Suggestion for Optical Implementation of Hadamard Gate Amir Feizpour Physics Department Sharif University of Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Evidence That Quantum Mechanics Is Hard to Simulate on Classical Computers Scott Aaronson Parts based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
Advertisements

A Comparison of Two CNOT Gate Implementations in Optical Quantum Computing Adam Kleczewski March 2, 2007.
Quantum Logic and Quantum gates with Photons
Quantum algorithms in the presence of decoherence: optical experiments Masoud Mohseni, Jeff Lundeen, Kevin Resch and Aephraim Steinberg Department of Physics,
Quantum Computing Uf H Nick Bonesteel
Trapped Ions and the Cluster State Paradigm of Quantum Computing Universität Ulm, 21 November 2005 Daniel F. V. JAMES Department of Physics, University.
Experimental quantum information processing - the of the art Nadav Katz A biased progress report Contact: Quantum computation.
Electrons on Liquid Helium
Analysis of the Superoperator Obtained by Process Tomography of the Quantum Fourier Transform in a Liquid-State NMR Experiment Joseph Emerson Dept. of.
Quantum Entanglement of Rb Atoms Using Cold Collisions ( 韓殿君 ) Dian-Jiun Han Physics Department Chung Cheng University.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Ion Trap Quantum Computer. Two Level Atom as a qubit Electron on lower orbit Electron on higher orbit.
Optical Qubits Li Wang Physics 576 3/9/2007. Q.C. Criteria Scalability: OK Initialization to fiducial state: Easy Measurement: Problematic Long decoherence.
Quantum Oracles Jesse Dhillon, Ben Schmid, & Lin Xu CS/Phys C191 Final Project December 1, 2005.
An Algebraic Foundation for Quantum Programming Languages Andrew Petersen & Mark Oskin Department of Computer Science The University of Washington.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.
Quantum Computation Using Optical Lattices Ben Zaks Victor Acosta Physics 191 Prof. Whaley UC-Berkeley.
Dogma and Heresy in Quantum Computing DoRon Motter February 18, 2002.
An Arbitrary Two-qubit Computation in 23 Elementary Gates or Less Stephen S. Bullock and Igor L. Markov University of Michigan Departments of Mathematics.
Quantum Computers Todd A. Brun Communication Sciences Institute USC.
Real Quantum Computers Sources Richard Spillman Mike Frank Mike Frank Julian Miller Isaac Chuang, M. Steffen, L.M.K. Vandersypen, G. Breyta, C.S. Yannoni,

Quantum Algorithms Preliminaria Artur Ekert. Computation INPUT OUTPUT Physics Inside (and outside) THIS IS WHAT OUR LECTURES WILL.
Quantum Information Processing
Quantum computing Alex Karassev. Quantum Computer Quantum computer uses properties of elementary particle that are predicted by quantum mechanics Usual.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Barry C. Sanders IQIS, University of Calgary, CQCT, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, Implementations of Quantum.
Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)
Liquid State NMR Quantum Computing
Requirements and Desiderata for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing Daniel Gottesman Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Beyond the DiVincenzo Criteria.
From Bits to Qubits Wayne Viers and Josh Lamkins
Quantum computation: Why, what, and how I.Qubitology and quantum circuits II.Quantum algorithms III. Physical implementations Carlton M. Caves University.
Implementation of Quantum Computing Ethan Brown Devin Harper With emphasis on the Kane quantum computer.
The Road to Quantum Computing: Boson Sampling Nate Kinsey ECE 695 Quantum Photonics Spring 2014.
Introduction to quantum computation Collaboration: University of Illinois Angbo Fang, Gefei Qian (Phys) theoretical modeling John Tucker (ECE) design of.
You Did Not Just Read This or did you?. Quantum Computing Dave Bacon Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Washington Lecture 3:
Quantum Computing Paola Cappellaro
QUANTUM COMPUTING What is it ? Jean V. Bellissard Georgia Institute of Technology & Institut Universitaire de France.
“Experimental quantum computers” or, the secret life of experimental physicists 1 – Qubits in context Hideo Mabuchi, Caltech Physics and Control & Dynamical.
Quantum teleportation via photonic Faraday rotation Juan-Juan Chen ( 陈娟娟 ) Advisor: Jun-Hong An.
Quantum Computing and Quantum Programming Language
Efficient measure of scalability Cecilia López, Benjamin Lévi, Joseph Emerson, David Cory Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering, Massachusetts Institute.
Gang Shu  Basic concepts  QC with Optical Driven Excitens  Spin-based QDQC with Optical Methods  Conclusions.
Quantum Computing: An Overview for non-specialists Mikio Nakahara Department of Physics & Research Centre for Quantum Computing Kinki University, Japan.
Quantum Computing & Algorithms
Mesoscopic Physics Introduction Prof. I.V.Krive lecture presentation Address: Svobody Sq. 4, 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Rooms. 5-46, 7-36, Phone: +38(057)707.
Basic Q.C. One moose, two moose Red moose, blue moose Live moose, dead moose.
1 Quantum Computation with coupled quantum dots. 2 Two sides of a coin Two different polarization of a photon Alignment of a nuclear spin in a uniform.
Jonathan P. Dowling OPTICAL QUANTUM COMPUTING quantum.phys.lsu.edu Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Department of Physics and Astronomy Quantum.
IPQI-2010-Anu Venugopalan 1 qubits, quantum registers and gates Anu Venugopalan Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univeristy Delhi _______________________________________________.
Quantum Computing
Optimization of Quantum Circuits for Interaction Distance in
An Introduction to Quantum Computation Sandy Irani Department of Computer Science University of California, Irvine.
Quantum Computing Are We There Yet?
Christopher Monroe Joint Quantum Institute and Department of Physics NIST and University of Maryland Quantum Computation and Simulation.
1 An Introduction to Quantum Computing Sabeen Faridi Ph 70 October 23, 2007.
TC, U. Dorner, P. Zoller C. Williams, P. Julienne
Four wave mixing in submicron waveguides
Superconducting artificial atoms coupled to 1D open space
Quantum Computing from theory to experiments
MIT: Education & Outreach
Coherent interactions at a distance provide a powerful tool for quantum simulation and computation. The most common approach to realize an effective long-distance.
Catching photons for the future of computing
Optical qubits
Quantum Teleportation
Coupled atom-cavity system
Quantum Information with Continuous Variables
Quantum Computing Dorca Lee.
Linear Optical Quantum Computing
Presentation transcript:

