1 A Study Of Anomalous Events In CMS-HF PMTs A. Halu, E. Gülmez, M. Deliömeroğlu Physics Department Boğaziçi University International Conference on Particle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress on ERT  0 efficiency study Spin PWG June 6,2002 LVL-1 meeting June 14,2002 Analysis meeting June 14,2002 Kensuke Okada.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
GEM DHCAL Simulation Studies J. Yu* Univ. of Texas at Arlington ALCW, July 15, 2003 Cornell University (*on behalf of the UTA team; S. Habib, V. Kaushik,
University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.
ECAL Testbeam Meeting, Rome 28 March 2007 Toyoko Orimoto Adolf Bornheim, Chris Rogan, Yong Yang California Institute of Technology Lastest Results from.
1 May 27, 2005 Comparison tower A data and Montecarlo OVERVIEW Comparison of MC (EM- v 4r060302p18 ) and tower A data using the “baseline” run (Run )
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Status of EMC background data Tim West University of Manchester.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
A Digital Hadron Calorimeter ? Vishnu V. Zutshi NIU/NICADD.
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.
Non-identified Two Particle Correlations from Run I Understanding drift chamber tracking – Tracker and candidatory – Two particle efficiencies/ghosts A.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
Preshower/Crack Upgrade Update Detector overview 2.W electron data 3.Simulation overview 4.Early tests of new simulation.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
CMS Calorimeter HB- HB+ HE- HE+ HF- HF+ HO-2 HO-1 HO0 HO+1 HO+2
Lead Fluoride Calorimeter for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory October 31 st 2008.
16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
7 May 2009Paul Dauncey1 Tracker alignment issues Paul Dauncey.
Hycal Energy Resolution, Timing, &Trigger Efficiency, A cumulative study. Chris Mauney.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
, Dan Peterson Apparent inconsistencies and other issues in the xBSM measurements of IBS Scans We have studied the pinhole and CodedAperture.
Some feedbacks from DRS data analysis (very preliminary) F. Scuri - I.N.F.N Sezione di Pisa RD52 – Collaboration Meeting – Pavia, March 12, 2013 F. Scuri.
10-Dec-2008 / S.KunoriHCAL Noise Identification and Monitoring1 HCAL Noise Identification and Filtering (HPD behavior and noise identification) Shuichi.
Feb 24, Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U.
Lucia Bortko | Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design | | IFJ PAN Krakow | Page 1/16 Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design Lucia.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Tracking Variable Study Follow up Ryan Kelley Boris Mangano Vivek Sharma.
2008/04/12APS April Meeting 1 Decomposition of Awayside Components of Dijet Correlation in Au+Au Collisions at √S NN = 200 GeV at PHENIX Chin-Hao Chen.
Influence of diffractive interactions on cosmic rays air showers ABSTRACT: A comparative study of commonly used hadronic collision simulation packages.
DREAM Coll. Meeting, Rome 2009F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa Template Analysis of DRS Data  Motivations  Preliminary results F. Bedeschi, R. Carosi, M. Incagli,
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Seoul National University Han-wool Ju CUNPA Kick-off Meeting Aug.22-23, 2013.
PMT AFTERPULSE STUDIES By Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa.
Sensitivity of HO to Muons Shashi Dugad for HO group India-CMS Meeting 6-7 Oct
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
Light mixer proposal Arjan Heering, Anton Karneyeu
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Dual Readout Clustering and Jet Finding
HERD Prototype Beam Test
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
TIB module performance at X5 Test beam – preliminary studies
HCAL Commissioning and Related Activities
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
Preliminary Results on Non-Projective HCal Simulations
Status report Minjung Kim
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Presentation transcript:

1 A Study Of Anomalous Events In CMS-HF PMTs A. Halu, E. Gülmez, M. Deliömeroğlu Physics Department Boğaziçi University International Conference on Particle Physics In Memoriam Engin Arık and Her Colleagues Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey October 27-31, 2008

2 Time Slices Do the anomalous events appear in time intervals other than the interval that the beam is incident on?  Check time slices...

3 100 GeV pion run, incident tower(tower 2) time slices 5 through 8

4 EM vs HAD channels How do the EM and HAD channels compare in terms of the number of anomalous events?  histograms for the sum of all towers...

5 EM alltowers charge (fC) HAD alltowers 300 GeV pion beam, all towers EM and HAD channels anomalous events real events

6 TS6 vs TS7 Concentrate on the time interval that the beam is incident in, namely the 6th and 7th time slices. How are they related?  scatter diagrams for incident tower and all other towers...

7 300 GeV pions, TS6 vs TS7 incident tower (tower 2) charge (fC) EM channel HAD channel

8 300 GeV pions, TS6 vs TS7 sum of all other towers charge (fC) Charge (fC) charge (fC) EM channel HAD channel

9 EM vs HAD channels How are the EM and HAD channels of an anomalous event related?  scatter diagrams for EM vs HAD channels, both for incident tower and all other towers.

10 charge (fC) 300 GeV pion beam, EM vs HAD incident tower (tower 2)

11 charge (fC) 300 GeV pion beam, EM vs HAD all other towers

12 EM/HAD energy ratios Do anomalous events generate comparable signals in both EM and HAD channels, as normal events do?  Investigate the behavior of EM/HAD and HAD/EM energy ratios...

GeV pions, EM/HAD ratio incident twr. all other twrs. Incident channel EM/HAD histogram displays a clear peak, justifying the existence of a correlation between the two channels for real events. Events with abnormally high signals in the EM channel do not have signals of comparable magnitude in the HAD channel. (events in the expected energy range) (events with Q > 8000 fC)

14 Conclusions Real events have comparable energies in both the EM and HAD channels whereas anomalous events lack such a correlation. This implies that the anomalous events were not collected the way they should have been. The effect seems to be amplified in towers behind which the readout boxes reside. Particles directly hitting the PMTs are most probably the cause of anomalous signals.

15 (Backup Slide) 300 GeV pions, HAD/EM ratio incident twr. all other twrs. Similarly, events with abnormally high signals in the HAD channel do not have signals of comparable magnitude in the EM channel. (events in the expected energy range) (events with Q > 8000 fC) The peak emerges again for the inverse ratio.