AQF, TEQSA, Learning Outcomes…. what’s the connection? Theresa Winchester-Seeto, Learning and Teaching Centre.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Outcomes & Staff Development Dr Lorraine Walsh, University of Dundee Bologna Stakeholder Conference February 2008 Heriot.
Advertisements

Research teaching Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching University of Washington August 2006 ACI Committee.
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Curriculum Design: The Basics 25 September 2012 Nicolene Murdoch Executive Director: Teaching, Learning & Quality Monash South Africa.
Using training packages to meet client needs Facilitator: Gerard Kell.
DEVELOPING UNITS OF COMPETENCY FOR ACCREDITED COURSES.
A Curriculum Model based on the work of Ralph Tyler
Elizabeth Deane WIL symposium July One definition: The broad skills that a University expects that graduates will have acquired and be able to demonstrate.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
The Priority of Research and Doctoral School Nino Zhvania Head of the Quality Assurance Office.
CBT – an evidence based approach Community College Baccalaureate Association Conference, Boston 07 March 2015 Pam Caven Director Policy & Stakeholder Engagement,
Outcomes-based Teaching and Learning Pre-workshop 1 Designing Intended Learning Outcomes Designing Intended Learning Outcomes.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Consistency of Assessment
Practical Approaches to the Development of Programme Outcomes Dr Jacqueline Potter, Centre for Academic Practice and Student Learning (CAPSL)
1 Writing Undergraduate Programme Outcomes Dr Ciara O’Farrell.
1 Outcomes-based Curricula: a general overview Dr Ciara O’Farrell.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
The Academic Assessment Process
Writing Instructional Objectives
STUDENT AFFAIRS ASSESSMENT BOOT CAMP BALL STATE UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 22, 2009 ALAN HARGRAVE, ED.D. Writing Learning Outcomes.
The Modernisation of Higher Education Introduction to LOLA methodology Anthony Vickers 27 th June 2012.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
Learning outcomes and introduction to assessment Pg Certificate in Higher Education Professional Practice Jannie Roed and Sue Moron-Garcia 6 th May 2009.
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015.
Developing teaching and learning standards in a new regulatory environment Elizabeth Deane, Kerri-Lee Krause and Geoff Scott University of Western Sydney,
EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY REGIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION QUALIFCATIONS FRAMEWORK.
Learning Outcomes: Keeping it Real Liz Warr. Eduspeak  Dialect particularly spoken in Educational Development Units, including favoured phrases such.
VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING CURRICULUM TRAINING ASSESSING.
Linking Levels, Learning outcomes and assessment Jenny Moon, Bournemouth University, UK
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Curriculum development A brief guide to the construction of relevant curricula.
Writing Learning Outcomes David Steer & Stephane Booth Co-Chairs Learning Outcomes Committee.
The Areas of Interaction are…
The Modernisation of Higher Education From Degree Programme Design to LOLA Anthony Vickers.
Outcomes-Based Programme Development and Quality Assurance at Masaryk University1 Outcomes-Based Programme Development and Quality Assurance at Masaryk.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
Knowing your academic level An exploration of the different levels of learning in the UK.
Roles and types of examination ITU, October 8, 2010 Hanne Leth Andersen, RUC.
Writing Postgraduate Programme Outcomes Dr Jacqueline Potter & Dr Ciara O’Farrell.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
The advantages of adopting learning outcomes
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
School for Academic Administrators: Learning Objectives Rodney A. Webb, Associate Vice-President, Academic January 24, 2005.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
The Bologna Process Learning Outcomes How can we use them to improve our students’ learning Janerik Lundquist Linköping University 2011.
JOB DESCRIPTIONS 1. Overview Regardless of the size or complexity of an organization, good job descriptions are vital management tools and important documents.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Kate Perkins for the Ithaca Group. Setting the scene  Where has the CSfW come from?  What is it for? Who is it for? The framework  Skill Areas  Developmental.
Planning Literacy Learning Essential Skills Practitioners Level 3.
Higher School Certificate Requirements and Students with Special Education Needs Key Messages NSW Education Standards Authority.
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
WORKSHOP Computer Science Curriculum Development
Using inquiry-based learning in capstone units
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Reflecting on Your Teaching – Using Learning outcomes to Critically Inform Your Teaching Content Alan Somerville ASSOCIATE DEAN LEARNING AND TEACHING,
Curriculum design Compliance with the new regulatory framework using the new ACU templates.
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Learning outcomes in higher education
Writing Criterion Referenced Assessment Criteria and Standards
Presentation transcript:

