 What is a SIP?

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 4 State Implementation Plan (SIP) A plan to reduce pollution to meet federal air quality standards that: –in most cases, applies to areas not meeting federal air quality standards (nonattainment areas); –establishes control strategies and target dates for reducing emissions; –describes how the state will monitor air quality and determine compliance with the standards; and –includes technical and regulatory processes for demonstrating attainment. The SIP is: –developed and submitted by the state; and –federally enforceable

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 5 Pretest Question #1 There is only one SIP for each state. True or False? TRUE SIP revisions are completed as necessary to update the SIP.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 6 SIP Revisions Revised as needed –when new laws or rules are enacted –when a region fails to attain standards or its attainment status changes –when new data or techniques become available Developed with participation from stakeholders –meetings, comment periods, and public hearings

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 7 The Texas SIP Section I: Introduction Section II: Regional Classification Section III: Public Participation/Intergovernmental Coordination Section IV: Preliminary Review Section V: Legal Authority Section VI: Control Strategy Section VII: Compliance Schedule Section VIII: Texas Air Pollution Emergency Episode Contingency Plan Section IX: Air Quality Surveillance Plan Section X: Review of New Sources and Modifications Section XI: Source Surveillance Section XII: Resources Section XIII: Intergovernmental Cooperation Section XIV: TCEQ Adopted Rules and Regulations

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 8 Components of a SIP

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 9 What are the NAAQS?

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 10 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Required by the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) Set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Primary health-based standards and secondary welfare standards set for six criteria air pollutants

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 11 NAAQS Criteria Air Pollutants Standards set for six criteria air pollutants: –Ground-Level Ozone (O 3 ) –Particulate Matter (PM) –Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) –Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) –Carbon Monoxide (CO) –Lead (Pb)

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 12 PollutantLevelAveraging Time Ozone (O 3 ) * ppm (2015)Eight-Hour ppm (2008)Eight-Hour Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) 12.0 µg/m 3 Annual (Arithmetic Mean) 35 µg/m 3 Twenty-Four-Hour Particulate Matter (PM 10 )150 µg/m 3 Twenty-Four-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) 53 ppbAnnual (Arithmetic Mean) 100 ppbOne-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 )75 ppbOne-Hour Carbon Monoxide (CO) 9 ppmEight-Hour 35 ppmOne-Hour Lead (Pb)0.15 µg/m 3 Rolling Three-Month Average Current Primary NAAQS Note: Secondary NAAQS are the same as the primary NAAQS for all pollutants EXCEPT SO 2, which has a secondary NAAQS of 0.5 ppm over three hours, and PM 2.5, which has a secondary NAAQS of 15.0 µg/m 3 annually. More information can be found at EPA’s NAAQS webpage ( NAAQS webpage * In 1997 EPA revoked the 1-hour ozone standard (0.12 ppm, not to be exceeded more than once per year) and in 2015 the EPA revoked the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard (0.08 ppm); however, some areas have continued obligations under those standards (“anti-backsliding”).

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 13 Pretest Question #2 The Federal Clean Air Act requires the EPA to revise the NAAQS every five years. TRUE or FALSE? FALSE The EPA is required to review the NAAQS every five years which may or may not result in a NAAQS revision.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 14 What are the types of SIP revisions?

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 15 EPA Action State Action EPA Revises NAAQS Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revision State Designation Recommendations EPA Nonattainment Designation Emissions Inventory, RFP, and Attainment Demonstration SIP Revisions Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan SIP Revision Redesignation to Attainment

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 16 Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revision Describes how the state meets the requirements of FCAA, §110(a) for a new or revised NAAQS –Infrastructure = Does Texas have the means and authority to implement the SIP?  ambient air quality monitoring and data systems  programs for enforcement of control measures –Transport = Does Texas significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance in another state?

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 17 Pretest Question #3 For a new or revised NAAQS, the Federal Clean Air Act requires Infrastructure and Transport SIP revision submittals from: a. states with nonattainment areas for that NAAQS b. all states c. states bordering Canada or Mexico d. states that failed to submit an Infrastructure and Transport SIP revision for the previous NAAQS B. All states

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 18 Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revision Required for all NAAQS Statewide plan Requirement is not tied to nonattainment area designations Due 3 years after the promulgation date of a new or revised NAAQS

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 19 Nonattainment Area Designations

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 20 Pretest Question #4 A nonattainment area is: a. an area designated by the EPA as not meeting federal air quality standards b. an area for which the state has failed to submit a SIP revision c. an area designated by the state as not meeting federal air quality standards d. a and c A Nonattainment areas are designated by the EPA

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 21 EPA Revises NAAQS Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revision State Designation Recommendations EPA Nonattainment Designation Emissions Inventory, RFP, and Attainment Demonstration SIP Revisions Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan SIP Revision Redesignation to Attainment EPA Action State Action