Suggestion for Optical Implementation of Hadamard Gate Amir Feizpour Physics Department Sharif University of Technology

Contents of my talk  Motivation  Implementation Methods  Optical Implementations  The main Problem  Solution  Model Proposed  Results Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Why QI & QC?  Quantum Computation  Reduces the needed steps to accomplish a certain job  Quantum Information  Reduces the amount of data needed to transmit a certain amount of Information Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Quantum Computer  DiVincenzo’s Criteria  A scalable physical system with well characterized qubits.  The ability to initialize the state of the qubits to a simple fiducial state.  A universal set of quantum gates such as generic one-qubit gates and a two-qubit gate.  A qubit-specific measurement capability.  Long relevant decoherence times, much longer than the gate operation time. Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Implementation Candidates  NMR  Ion trap and neutral atom trap  Schemes based on solid state physics  Quantum dot qubits  Superconducting qubits  Schemes based on quantum optics Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Why Photons?  Advantages of using photons as qubit  Quantum optics is a well developed field.  Photons decohere slowly.  Photons travel well.  Photons can be experimented with at room temperature. Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

How to use optics?  From the view point of qubit  Single photon,  Coherent states.  From the view point of gates  Linear optics,  Non-linear optics. Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Optical Schemes  Early optical quantum computer based on non-linearities  Qantum optical Fredkin gate (Milburn 1989)  N- port interferometers and optical circuits  Decomposition of unitary (Zielinger et. al, 1998)  Optical Simulation of Quantum Logic ( Cerf et. al, 1998 ) Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Optical Schemes (Continued)  KLM theory (Knill et al, 2001)  Linear optics (beam splitter and phase shifter)  Probabilistic gates  Teleported gates  Schemes based on coherent state  Non-linear optics  Linear optics Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

What’s the problem?  Single photon  Photons do not interact directly, making two qubit gates very difficult  Coherent State  Producing superposition states is a hard to accomplish Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

What’s the way out?  Pay more to get what you want  KLM theory: ancila bits and post- measurement  Using a intermediate medium: optical non- linearities  But optical non-linearities are usually weak Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

There’s yet another way  Enhance the effective non-linearity of the medium  Trapping the photons in the medium  Thus: Increasing the interaction time  How to do that?  Micro-resonator  Photonic crystal Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Qubit  Coherent state with a - phase difference and the same average number of photons  Larger values of make the chosen basis more nearly orthogonal Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Semi-Hadamard Gate  Consider this example: Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results This transformation is possible using a Kerr media which produces a phase change. The fidelity can be used as a proper criteria

Gate: CROW  A coupled resonator optical waveguide made up of micro-rings with large Kerr coefficient Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Dispersion Relation Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results  Transfer Matrix Method

Unitary Evolution  Effective unitary evolution  where Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Fidelity  Fidelity of obtained output to the desired output for Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Size Sensitivity Contents Motivation Implementation Methods Optical Implementations The Main Problem Solution Model Proposed Results

Acknowledgement At the end, I must thank my advisors Prof. A. R. Bahrampour and Prof. V. Karimipour, and all members of Quantum Information Group and Optics Group at Sharif University of Technology.