AQF, TEQSA, Learning Outcomes…. what’s the connection? Theresa Winchester-Seeto, Learning and Teaching Centre

The Environment Increasing regulated and more accountable –Tertiary Education Quality Standards Agency and Australian Qualifications Framework –Office of Learning and Teaching (standards) –Industry requirements –University processes and requirements (FSQC/ASQC)  alternative: –ither comply grudgingly; OR –take the opportunity to review programs holistically to better define what we do and why

Players AQF “defines relative complexity and depth of achievement and autonomy required of graduates to demonstrate the achievement” TEQSA will systematically: compare the stated learning outcomes for a given course with the specified learning outcomes for the relevant AQF level and qualification type descriptor, and; assess whether the design of all the components of the course will support achievement of the learning outcomes

Definitions Aim/Goal – Broad, guiding statements “Develop the capacity to think creatively and independently about design problems” Objectives – specific statements about what the instructor intends to happen (Students should) “comprehend fundamental concepts in the historical study of the French Revolution”

More definitions Learning outcomes are the expression of the set of knowledge, skills and the application of the knowledge and skills a person has acquired and is able to demonstrate as a result of learning (AQF 2013) Threshold learning outcomes are the expression of the minimum set of knowledge, skills and the application of the knowledge and skills a person has acquired and is able to demonstrate in order to pass the qualification

Other factors that influence LOs Industry/Professional requirements e.g. accreditation Community expectations University requirements –Graduate capabilities –Academic Plan

Learning Outcomes can apply to: Institution (now GC) Program Unit Module Learning activity Additional factors that affect unit LOs: Program LOs Overall program structure What has come before (pre-reqs etc) What comes after

The good, the bad and the ugly…. In groups of 3-4 use your own unit LOs and/or those from Examples of Learning Outcomes and Graduate Capabilities –  pick out 3 that you think are useful or work well as unit outcomes;  pick out 3 that you do not think are useful or work well;  think about why they work well or why they are useful? OR why not? (10 mins)

Review of UNITS around LOs Issues identified: using aims as outcomes (understand, appreciate, knowledge, competence, develop, acquire) e.g. “students will have acquired a body of theoretical and practical knowledge relevant to the topics set for this unit” just a description of the teaching and learning (3- 4 sentences) conflations of assessment or learning task e.g. conduct a literature search

Review of UNITS (cont) have no discernible or measurable actions/ verbs e.g. “project management” have not content or focus e.g. “work collaboratively” have no real context e.g. “apply research skills” or “critical analysis” are non-specific e.g. “read and write critically” heavy reliance on terms such as “understand”, “know”, “be familiar with”, and “appreciate”

The problem with verbs

AQF Levels Criteria and Qualifications Type Descriptors Dimensions: Knowledge – depth, breadth, kinds of knowledge and complexity Skills – kinds and complexities of skills Application of skills and knowledge – context in which skills and knowledge are applied

Generic Learning Outcomes Fundamental skills – literacy, numeracy People skills – working with others, communication Thinking skills – learning to learn, decision making, problem solving Personal skills – self direction, acting with integrity

Activity – Unit Learning Outcomes (level) In groups of 4 (or program groups) – select up to 8-10 unit LOs from your program; assess the appropriateness of existing unit LOs in the light of AQF standards; consider the need for threshold LOs; for UG also take into consideration whether they are at 100, 200, 300 level etc; adjust if needed (consider the Bloom’s verbs or SOLO approaches); keep notes on rationale to share with other unit convenors from the program. (45 mins)

Activity – Program Learning Outcomes Start with overview of unit LOs and develop into a small number of program LOs (6) that will meet AQF and Grad Caps requirements Look for common threads/themes in unit LOs Look for anything that is missing in unit LOs (you may need to adjust these) Map to PG or UG Grad Caps – have you missed something? Check for alignment of Program LOs, unit LOs and Grad Caps.