First BIRN Cognitive Challenge Group Boston All-Hands Meeting October 12, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Methods Effective functional connectivity of phonological and semantic processing processing during word reading Cheryl M. Capek 1,2, Simandeep Poonian.
Advertisements

Neural systems for attention to threat in anxiety: an fMRI study Leor Shoker, Nazanin Derakshan, Anne Richards & Elaine Fox.
When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI Stark & Squire (2001) By Mike Toulis November 12, 2002.
Neural Correlates of Consciousness By Charlene Campbell.
Emotional Intelligence predicts individual differences in social exchange reasoning D. Reis, M. Brackett, N. Shamosh, K. Kiehl, P. Salovey & J. Gray.
Designing a behavioral experiment
HST:583 fMRI Acquisition Lab1 Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli TASKS: Self Reference Sensorimotor Breath holding Sternberg Self ReferenceSternberg Breath holding.
Dissociating the neural processes associated with attentional demands and working memory capacity Gál Viktor Kóbor István Vidnyánszky Zoltán SE-MRKK PPKE-ITK.
Activation of the Visual Word Form Area in Dyslexic Readers: A Research Proposal Jennifer Geiss.
Results Animals with recognition displayed increased BDNF in the iTC, CA1 of the hippocampus, the diagonal band, basolateral amygdala and the anterior.
Neural mechanisms of feature- based attention Taosheng Liu.
Research by Wagner et al Presented by Daehan Choi.
Efficiency – practical Get better fMRI results Dummy-in-chief Joel Winston Design matrix and.
Saur et al. (2008) PNAS Ventral and dorsal pathways for language (14 authors!) Hickok & Poeppel’s (2004, 2008) Model –Dual-streams for auditory language.
RESULTS The masking paradigm worked well (participants reported that they knew there was something in the prime position, but where unable to identify.
Where is the semantic network?. What is the semantic network?  Knowledge of objects, people, concepts and word meanings  Spreading-activation theory.
Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci.. Phonology in IFG Gelfand and Bookheimer, Neuron 2002.
 Participants Right-handed, community-dwelling individuals; 16 younger adults (19-28 years; 8 female); 16 older adults (60-82 years; 8 female). Participants.
Issues in Experimental Design fMRI Graduate Course October 30, 2002.
Neurocognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia Colin Hawco, PhD Oct York University.
LNCD Vulnerabilities in Neurocognitive Processes in Adolescence
Functional Connectivity in an fMRI Working Memory Task in High-functioning Autism (Koshino et al., 2005) Computational Modeling of Intelligence (Fri)
Building memories remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity Anthony D. Wagner, Daniel L. Schacter, Michael Rotte,
Studying Memory Encoding with fMRI Event-related vs. Blocked Designs Aneta Kielar.
Cognitive Challenge Summary Analysis of Phase II data –240 sessions analyzed using BPutil pipeline, BIRN QA and Eventstats –ROI analysis of MFG, IPL, and.
Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention de Fockert, Rees, Frith, Lavie (2001)
Pattern Classification of Attentional Control States S. G. Robison, D. N. Osherson, K. A. Norman, & J. D. Cohen Dept. of Psychology, Princeton University,
The role of the posterior prefrontal cortex in task preparation
1 Experimental Design An Introduction to MRI Physics and Analysis Michael Jay Schillaci, PhD Monday, March 17 th, 2008.
INTRODUCTION ADULT AGE DIFFERENCES IN THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE DURING VISUAL TARGET DETECTION MEASURED BY FUNCTIONAL MRI David J. Madden 1, Scott A. Huettel.
Articulatory Net I.2 Oct 14, 2015 – DAY 21
ABSTRACT This presentation discusses brain plasticity in Schizophrenia. People with Schizophrenia experience disruptions in activating and inhibiting systems.
Orienting Attention to Semantic Categories T Cristescu, JT Devlin, AC Nobre Dept. Experimental Psychology and FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford,
Short Term Memory William James (1900): Made Primary-Secondary memory distinction. Important distinction: Primary was limited capacity and duration. Secondary.
Introduction Ruth Adam & Uta Noppeney Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen Scientific Aim Experimental.
FMRI and Behavioral Studies of Human Face Perception Ronnie Bryan Vision Lab
Cerebral Mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming Stanislas Dehaene, Lionel Naccache, Laurent Cohen, Denis Le Bihan, Jean- Francois.
The role of visuo-spatial working memory in attention to eye gaze Anna S. Law, Liverpool John Moores University Stephen R. H. Langton, University of Stirling.
Robert W. McCarley, Presenter Cindy Wible, Marek Kubicki ( generated fMRI data), and Dean Salisbury (generated ERP data) Harvard, VA Boston Healthcare.
Introduction  Recent neuroimaging studies of memory retrieval have reported the activation of a medial and left – lateralised memory network that includes.
Cannabis Use and Memory Brain Function in Adolescent Boys: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study  Gerry Jager, Ph.D.,
A visual sense of number
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Tonotopy during a Change Detection Task:
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Maurizio Corbetta, Gaurav Patel, Gordon L. Shulman  Neuron 
Neuronal Dynamics and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Toward a Translational Paradigm for Dysfunctional Large-Scale Networks  Peter J. Uhlhaas, Wolf Singer 
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Sequential effects of propofol on functional brain activation induced by auditory language processing: an event-related functional magnetic resonance.
Liping Wang, Lynn Uhrig, Bechir Jarraya, Stanislas Dehaene 
Neural Correlates of Visual Working Memory
The Prefrontal Cortex—An Update
The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (May 1999)
Progress Seminar 권순빈.
Maurizio Corbetta, Gaurav Patel, Gordon L. Shulman  Neuron 
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Distributed Neural Systems for the Generation of Visual Images
Mathilde Bonnefond, Ole Jensen  Current Biology 
Michael S. Beauchamp, Kathryn E. Lee, James V. Haxby, Alex Martin 
Neural Correlates of the Attentional Blink
René Marois, Hoi-Chung Leung, John C. Gore  Neuron 
Vahe Poghosyan, Andreas A. Ioannides  Neuron 
Facial-Expression and Gaze-Selective Responses in the Monkey Amygdala
Michael S. Beauchamp, Kathryn E. Lee, James V. Haxby, Alex Martin 
Neuroimaging, Predictive approaches.
Similarity Breeds Proximity: Pattern Similarity within and across Contexts Is Related to Later Mnemonic Judgments of Temporal Proximity  Youssef Ezzyat,
Memory Control: A Fundamental Mechanism of Emotion Regulation
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Human Posterior Parietal Cortex Flexibly Determines Reference Frames for Reaching Based on Sensory Context  Pierre-Michel Bernier, Scott T. Grafton  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

