Dr. Harini Methuku Scientific College of Design 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Advertisements

Janet Bohrer Development Officer Development and Enhancement Group Student involvement in quality assurance processes of the QA agencies ENQA workshop.
9 November 2007 Cecilia de la Rosa Head of the Internal Quality Unit How to prepare for an external review Current trends in the European Quality Assurance.
Performance Appraisals
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
the UNCG University Libraries ASERL Meeting November 13, 2012 Atlanta, GA Kathryn Crowe Associate Dean for Public Services
THE HLC SELF-STUDY PROCESS THE INFORMAL INTERVIEW: QUESTIONS FOR THE HALLWAY.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
1 Roundtable Meeting of Quality Assurance Agencies of the Organisation of Islamic Conference Member Countries Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia November 2009.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
1 Assessment Update Association of Institutional Research and Planning Officers (AIRPO) January 8, 2009 Nancy Willie-Schiff, Ph.D. Assistant Provost SUNY.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
A Report on Progress toward the Strategic Goals Presented to the Valencia District Board of Trustees on behalf of the College Planning Council.
Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
OQN Seminar Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing 11 th November 2009 Preparing the Stakeholders for the Audit Visit: The.
Consistency in Accreditation ASPA April 4, 2011 Department of Medical Laboratory Science Rush University Herb Miller, Ph.D. NAACLS.
How to Get Started with JCI Accreditation. 2 The Accreditation Journey: General Suggestions The importance of leadership commitment: Board, CEO, and clinical.
THE TEACHING & LEARNING CENTER- AN OVERVIEW MOHAMMED EL-AFFENDI AUGUST 2014.
Safety Auditors Conference 2005 A Practical Approach…….
Student Voice in Academic Audit Dr Jan Cameron Director Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities May 2015.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
MYP Pre-authorisation Report April 12-13, 2010 Recommendations Summary Professional Development Day May 17 th 2010.
SACS CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools/ Council on Accreditation and School Improvement
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Dr Saleh Mohamed Al Khusaiby Personal Reflection on the Interviews Dean, Oman Medical College Sohar Medical Campus Oman Accreditation Council meeting November.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
THE SELF-STUDY “OUR EXPERIENCE” MAJAN COLLEGE (UNIVERSITY COLLEGE )
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Dr. Diana Beattie Dean, Bowshar Campus Oman Medical College.
Improving Technology Infrastructure and Web-based Information and Services Northeast Iowa Community College PRP031A Christine Woodson, Project Director.
Partnership Health: Evaluation and possibilities for an adapted structure Agenda item 11 Madhavi Bajekal, ONS (UK) PH coordinator Directors of Social Statistics.
Judy Beachler, Cosumnes River College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College The Accreditation Team(s)
Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.
Outline of Quality assurance and accreditation
The First Appraisal as a Principal
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Changing the Quality Assurance Model: Example of Lithuania
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Reflection on OAC Manual Quality Audit- Learning By Sharing
Quality in administration of higher education
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Aim of the institutional evaluation
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Harini Methuku Scientific College of Design 1

 Specialized Art & Design College in Sultanate of Oman  Initiated in 2004  Majors offered:  Graphic Design Printing  Graphic Design Digital,  Interior Design,  Fine Arts,  Fashion Design (Arabic),  Photography,  Architecture,  Animation. 2

Scientific College of Design is committed to academic excellence, student centeredness, and offers art & design education through practical and theoretical knowledge in an engaging environment. 3

 Rationale SCD's top management belief on the importance of quality audit was the driving force behind our participation in the pilot study. 4

 Ministry of Higher Education’s annual reports helped SCD in understanding areas we have improved as well as areas on which SCD needed to focus for further improvement. 5

 Participation in the Pilot Study for Institutional Standards Assessment was a great experience in identifying strengths and weaknesses and was an asset in preparation for the real quality audit 6

 OAAA assisted SCD by giving a full day workshop to the SC.  OAAA designated an authorized person with whom SCD could communicate during the process for any clarifications/explanation.  OAAA sent matters for clarifications, planning visit agenda and ISA visit program schedule to SCD prior to Planning meeting. 7

 Spreading the "Quality Culture" was the first step to ensure dedication and participation from all employees in the self-study.  Initiation process because the 1 st audit report in 2009 revealed SCD lacked written policies and procedures, detailed plans, documentation, involving stakeholders.…  SCD initiated Steering Committee responsible for pilot study audit process. 8

 Quality Assurance & Enhancement Unit conducted presentations/workshops to faculty, staff and students on -  SCD policies, plans and procedures  Basic information on panel members  Guidelines for quality audit interviews  Selection of SCD faculty, staff, students, alumni, board of trustees, employers for interviews  Briefing Meeting to the interviewees 9

 Steering Committee (SC) comprised of 9 members (academic and non academic staff members) who were responsible for each standard.  QA&E unit developed a schedule and shared with the SC.  SC met periodically to evaluate and study the gap areas as per the 9 standards set by OAAA. 10

 SCD Steering Committee was expanded by forming subcommittee to identify:  Areas of strengths  Areas with on going improvements  Areas in need of new approach  Addressing the OAAA 2009 CAR (Commendations, Affirmations and Recommendations) and avoiding to repeat the same pitfalls were among the main goals of the SC. 11

 SC was asked to draft a write-up on the criterion they were working and send to the QA&E unit Head.  QA&E unit Head with the support of the Dean reviewed the submitted write-up.  SCD Dean reported to the Board of Directors, and Board of Trustees on the effectiveness and achievements during the process. 12

 Helped in identifying certain Standard and criterion which were “Not Applicable”.  Understand and give realistic rating against each criterion and for the overall standard.  Understand and get clarification on some of the misconceptions HEIs used to have on set standards.  Audit visit also gave SCD an insight on the importance of documenting each and every event. 13

 The preliminary check gave us more confidence as it gave us a clue that we were proceeding in the right direction.  It lead us to review our approaches, drop some or develop new ones.  It revealed approaches we had not foreseen earlier.  We overcame difficulties that the pilot study report revealed. 14

 Pilot study report helped to understand the immediate need to initiate certain new policies, procedures and plans.  The process helped to know additional evidences which could be submitted with the ISAA. 15

 It was an excellent experience to spread good practices and "Quality Culture" among SCD internal stakeholders from the Board of Trustee members to Freshman students.  SCD continued its effort and dedication following the same process of forming a Steering Committee, identifying areas to be addressed, drafting SCD portfolio, collection of evidences……  It has been a long journey from 2009 OAAA audit visit report to making changes as per OAAA Institutional Standards and making our self ready to the big challenge. 16

THANK YOU 17