SOLO Pam Hook and Julie Mills. Pre-structural Uni-structural Multi-structural Relational Extended Abstract.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Teaching for Higher Order Outcomes Peter Ling June 2012.

Advertisements

Students don’t understand what you’ve asked them to do.

‘What is it and how could it help me and my pupils?’

Engaging in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Charles Darwin University Institute for Teaching and Learning Keith Trigwell.

Deeper Questioning: How do we use questioning effectively so that it deepens our students learning and the quality of our teaching?

Building Knowledge for Themselves Engaging Students in Building Knowledge for Themselves.

Quality First Teaching In Any Subject From Good to Outstanding

Designing and Planning a Teaching Session This document is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales license, available.

Current Comfort Level with Learning Targets

Learning Taxonomies Bloom’s Taxonomy

Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.

What is assessment?. Effective Teacher Assessment Explain different types of teacher assessment Demonstrate each type of assessment Plan how you could.

1 Angela Ho, EDC Chan Chi Hung, Learning to Learn Project.

Assessment IT Sligo Nov Concerns about assessment Both new and experienced lecturers can be worried about how best to assess students! What.

OBTL for SCM Linda Lai November Shifts Teacher-centred Education to Student-Centred Education Constructive Alignment attributes of an ideal graduate.

Module design Setting aims and learning outcomes Dr. John Milliken School of Education Queens University Belfast.

» “Structure of Observed Learning Outcome” (SOLO) » It is a ‘taxonomy’: It classifies, categorises learning. » It describes increasingly complex stages.

Quality Questioning Using the SOLO Taxonomy An online workshop

To Lecture or not to lecture? That is the question Dr. Julian Hermida Algoma University Teaching Forum Academic Standards and Teaching & Learning Committee.

Observation System Kidderminster College June 2012.

Biggs’ Constructive Alignment: Evaluation of a Pedagogical Model Applied to a Web Course

The Year of the Curriculum : Life Without Levels The programme consists of a Bridging Unit and five further units: (Have you completed the Bridging Unit.

GOOD MORNING. 2 Objectives of Learning VANAJA.M Assistant Professor Department of Education Acharya Nagarjuna University.

Engaging Pupils Religious Education Quality Circle January 18 th 2006.

Where Great Teaching Begins Rachel Beech CI 843 Spring 2012.

Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.

School Conference 2010 Vicki Lewis & Liza Rossie.

What has this got to do with NCEA?

Biggs & Collis (1982) SOLO Taxonomy Overview and ideas for use Robin Trangmar Coleg Llandrillo.

Planning Higher Order Skills into Teaching for Deep Learning Session 7.

Visible NQTs Session 4 February Learning Intentions & Success Criteria By the end of the session you will have a clear understanding of learning.

Assessment Life after Levels Autumn First response:

It's great fun doing new things with computers, designing "Inquiry Models" and putting on our "Thinking Hats", but unless we increase the learning and.

1 Setting Appropriate Assessment and Grading Criteria.

Page 1 Formative and Summative Assessment by TIE, Melanie Hurley, Learning Specialist.

ZU students as critical thinkers Preferred learning styles –Surface learning –Structured learning –Rote learning –Memorizing.

Constructive Alignment One approach to curriculum development

Clarity about Learning. Assessment For Learning Archway of Teaching Capabilities Clarity about what is to be learnt Learning Intentions success criteria.

Alexandra Hugman, Teaching Science for Deeper Meaning, The University of Sydney, 2008 Assessment Internal- Working with Teams - Working with Peers External.

TLC Sixth Form Teaching The issues: Students disliked independent learning as it allowed room for mistakes to creep through unchecked. This led to a lack.

Chapter 4. Chapter 4 Determining Learning Outcomes 1. LEARNING OUTCOMES 2. ASSESSMENT 3. TEACHING 4. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOP MATERIALS Buy – Adapt - Develop.

A. EDUCATORS PRACTICE IS DELIBERATE B. BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE LINK BETWEEN TEACHING PRACTICE AND LEARNING OUTCOMES Ka Hikitia- Asmita.

Teaching and Learning Activities for Deep Learning Dr. Julian Hermida Algoma University Workshop on Teaching and Learning February 18, 2009.