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 22 Designations Process EPA sets a new or revised NAAQS States submit designation recommendations –Attainment: the area meets the NAAQS –Nonattainment: the area does not meet the NAAQS –Unclassifiable: the area cannot be classified based on available information EPA makes final designations –120-day notice to states if designations differ from recommendations

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 23 Pretest Question #5 Nonattainment area designations are made: a. immediately upon NAAQS revision b. on the effective date of the NAAQS revision c. one year following the NAAQS revision d. two to three years following the NAAQS revision D. Two to three years State recommendations are due one year following a NAAQS revision. The EPA is required to finalize designations one year later, although this may be extended by an additional year.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 24 Pretest Question #6 If an attainment area monitors pollutant levels that exceed the NAAQS after initial designations are final, the area is designated nonattainment by operation of law. True or False? FALSE Nonattainment area designations must be made through the formal designations process.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 25 Texas NAAQS Nonattainment Areas Ozone –2008 Standard – ppm  Houston-Galveston-Brazoria  Dallas-Fort Worth Particulate Matter –El Paso for PM 10 Lead –A portion of Collin County in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area Nitrogen Dioxide –All areas attainment Sulfur Dioxide –No areas designated Carbon Monoxide –All areas attainment

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 26 Nonattainment Area SIP Revisions

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 27 MARGINAL (3 Years) Emissions Inventory Emissions Statements Nonattainment NSR Program & Emissions Offsets RACT Fixups I/M Corrections Conformity MODERATE (6 Years) Basic I/M RACT & RACM Emissions Controls Attainment Demonstration Contingency Measures RFP - 15% VOC Reductions within 6 years SERIOUS (9 Years) Enhanced Monitoring and I/M Modeled Attainment Demonstration 3% per Year VOC Reductions After 6 Years RFP Milestone Contingency Measures Clean Fuels Program VMT Demonstration SEVERE (15-17 Years) VMT Growth Offset Major Source Fees for Failure to Attain (185 Fees) EXTREME (20 Years) Clean Fuels and Controls for Boilers Traffic Controls During Congestion

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 28 EPA Revises NAAQS Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revision State Designation Recommendations EPA Nonattainment Designation Emissions Inventory, RFP, and Attainment Demonstration SIP Revisions Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan SIP Revision Redesignation to Attainment EPA Action State Action

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 29 Emissions Inventory Identifies: –Types of emissions sources present in an area  Stationary Point Sources  Area Sources  Non-Road Sources  On-Road Sources –Amount of each pollutant emitted –Types of process and control devices employed at each plant or source category FCAA requires states to submit emissions inventory information for all relevant sources in nonattainment areas

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 30 Emissions Inventory SIP Revision Required for all nonattainment areas, regardless of classification Due two years after the effective date of a nonattainment designation Provides current and comprehensive data on emissions contributing to nonattainment Establishes a Base Year Inventory for the nonattainment area

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 31 Reasonable Further Progress SIP Revision Describes how incremental emissions reductions requirements will be met in a nonattainment area Demonstrates that emissions will be reduced by specified amounts between the base year and the nonattainment area’s attainment year For ozone nonattainment areas: –Moderate or higher areas must submit plans providing for a 15% reduction in VOC emissions –Serious or higher areas must submit plans providing for additional 3% annual combined reductions of NO X and VOC averaged over three-year increments until the attainment deadline

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 32 Pretest Question #7 A reasonable further progress SIP revision demonstrates: a. how a nonattainment area will improve air quality and meet the NAAQS by the area’s attainment deadline b. how a nonattainment area will continue to meet the NAAQS once redesignated to attainment c. that emissions will be reduced by specified amounts between the base year and the nonattainment area’s attainment year d. a and c C Attainment of the NAAQS is addressed in an Attainment Demonstration SIP revision.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 33 Attainment Demonstration SIP Revision Describes in detail the strategies and emissions control measures that show how a nonattainment area will improve air quality and meet the NAAQS by the attainment deadline Components of an attainment demonstration include: –Monitoring data –Emissions inventory –Photochemical modeling –Control strategy

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 34 Pretest Question #8 A state is required to develop Attainment Demonstration SIP revisions for: a. the entire state b. all nonattainment areas in the state c. all attainment areas in the state d. some nonattainment areas in the state, depending on classification D For ozone nonattainment areas, states must submit Attainment Demonstration SIP revisions for nonattainment areas classified as moderate and above.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 35 Components of an Attainment Demonstration: Monitoring Data Monitoring Data is used to: –determine if an area is meeting the standard –analyze trends Monitoring Data is also used to: –provide information on transport, meteorology, and emissions sources –develop estimates of emissions from non- industrial, mobile, and biogenic sources.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 36 Components of an Attainment Demonstration: Emissions Inventory Provides data for a variety of air quality planning tasks: –Establishing baseline emission levels –Calculating emission reduction targets –Control strategy development (quantifies the inventory used to determine potential control strategies for the SIP revision) –Emission inputs into air quality simulation models

