Levels of Engagement of Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Living in Community Group Homes Renáta Tichá, PhD Sherri Larson, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Defining and Measuring Excellence in the Beginning College Experience Betsy O. Barefoot & John N.
Pat Brown, EdD University of Washington Center for Technology and Disability Studies
Classroom-Based Interventions for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Joseph Wehby Associate Professor Special Education, Peabody College.
Mayo Brain Injury Outpatient Program: Methods and Outcomes James F. Malec, PhD Professor, Professor, Mayo Clinic and Medical School Rochester, MN USA.
June 2014 NCSC Commitment to Student Communicative Competence.
The Illinois Autism Training and Technical Assistance Project Kathy Gould, Project Director IATTAP Lombard State Office 1590.
Family Quality of Life and Application Among People with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Families Professor Robert L. Schalock, Ph.D. Institute of.
Preliminary Feedback from ACGME CLER Site Visit August 19-21, 2014
Providing Services to Young Children with Disabilities through Inclusive Child Care Dubai International Rehabilitation Forum March 7, :40-13:00.
USDE and DHHS Listening and Learning Panel on Family Engagement
Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Mark Olson and Renáta Tichá Active Support.
Person Centered Planning -- As Established in “The State Plan: A Blueprint for Change”
Special Education in the Calgary Board of Education Presented by: Debra Caso-Rohland Pat Loewen.
For more information, please contact Jonny Andia at 1.
Introduction to Occupational Therapy. Introduction Thank you for having me. My name is _____ I am an (occupational therapist).
Issues in Research on Minority Populations Charlotte Brown, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychiatry Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic PMBC Summer.
Transition Assessments Matrix Great Prairie AEA Transition Coordinators  Transition Assessment  Living, Learning and Working.
The Vision Implementation Project
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
State Health Access Reform Evaluation Lynn A. Blewett, Ph.D. State Health Access Data Assistance Center State Coverage Initiatives (SCI) National Meeting.
Person Centred Active Support It ain’t what we do it’s ‘just’ the way that we do it ! Promoting Active Engagement.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Inclusive Education Defining Inclusive Education Inclusive Education(IE): “ …Means that all students in a school regardless of their differences are.
2010 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION REPORT SUMMARY The provision of training and technical assistance (TA) to provider agencies is an integral component.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Balancing Incentive Program and Community First Choice Eric Saber Health Policy Analyst Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Acknowledgments: Data for this study were collected as part of the CIHR Team: GO4KIDDS: Great Outcomes for Kids Impacted by Severe Developmental Disabilities.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Statewide Head Injury Program (SHIP) MA Rehabilitation Commission.
Ted Price, Ph.D. West Virginia University Workshop Facilitator September 16, 2010.
Professional Administrative Support for Adult Learning Pro- SAL PROJECT INFORMATION.
Arbitre Consulting, Inc.
Nursing Facility Transition and Diversion Module 2: Independent Living and Person-Centered Planning.
Tamar Heller, Katie Arnold, Lieke van Heumen Elizabeth McBride, & Alan Factor Growing Older with a Disability Toronto, June 6, 2011 Rehabilitation Research.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
Integrated Specialized Services 2005 Inclusion Institute Chapel Hill, NC Peggy Freund, Ph.D. National Individualizing Preschool Inclusion Project Center.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Clinton County RESA Early On ® Training & Technical Assistance Higher Education Introduction to: Developing Functional IFSP Outcomes to Meet the Unique.
Early Childhood Special Education. Dunst model interest engagement competence mastery.
COACHING. Coaching focuses on partnering with families. This is a shift from the expert telling parents what to do in a top down fashion to a coach who.
1 Establishing Spanish- and English- Speaking CBT Groups for Depression in a Training Clinic Velma Barrios, Ph.D. Margareth Del Cid Ashley Elefant Palo.
Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities
An Update of One Aspect of Monitoring, Support and Technical Assistance Available Through the State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education.
University of Minnesota Minnesota Department of Human Services Minnesota Positive Behavior Support Initiative.
STRONG FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IS CENTRAL TO EFFECTIVE SCHOOL REFORM Jan Patterson and Ann Bliss Smarter Schools National Partnerships Key Reform.
School Readiness and Early Childhood Special Education – Ready Children & Ready Schools Scott McConnell, Ph.D. Professor, Educational Psychology & Affiliate,
Final-placement Meeting 18 October Demonstrate the ability to identify and apply appropriate methods of intervention, describe their theoretical.
Title of Study : Preliminary findings from “An evaluation of the impact of the inclusion of a "Health and Well Being Module" in the undergraduate curriculum.
Home and Community- Based Services: Creating Systems for Success at Home, at Work and in the Community A REPORT FOR THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY.
 Occupational Therapy???.  Occupational Therapy is a health profession that views “health” as a balance of psychological, social, emotional, spiritual.
1 This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under.
Promoting evidence based crisis prevention, intervention & recovery services for people with developmental disabilities &/or mental health support needs.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Person-centered Practice
Orphaned Children Morrison and Ellwood (2000):
Partners with Business
PERSON CENTERED APPROACH
Active Support “It ain’t what we do it’s the way that we do it” Norma Wood Claire Reynolds adapted with.
The Heart of Student Success
What is Community Living?
Convention on Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD)
NYC Family Meeting; Updates for Self-Direction
Some Further Considerations in Combining Single Case and Group Designs
Presentation transcript:

