13-6-2016 Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Responsibility issues in the governance of responsible innovation Ibo van de Poel, Philosophy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Advertisements

Elderly participation in European Health policy and Patients Rights Teresa Petrangolini ACN Director.
Transforming Ideas into Policy Making - Thoughts, values and global governance Minakshi Bhardwaj Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba,
EURADWASTE 29 March 2004 LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT THE COWAM EUROPEAN PROJECT EURADWASTE, 29 March 2004.
Care Robots and Liability Issues Allocating damages inflicted by (self-learning) care robots Elbert de Jong LL.M. Centre for Intellectual Property Law,
Ethics and Social Responsibility CHAPTER 5. Copyright © 2008 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. 2 Learning Objectives.
Management Ethics and Social Responsibility
Managerial Ethics What is Ethics? Criteria for Ethical Decision Making
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
SM a1 Taiz master program Engineering & Management Course Strategic management Strategic position (ECS adapted) Lecturer : John L Simons
P3P: Platform for Privacy Preferences Charlin Lu Sensitive Information in a Wired World November 11, 2003.
The Growth of Dual-Use Bioethics Lecture No.13 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the following slides.
Promoting responsible innovation: constructive technology assessment and the Dutch experience Arie Rip (University of Twente) Excerpts from Contribution.
Basic Challenges of Organizational Design
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
AIR PASSENGERS` RIGHTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Axel Luttenberger.
EFFECTING CULTURAL CHANGE IN RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Encouraging a culture of research integrity Andrew C. Rawnsley.
Benefits of a strong collaboration with patient groups at national and EU level Susanna Palkonen, Director European Federation.
Ethics and Reflexivity in Educational Research
Ethics Last Update Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D
European Standards on Confidentiality and Privacy in Healthcare Dr Colin M Harper Division of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Queen’s University.
Anne Maher Chief Executive London The Pensions Board 10 October 2006 EUROPEAN PENSIONS 2006 RISK AND RISK SHARING – REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE.
Assuring Public Safety and Assessing Risk Across Sectors The Essence of Regulatory Focus John Paterson University of Aberdeen.
Burden sharing for adaptation: a case for the EU? Susanne Hanger International symposium on ‘ The Governance of Adaptation’ Amsterdam, 22nd and 23rd of.
T RUST AND R ESPONSIBILITY FOR B IG D ATA P RACTICES Heike Felzmann Centre of Bioethical Research & Analysis; InPrime, Insight Centre for Data Analytics;
Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility
The roots of innovation Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) The roots of innovation Proactive initiative on:
Overview: What is ethical leadership? 1. Leadership Ethics Perspective 2. Principles of Ethical Leadership 3. Diverse Ethical Perspectives 4. How Does.
Joana Mendes Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance, University of Amsterdam Jean Monnet Seminar, University of Macau 27 October 2011 Participation.
Ethics and Engineering
 RESPONSIBILITY: FP7 Co-ordination action  Aim: contribute to development of RRI Governance Framework for future European Commission (and eventually.
EHR stakeholder workshop – 11th October EHR integration for clinical research: Legal & Privacy issues Mats Sundgren – AstraZeneca Petra Wilson -
HA405: Leadership and Ethics in Health Care Week 2 Seminar
Ethical Decision Making , Ethical Theories
Models of Anticipation within the Responsible Research and Innovation Framework: the Two RRI Souls and the Challenge of Human Rights Daniele Ruggiu CIGA,
Proposal COM (2010) 395 final: Concrete recommendations from the health and safety perspective Stefano Boy, Engineer Paolo Derosas, Lawyer European Trade.
Responsible Research and Innovation Enhancing Responsible Research and Innovation through Curricula in Higher Education (EnRRICH)
MEM 604: Social, Legal and Ethical Considerations for Engineering Managing Safety and Liability.
WHOIS Public safety and data protection requirements.
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
The way forward: Recommendations on improving cooperation between RIGOs and CSOs A Private Sector’s View Gilberto Marin Quintero, President of the Board.
RRI Showcase Knowledge for Climate. | Showcase Knowledge for Climate Knowledge for Climate  Large-scale, multi-actor research program  Aimed at knowledge.
Session 1. The Central Principles of HiAP WORKSHOP: PREPARING FOR TRAINING IN HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP) USING THE NEWLY LAUNCHED WHO HiAP TRAINING.
Some principles for acceptance criteria for online risk picture
Management Ethics and Social Responsibility
Chapter 15 Ethics and human resource management
Session 1. The Central Principles of HiAP
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Accountability: an EU perspective
Are we sure? UNECE-workshop on uncertainty treatment in Integrated Assessment Modelling January 2002 Rob Maas.
I3U Commitment 27 “A – Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard B – Research Programme on Public Sector and Social Innovation“ Venue: Vienna, I3U Project Meeting.
Virtue Ethics & Moral Reasoning
Re-inventing Safety and Security – A Symposium of the Leiden-Delft-Erasmus Centre for Safety and Security, 23 January 2017.
Social and Cultural Issues in Requirements Engineering
Ethics and Social Responsibility
EU perspective – Sustainable development means….
Inadequate odorization of biomethane in the light of the Product Liability Directive GESP Research Day 19 September 2013 University of Groningen.
Feedback from ACEA truck manufacturers and next steps
Corporate Moral Responsability for Disasters by Sveinn Eldon
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
EU Research and Innovation policy - Past and Future
The activity of Art. 29. Working Party György Halmos
It was Twenty Years Ago Today
Professor (ret.), PhD, Stockholm University/ Resilience Center
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
EUROGAS LNG TASK FORCE Bilbao, 13 March 2009 Presentation by
Exploring Bioethics.
On Responsible (research) and innovation
Fostering Improved Training Tools for Responsible Research & Innovation
On Responsible (research) and innovation
Presentation transcript:

Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Responsibility issues in the governance of responsible innovation Ibo van de Poel, Philosophy

2 Responsible Innovation Overview Responsible innovation Responsibility Governance of responsible innovation Responsibility problems Directions for solutions

3 Responsible Innovation What is Responsible Innovation?

4 Responsible Innovation Responsible Research and Innovation is a transparent, interactive process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view to the (ethical) acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process and its marketable products (in order to allow a proper embedding of scientific and technological advances in our society). (Von Schomberg 2012)

5 Responsible Innovation European Union The European Commission (EC) … wants to promote the responsible use of science and technology both within the European Union (EU) and worldwide. This goal involves striking a balance between ethical and socio-cultural diversity, both at the EU level and globally, while respecting internationally recognized fundamental values ― and promoting their further development. (Directorate-General for Research and Innovation EU. (2012). Ethical and RegulatoryChallenges to Science and Research Policy at the Global Level.

6 Responsible Innovation

7 Process and product dimension Procedural Accountability Transparency Stakeholder involvement Product That reflects deeply held public values Safety Sustainability Privacy Justice etc.

8 Responsible Innovation What is Responsibility?

9 Responsible Innovation Notions of responsibility Cause Task or role Capacity Virtue The (moral) obligation to see to it that Accountability Blameworthiness Liability.

10 Responsible Innovation Moral responsibility Backward-looking Accountability Blameworthiness Liability Forward-looking Obligation Virtue

11 Responsible Innovation Governance of responsible innovation

12 Responsible Innovation Governance ProductProcess Backward-looking responsibility Forward-looking responsibility

13 Responsible Innovation Governance ProductProcess Backward-looking responsibility Product liabilityISO 9000 Forward-looking responsibility VSDCTA

14 Responsible Innovation Implications for governance We would like to further all four kinds of responsibility But can we at the same time? Responsibility problems may arise

15 Responsible Innovation Responsibility problems

16 Responsible Innovation Three types of responsibility problems Trade-offs between the four kinds of responsibility Problem of many hands Uncertainty and ignorance

17 Responsible Innovation Trade-offs: an example DC-10 Crashed just outside Paris on 3 March 1974, killing all 346 people on board. Cause was a cargo door that opened Problem was known (a memorandum by Convair engineer Applegate in 1972) Convair and McDonnell Douglas took no action, allegedly partly out of fear of liability (“better not to know of the problem”) Seems to reveal tension between backward-looking and forward-looking responsibility

18 Responsible Innovation Trade-offs Forward-looking responsibility requires learning, transparency, and willingness to act This may be at odds with backward-looking responsibility Maybe not with accountability But certainly with blameworthiness and (legal) liability To avoid blame and liability, people might prefer not to know or not to act which hinders learning and the assuming of forward- looking responsibility

19 Responsible Innovation The problem of many hands The problem of many hands (PMH) occurs if a collective is morally responsible for φ, while none of the individuals making up the collective is morally responsible for φ Can apply to different kinds of reponsibility Forward-looking and backward-looking

20 Responsible Innovation Avoiding responsibility Accepting responsibility

21 Responsible Innovation Problem of many hands The allocation of (forward-looking) responsibility in the case of secondary emissions may lead to problem of many hands: Many people are involved and division of tasks and responsibility is unclear. Each of the parties tends to allocate responsibility to others. “Nobody” is responsible.

22 Responsible Innovation Uncertainty: an example EU Council Directive 85/374/EEC for product liability Article 7 The producer shall not be liable as a result of this Directive if he proves: (…) (e) that the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the time when he put the product into circulation was not such as to enable the existence of the defect to be discovered (…)

23 Responsible Innovation Types of ‘uncertainty’ HazardPossibility that a technology causes undesirable effects Risk Specification of a hazard, usually in terms of probabilities and consequences Uncertainty Situation in which hazards are known but cannot be expressed as risks due to a lack of knowledge IgnoranceSituation in which hazards are unknown Indeterminacy Consequences (hazards) are causally open, for example because they depend on user or operator behaviour Ambiguity Situation in which there are different disagreeing perspectives on the nature and the (un)desirability of a hazard

24 Responsible Innovation Uncertainty and responsibility Uncertaintymay be an excuse in the case of backward-looking responsibility (esp. blameworthiness and liability) Uncertainty makes it more difficult to take forward-looking responsibility at the product level At the process level, uncertainty may be less of a problem

25 Responsible Innovation Directions for solutions Trade-offs Design approach to governance/responsibility distribution: institutional design Problem of many hands Procedural approach to distribute responsibility (Doorn) Based on John Rawl’s WRE approach Uncertainty New technologies as social experiments Conditions for morally responsible experimentation