R119 Analysis Overview Joel Sander for numerous people.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
Advertisements

1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Neutron background measurements at LNGS Gian Luca Raselli INFN - Pavia JRA1 meeting, Paris 14 Feb
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Saclay, 04 / 11 / 2002 E. Perez 1 Simulation of the performances of the upgraded L1Cal  Short reminder  Performances (jets) (see Jovan’s talk for electron.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
Neutron background measurement at LNGS: present status Measurement carried out in collaboration between LNGS ILIAS-JRA1 and ICARUS groups.
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.
The SuperCDMS-SNOLAB Trigger System Report of the Trigger Task Force Scott Oser (co-chair), Dave Toback (co-chair), Dan Bauer, Anders Borgland, Ray Bunker,
From CDMSII to SuperCDMS Nader Mirabolfathi UC Berkeley INPAC meeting, May 2007, Berkeley (Marina) CDMSII : Current Status CDMSII Perspective Motivation.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
Surface events suppression in the germanium bolometers EDELWEISS experiment Xavier-François Navick (CEA Dapnia) TAUP Sendai September 07.
Dark Matter Search with SuperCDMS Results, Status and Future Wolfgang Rau Queen’s University.
SuperCDMS From Soudan to SNOLAB Wolfgang Rau Queen’s University.
Preliminary analysis of p-Pb data update n. 6 Lorenzo Bonechi LHCf Catania meeting – 19 December 2013.
Michael Unrau, Institut für Kernphysik Analyse von Bolometersignalen der EDELWEISS Dark Matter Suche EDELWEISS dark matter searchFull InterDigitized detector.
Experiment TGV II Multi-detector HPGe telescopic spectrometer for the study of double beta processes of 106 Cd and 48 Ca For TGV collaboration: JINR Dubna,
Dan Bauer - CDMS Project ManagerAll experimenters meeting - April 23, 2007 Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) Progress at Soudan since last summer Successful.
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
2005 Unbinned Point Source Analysis Update Jim Braun IceCube Fall 2006 Collaboration Meeting.
Various Rupak Mahapatra (for Angela, Joel, Mike & Jeff) Timing Cuts.
A maximum likelihood analysis of the CoGeNT public dataset Chris Kelso University of Utah Astroparticle Physics 2014 June 25, 2014 Work in progress with:
First Year S5 Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescences Drew Keppel 1 representing the LIGO/VIRGO Compact Binary Coalescence Group 1 California Institute of.
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
The SuperCDMS-SNOLAB Trigger System Report of the Trigger Task Force Scott Oser (co-chair), Dave Toback (co-chair), Dan Bauer, Anders Borgland, Ray Bunker,
Ray Bunker (UCSB) – APS – April 17 th, 2005 CDMS SUF Run 21 Low-Mass WIMP Search Ray Bunker Jan 17 th -DOE UCSB Review.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
The Surface Rejection with Position Information Gensheng Wang California Institute of Technology CDMS Collaboration Meeting, UCBS Feb. 11, 2005.
HKS collaboration 2008/5/16 Wedding Party 2008/5/10.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.
By: Daniel Coelho Matthew Szydagis Robert Svoboda Improving Electron / Gamma Separation LBNE Software Fermilab, ILFebruary 1, 2013.
IC-22 Point Source Analysis with Unbinned Maximum Likelihood C. Finley, J. Dumm, T. Montaruli 2008 May 2.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
Status of ULE-HPGe Experiment for WIMP Search in YangYang
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
The Heidelberg Dark Matter Search Experiment
Converted photons efficiency
Clarence Chang CDMS Collaboration Meeting Feb 11-12, 2005 UCSB
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Harry Nelson UCSB DUSEL Henderson at Stony Brook May 5, 2006
CRESST Cryogenic Rare Event Search with Superconducting Thermometers
Electron Observations from ATIC and HESS
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
Status of ECAL Optimization Study
杨勇 上海交通大学 On Behalf of the Collaboration 粒子物理数据分析基础和前沿研讨会,2016/9/13
Comparisons of data/mc using down-going muons
FFT analysis Goal : Energy calibration ( systematic error estimation)
2000 Diffuse Analysis Jessica Hodges, Gary Hill, Jodi Cooley
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Samples and MC Selection
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

R119 Analysis Overview Joel Sander for numerous people

What This Talk Should Be R119 Overview Cuts & Efficiencies Data Quality Band & Qinner Timing Cut Known issues with the data What remains to be done Timeline to a result Not ^

Gaps due to extra calibration runs R119 Overview 12 Detector run from March 25 th through August 8 th 6 Ge detectors Collected ~70 live days of low background data during 137 calendar days 50% low background efficiency due to extra calibration runs interspersed throughout 7 million gamma calibration events 200k neutron calibration events Flash detectors every 4hrs to maintain neutralization

Data Quality – Z11 Near ydelay = -20, Z9 (G31) has a discrete change in charge collected. No other detector has this feature. Z11 has a high number of barium calibration events with slow timing parameters and low yield. The slow timing/low yield events appear to be coming from the strange region.

Data Quality – Charge Threshold The charge threshold can affect the efficiency of the lowest energy bin…how low can the charge threshold go? 1) Misfit likelihood increases 2) Guarantee no zero-charge NR events Simulate charge traces with white noise To keep expected leakage of gamma events into the NR band < 0.1, the minimum analysis threshold, pric = 7 keV. Charge threshold cut at 3.85 sigma keeps keeps number of zero-charge NR events < 0.01.

Data Quality – Trigger Efficiencies I Run 119 tower 1 trigger efficiencies are comparable to run 118 trigger efficiencies.

pt (keV) Tower 2 Trigger Efficiencies Efficiency pt (keV) Efficiency Tower 1 Trigger Efficiencies Data Quality – Trigger Efficiencies II Tower 1 trigger efficiencies similar to R118 Tower 2 germanium trigger efficiencies worse than Tower1 Tower 2 silicon trigger efficiencies better than Tower1 Trigger efficiencies don’t reach 100% for all detectors pt (keV)

Gamma & Nuclear Recoil Bands Gamma calibration events Neutron calibration events Ge Z9 Er Band Efficiency from Barium Ge Z9 Er Band Efficiency from Background Si pric (keV)

Neutron Q inner Cut Estimate efficiency for neutrons passing Q inner cut (blue efficiciencies) Correct for ‘funnel’ and ‘rain down’ events Re-estimate efficiency for corrected neutrons passing Q inner cut (red efficiencies)

R118 Z3 Efficiency Efficiency comparable to r118 Timing Cut Goal: A fraction of an event leakage  pric (keV) Efficiency Worst neutron efficiency shown (excluding T1Z1)

Filter Noise Traces in Ba Series _2123 Unusually high noise power at low frequencies Resulting optimal filter low frequency weighting is abnormally low 62.3 keV event found in noise trace sample – passes DarkPipe pulse rejection routine → bug in code At least 6 r119 & 1 r118 Ba series, as well as 5 r118 background series exhibit similar symptoms – need to evaluate the extent of the problem and reprocess accordingly Other datasets show weaker symptoms – are they ok? qsum / prg Yield shift for Z11 in dataset _1528 Count

What Remains to be Done Understand impact of events contaminating some noise traces How many datasets does this effect? Update bad events cut results from darksnoop results from recent KS tests contamination of noise traces Some cuts still need to be checked timing cut Qinner cut Leakage estimates must be made Are we confident that we have found all bugs? If not when will we be?

What is the Timeline to a Result? Current time line: by 21 st : complete analysis unblind eliminate all bugs by April APS: double check result write PRL present new result!