Levels of Engagement of Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Living in Community Group Homes Renáta Tichá, PhD Sherri Larson, PhD Xueqin (Shirley) Qian, MEd Research and Training Center on Community Living Institute on Community Integration University of Minnesota 1

Agenda What is the Institute on Community Integration (ICI) What the Research and Training Center on Community Living (RTC)? What is Active Support (AS)? What is engagement? Overview of the Active Support Project Report baseline results Conclusions/summary Next steps

Institute on Community Integration (ICI) The Institute on Community Integration (ICI) was established in 1985 at the University of Minnesota. We are a federally designated University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCEDD), part of a national network of similar programs in major universities and teaching hospitals across the country. The Institute is home to over 80 projects and 5 Affiliated Centers addressing disability issues across the lifespan.national network ICI videoclip –

Research and Training Center on Community Living (RTC) Is located within ICI Provides research, evaluation, training, technical assistance and dissemination to support the aspirations of persons with developmental disabilities to live full, productive and integrated lives in their communities

Active Support (AS) Study Background Randomized control trial testing efficacy of AS intervention Started in 2008 and finishes this September Collected baseline data on staff assistance, talk, praise, etc. and social and non-social engagement of 78 people with IDD in 20 community group homes

What is Active Support? A training and organizational approach originally developing in the UK and Australia Designed to increase capacity of DSPs to plan for and/or engage people in skill development, meaningful daily activities, and new opportunities Designed to increase levels of engagement in everyday activities of persons being supported 6

Hotel Model

Community-Based Services People’s Lives: Smaller, more typical home settings Expectations increased (choice, PCP, inclusion), but not specific methods Focus on Health and Safety remain Teaching & skills building emphasized more at school At home: still often bored, depressed, lack of positive roles DSP Roles: Teacher/instructor Scheduler/decider Parental substitute

Why Bother with Active Support? Studies have shown that even in community settings: People supported are often disengaged from their life Staff time is spent doing for or to rather than supporting the lives of people with disabilities High need = Low engagement

Engagement Degree of meaningful involvement in one’s own life –Daily activities –Social interactions Associated with health and other quality of life outcomes for people with IDD

Engagement Example Videoclip 11

AS Changes the DSP Job From a “hotel model” (DSPs do things for people) to active support model (DSPs do things with people) Learn how to think and act beyond 1 day, 1 shift (increased emphasis on planning communicating, & team work) Learn to incorporate people in every aspect of daily living, right now, regardless of impairment Shifting of who is “responsible” for things around the house (DSPs help people carry out their responsibilities) 12

Outcomes for People Supported People have something to do and do less waiting People are socially engaged as well as physically engaged People are trying new things People are using their skills and abilities 13

AS Study Results Overview The following section of my talk will focus on our findings based on the baseline data for 78 participants in 20 community group homes in MN

Research Questions (1)What proportion of the time are individuals with IDD in group homes engaged in meaningful activities? (2)To what extent individual characteristics, staff behaviors, and house/organizational factors predict overall engagement level?

