U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
SPP/APR/SSIP/SiMR Welcome to More Acronyms. Who is here? Introductions – who are you HERE? Your name cards are color coded by which group you represent.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
MPRRC U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Special Education Technical Assistance Resources for Charter Schools.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
Pouring a Foundation for Program Improvement with Quality SPP/APR Data OSEP’s message regarding Indicators 1, 2, 13 and 14 - data collection and improvement.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
RESULTS-DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION Ann Moore, State Director Office of Special Education (OSE) January 2013.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome Stakeholders December 5, 2007 Improving Special Education Services (ISES) December 5,
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
1 General Supervision. 2 General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum Components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the Components.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Ruth Ryder SPDG National Meeting March 5-6, 2013 ESEA Flexibility and SPDG: What’s the connection?
Arizona Early Intervention Program (AzEIP) Team-Based Early Intervention Services Overview for Administrators ADMINISTRATIVE.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Dan Schreier, Gregg Corr, Jill Harris, Ken Kienas, Kate Moran,
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Evaluating for Impact Washington State’s Perspective: Our Blueprint.
An Update of One Aspect of Monitoring, Support and Technical Assistance Available Through the State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
2008 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference “Building Partnerships for Effective Change” December 8, 2008 Systemic Approaches to Improving State Compliance.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Part C Data Managers — Review, Resources, and Relationship Building
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
TEA Corrective Action Plan
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
SPR&I Regional Training
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Using Data for Program Improvement
Using Data for Program Improvement
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs State Performance Plan Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development Effective Dispute Resolution Integrated Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives & Sanctions Components of General Supervision Fiscal Management

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Integrated System of General Supervision OSEP first presented concept at 2004 National Accountability Conference; Revisited at NAC 2006 OSEP/RRC/NECTAC Planning Meeting November 2006 NCSEAM draft “Developing and Implementing an Effective System of General Supervision”, Fall 2006 Kansas City meeting, December 2006

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs The components Each of the Big 8 is required by IDEA, GEPA, etc. Most states have established independent components States typically develop their own models for meeting general supervision requirements

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Why an “Integrated System”? General Supervision system must be accountable for:  improving educational results and functional outcomes  ensuring that public agencies meet program requirements

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Why an “Integrated System”?  To be effective, components must  connect  interact  articulate  inform each other

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs How can a state use the General Supervision paper? What are the “Big 8”? What is the “evidence” to demonstrate a component is part of General Supervision system?

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Integration of Big 8 Components 1. State Performance Plan (SPP) 2. Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation 3. Data on Processes and Results 4. Targeted Technical Assistance and Professional Development 5. Effective Dispute Resolution 6. Integrated Monitoring Activities 7. Improvement, Correction, Incentives and Sanctions 8. Fiscal Management

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs This session State Performance Plan (SPP) Policies, Procedures and Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Integrated Monitoring Activities

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discussion Successes? Remaining challenges? Questions, issues? Other evidences? Further suggestions?

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs State Performance Plan Blueprint for systems change All other components must be integrated with SPP

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Policies, Procedures and Effective Implementation Aligned with IDEA Include descriptions of activities to identify noncompliance methods for requiring correction of noncompliance range of sanctions to enforce correction establish and maintain specifications for highly qualified personnel

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Policies, Procedures and Effective Implementation Local educational agency (LEA) policies and procedures aligned with those of state LEA policies and procedures designed and implement to improve results LEA policies and procedures personnel adequately prepared State and LEAs have written policies and procedures in place, including assurances Required memoranda of understanding (MOUs) in place and current

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discussion Successes? Remaining challenges? Questions, issues? Other evidences? Further suggestions?

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Data on Processes and Results Collection and verification 618 Dispute resolution Previous monitoring reports Other Examination and analyses Areas of state concern Clusters of related indicators

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Data on Processes and Results Reporting Annual Performance Report (APR) (state) LEA performance against state targets Status determination Improvement Data are used to plan and revise activities

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discussion Successes? Remaining challenges? Questions, issues? Other evidences? Further suggestions?

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Integrated Monitoring Activities Stakeholders involved Focus on specific hypotheses for areas Teams include family members Investigation related to compliance and program improvement Multiple methods and data sources to monitor every program, every year

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Integrated Monitoring Activities Activities include continuous examination of performance for compliance and results Written reports specify evidence of correction and improvement Internal and external TA and professional development support improvement and correction

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discussion Successes? Remaining challenges? Questions, issues? Other evidences? Further suggestions?

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Putting the Puzzle Together Use the General Supervision paper to: Self-evaluate your state’s Big 8 components Improve connections among components to strengthen your General Supervision system.

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Benefits More efficient and effective state system Improved outcomes for children with disabilities and their families!

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Web Resources National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring edu/ Regional Resource and Federal Center Network SPP/APR guidance materials OSEP Technical Assistance Network

Building the Legacy U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Contact Information Ruth Ryder Gregg Corr