Wondering About Food Aggression in Shelter Dogs? Amy Marder, VMD, CAAB Adjunct Assistant Professor Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine At Tufts University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
* © 2011 ASPCA ®. All Rights Reserved. * Let ‘Em Eat! Emily Weiss, Ph.D., CAAB Vice President of Shelter Research and Development.
Advertisements

Match-Up II Training Dr. Amy Marder.
CHILD WELFARE EVALUATIONS Susan Cohen Esquilin, Ph.D.
Maternal and Newborn Indicator Validation Study in Mozambique A collaboration between Maternal Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP), Child Health Epidemiology.
Results of the 2007 North Dakota Licensed Child Care Dismissal Study HNDECA Meeting Bismarck, ND April 23, 2008 Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Executive.
Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture
Richmond Terrace Resident Satisfaction Survey April - June 2014 Report Results and Action Plans for Richmond Terrace April-June 2014.
Methodology Conducted from March 16 – 22, 2006
The Effects of Environmental Enrichment on the Behavior of Shelter Dogs Meghan E. Herron, DVM, DACVB, Taylor Kirby-Madden, BA, Linda K. Lord, DVM, PhD.
Understanding Shelter Animal Behavior: Now more important than ever! Amy Marder, VMD, CAAB Adjunct Assistant Professor Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine.
A Summary of the Results of a 2003 Study of Colorado-Based Veterinarians on Non-Accidental Injury in Dogs and Cats This work was supported by the Animal.
There is no reason to pay close attention to this unless you are going to conduct a proposal for a needs assessment.
Who is CJ? Michigan Humane Society; Dir. Of Ops Daily operations Including evaluation APDT/CPDT Dog Behavior Consultant Pawsitive Start.
Business Statistics for Managerial Decision
PREFERENCES FOR CUSTOMARY ROUTINES AND ACTIVITIES SECTION F June 3, PM.
Yakima Valley Pet Rescue Presents.... R.E.S.P.O.N.S.I.B.I.L.T.Y. Pet Education.
What we can predict about your residents for 2007/2008.
Behavioral Modification Presented by: Molly Blum, Abram Figueroa, Joseph Wettstein, Emily Yen.
Acquiring goods and services via the Internet : Consumer shopping perceptions Acquiring goods and services via the Internet : Consumer shopping perceptions.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Tues, Feb 4, 2003.
Functional Analyses Figuring out the source of the problem, the problem, and the resolution of the problem.
RESEARCH METHODS IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR Canine Aggression. Don’t Label the Dog! Identify the ______________…correctly Work with the animal, don’t ___________them. Understand.
 Wet or canned food  Dry dog food  Homemade  Vegetarian  Some dogs are big some are small and some are medium, but they all need different amounts.
Juliann Cummings. Euthanized dogs and cats Problems in our community Health problems of animals not spayed and neutered Fact or fiction What can you do?
How America Shops & Spends 2014
TERMINATION OF LONG-TERM MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT WITH FOSTER YOUTH Kimberlin Borca, Foster Care Research Group University of San Francisco April 29, 2012.
Business and Management Research
Alachua County Animal Welfare 2014 Progress Report.
Introduction In March of this year, the Center for Disease control estimated the incidence of Autism Spectrum Disorders to be 1 in 50, an increase from.
Digital identities in ePortfolios: the first-year experience in a higher educational institution Sue Murray and Susi Peacock Centre for Academic Practice.
1 Predicting Trainee Success Jason Gold, Ph.D. Center Mental Health Consultant Edison Job Corps Center Edison, New Jersey Robert-Wood Johnson Medical School.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
Evaluating Factors that Affect Nurses’ comfort Level with Emergency Interventions in the Rural Hospital Setting By: Erin Ross RN. BSN.
Animal Science II- Small Animal Unit A- The Small Animal Care Industry.
Areas of Specialization Careers in Psychology. Clinical Psychologists ► Largest group ► Treat psychological problems  anxiety, depression, schizophrenia.
