Sensitivity of HO to Muons Shashi Dugad for HO group India-CMS Meeting 6-7 Oct.-2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test for the CLAS12 RICH detector L. Barion, M. Contalbrigo, L. Pappalardo (INFN Ferrara) V. Lucherini, M. Mirazita, P. Rossi (INFN Frascati) M. Turisini.
Advertisements

2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
HCAL RBX PRR Overview Jim Freeman RBX PRR March 1-2, 2001.
HCAL TB2002 CPT Week, CERN, 05-Nov-2002, S.Kunori1 HB TB2002 Some Results Shuichi Kunori Jordan Damgov 05-Nov-2002.
CMS Outer Hadron Calorimeter (HO) Project Naba K Mondal Tata Institute, Mumbai, India.
Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.
Simulation Workshop on CMS Calorimetry, Ooty, Feb 18 – 20, HCAL Status CMS HCAL Status Jim Freeman.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement.
ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
We observe two classes of anomalous signals in HCAL 2) Cherenkov light produced by interactions in the window of the Forward Calorimeter PMTs ¼ photoelectrons.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Leroy Nicolas, HESS Calibration results, 28 th ICRC Tsukuba Japan, August Calibration results of the first two H·E·S·S· telescopes Nicolas Leroy.
MTCC –II & HCAL noise chasing Mandakini Patil India-CMS meeting Jan07 Shantiniketan.
HCAL1 Status 2003 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance 2003 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Tests in muon halo beam.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
October 2002US CMS HCAL at BU1 US CMS HCAL Meeting Boston University Vasken Hagopian Florida State University.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
CALOR2006 June 7, Julie Whitmore Fermilab Overview of the CMS Hadron Calorimeter.
Montpellier, November 15, 2003 J. Cvach, TileHCAL and APD readout1 TileHCAL- fibre readout by APD APDs and preamplifiers Energy scan with DESY beam –Energy.
CMS Upgrade Workshop – Nov 20, H C A L Upgrade Workshop CMS HCAL Working Group FE Electronics: New QIE Nov 20, 2007 People interested in QIE10 development:
CMS Calorimeter HB- HB+ HE- HE+ HF- HF+ HO-2 HO-1 HO0 HO+1 HO+2
STATUS OF HO Sudhakar Katta TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS meeting, Delhi 27 th Sept 2007.
Motivation General rule for muon triggers: Never neglect a possible backup reduction factor. It will always come back to you. Even if RPC trigger works.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC -- Photon sensor mini workshop 05/9/16 University Niigata University.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Some feedbacks from DRS data analysis (very preliminary) F. Scuri - I.N.F.N Sezione di Pisa RD52 – Collaboration Meeting – Pavia, March 12, 2013 F. Scuri.
10-Dec-2008 / S.KunoriHCAL Noise Identification and Monitoring1 HCAL Noise Identification and Filtering (HPD behavior and noise identification) Shuichi.
Progress and plans for HO Installation S. Dugad, K. Sudhakar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research India-CMS Meeting at BARC, July 2005.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
DREAM Coll. Meeting, Rome 2009F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa Template Analysis of DRS Data  Motivations  Preliminary results F. Bedeschi, R. Carosi, M. Incagli,
Status of HO Installation Shashi Dugad Tata Institute of Fundamental Research India-CMS Collaboration Meeting, Chandigar April 2007.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
ZDC Status A.Mestvirishvili Iowa. Quite while we had some problems with ZDC, QIE saturations, Reflections, Noise etc. To improve the situation several.
HCAL1 Status 2004 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance in 2004 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Stability in 2003 Led.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
20 April 2007MICE Tracker Phone Meeting1 Analysis of cosmic/self-triggerd data of station 5 Hideyuki Sakamoto MICE Tracker Phone Meeting 20 th April 2007.
SRS TIMING ANOMALY RD51 Mini-Week June 9, 2015 M. Phipps, BNL 1.
Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda ( Univ. of Tsukuba)
HCAL Fall meeting, Nov 11-13,`04 HCAL digital optic link and trigger mapping Ianos Schmidt The university of Iowa.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
SiPM linearization status update
Light mixer proposal Arjan Heering, Anton Karneyeu
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
Roberto Chierici - CERN
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
HCAL – SiPM upgrade requirements
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
BESIII EMC electronics
Development of hybrid photomultiplier for Hyper-Kamiokande
Correlation of HO signal with DT
Status of the Calibration
Presentation transcript:

Sensitivity of HO to Muons Shashi Dugad for HO group India-CMS Meeting 6-7 Oct.-2003

