Unbridled Learning: CSIP Development and Delivery Targets November/December 2014 Primary School Ann Taylor, Principal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
Advertisements

Moving Forward!. Let’s C.H.A.T. (Children, High Expectations, Academic Achievement, Teacher Growth) Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference.
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia January 2006State Council of Higher Education for Virginia GEAR UP Summer Programs.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Can Data Drive Policy and Change in Oakland Schools? NNIP Providence 2012 Urban Strategies Council Taking.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
Closing the Achievement Gap A 3-hour training for experienced SBDM Council members.
The KSI/RTI Puzzle: Do the pieces fit? Judith Halasek Pamela Pickens Judith Halasek Pamela Pickens.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Commitment to Student Improvement CSI-Pike County KRS (Interventions) KRS (Below or Above Benchmarks) KSI is a framework for providing.
March 2010 what the school readiness data mean for Harford County’s children ©
Clarifying Retreat.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Leestown Middle School Title I. What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
What the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children March 2008.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Cambrian School District September 17, 2015
 SYSTEM - an assemblage or combination of things or parts forming a complex or unitary whole  KPREP testing is one measure of our school system.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 2010 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Lawrence Public Schools August 9, 2010.
School Improvement Plan Central Elementary Vanessa S. McAllister, Principal Margaret Lewis, Assistant Principal RaeAnn Whiteside, Literacy Coach.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
School Improvement Plan
Spencer County Preschool Update 2013 – 2014 SCHOOL YEAR.
Unbridled Learning: CSIP Development and Delivery Targets November/December 2014 Middle School Kristi Miller, Principal.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Unbridled Learning: CSIP Development and Delivery Targets November/December 2014 Intermediate School Brian Futrell, Principal.
Kentucky Board of Education OCTOBER 9, 2012 College/Career Readiness, Proficiency and Achievement Gap Update.
March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report Washington County.
Consolidated District and School Improvement Plans
Kent County January 2017 November 2016.
Anne Arundel County March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Queen Anne's County January 2017 November 2016.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Cecil County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Wicomico County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Prince George’s County
Washington County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Dorchester County January 2017 November 2016.
Harford County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Dorchester County March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Charles County January 2017 November 2016.
Montgomery County January 2017 November 2016.
Caroline County January 2017 November 2016.
Baltimore County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Ready to Read Ready to Succeed
Teaching & Learning Update
Queen Anne’s County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Garrett County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process
Calvert County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Worcester County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Talbot County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Anne Arundel County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Frederick County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Campbell County Middle School
Presentation transcript:

Unbridled Learning: CSIP Development and Delivery Targets November/December 2014 Primary School Ann Taylor, Principal

Delivery Target Areas – Primary Shows as District Delivery Target – This is a new Delivery Target as of Fall 2014  Kindergarten Readiness (KSCREEN) Targets  Increase the percentage of kindergarten students (regardless of prior setting) scoring ready on the KSCREEN from 48.2% in 2014 to 74.1% in 2019

CSIP Goals Primary School Goals are based on MAP as there is no K-Prep Assessment for K-2.  By 2017, 80% of all students at Trigg County Primary School will reach end-of-year benchmark on MAP in Math  By 2017, 80% of all students at Trigg County Primary School will reach end-of-year benchmark on MAP in Reading  By 2019, 74.1% of kindergarten students (regardless of prior setting) will score as ready on the KSCREEN

Goal 1: By 2017, 80% of all students at Trigg County Primary School will reach end-of-year benchmark on MAP in Math Objective for School Year: demonstrate a proficiency (70% of all students) by reaching end of year benchmark in Math by 06/30/2014 as measured by MAP. Result: 63% Objective for School Year: demonstrate a proficiency (70% of all students) by reaching end of year benchmark in Math by 06/30/2015 as measured by MAP. Strategies to be utilized: a.Continuous Assessment b.Professional Learning c.Response to Intervention d.Parent & Community Involvement

Goal 2: By 2017, 80% of all students at Trigg County Primary School will reach end-of-year benchmark on MAP in Reading Objective for School Year: demonstrate a proficiency (70% of all students) by reaching end of year benchmark in Reading by 06/30/2014 as measured by MAP. Result: 58% Objective for School Year: demonstrate a proficiency (70% of all students) by reaching end of year benchmark in Reading by 06/30/2015 as measured by MAP. Strategies to be utilized: a.Continuous Assessment b.Professional Learning c.Response to Intervention d.Parent & Community Involvement

Goal 3: Objective for School Year: demonstrate a proficiency: 70% of incoming kindergarten students will demonstrate ready or ready with enhancement scores by 6/30/2014 as measured by the Brigance Kindergarten Screener. Result: 48.2 Objective for School Year: demonstrate a proficiency: 59.2% of incoming kindergarten students will demonstrate ready or ready with enhancement scores by 6/30/2015 as measured by the Brigance Kindergarten Screener. Strategies to be utilized: a.Community and Family Involvement b.Preschool Learning Environment By 2019, 74.1% of kindergarten students (regardless of prior setting) will score as ready on the KSCREEN

Digging Deeper in Gap Performance includes all types of student populations tracked: Disability, White, African-American, Hispanic, Asian, Limited English Proficiency, Free/Reduced Price Meals, and All students  Describe the achievement gap that exists. African American, Disability, Free/Reduced Lunch  Describe the barriers that prevented the school from closing the achievement gap. Based on our Brigance Screening data, approximately 50% of our students are entering kindergarten "not ready" at this time. As mentioned, we provide additional services for our students based on their academic performance; however, we have some students that seem to struggle with attendance which creates a barrier for success. We also have some that require additional services in the area of speech and their phonetic deficits affect their academic performance.

 Describe the actions that will be taken to remove the barriers that prevented the school from closing the achievement gap. We have seen an improvement in our Brigance readiness data. Because of this, we understand the need to continue to focus our efforts on early childhood intervention. We will also continue to track our students based on their MAP data and common assessment performance to determine when additional assistance is needed and intervene early. We will continue to offer professional development for our teachers regarding the delivery of their instruction, the effectiveness of their assessments, and the reflection/modifications that are required when focusing on the success of all students. This will continue to improve the quality of our instruction which will directly affect the performance of our students. We try to create positive relationships with our students/parents and know this is a factor in attendance. If a students becomes absent frequently, we reach out to the family to discuss the reasons and what we can do to help. Because we know that speech can be a barrier for some of our students, we will provide progress monitoring data for our identified TAG students to our speech therapists. This will help us track their success and make changes as needed.