Regional Policy Requirements and application of ARTICLE 55 Lisbon, 19 April 2013 Michaela Brizova DG REGIO.F1: Operational Efficiency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Instruments under the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds MS expert meeting 17 June 2013.
Advertisements

OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY for the 2007 – 2013 programming period
Article 55 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006: Revenue-generating projects Impact of the revision 2010 Presented by Anton Schrag DG.
European Union Cohesion Policy
European Territorial Co-operation Eligibility of expenditure for co-operation programmes Art. 17(1) ETC Regulation 16th meeting of the Expert Group on.
Performance Framework
METHODOLOGY FOR THE CALCULATION OF DISCOUNTED NET REVENUES Expert Group Meeting, 26 September 2013.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
European Union Cohesion Policy
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Hungarian Delegation Lisbon, 28 October 2008 Financial Institute for Regional Development.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
Eligibility of expenditure Relevant rules and regulations Workshop on Financial Management and auditing Rostock, 3 February 2005 Rostislav Zatloukal.
30 th meeting of the Expert Group on DA and IA for the ESI Funds Fiche No 37 based on Fiche No 21 Article 14(1) ESF Reg. Brussels, 18 May 2015.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
Part-financed by the European Union Eligibility of expenditure Joint Technical Secretariat Information Seminar for Latvian Project Partners Riga, 29 April.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Name, Surname, Position Event, Date, Place Financial issues.
Additionality of Structural Funds (CPR Article 86, Annex III)
ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL ISSUES DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner Support unit-C3.
11 New Member States Conference on Cohesion Policy in Latvia EU FUNDS IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW MEMBER STATES April 2009.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 9 June 2009 “ Cohesion policy: response to the economic crisis” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Communication Temporary framework for State aid measures European Commission DG Competition 21 January 2009.
1 Expert Group Meeting Brussels, 13 March 2015 Study to determine flat-rate revenue percentages for the sectors or subsectors within the fields of (i)
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes DG AGRI, October 2005.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
NPA Eligiblity rules Per Dahlström Managing Authority 20th October 2015 – Copenhagen, Denmark.
Closure of the Programming Period ESF TWG Luxemburg 2 nd December 2015.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Financial aspects of closure European Commission Michael HILL, DG Regional Policy.
Regional Policy Performance framework review and reserve Jan Marek Ziółkowski Evaluation and European Semester Unit DG for Regional and Urban.
Implementing Authority for Cross Border Co-operation Programme Phare Wspólna Street 2/ Warszawa Poland Eligibility of costs INTERREG III B CADSES.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Socially Acceptable Costs for Municipal Solid Waste Management Services Vojtěch Doležal, SEWACO s.r.o 24 June 2015 ISWA Study Tour WASTE-TO-ENERGY.
Regional Policy Cost-Benefit Analysis of ERDF and CF projects A few issues of relevance for audits JC Blain, Auditor REGIO/C4 JC Lisbon, 19 April 2013.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
programme closure. Final Implementation Report.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs)
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Francesco ANGELINI European Commission, DG for Regional Policy Coordination Unit – Major Projects Team.
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
- Special Education Needs (SEN) Network Administrative and Financial Aspects.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION JEREMIE, by George Kolivas REGIO-B.4 – Financial Engineering JEREMIE stands for : ‘Joint European REsources for MIcro.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
Training and Development Programme for future Structural Funds Trainers February 2006.
State aid in the fishery and aquaculture sector
Background Legal basis of the TA financing decision: Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions.
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 10 October 2016
Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG
data to be recorded and stored in computerised form (DA)
Performance framework review and reserve
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
COCOF meeting 27 May 2010, Barcelona
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
ELIGIBILITY SEMINAR Brussels 4 October 2004
Pedro Cruz Yábar Brussels, 21st June 2016
Yvonne SIMON, Legal officer, DG REGIO
Transition from ISPA to Cohesion Fund
Presentation transcript:

Regional Policy Requirements and application of ARTICLE 55 Lisbon, 19 April 2013 Michaela Brizova DG REGIO.F1: Operational Efficiency

Regional Policy Legal basis programming period Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 Article 55 Revenue-generating projects - Definition - Threshold - Estimation of revenues in advance - Monitoring of revenues - Exception

Regional Policy Simplification of Article 55 Application difficulties signalled by the Member States Disproportioned administrative burden 2 amendments of Council Regulation 1083/2006 (2008, 2010) Threshold EUR 1 million for ERDF and CF Non-application to ESF Simplified monitoring of revenues

Regional Policy Article 55(1): Definition Revenue-generating project means a) any operation involving an investment in infrastructure the use of which is subject to charges borne directly by users or b) any operation involving the sale or rent of land or buildings or c) any other provision of services against payment