Marketing Research. Monday, February 23 Give a couple examples of Marketing Research. Give a couple examples of Marketing Research. Why do you think Marketing.
LOGO Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it Leena Pöysti, Sirpa Rajalin, Heikki Summala Accident.
Reconstructive or cosmetic plastic surgery: factors influencing the type of practice established by Canadian plastic surgeons Colin W. McInnes 1, Cynthia.
Monsoureh-Rezasoltani Ismail Said Methods for Evaluating Responses of Children with Outdoor Environments November st National Conference on.
Use of the Internet by Prenatal Clients for Health Information and its Consequences Amanda Lai, Lindsay Van Tongeren, Catherine Kline, Angela Towle & William.
Unit 4- Safety and Decision Making: Lesson 1 November 29 th, 2010.
Warm-up A newspaper article about an opinion poll says that “43% of Americans approve of the president’s overall job performance.” Toward the end of the.
“Study on Public’s Reception and Perception of Volunteer Services” 香港大學 民意研究計劃 The University of Hong Kong Public Opinion Programme Dr Robert CHUNG Ting-yiu.
Factors associated with home-related injuries among children under 5 years, using PRECED model, in rural areas of Toyserkan in 2012 Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai.
“Boom Boom Pow” By: Erin McIntyre Hinds
Lesson  Rebecca and Tova have math class right after lunch.  Rebecca always eats a hot lunch on days when she has an exam, because she has a theory.
FOSTERING ANIMALS Ann Smith. PRODUCT AND STEPS TO BEGIN  Find a facilitator with a background with Veterinary Sciences.  Volunteer with an Animal Rescue.
The Challenge of Non- Response in Surveys. The Overall Response Rate The number of complete interviews divided by the number of eligible units in the.
Pit Bulls are great Dogs By: Kevin Grice Pit bulls often are very aggressive towards other animals. This is something that can be socialized out of.
International Workshop on Social Statistics Beijing, China 22 – 26 November 2010 Violence against Women Questionnaire Interregional Project on Eradicating.
Placing Medium and Large Breed Shelter Dogs with Behavioral Challenges in Foster Homes Results and Outcomes.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Shaping Versus Percentile Shaping for Canine Skill Acquisition Jeffrey R. Miller, Jonah P. Streff, Nicole C. Scharrer,
What is involved in Psychological Methods? Within this chapter, we will focus on: 1.The various methods used by psychologists to study behaviour scientifically.
2009 Post-school Survey Webinar #7 June 2, 2010 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko
Mood Disorder PHQ-9© PHQ-9-OV© SECTION D MOOD January 14, PM.
University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication Jennifer Brown,
Contingent parental investment: An evolutionary framework for understanding early interaction between mothers and children David Beaulieu, Daphne Bugental.
The Role of Close Family Relationships in Predicting Multisystemic Therapy Outcome: An Investigation of Sex Differences ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Multisystemic.
Restaurant Smoking Policies and Reported Exposure to ETS The case of Massachusetts Tandiwe Njobe National Conference on Tobacco or Health November 2002.
Use of behavior modification and behavioral medication for distressed shelter dogs Karen L. Overall, MA, VMD, PhD, DACVB, CAAB Biology Department University.
College Students’ Behaviors, Perceptions, Beliefs, and Attitudes Regarding Tanning Bed Use Fawna M. Playforth, BS; Laurie J. Larkin, PhD; & Laurel A. Mills,
One Step at a time Nico Joiner Dealing with challenging dogs in a shelter environment.
Serving the Community and Saving Lives for Over 25 Years Let It Grow!
Dogs Rule and Cats Drool By Curtis Winkler. Dogs vs. Cats There are approximately 68 million owned dogs in the United States. Four in ten (or 40 million)
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
Governor’s Teacher Network
Factors influencing customer behavior
Welcome to Cat 101! What brings you here today?
Assessing Canine Behavior in the Shelter: Input from Multiple Sources
Presentation transcript:

Wondering About Food Aggression in Shelter Dogs? Amy Marder, VMD, CAAB Adjunct Assistant Professor Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine At Tufts University

Food Aggression in Shelter Dogs

Food-related Aggression Dogs that show teeth, growl, snap or bite when they or their food is approached, touched or taken away by a person or animal Also called food guarding MAY occur with guarding of resting area, favorite person, toys, stolen objects

Sources of Behavioral Information Behavioral history from previous home, foster home or previous shelter (intake questionnaire or interview) Behavior evaluation Behavior in shelter

Why Are Dogs Food Aggressive? Normal canine behavior May appear when dog is subjected to stress (self-protective behavior) May appear when dog is in competition with other individuals (dog, people) May appear when dog’s food is unfamiliar or limited (as in shelter)

Food Aggressive Dogs Restrict adoptions to homes with no children, experienced dog owners Consider dangerous and unadoptable Conduct behavior modification programs and adopt Pre-adoption counseling and adopt What do you do?

ASPCA Online Survey (Mohan-Gibbons et al, 2012) 77 shelters Aggression over food or non-food items was the most common reason given for considering a dog unadoptable On average, 14% of dogs exhibited food aggression during the behavior evaluation Only 1/3 (25) of the shelters surveyed made any attempt to modify the food aggressive behaviors and place the dog 51% (39) made no attempt to place any dogs that showed food aggression

What HAS been done? ARL Boston ( ) Behavior modification (based on Jean Donaldson), restricted placement and follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months. No problems Humane Society of Boulder Valley (Lindsay Wood, 2012) Behavior modification and placement. 89% did not show food aggression when retested on the behavior evaluation Very few instances of food aggression resurfacing in the adoptive home

And MORE? Mohan-Gibbons et al, dogs (other than pit bulls and Rottweilers) Displayed food aggression on the SAFER evaluation Were also treated with ASPCA behavior modification program for food aggression After adoption followed with questionnaire at 3 days, 3 weeks and 3 months Of the 60 adopters who were reached at least once, only 6 reported food aggression at 3 weeks By 3 months, 0 reported food aggression

Behavior Modification Programs for Food Aggression MINE (Jean Donaldson) Dogwise Counterconditioning and desensitization of approach and touching dog and food Emily Weiss ( SAFER® manual) Free-feeding dry food Counterconditioning while dog is in shelter by adding delicious food to bowl while dog is eating dry food Reward lifting head Pre-adoption counseling and program for adopters Follow-up

Behavior modification programs for food aggression Center for Shelter Dogs ( Counterconditioning and desensitization while dog in shelter Reward moving away from food Restricted placement Follow up 1 week, 1 month, 2 months Lindsay Wood (2011) Counterconditioning and desensitization while dog in shelter Reward lifting head Restricted placement Pre-adoption counseling Follow up 2 weeks, 2 months, 1 year

What if You Do Not Have Resources to do Behavior Modification? Is it possible to safely adopt food aggressive dog with only pre- adoption counseling and follow-up?

148 (2013) Food-related aggression in shelter dogs: A comparison of behavior identified by a behavior evaluation in the shelter and owner reports after adoption Amy R. Marder ∗, Anastasia Shabelansky, Gary J. Patronek, Seana Dowling-Guyer, Sheila Segurson D’Arpino

Van der Borg (1991) – 72 dogs – Aggression over food and bones was the most poorly predictive behavior 1-2 months after adoption – 25% of adoptive owners never interacted with their dog while eating – Even when food aggression was present it was of little concern to the owner Background

To determine the relationship of both the presence and absence of FA identified by MU II Shelter dog Rehoming Program in the shelter and the presence or absence of FA in the new home after adoption Adopters perception of food aggression was also gauged Objectives

Subjects 97 dogs Adopted between January 2009 and November 2010 Over 4 months of age at time of evaluation Having resided in the shelter, not foster home In their new adoptive home for at least 3 months

