Rubric Exercises PERFORMANCE RATING PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Beginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Content Diagnosis (Application & Analysis) PERFORMANCE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You can use this presentation to: Gain an overall understanding of the purpose of the revised tool Learn about the changes that have been made Find advice.
Advertisements

The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Improving writing in APHS
Assessment in the MYP CENTURY MIDDLE SCHOOL. What is Assessment? Assessment is integral to all teaching and learning. MYP assessment requires teachers.
Constructing Good Courses : Designing Rubrics Jodi Welsch CTEAG Sessions 2008.
Dress for Success Take 15 minutes to finalize your presentations Career Management October 10, 2013.
Group 3 Teachers: No Growth Model Classes
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
TIPS for Writing Case Studies Provided by the Abstracts Committee.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
How to build effective WORD WALLS and PERFORMANCE TASKS
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
Assessment and Performance-based Instruction
Performance-based Assessment The types of work we choose to evaluate and the methods we use to evaluate that work deliver powerful messages to students.
SCORING. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Define what SCORING means for the purpose of these modules Explain how and why you should use well-designed tools, such.
The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
IntroductionIntroduction | Task | Process | Evaluation | Conclusion | CreditsTaskProcessEvaluationConclusionCredits © World 4 Teachers Pty. Ltd
Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources: 1.Print copies for each person of the following from the Resource Tab: a)Grain Size Visual.
ASSESSMENT SYED A RIZVI INTERIM ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
How to Evaluate Student Papers Fairly and Consistently.
Principles in language testing What is a good test?
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
North Carolina Network for Excellence in Teaching  The Assessment Toolkit.
May 6, 2014 Facilitated by Jennifer Gondek Instructional Specialist for Inclusive Education, TST BOCES.
Performance-Based Assessment Authentic Assessment
Lesson Plan Project by Jill Keeve. Goal/Objective Goal : Students will use a reading excerpt to explore alternate background information on conic sections.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Developing Evaluation Rubrics or Scoring Guides  for UMass-Dartmouth  January 27, 2012.
PROYECTO: Poema Diamante Student Instructions Overview: Create a poem that describes you. Featuring photos of yourself, the things you like to do, your.
Kesarkar Madhura, Ph.D. Head, Department of Education, SNDTWU, Mumbai.
Rubrics. What is a Rubric? A rubric is a set of guidelines for scoring performance against criteria. Performance is described along a scale of quality.
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
By: Akilah Philips Barry Harris Jeremy Taulton Naairah Lott Tessa Anderson Tiara Edwards.
Embedded Assessment 1 Creating and Presenting a Monologue.
Improving Student Achievement Three of the most effective strategies that have been found to have most success are: Sharing learning intentions with students.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
The Rubric. Teachers grade with a rubric for the following reasons: To ensure that there is a standard way of grading So students know why they got their.
EDTECH 522 Final Project Presentation Virtual Collaboration Class using WiziQ November 17, 20091by: Nancy J. Sipes.
Department of Sociology Learning Assessment Development Heather Zaykowski, Ph.D.
College of Education, Eastern Visayas State University September 16, 2011.
Plant and Animal Cell Project Rubric __/28 ___% 4321 Eye Contact Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking.
Teaching Specific Types of Knowledge Chapter 11 Classroom Instruction that Works.
Rubrics: Using Performance Criteria to Evaluate Student Learning PERFORMANCE RATING PERFORMANCE CRITERIABeginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Content.
Learning Outcome 01 : Be able to prepare for the production of dynamic products Unit R007: Creating dynamic products using sound and vision Cambridge Nationals.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
Learning Outcome 01 : Be able to design interactive products Unit R005: Creating an interactive product using multimedia components Cambridge Nationals.
Rubrics.
COM 535, S08 Writing Performance Objectives February 20, 2008.
Case Description Papers – Utilizing a New Scoring Rubric Peggy Cyr, MD, David Little, MD, Martha Seagrave, PA-C, Julie Schirmer, MSW, Kahsi Smith, PhD,
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
ICTA Grading Rubrics: Research
Descriptive Writing.
Revising English Language Paper 1 – Section B
Writing Rubrics Module 5 Activity 4.
Rubrics.
Clusters: August 29.
Y10 Cycle Sheets Y10 generally work over 2 cycles, with the fortnightly double and relevant homeworks being allocated to LANGAUGE practice. Therefore:
LITERATURE Assessment Criteria Currently Achieving Grade
Developing a Rubric for Assessment
CALCULATE Use numbers given in the question to work out an answer. Always show working.
Rubrics: a good tool for engaging thoughtful learning
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Grading Rubric Category Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

Rubric Exercises PERFORMANCE RATING PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Beginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Content Diagnosis (Application & Analysis) PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS Explanation (Knowledge & Comprehension ) PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS Treatment (Evaluation) PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS Management (Creation) PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS Format AMA Style PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTORS

Rubric Examples Sample rubric What are the problematic areas? How does it need to be revised?

