HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Comparison of Early Versus Late Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically III Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and.
Advertisements

MODELING THE PROGRESSION AND TREATMENT OF HIV Presented by Dwain John, CS Department, Midwestern State University Steven M. Shechter Andrew J. Schaefer.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study PEG alfa-2a + RBV versus PEG alfa-2a versus INF + RBV APRICOT STUDY Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and HIV.
Cell- and Tissue-based Measures of Viral Persistence Are Associated with Immune Activation and PD-1-Expressing CD4+ T cells H Hatano 1, V Jain 1, PW Hunt.
HIV-1 DNA levels after antiretroviral therapy in primary infection predict disease progression: the SPARTAC Trial James Williams 1,2,3, Jacob Hurst 1,2,3,
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Is monitoring for CD4 counts still needed for the management of patients with long- term HIV RNA suppression? Andrew Hill, Liverpool University, UK.
The Effect of Syphilis Co-infection on Clinical Outcomes in HIV-Infected Persons The Effect of Syphilis Co-infection on Clinical Outcomes in HIV-Infected.
1 Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Slide 1 of 11 From DA Wohl, MD, at New York, NY: May 03, 2012, IAS-USA. IAS–USA David Alain Wohl, MD Associate Professor of Medicine The University of.
The Immunologic Efficacy of Antiretroviral Therapy among HIV-infected Patients in North America and Africa Elvin Geng* 1, Eric Vittinghoff 1, Jean Nachega.
Catherine Kober Margaret Johnson Martin Fisher Caroline Sabin On behalf of UK-CHIC BHIVA/BASHH Manchester 2010 Non-uptake of HAART among patients with.
HIV i-Base: SMART Study & CROI Feedback UK-CAB - Feb 2006 UK-CAB 24 February 2006 CROI Feedback: SMART Study Simon Collins.
BHIVA Clinical Audit Management of patients who switch therapy; re-audit of patients starting therapy from naïve.
Impact of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on the Incidence of HIV- encephalopathy among perinatally- infected children and adolescents. Kunjal Patel,
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES AT THE BOTSWANA- BAYLOR CHILDREN’S CLINICAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE: A REPORT TO THE WHO TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP ON PEDIATRIC CARE.
Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV-Infected Subjects on HAART: Prevalence and Associations Kevin Robertson *1, Kunling Wu 2, Thomas Parsons 1, Ron Ellis.
INTRODUCTION Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients Starting Antiretroviral Therapy During Hospitalization Leigh E. Efird, PharmD 1, Manish Patel, PharmD 1,
Challenges to replacing CD4 testing with viroloigical monitoring Andrew Hill, Pharmacology Research Laboratories, University of Liverpool, UK World AIDS.
Primary HIV-1 Infection Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment Summary of Evidence Martin Markowitz M.D. Clinical Director and Staff Investigator Aaron.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Combined PI and NNRTI Resistance Analysis of the Pooled DUET Trial: Towards a Regimen-Based Resistance Interpretation J. M. Schapiro, J. Vingerhoets, S.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
The effect of tuberculosis treatment on virologic and immunologic response to combination antiretroviral therapy among South African children Heidi M.
1 The impact of ongoing illicit drug use on virologic suppression in HIV-infected injection drug users receiving HAART Authors: Harout Tossonian, Jesse.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
INTRODUCTION A previous cohort study from our unit suggested a benefit for the use of efavirenz compared to nevirapine in a group of patients initiating.
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Figure 2: Trends in currently prescribed antiretroviral therapy % prescribed HAART increased from 74% to 83% Trends in ART use, HIV viral load, and CD4.
Results From DUET-1 and DUET-2: ETR Plus DRV/RTV Associated With High Rates of Viral Suppression in Treatment-Experienced Patients This program is supported.
Weekly Alendronate Safe and Effective at Increasing Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on: McComsey GA, Kendall.
Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Influence of the Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy.
Acute Renal Failure in HIV- Infected Individuals Greatly Increases Risk for In-Hospital Mortality Slideset on: Wyatt CM, Arons RR, Klotman PE, Klotman.
CD4 trajectory among HIV positive patients receiving HAART in a large East African HIV care centre Agnes N. Kiragga 1, Beverly Musick 2 Ronald Bosch, Ann.
Neurologic Effects Associated With Efavirenz Generally Mild, Transient Slideset on: Clifford DB, Evans S, Yang Y, et al. Impact of efavirenz on neuropsychological.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
Identification of Potential Risk Factors for Mother-to- Infant HCV Transmission Slideset on: Mast EE, Hwang LY, Seto DS, et al. Risk factors for perinatal.
Previous SVR With Interferon-Based Therapy for HCV Lowers Risk of Hepatotoxicity in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Individuals on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on:
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
HIV Infection Increases Risk of ASCUS and Subsequent Development of SILs Slideset on: Duerr A, Paramsothy P, Jamieson DJ, et al. Effect of HIV infection.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
Slideset on: Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving.
Entecavir Superior to Lamivudine for Treatment of Nucleoside-Naive, HBeAg- Negative Patients Slideset on: Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, et al. Entecavir versus.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance Satellite Session: HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance and Control: a Global Concern Silvia Bertagnolio, MD WHO,
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Treatment-Naïve Adults
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Lopinavir-ritonavir mg BID (n = 354)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Dolutegravir + ABC-3TC and CSF HIV-1 RNA Levels ING Study
Atazanavir + ritonavir vs. Lopinavir-ritonavir CASTLE Study
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Immune activation set point during early HIV infection predicts subsequent CD4+ T-cell changes independent of viral load by Steven G. Deeks, Christina.
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION
Presentation transcript:

HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A multicenter observational study of the potential benefits of initiating combination antiretroviral therapy during acute HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:

clinicaloptions.com/hiv HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Hecht FM, et al. J Infect Dis. 2006;194: Background and Rationale  HIV-1 RNA set point after seroconversion predictive of subsequent disease progression –Suggests early events in HIV pathogenesis could influence long-term outcomes  Previous clinical trials suggested possible benefit of HAART when initiated during primary infection, then discontinued  Current study evaluated whether HAART initiation within 2-24 weeks after HIV seroconversion associated with improvements in viral load or CD4+ cell count following treatment discontinuation

clinicaloptions.com/hiv HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Hecht FM, et al. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:  Patient data from AIEDRP cohort (n = 395)  Participants self-selected whether to initiate HAART  Inclusion criteria for current analysis –Treatment commenced within 6 months of negative or indeterminate antibody test –Treatment consisted of ≥ 3 antiretroviral drugs –Treatment maintained for ≥ 12 weeks, stopped for ≥ 4 weeks –Acute treatment group: HAART initiation 0-2 weeks after seroconversion –Early treatment group: HAART initiation 2-24 weeks after seroconversion –Untreated patients –Same study entry criteria except no HAART and monitored for ≥ 6 months  Primary endpoints –HIV-1 RNA level, CD4+ cell counts at 24, 48, 72 weeks of untreated observation Summary of Study Design

clinicaloptions.com/hiv HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Hecht FM, et al. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:  HAART initiation within 2 weeks of seroconversion associated with significant HIV-1 RNA level decreases, CD4+ cell count increases –Benefit continued to Week 72 following treatment discontinuation –Difference vs untreated group significant only in analyses adjusted for baseline HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ cell counts  Compared with no treatment, limited benefit to HAART initiation ≥ 2 weeks after seroconversion Main Findings CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant. *Adjusted for baseline HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ cell counts. Follow-up Time Point Acute Treatment Minus Untreated* P Value Early Treatment Minus Untreated* P Value Week 24, HIV-1 RNA log 10 copies/mL (95% CI) (-1.01 to -0.38)< (-0.68 to -0.35)<.05 Week 48, HIV-1 RNA log 10 copies/mL (95% CI) (-1.02 to -0.16)< (-0.35 to 0.15)NS Week 72, HIV-1 RNA log 10 copies/mL (95% CI) (-1.30 to -0.07)< (-0.27 to 0.47)NS

clinicaloptions.com/hiv HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Hecht FM, et al. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:  Mean CD4+ cell counts (adjusted data) in acute treatment group consistently > 120 cells/mm 3 higher than untreated groups –CD4+ cell count benefit remained significant through Week 72  Mean CD4+ cell count in early treatment group ≥ 100 cells/mm 3 higher than untreated group at 24, 48 weeks only –CD4+ cell count benefit remained significant through Week 72 Patient Outcomes Follow-up Time Point Acute Treatment Minus Untreated* P Value Early Treatment Minus Untreated* P Value Week 24, CD4+ cells/mm 3 (95% CI) 132 (51-213)< (88-163)<.05 Week 48, CD4+ cells/mm 3 (95% CI) 120 (24-217)< (68-169)<.05 Week 72, CD4+ cells/mm 3 (95% CI) 125 (3-247)<.0579 (11-146)<.05 CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant. *Adjusted for baseline HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ cell counts.

clinicaloptions.com/hiv HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Hecht FM, et al. J Infect Dis. 2006;194: Other Outcomes  Adjusted analyses may overstate therapeutic benefit –Differences in unadjusted analyses not significant for viral load and CD4+ cell counts in acute treatment group after Week 24 –Differences in unadjusted analyses not significant for viral load in early treatment group after Week 24  Study limitations: nonrandom treatment assignation, heterogeneous regimens, varied treatment duration, no assessment of reasons for treatment discontinuation, small acute treatment group

clinicaloptions.com/hiv HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Hecht FM, et al. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:  HAART initiation within 2 weeks of seroconversion associated with decreased viral load, increased CD4+ cell count to 72 weeks after treatment discontinuation –Trend toward long-term benefit  HAART initiation ≥ 2 weeks after seroconversion associated with smaller CD4+ cell count benefit, loss of viral load benefit by Week 72 –Magnitude of benefit decreased with time Key Conclusions