Sensitivity of HO to Muons Shashi Dugad India-CMS Meeting 6-7 Oct.-2003

HO Setup 1 Sector (6 Trays) of Ring-1, Ring-2 and 5- Trays of Ring-0 hooked up in the testbeam 2 Readout Box (RBX) of HB configuration containing 4 HPD each were provided for optical readout of HO towers –20,30,30 towers each in Ring-0,1,2 respectively –Eta-tower=5 (Ring-1) cannot be connected due to constraints from RBX

HO Readout Only 4-HPD (18 towers each) could be connected to DAQ system at any time Depending on the beam direction, following configuration chosen; RBX-2 RBX-1 Ring-0 Ring-1 HPD 1,2 RBX-1 Ring-1 Ring-2 HPD 1,2 HPD 3,4 RBX-2 Ring-0 HPD 1,2 HPD 3

HO Read Out Signal Flow: –Tile  Pigtail  Optical Cable  HPD  QIE  Transducer  Optical fiber communication cable  HTR Charge data from each tile is readout at every 25 nSec and stored on trigger –Data from 20 time slices (500 nSec) is stored for each event RBX-1RBX-2 Ring # Tray # HPD4 HPD3 HPD2 HPD ,5,6 1,2,3 HPD4 HPD3 HPD2 HPD ,5 2,3

Muon Runs Muons of 225 GeV shooted in each tower 10 K events taken for each tower Data is stored in root-tuple – Data read through HTBDAQ library All HB towers upto Phi_tower = 6 scanned All HO towers from Phi=2-6 scanned except one tower in each phi-strip

Analysis Average charge/slice distribution obtained Latency: Distribution of Slice# giving max. charge obtained Signal contained in 5-time slice for HO and 7-time slices for HB detector –Higher signal width as compared to last year data Signal charge obtained by summing time slices in HO Signal charge obtained by summing 0-4 time slices in HO S/B Ratio = Signal Peak/Ped. RMS

S/B Ratio Study Charge readout by 4 different capacitor banks –Each of them may have different ped. peak and RMS Obtain noise distribution as per Cap-ID S/B does not change with Cap-ID correction Signal charge is dominantly coming from 3-time slices –Obtain S/B for 3- time slices –Obtain S/B by choosing slice with max. charge and then summing in 3- slices Signal increases with HV –Obtain S/B at diff. HV

Summary of S/B Ratio Study Signal Strength and S/B Ratio for HO Detector –3d  Dynamic selection of 3-slices Ring # #of SlicesAvg.Peak (fC) S/B using Peak Avg. Mean (fC) S/B using Mean d d d

HO for Muon Trigger Important to see effect of noise on trigger efficiency –Signal Eff.(Q) = Fractional area beyond Q for signal run –Purity(Q) = 1. – Fractional area beyond Q for pedestal run –Signal Eff. And Purity obtained at different values of Q for each tile Ring-1 has low purity at moderate efficiency, need to enhance signal strength –Sort HPD’s by QE –Enhance HV to HPD

Summary Clean muon signal seen in all HO towers –No dead channels S/B Ratio: –4.5 for Ring-0, 2.2 Ring-1 and 3 for Ring-2 No significant improvement with 3-time slice signal size or CapID criteria Latency: Signal Peak Charge has a spread in 3-slices Ring0, Ring2 has reasonable purity at high efficiency, Ring-1 needs improvement –30% improvement in KV –Pre-selection of HPD expected to improve S/B by another 20-30%

LASER CALIBRATION SETUP Only 1 of the RBX (HO-1, located behind Ring-2) was lighted with laser light pulses Data from Spigot=11,12,13 used for analysis –Spigot-14 had problem with 3-channels in the readout Run#EventsAttenuation

High Intensity LASER Runs Light Intensity correction using PIN is important and depends upon the accuracy with which PIN signal is measured? –Should be much better than statistical accuracy of HPD pixel signal (~1% at high intensity) Light intensity correction can be obtained by summing of normalized HPD pixel signal –Statistical accuracy of this would be 1/Sqrt(N) better than the pixel (N=3*18 for this dataset) –This will work provided systematic effects are much smaller than statistical accuracy Usage of high intensity runs depends on deeper understanding of these issues –LOW intensity runs (9535, 9537) are used in the current analysis

Analysis Get ped. and signal distribution for each HPD pixel and PIN diode at different LASER intensity. – 7-time used for obtaining signal charge (7-13 for HPD and 3-9 for PIN) Get intensity correction using normalized PIN and HPD signal distribution Apply intensity correction and re-obtain signal distribution –Get peak and sigma using gaussian fit Tails seen signal distribution –Using these parameters, obtain # of p.e. and calibration factor (#of p.e./fC) for each pixel at each intensity

Results Low intensity runs gives calibration factors of 3.6  0.2 p.e./fC Variation of calib factors among different pixels are not very high Intensity corrections can be obtained form HPD itself Bright intensity runs could not be used for obtaining calibration factors