Sample Case Study Rubric – Student Creation LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 EngagementPresentation involves audience, allowing time for audience to think and respond. Audience is involved, however, processing or response time is limited. Audience is involved but inadequate processing or response time is provided. Speaker does not involve audience. ContentIncidents are interesting and realistically portrayed Incidents are interesting but not realistically portrayed Incidents are realistically portrayed but not interesting. Incidents are neither interesting, nor realistically portrayed. Writing Skills Writing is totally free of errors There are occasional errors. There are more than occasional errors Errors are frequent

#1 – Engagement What are the problematic areas? How does it need to be revised? LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 EngagementPresentation involves audience, allowing time for audience to think and respond. Audience is involved, however, processing or response time is limited. Audience is involved but inadequate processing or response time is provided. Speaker does not involve audience.

#1 – Engagement Problematic Area: Clearly defined criteria; what does ‘inadequate’ and ‘limited’ mean? Levels 2 and 3 are similar; distinguish using above suggestion Wording is not consistent across all levels of mastery Suggested revision: Provide a unique, concrete description of each criteria consistently across all levels of mastery LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 EngagementPresentation involves audience, allowing time for audience to think and respond. Audience is involved, however, processing or response time is limited. Audience is involved but inadequate processing or response time is provided. Speaker does not involve audience.

#1 – Engagement LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 EngagementPresentation involves audience, allowing time for audience to think and respond. Audience is involved, however, processing or response time is limited. Audience is involved but inadequate processing or response time is provided. Speaker does not involve audience. LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 EngagementSpeaker involves audience, and provides time for audience to think and respond to all of the posed questions. Speaker involves audience, but provides time for audience to think and respond to some of the posed questions. Speaker involves audience, but does not allow time for audience to think and respond. Speaker does not involve audience. Original Suggested

#2 – Content What are the problematic areas? How does it need to be revised? LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 ContentIncidents are interesting and realistically portrayed Incidents are interesting but not realistically portrayed Incidents are realistically portrayed but not interesting. Incidents are neither interesting, nor realistically portrayed.

#2 – Content LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 ContentIncidents are interesting and realistically portrayed Incidents are interesting but not realistically portrayed Incidents are realistically portrayed but not interesting. Incidents are neither interesting, nor realistically portrayed. Problematic Area: Clearly defined criteria; what does ‘interesting’ mean? Clarify priority of portrayal and interest; is one more important? Suggested revision: Provide a concrete description of each criteria consistently across all levels of mastery

#2 - Content LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 ContentIncidents are interesting and realistically portrayed Incidents are interesting but not realistically portrayed Incidents are realistically portrayed but not interesting. Incidents are neither interesting, nor realistically portrayed. LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 ContentIncidents target key areas of importance to the case, and are realistically portrayed. Incidents target key areas of importance to the case, but are not realistically portrayed. Incidents do not target key areas of importance to the case, but are realistically portrayed. Incidents do not target key areas of importance to the case, nor are they realistically portrayed. Original Suggested

#3 – Writing Skills What are the problematic areas? How does it need to be revised? LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 Writing skills Writing is totally free of errors There are occasional errors. There are more than occasional errors Errors are frequent

#3 – Writing Skills LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 Writing skills Writing is totally free of errors There are occasional errors. There are more than occasional errors Errors are frequent Problematic Area: Clearly defined criteria; what does ‘occasional’, ‘frequent’ and ‘more than’ mean? Criteria category accurately defined; are ‘writing skills’ what errors refer to? Suggested revision: Provide a concrete description of each criteria consistently across all levels of mastery Clarify criteria category so that it is accurately supported by its descriptors

#3 – Writing Skills LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 Writing skillsWriting is totally free of errors There are occasional errors. There are more than occasional errors Errors are frequent LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 Format Paper does not contain any grammatical and/or spelling errors. Paper contains 1-2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. Paper contains 3-4 grammatical and/or spelling errors. Paper contains 5 or more grammatical and/or spelling errors. Original Suggested

More Information… Rubric Exercises Christine Savi, PhD CLD & QEP: Assessment