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 37 Components of an Attainment Demonstration: Modeling Models are used to predict future pollutant levels for use in demonstrating attainment of standards by mandated attainment dates. Models estimate the emissions reductions needed to attain the standard and use meteorology, emissions, and chemistry to simulate pollution events and to test control strategies and real-world results. Real World SituationComputer Grid Simulation

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 38 Components of an Attainment Demonstration: Control Strategy Development Analysis is done to determine the type and need for emissions reductions to attain the NAAQS. State, local, and federal strategies are considered. Rules are adopted and incorporated into the SIP as needed. Contingency measures are included in the plan to be implemented if the area fails to attain the standard by the attainment date.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 39 Control Strategy Development: RACT and RACM Federally required control measures Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) –Lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) –Helps advance attainment of the NAAQS –Considers technological and economic feasibility as well as enforceability and practicality

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 40 EPA Revises NAAQS Infrastructure and Transport SIP Revision State Designation Recommendations EPA Nonattainment Designation Emissions Inventory, RFP, and Attainment Demonstration SIP Revisions Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan SIP Revision Redesignation to Attainment EPA Action State Action

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 41 Determination of Attainment Also known as a Clean Data Determination The nonattainment area is meeting the NAAQS based on certified monitoring data Initiated by a state request or by the EPA Final determination from EPA will suspend planning requirements for so long as the area continues to attain the NAAQS

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 42 Pretest Question #9 A nonattainment area is redesignated to attainment when the EPA finalizes a Determination of Attainment for the area. True or False? FALSE A determination of attainment (or clean data determination) is not a redesignation and does not change an area’s attainment status. It does suspend planning requirements but not anti- backsliding requirements.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 43 Anti-Backsliding Requirements Anti-Backsliding requirements are intended to ensure that air quality in nonattainment areas does not get worse after a standard is revoked. Examples include: New Source Review permitting, contingency measures, Failure to Attain fees. Areas still designated nonattainment for a revoked standard remain subject to applicable anti-backsliding requirements. Anti-backsliding obligations are removed through redesignation.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 44 Redesignation Requirements The EPA may redesignate an area to attainment if all of the following conditions are met: –the NAAQS have been attained (clean data); –the state has met all applicable requirements for the area under the FCAA, §110 and Part D; –the applicable SIP revision has been fully approved by the EPA under the FCAA, §110(k); –the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions; and –the EPA has fully approved a maintenance plan for the area under FCAA, §175A.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 45 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan SIP Revision The Redesignation Request describes how a nonattainment area meets redesignation requirements and how the area will continue to meet the NAAQS once redesignated to attainment. The Maintenance Plan should contain: –attainment inventory; –maintenance demonstration; –verification of continued attainment; –monitoring network; and –contingency plan. Two 10-year maintenance plans are required.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 46 Pretest Question #10 The EPA will not redesignate a nonattainment area to attainment for a revoked NAAQS. True or False? TRUE The EPA recently established a “redesignation substitute” option for revoked standards.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 47 Redesignation Substitute for Revoked Standards EPA’s Ozone Standard SIP Requirements Rule provides the redesignation substitute to remove anti-backsliding measures for revoked ozone NAAQS –Includes substance of FCAA redesignation criteria Redesignation Substitute elements –Monitoring data showing attainment of the revoked NAAQS –Showing that attainment was due to permanent and enforceable emissions reductions –Demonstration that the area can maintain the standard for 10 years after approval

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 48 Other types of SIP revisions

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 49 Regional Haze SIP Revision Describes how the state will meet visibility progress goals in Class I areas –Guadalupe and Big Bend National Parks in Texas Establishes goals and strategies to reduce visibility-impacting pollutants to meet a national visibility goal by 2064 –In Texas, primarily NO X, SO 2, and PM Comprehensive analysis due to the EPA every 10 years and progress reports due every five years through 2064

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 50 Program or Rule Update SIP Revision Updates to required programs or rules incorporated into the SIP control strategy Requires a SIP revision Examples include: –Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program –Rules for Stationary Sources

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 51 How are SIP revisions developed?

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 52 SIP Development Initial research phase –Data collected and modeled, control strategies proposed and tested, and the revision drafted –Typically requires 1-4 years TCEQ's formal rulemaking process –Publication of the proposal, public meetings, hearings, review of public comments, and adoption by TCEQ's commissioners –Takes about six months –Legally binding and enforceable under state law once SIP revision adopted by the commission Submitted to the EPA for review and approval –Federally enforceable after it has been approved by the EPA

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 53 Consequences of Failing to Develop an Approvable SIP Failure to submit or implement a SIP or submission of a SIP that is unacceptable to the EPA can result in: –start of a federal implementation plan (FIP) clock; –SIP call; or –EPA sanctions or other penalties on the state.  Sanctions can include cutting off federal highway funds and setting more stringent pollution offsets for certain emitters.

Air Quality Division SIP 101 KJP May 3, 2016 Page 54 Contact Information Kristin Patton –SIP Team, Air Quality Planning Section –(512) Contact the SIP Team or join our list – Questions?