Between March and April 2011, adopters were contacted by a professional survey company Delivered by or telephone Pilot tested Questionnaire contained 4 sections – Dog demographic information – Dog behavior related to food (dog food, delicious items) – Adopters’ perception of food aggression – FA management techniques Adopter survey

Growl and/or show teeth Snap and/or lunge Bite Never, rarely, sometimes, frequently, always Owners who never approached or touched dogs food while eating were excluded Adopter survey

Adopters’ perception of food aggression – Do you consider your dog to be FA? – If yes, how challenging (Not at all –great challenge) – If no, how challenging would it be if yes How likely is it that you would adopt your dog again? 43% response rate No difference in response between on line or telephone surveys, or between FA+ and FA- Adopter survey

97 dogs – 28 intact females – 19 spayed females – 29 intact males – 21 neutered males – Most were mixed breeds – “breeds” identified Pit bull type, Labrador Retriever, Chihuahua, Beagle – Mean weight 20 kg – Mean age 5 years – Most owners had dogs months Results

20 (21%) of 97 dogs were identified as FA+ over dog food, chew items or both 77 (79%) of 97 were identified as FA - 10 (50%) bit the rubber hand, 3 (15%) snapped or lunged and 7 (35%) growled or showed teeth Results

Food Aggressive (FA+) vs. Non-Food Aggressive (FA-)

28 (29%) adopted dogs were identified as FA+ either over a meal or delicious food item or both 11/20 (55%) of dogs identified as FA+ on the behavior evaluation showed FA+ after adoption but 9/20 (45%) did not 17/77 (22%) of dogs identified as FA- on the behavior evaluation showed FA+ after adoption 60/77 (78%) of dogs identified as FA- on the behavior evaluation did NOT show FA+ after adoption Results

Presentation of Food Aggression in the Home with FA+ Dogs

Of the 77 dogs that did not show food aggression on the evaluation, 78% (60) DID NOT show food aggression in the home But 22% (17) DID show food aggression in the home FA- Dogs in the Home

PPV=55 % (likelihood for dog that was FA+ in the shelter would also be FA+ in the home) NPV=78% (likelihood for a dog that was FA- om the shelter would also be FA- in the home) PPV was weaker then the NPV Predictive Value

26/28 (93%) of the dogs that were FA+ after adoption exhibited the behaviors rarely and only exhibited less severe behaviors of growling or showing teeth. 5/28 (18%) showed more severe behaviors of snap, lunge or bite. Results

What About the Adopters? Marked disparity between dogs’ actual behavior and adopters perception Of 97 adopters 93 (96%) did not consider their dog to be FA + and 4 were unsure Even owners that had observed their dog to show aggressive behaviors did not consider their dog to be FA+ 26/28 (93%) and 2 were unsure When asked about potential FA+ behaviors, 27/97 (28%) rated Not a challenge at all, 5/97 (5%) a great challenge Owners who actually observed aggressive behavior rated FA+ behavior as less of a challenge

What About the Adopters? Most of the respondents, whether their dog was food aggressive or not, would adopt the same dog again 59/69 (86%) of owners of dogs that displayed aggressive behavior 25/28 (89%) of owners of dogs that did not

Conclusions The detection of food aggression via a behavior evaluation should be interpreted with caution A positive finding does not consistently indicate that the behavior will occur in the home or that the dog is unsuitable for adoption Each dog should be considered as an individual, and all behavioral and owner-related factors considered when making adoption decisions

Conclusions Continued Viewing dogs and their potential owners as individuals Choosing compatible owners Training owners to safely manage food aggressive behavior Can save the lives of many dogs

Recommendations Implement one of the behavior modification programs before adoption. Adopt with restrictions and provide follow-up If not possible, implement program of pre- adoption counseling, adoption with restrictions and follow-up CSD “Special Adoption Program” Start with dogs with mild food aggression (show teeth, growl)

Thank you for your attention!