Participants –Individuals with IDD (n=78) Average age = 41 years old 53% were male 23% had mild, 26% moderate, 17% severe, and 35% profound disabilities 56% used speech for communication, and the rest used AAC –Staff (n=121) 18% had high school diploma and 18% had a college degree –Supervisors (n=20)

VariableMeasures Social engagementDirect observation Nonsocial engagementDirect observation Staff assistanceDirect observation Adaptive behaviorThe Inventory for Client and Agency Planning (ICAP). Maladaptive behaviorICAP AgeICAP TenureReported by supervisors Turnovercalculated by dividing the number of staff left in the last 12 months by the sum of current staff and number of staff needed to fill the vacancy (Larson et al., 1998). Staff competenceDirect Support Professional Competency Assessment Management practiceManagement Practice Questionnaire (Mansell, 1995)

Direct Observation Method Tapp, J., Wehby, J. H., & Ellis, D. N. (1992). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies (M.O.O.S.E.S). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.

Direct Observation Results Engagement and staff assistance Level of Intellectual Impairment n Social Engagement Nonsocial Engagement Staff Assistance Mild (19.28)46.92 (23.22)3.27 (4.26) Moderate (12.30)47.74 (19.39)5.19 (6.05) Severe (5.19)27.86 (21.01)4.60 (4.14) Profound (9.21)20.49 (22.89)4.04 (5.10) Total (15.14)35.01 (24.72)4.19 (4.92)

Direct observation results: Individuals with disabilities (80 minutes of observations, n=78)

Multilevel Results We found that group variables, i.e. home where the individual lives, is a significant predictor of both nonsocial and social engagement outcomes even after individual variables, e.g. adaptive behavior of consumers, have been accounted for

Predicting Nonsocial Engagement Both adaptive and maladaptive behavior were significant predictors Overall house effect (random) was also a significant predictor of non- social engagement but no additional level-2 predictors were The model accounted for 37% of variability between houses

Predicting Social Engagement Adaptive behavior was a significant predictor Consumer age bordered on being a significant Staff competence was a significant house-level predictor over and above hour random effect The model accounted for 22% of variability between houses

ICAP Adaptive Behavior Index 1.Motor skills 2.Social and communication skills 3.Personal living skills 4.Community living skills Main criterion is independence

ICAP Maladaptive Index 1.Hurtful to self 2.Hurtful to others 3.Destructive to property 4.Disruptive behavior 5.Unusual/repetitive habits 6.Socially offensive behavior 7.Withdrawn or inattentive behavior 8.Uncooperative behavior

Study Conclusions Before an AS intervention is implemented, –only consumer behavior (adaptive and maladaptive) makes a difference in the level of nonsocial engagement of consumers –Consumer adaptive behavior, age, and the way supervisors evaluate their staff competence effects the level of social engagement of consumers

What does it all mean? Engagement in one’s own life provides for a better life quality for people with disabilities This study has shown that on average people with IDD are engaged in nonsocial activities 35% of the time, only 12% in social interactions People with more severe disabilities tend to be less engaged overall

What does it all mean? Cont. People with IDD who’s behavior enables them to live more independently are more likely to be engaged in their life while living in community group homes Younger people with IDD tend to be more socially engaged Culture of the group home makes a difference in people’s nonsocial and social engagement People with IDD who have more competent staff tend to be more socially engaged

Next Steps We are in the process of analyzing the data to determine the effectiveness of the Active Support (AS) intervention on consumer engagement in US community group homes over time We are also looking at the effectiveness of AS on additional outcomes, e.g. staff skills

Contact Information Renáta Tichá, PhD, , Sheryl Larson, PhD, Research and Training Center on Community Living, University of Minnesota, Pattee Hall, 150 Pillsbury Drive SE Minneapolis, MN

Thank you for joining us! What else would you like to know? 34