Regional Policy Article 55(1) what it means in practice Analysis based on cash flows Always net revenue (i.e. revenue – costs) Generally, it is an estimated value for future period extending after project’s completion It is calculated for a project being financed, i.e. incremental revenue and costs

Regional Policy 6 Cash in-flows Revenue: cash in-flows directly paid by users Other cash in-flows Charges borne directly by users for the use of infrastructure, sale or rent of land or buildings, or payments for services Private and public contributions and/or financial gains that do not stem from tariffs, tolls, fees, rents or any other form of charge directly borne by the users Funding-gapFinancial Profitability of the National Capital Article 55(1): Classification of Cash In-Flows

Regional Policy Article 55(1): Net revenue Only projects generating positive net revenue (already without residual value) can be regarded as revenue-generating projects in the sense of Article 55(1) Negative net revenue – not a revenue-generating project (financial sustainability of the project to be checked) Net revenue = revenues – operating costs (+ residual value)

Regional Policy Article 55(2): Funding gap method “Funding gap”: part of the investment costs which cannot be financed by the project itself, i.e. by the net revenues expected to be generated Single calculation methodology for establishing the maximum level of public support Sound financial management: money not wasted on projects which do not need grant assistance “Eligible expenditure on revenue-generating projects shall not exceed the discounted investment cost less the discounted net revenue from the investment over a specific reference period”

Regional Policy Grant calculation (I) 3 steps to determine the EU grant: 1) Find the funding-gap / funding-gap rate 2) Set the project's "decision amount" 3) Set the EU grant (contribution from ERDF/CF)

Regional Policy Grant calculation (II) 1)Funding gap rate: R = (DIC-DNR)/DIC DIC: discounted investment cost DNR: discounted net revenue i.e. (revenue - operational costs +residual value) 2)Set DA = EC*R DA: decision amount EC: eligible cost 3)Set EU grant = DA*CRpa CRpa: co-financing rate fixed for the priority axis in the Commission's decision adopting the operational programme

Regional Policy Grant calculation (III) What is “eligible expenditure”? Not eligible according to art. 56, (e.g., paid before 2007 or not eligible according to MS or Funds eligibility rules) Not eligible according to art. 55 Eligible expenditure to be used as a basis for calculating the contribution from the Funds Non-eligible expenditure (1) Net revenue (apportioned with eligible/ineligible costs) (2) Eligible expenditure (3) Eligible cost Total investment cost

Regional Policy Article 55(2): Estimation of revenues Funding gap method to be applied: Projects where it is possible to estimate the revenues in advance (tariffs & demand) + Projects which generate positive net revenue

Regional Policy Article 55(3) Where it is objectively not possible to estimate revenues in advance due to: Lack of data (for tariff & demand) Unforeseeable demand (new demand might be generated by supply) …the net revenues generated within 5 years after the completion of an operation shall be deducted from the expenditure declared to EC

Regional Policy Article 55(4) Where an operation has generated net revenue, which has not been taken into account under: Article 55(2): revenues known Article 55(3): revenues initially not known …the net revenues generated shall be deducted at the latest at the closure. Please note for Article 55(3): deduction done within 5 years or at closure, whichever comes first

Regional Policy Article 55(4) Deductions required: New sources of revenue Changes in the tariff policy Deductions not required in principle Changes in demand or other external economic factors Systematic underestimation of revenues constitutes irregularity

Regional Policy Monitoring System should be in place for monitoring of revenues Objective: Prevent over-financing (by correct application of funding gap methodology, etc.) Contribute to effective allocation of resources Early detection of possibility to reallocate funds prevents losses at closure DEDUCTIONS at closure = NET LOSS (unless overbooking)

Regional Policy Article 55(5) » limits application of provisions on revenue-generating projects to: ERFD and CF (ESF excluded) Projects above EUR 1 million (total cost) For projects below the threshold or projects generating revenues outside the scope of Article 55: Principle of sound financial management Project revenue to be understood as income reducing the investment cost NATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Regional Policy Articles 55(6) and 44a Provisions on revenue-generating projects do not apply to: projects subject to State aid rules within the meaning of Article 87 of the Treaty (following Leipzig- Halle judgment of the Court of Justice of EU, more infrastructure projects could be considered within the ambit of State aid) operations covered by financial engineering instruments under Article 44 of Council Regulation 1083/2006

Regional Policy Closure Guidelines Adopted on 20 March Provide basic principles related to Article 55 More detailed technical questions to be addressed in the Question and Answer document (under preparation)

Regional Policy Guidance documents Note COCOF 07/0074/09: Guidance Note on Article 55 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006: Revenue-generating Projects Note COCOF 08/0012/03: Guidance Note on Article 55(6) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 DG REGIO working document n°4: Guidance on the Methodology for carrying out Cost-Benefit Analysis Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects, DG Regional Policy, July 2008

Regional Policy For more information InfoRegio: ec.europa.eu/inforegio PT unit of DG REGIO: contact point