Summary of Accelerator Sessions M. Biagini for the Accelerator Team SuperB XV Workshop Caltech, CA, Dec. 14-17 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Advertisements

Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
First approach to the SuperB Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN April 26th, 2006 UK SuperB Meeting, Daresbury.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Sep 29 – Oct 3, 2009 LCWA 09 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas Sept 29 – Oct 4, 2009 Damping Ring R&D updates SLAC Mauro Pivi SLAC Allison Fero.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
M.E. Biagini, M. Boscolo, T. Demma (INFN-LNF) A. Chao, M.T.F. Pivi (SLAC). Status of Multi-particle simulation of INFN.
Fast feedback, studies and possible collaborations Alessandro Drago INFN-LNF ILCDR07 Damping Rings R&D Meeting 5-7 March 2007.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Nov 17, 2009 Webex Assessing the 3.2 km Ring feasibility: Simulation parameters for electron cloud Build-up and Instability estimation LC DR Electron Cloud.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program: SuperB Mike Sullivan OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
Joint Belle SuperB Background Meeting Feb 9 – 10, 2012 SuperB SR bkgds 1 SR Backgrounds in SuperB M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
LCWS, UTA, Reaching ultra-low emittance at SLS through (systematic and) random optimization LCWS 2012 Joint CLIC/ILC Working Group – Damping.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
S UPER B site status report S. Tomassini INFN-LNF On behalf of SuperB Collaboration SuperB general meeting– Frascati – December 1-5, 2009.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
TDR and R&D Plans J. Seeman and M. Biagini For Super-B Staff.
SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
T. Demma (INFN-LNF) In collaboration with: M. Boscolo (INFN-LNF) A. Chao, M.T.F. Pivi (SLAC). Macroparticle simulation of IBS in SuperB.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Electron Cloud, IBS, and Fast Ion Update
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Accelerator R&D for the Super-B Factory
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Intra-Beam Scattering modeling for SuperB and CLIC
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
SuperB Accelerator Status
Single-bunch instability preliminary studies ongoing.
Accelerator Overview M
Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
M. Pivi PAC09 Vancouver, Canada 4-8 May 2009
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Summary of Washington DOE Review
IR Summary M. Sullivan For
Super-B Accelerator Overview
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
SuperB Accelerator Overview
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Accelerator Sessions M. Biagini for the Accelerator Team SuperB XV Workshop Caltech, CA, Dec

Workshop Talks IBS (Demma) E-cloud instability (Demma) Synchrotron light properties from SuperB (Wittmer) Feedbacks (Drago) Geological LNF (Tomassini) Second order momentum compaction (Novokhatski) Site committee document (Raimondi) Spin tracking in LER (Monseu) LET DIAMOND (Liuzzo) Vibration studies (Bertsche) Vibration LNF (Brunetti) Backgrounds studies (Sullivan, Perez) IR coupling correction without solenoid (Nosochkov) Wakefields in the IR (Weathersby) QD0 design/prototype work (Paoloni) Mike’s summary

CDR2 - Accelerator Accelerator part of CDR2 updated with:  New beam-beam scan (Chap. 8)  Dynamic aperture (Chap. 6)  Possible synchrotron light beamlines (Chap. 18)

Tracking the beam (x,x’,y,y’,z,d) in a MAD lattice by 1 st and 2 nd order transport maps Apply beam-cloud interaction point (IP) at each ring element Parallel bunch-slices based decomposition to achieve perfect load balance Beam and cloud represented by macro-particles Particle in cell (PIC) code 3D electron cloud dynamics The interaction between the beam and the cloud is evaluated at 40 Interaction Points around the SuperB HER for different values of the electron cloud density The threshold density is determined by the density at which the growth starts e-cloud instability in HER (Simulation code: CMAD, M.Pivi, SLAC) Demma

e-cloud induced emittance growth in SuperB HER (V13) Taking into account the effect of solenoids in drift regions, beam cloud interaction evaluated at magnetic regions only.  el = 8x10 11 e-/m 3  el = 9x10 11 e-/m 3  el = 10x10 11 e-/m 3 This work would have not been possible without the support of the INFN-NA group (in particular Dr. S. Pardi) that provided access (and assistance) to the SCOPE- GRID Cluster to perform all the parallel simulations presented here vertical emittancehorizontal emittance bunch population Demma

Intra Beam Scattering Status Effect of IBS on transverse emittances about 30% in LER and less than 5% in HER, still reasonable if applied to lattice natural emittances values Interesting aspects of the IBS such as its impact on damping process and on generation of non Gaussian tails may be investigated with a multi-particle code being developed:  Benchmarking with conventional IBS theories gave good results Preliminary FORTRAN (faster!) version of the code produced:  Remaining features are going to be included very soon  Started collaboration with M. Pivi (SLAC) to include the IBS in CMAD (parallel, faster) Started studies on full lattice (including coupling and errors) Demma

Multi-particle tracking of IBS in LER  z =5.0*10 -3 m  p=6.3*10 -4 e x =1.8*10 -9 m e y =0.25/100*e x t x = * sec t y = * sec t s = * sec MacroParticleNumber=10000 NTurn=10000 (≈10 damping times) Mathematica vs Fortran implementation of the IBS multi-particle tracking code. The Fortran version is more then 1 order of magnitude faster!