First BIRN Cognitive Challenge Group Boston All-Hands Meeting October 12, 2004

To develop tasks that test for regional brain dysfunctions related to the progression and treatment of schizophrenia.

Outline 1.Challenge Tasks used for Human Phantom Studies 2.Revised Designs and Results 3.New Candidate Designs and Results

Tasks –Temporal Lobe / Auditory Processing Mismatch Task –Prefrontal Cortex / Executive Function Sternberg Memory Scanning Task

Control condition - 1 tone only (either 1,000 or 1,200 HZ) Mismatch condition - Standard Tone 1,000 Hz (95%), Deviant tones 1,200 Hz, (5%). Tones ms duration, 300 ms ISI, unattended (visual distracter task). MISMATCH PARADIGM Run 1: 8 min Run 2: 8 min. R MC 1k M R C 1.2k M R R R R R R R M R M M R C 1k M R R R R R R R M Visual Distracter Task on during all epochs Control 1k Control 1.2k Mismatch

MISMATCH PARADIGM Contrast of Mixed vs. ControlMixed Blocks

Learn -***- 3t A 1t 5t 3t A 5t 1t EncodeDelay14 probes 2.7”37.8” Sample Run…… (total time = sec)     Arrows 37.8” fix Prompt 2” Learn ***** (13.5 or 8.1 or 2.7”) 8.1” 2.7” 5t 3t 1t Learn --*-- fix

dlPFC ROIs

Encode Timing

Probe Timing

Revised Designs 1.Revised SIRP 2.Auditory Oddball

Learn 3t 1t 5t 3t 5t 1t Encode14 probes at end” Sample Run…… (total time = 360”, including DDAs) Order of WM blocks randomized * 5 * 4 * * 9 * * Prompt 1.5” +.5” Learn 5t 3t 1t + + +… Learn fix 6” 2.7” each, 1.1 appearance, 1.6 jitter, minimum pre.300, response time for each probe =~1.5s Average 12”, minimum 4”, max 20”, multiple of 2’’, randomized total fix time = 78” = 46”q block 2 each WM load 6 blocks = 276” DDAs (6sec) fix(14s)fix

Revised SIRP

Auditory Oddball Duke-UNC 4T U Minn 3T

Auditory Oddball

Candidate Dual-Task Designs 1.Oddball + MisMatch 2.SIRP + MisMatch

Rest Oddball Fixation 30 sec Auditory tones: p(1000 Hz) = 0.9, p(1200 Hz) = ms ISI, 100 ms duration Visual stimuli: block lengths = 30sec, ISI = 2000 ms 15 sec of fixation at beginning and end of run Repeat Dual Visual Oddball and Auditory Mismatch … … …

Two subjects acquired at 4.0 Tesla with TR = 1.5 sec Response evoked by Auditory Deviants

Oddball Blocks activate IPS and FFG Individual Subject with 4 task runs collected at 4.0 T with 1.5 sec TR

P ASV TGZR Rest Set Size 5Set Size 2 ****** ******** * 1 * 7 * ****** ******** A G T Y H Fixation 18 sec Auditory tones: p(1000 Hz) = 0.9, p(1200 Hz) = ms ISI, 100 ms duration Visual stimuli: block lengths = 18 sec, ISI = 2000 ms 9 sec of fixation at beginning and end of run Repeat Dual Visual Sternberg and Auditory Mismatch

Reaction Time by Run for In-Set Probes Run

Deviant vs. Standard

Numbers vs. Rest (2 Item Memory Load)

Letters vs. Rest (5 Item Memory Load)

Letters vs. Numbers (5 vs. 2 Item Memory Loads)

5 vs. 3 FFG IPS MFG

Task Cycle for Intraparietal Sulcus Five Items Load Two Items Load

Task Cycle for Fusiform Gyrus Five Items Load Two Items Load

Load 5 vs. 3

Summary of Analysis of Memory Scanning Task Robust activation of dlPFC and Parietal regions (the usual suspects) Similar patterns of activation for both 2 and 5 memory loads Differential load-related activation in FFG and IPS (primarily in left hemisphere – content specificity?) Differential load-related activation in dlPFC

Proposed New Task 1.Emotional Distracter Task

... Emotional Distracter Task

Emotional Distracter

MFG IPS SMG PCG Emotional Distracter Task

-0.10% -0.05% 0.00% 0.05% 0.10% 0.15% 0.20% Emotional novel Neutral novel Target -0.10% -0.05% 0.00% 0.05% 0.10% 0.15% 0.20% Emotional novel Neutral novel Target Posterior IFG ACG FFG AMG Emotional Distracter Task

Anterior MFG Posterior IFG Emotional Distractor Task