Concept Mapping concept Related Link. Opening Questions What does it mean when a student says “I understand?” Does it mean something different for every.

Going SOLO Using SOLO Taxonomy to raise the quality of learning to “out of this world.”

Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.

Planning Visible Learning Focus

ITU Seminar on Teaching & Learning Claus Brabrand ((( ))) ((( ))) Associate Professor, IT University.

Google options - formats, wonderwheel, timeline Locating info on the page - Find for keywords.

My level of thinking and learning is… TASK: Prestructural I’m not sure about … Unistructural I have one relevant idea about … Multistructural I have several.

Making marking easy(er!) Butterfly. Why do we mark? So we know how well the students are doing and what we need to do to get them to improve So the students.

SOLO Taxonomy SOLO Taxonomy. What level is your understanding of SOLO taxonomy.

© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.

What is the connection between outstanding learning and ‘The Wizard of Oz’? Write your ideas on a post - it.

Numeracy and Maths Parent Workshop September 2015.

VLC Training 2014 Steve Walker

Reviewing your LDDC work

Please can you… List at least 5 things that are yellow If you have time keep going…can you get to 20?

...I did it and lived to share the lessons

Understanding Levels of Thinking using:

Visible Learning for Literacy

To introduce the ‘SOLO Taxonomy’ framework

Some ideas for 2015 “SOLO is our language of learning”

Biggs & Tang speak of the different types of motivation that we experience from our learners and the importance of the right type to drive deep learning.

How to make the Kessel Run in less than 12 par secs

Task: Place the symbols into categories

Understanding Levels of Thinking using:

at The Hollyfield School

Pinch Points: Planned Interventions in Science lessons

Planning Learning.

Presentation transcript:

SOLO Pam Hook and Julie Mills

Pre-structural Uni-structural Multi-structural Relational Extended Abstract

The SOLO levels I’m not sure about… Prestructural I have one relevant idea about… Unistructural I have several ideas about… Multistructural I have several ideas about… …and can relate them to the BIG PICTURE Relational I have several ideas about… …and can link them to the BIG PICTURE …and can look at these ideas in a new and different way Extended Abstract

In my classroom I find currently that SOLO provides a great framework for students to progress, where students learning becomes deeper as they move through the levels.

We are finding out about photosynthesis. State what photosynthesis is Identify what is needed and produced during photosynthesis. Connect these to produce an equation for photosynthesis. Compare and contrast the processes of osmosis and diffusion. Explain why plants need energy for active transport. Relate the importance of photosynthesis to its functions and predict the consequences of a reduction in photosynthesis on the future of our planet.

(Deep learning image from Tait Cole. SOLO level verbs and examples Adapted from Pam Hook & Julie Mills: SOLO Taxonomy: A Guide for Schools and using The SOLO taxonomy & constructive alignment

SOLO outcomes followed by some flipped learning, practical work and FAIL Critique of work Students decide success criteria for their redraft. Students decide WGW & EBI

Why do I think you should use it? It is excellent for both formative and summative assessment. It makes learning challenging but visible and provides a framework for progression. Its great for finding out what students know before you start and then at any point there after progress can be checked. It is easy to use when planning lessons or a scheme of work as you can scaffold the learning experiences for the outcomes (constructive alignment) at unistructural, multistructural, relational and extended abstract levels. It supports metacognition: what am I doing? – how well is it going? – what should I do next? Challenge can be provided through feedback and feed forward, which could be: teacher to student, student to teacher and student to student.

There are a growing number of people out there who are or have tried SOLO. Many are writing or have written about SOLO and are using SOLO in their everyday teaching. I highly recommend the following who have helped and inspired me on my SOLO journey: Pam Hook – - SOLO taxonomy a guide for schools pam Hook and Juliehttp://pamhook.com/ Biggs and Tang- Teaching for quality learning at university. (excellent introduction to constructive alignment amongst other things) Lisa Ashes – (excellent blogs on a range of topics including SOLO) “SOLO teaches pupils to make relationships between ideas and then use these to question ideas further.” David Didau – (excellent blogs that are always thought provoking) Tait Coles – (great blogs and some nice videos of a year 8 class new to SOLO) (great article from “Creative teaching and learning” p57)