Second order momentum compaction When  1 is very small the 2° order  2 may play a role in the longitudinal beam dynamics, good or bad, depending on its sign There is no instability threshold for a positive value of  2 It is necessary to check that  2 for Super-B has the right sign, or is < 0.05 at least, if positive  2 < 0, beam stable  2 > 0, beam unstable Novokhatski

Strong Head –Tail Instability Example for PEP-II, high current, LER Novokhatski

Bunch-by-bunch feedback upgrade During last month all the 6 DA  NE feedback have been upgraded VFB – new 12 bit iGp systems with larger dynamic range and software compatibility with the previous version LFB - completely new systems in place of the old systems designed in in collaboration with SLAC/LBNL: fe/be analog unit connected to iGp-8 as processing unit HFB: upgrade hw/sw of the iGp-8bit system already used Epics server upgraded to the last version of LINUX New front-end/back-end analog unit used in the longitudinal feedbacks Drago

Larger dynamic range  system more flexible Fast and easy back-end timing in the trasverse or longitudinal systems “Bunch cleaning” function can be used to “kick out” a specific bunch or bunch pattern Better performances, more sophisticate software, simpler hardware Bunch-by-bunch feedback improvements Drago

Synchrotron light SuperB Comparison of brightness and flux from bending magnets and undulators for different energies dedicated SL sources & SuperB HER and LER Assumed undulators characteristics as NSLS-II Synchrotron radiation generated with both HER and LER compete very well with state of the are dedicated lighsources in operation, construction and design The lattices are already well optimized with respect to source point parameters. Only small gains still possible Wittmer Brightness from Bends Flux from Bends

Synchrotron light from undulators Wittmer Brightness from UndulatorsFlux from Undulators 4.5 GeV may improve if  x /2

Possible beam lines layout Wittmer

Zgoubi tracking studies for Invariant Spin Field A method to study high order spin dynamics is being implemented with Zgoubi tracking code Based on «stroboscopic averaging» Studies to prove convergence in a reasonable time Probably will need parallelization for computer speed PRELIMINARY RESULTS ON CONVERGENCE STUDY 100 Turn1000 Turn 2500 Turn5000 Turn Monseu

Second campaign of geological survey was completed last July Second campaign of ground motion measurements was completed last October (see L. Brunetti talk) Definition of parameters site choice (see Raimondi talk) Site & layout Tomassini

Damping ring Collider hall

Second campaign of Geological survey On last July the second campaign of geological prospection was completed at LNF. 4 additional holes of different dept have been bored in the points reported below and marked by a blue arrow. Each hole was lined with a plastic pipe with an inner bore of about 70mm. 50m 40m 30m 50m 40m 1 st campaign 2 nd campaign

Site Committee (Di Fabrizio, Esposito, Popolizio, Raimondi, Seeman, Tomassini) Document on requirements for site choice Site layout and geology:  Dimensions  Flatness and slope  Geology  Ground stability Site conventional facilities:  Buildings  Electric power  Civil construction  Cooling water  Existing conventional facilities  Logistic Site general requirements Raimondi

Low Emittance Diamond LET procedure studied for SuperB applied to the DIAMOND SL source (Rutherford) Modified to include BPM tilt errors in DIAMOND Two MD shifts (Nov. 23 th, Dec. 7 th ) Procedure very fast compared with present DIAMOND LET procedure (LOCO code) Very good results up to now (emittance coupling measured after correction 0.23%, rms Y- dispersion about 600  ) but need more work on code and MD shifts Need to implement correctors tilts Liuzzo

D Y ≈ 600 μm Coupling 0.23% CFS Correction with Skew Quadrupoles

Accelerator Board Comments Site:  Make a technical determination of shielding requirements  Investigate a larger foot print with more x-ray lines  Discuss “medium constraint” on nearby park-historical situations Near term technical work (site independent issues):  Vacuum design  Magnet designs  RF configuration  Support designs  Control system

Accelerator Board issues for the next 6 months  Assemble a design/construction team  What is the project management structure?  Determine how to hire people  Determine how SLAC and US will contribute to the accelerator  What is needed for the TDR? Still the same?  What is the design of a full SR facility? Plan now?  How does the accelerator fit into the “ERIC” process?  How does the accelerator team participate in the site selection process?

Near term TDR Activities MDI activites (DCH inner radius, W shield) QD0 design and tests IR QDF design Vibration sensors Cryostat design Spin rotator design Vacuum systems(bellows, extruded chambers, pumps, flanges) Instrumentation (BPMs, emittance measurements, polarization) Polarimetry Tunnel layout Injection system Low level RF Cavity coupler box upgrade New PEP-II element list RF power supplies Magnet supports Review cost estimates

Thank you I wish to thank all the contributors that in the past 5 years have kept SuperB alive... Many are missing in the following... Sorry!

Merry Christmas !!!!!