Social Groups & Social Networks Dr Emma Moore

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Window on Humanity Conrad Phillip Kottak Third Edition
Advertisements

CODE/ CODE SWITCHING.
ENG 528: Language Change Research Seminar
Social Dialectology Ch.3 Measuring the Cause of Variation Defining a Linguistic Variable Social Factors Related to Variation Identifying Variation in.
Sociolinguistics Chapter 7 Gender and Age.
DISCOURSE, GENDER AND SEXUALITY. In all speech communities, the linguistic features used by men and women contrast to different degrees. In all speech.
Sociolinguistics Chapter 9
1 Sociolinguistics Gender Dr Emma Moore. 2 Contents What is gender? When did linguists start thinking about gender? What have variationist sociolinguists.
Languages Dialect and Accents
Introduction to Linguistics for lawyers
Culture and Diversity Chapter 5.
Bronwyn Ewing School of Early Childhood QUT Young Children and ICT.
Families, communities and social change: then and now Nickie Charles Centre for the Study of Women and Gender University of Warwick NCRM Community Re-studies.
Language Variation Dr. Katie Welch LING Listening Exercise When listening.
ETHNOGRAPHY OF COMMUNICATION As a domain of inquiry, linguistic anthropology starts from the theoretical assumption that words matter and from the empirical.
ETHNOGRAPHY OF COMMUNICATION
Objectives know the basic terminology related to the topic of code-switching; be familiar with the techniques used in this sub-field of sociolinguistics;
Varieties of English Sociolinguistics.
Gender and Language The ideology of gender categories is typically enacted in linguistic practices; indeed, it is through language that the individual.
Chapter 5: Culture & Community
Today Speaker Variable: Gender
Language and social variation
Language and Dialect.
Wardhaugh – Chapter 6 – LING VARIATION
INCORPORATING CULTURE IN DEVELOPING ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILLS FOR EFL ADULT LEARNERS: A CASESTUDY OF VIETNAMESE TEACHERS’ VOICES Mach Buu Hien SEAMEO RETRAC.
Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?
Language Variation and Change Recommended Literature.
Chapter 3 Social Dialectology ‘us’ vs. ‘them’. Funny…?
UNDERSTANDING GENDER 1.GENDER FORMATION –developing a sense of who you are as boys or girls through everyday interactions with family, friends, media,
Sociolinguistics Language Variants and Speech Communities.
Regional and Social Dialects
Slide 1 LING – Sociolinguistics – Spring 2011 Wardhaugh Ch 1 Discuss calendar, readings.
Language Variation: Social Class
Gender, Technology & Higher Education Nov 6 th, 2006.
Chapter 16 Socioemotional Development in Late Adulthood.
Wolfram & Schilling-Estes Chapter 9
LANGUAGE, CULTURE AND COMMUNICATIO N  Anthropology  Culture  Cultural Holism  Norms  Cultural Model  Enculturation  Cultural relativism  Ethnocentrism.
Language and Identity. Identity We all have multiple identities. This is revealed through language use. Agency: the amount of control one has over how.
1 Language and Social Variation. 2 1.Introduction: In the previous lecture, we focused on the variation in language use in different geographical areas.
Hello, Everyone! Part I Review Exercises Questions 1. Define the following 4 terms: 1) bound morpheme 2) free morpheme 3) derivational morpheme 4) inflectional.
IN THE NAME OF GOD SOCIOLINGUISTICS (Chapter9 Part 2) BY: MASOUD SHAKIBA 1.
Slide 1 LING – Sociolinguistics – Spring 2011 Wardhaugh Ch 7 Wardhaugh – Chapter 7 – SOME FINDINGS Socioling studies cliff’s notes:
Speech Provides clues Regional accent Dialect Contains features which are unrelated to regional variations Two people growing up in the same geographical.
LANGUAGE, SOCIETY AND CULTURE. SOCIOLINGUISTICS Society Language Anthropology Sociology Social Psychology Social dialects Variety of the language used.
Gender and Language Variation Wolfram & Schilling-Estes Chapter 8.
Slide 1 LING – Sociolinguistics – Spring 2011 Wardhaugh Misc  Linguistic relativity = people who speak different languages perceive and think.
What does “Non Standard English” mean? According to Wolfram Et Schilling-Estes, Vernacular or nonstandard varieties are those ”varieties of a language.
Dr TM Sengani: Unisa African Languages Dr AC Tshivhase: Unisa Curriculum and Learning Development Tshivenda kin-terms/naming and the building of peace.
Slide 1 LING – Sociolinguistics – Spring 2011 Wardhaugh Ch 8 Wardhaugh – Chapter 8 – CHANGE Language Change  Not all variation that shows a relationship.
Communities of Practice Stephen Merry & Paul Orsmond Staffordshire University Faculty of Sciences.
Language, Society and Culture. Speech Social identity used to indicate membership in social groups Speech community Group of people who share norms, rules.
LANGUAGE, DIALECT, AND VARIETIES
LECTURE 3 1 APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY.
Slide 1 LING – Sociolinguistics – Spring 2011 Wardhaugh Ch 5 Calendar Wardhaugh Ch 5 Also will discuss Milroy & Milroy article on Tuesday (notes.
Moza: Samira: Zainb.  Variation and Change  Post-vocal |r| its spread and its status  The spread of vernacular forms  How do language.
What is Sociolinguistics? -It is aspects of linguistics applied towards connections between language and society -It is the way.
Sociolinguistic Patterns Social Class AgeGenderStyle Network Social Dimensions of concern.
Sociolinguistics Styles Dr Emma Moore.
James and Lesley Milroy. James & Lesley Milroy Social network as analytical framework.
Welcome to the flashcards tool for ‘The Study of Language, 5 th edition’, Chapter 19 This is designed as a simple supplementary resource for this textbook,
We stop at: L4 when do we switch from L to H(formal)? (P:40) Now: Practice 2:(L5: Language Maintenance and shift P(52- 73)
Social Class & Style Dr Emma Moore
1 Chapter 2 English in the Repertoire By Barbara Mayor Presentation: Dr. Faisal AL-Qahtani.
Introducing Sociolinguistics Dr. Emma Moore
Lecture 7 Gender & Age.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 جامعة الملك فيصل عمادة.
CHAPTER 5 This chapter introduces students to the study of linguistics. It discusses the basic categories and definitions used to study language, and the.
Linguistic Predictors of Cultural Identification in Bilinguals
L23A: Sociology of Language
Variation and social networks
Presentation transcript:

Social Groups & Social Networks Dr Emma Moore Sociolinguistics Social Groups & Social Networks Dr Emma Moore

Contents What are the limitations of survey studies? Why study local groups? How can we study local groups? What have social network/community of practice studies told us about sociolinguistic variation?

Limitations of surveys Do surveys make assumptions about the community and its structure? What does it mean to talk about social class? Do large scale studies make assumptions about what speakers think? Do all speakers view the same linguistic variant in the same way?

Labov’s speech community “The speech community is not defined by any marked agreement in the use of language elements, so much as by participation in a set of shared norms; these norms may be observed in overt types of evaluative behaviour, and by the uniformity of abstract patterns of variation which are invariant in respect to particular levels of usage” (Labov 1972: 120). All speakers share the same norms Uniformity in style shifting behaviour

Challenging abstract social categories: local definitions of class Rickford (1986) Cane Walk, village in Guyana Three main social groups: The senior staff The estate class The working class All three groups bound by ethnicity & historical ties (19C semi-forced migration from India) Differences in life chances based on local definitions of class

Explaining language use Guyanese Creole  Standard English Analysing singular pronoun use WC: 18% StE Estate class: 83% StE Why? Estate class: StE = getting ahead WC: no chance to get ahead; Creole = social solidarity, militancy Can we say all social classes are adhering to the same norms?

Challenging abstract social categories: social groups Cheshire (1982) Reading adventure playgrounds Groups of ‘delinquent’ children (WC) Examining morphosyntactic variation E.g. use of nonstandard has, was etc. Considered style shifting Language used with peers Language used with the teacher in school

Adhering to different norms Use of nonstandard present tense forms Inconsistent style-shifting Noddy: hated school, disliked teacher Kitty: regular school attender Barney: hated school, disliked teacher Vernacular style School style Noddy 81% 78% Kitty 46% 33% Barney 32% 54% Boys do not adhere to ‘community’ norms of evaluation, but to ‘vernacular culture’ norms

Vernacular speakers & vernacular norms? Are standard variants always the most “prestigious”? Social psychological studies investigating responses to different language varieties Giles and Powesland (1975): RP = “competence” Vernacular = “personal integrity”; “social attractiveness” Revealing the positive value of vernacular varieties

Understanding how forms gain value Bourdieu (1977): The linguistic market The value of a linguistic variety is determined by the status of those who use that variety, in the marketplace in which it is used Standard language Spoken by high status speakers Standard language itself assigned high status

Understanding how forms gain value Woolard (1985): There is more than one linguistic market Vernacular varieties are valued in vernacular settings (the vernacular market) Vernacular language Spoken by speakers in local communities (loyalty, integrity, friendship) Vernacular language itself assigned status as symbolic of local attributes

Looking at local connections NOT abstract categories Competing norms Vernacular varieties = low mainstream status,unattractive = high local status, attractive How do we understand the social function of vernacular forms? By accessing local communities where the forms are meaningful Looking at local connections NOT abstract categories

Modelling local communities: Social networks Social network: refers to the social ties which link people to one another Network density Multiplexity Work network Kinship network

Milroy’s (1980) study of Belfast Three WC Belfast communities Ballymacarrett, Hammer & Clonard Speakers classified by their social networks Assessing network strength scores for speakers Leisure activities Employment Knowledge of other community members

Milroy’s (1980) study of Belfast Linguistic variables: Local vs. incoming prestige forms E.g. (a)-backing in words like bad /a/ (standard pronunciation) /ɔə/ (vernacular change in progress) Results Men tended to use more vernacular variants than women in Ballymacarratt and Hammer Young women had higher use of particular vernacular variants in Clonard

Network ties and language use Ballymacarratt and Hammer Men had stronger network ties Employment Roles in the community/visibility Clonard Young women had higher network strength scores Employment (loss of linen industry)

Significance of Milroy (1980) The importance of LOCAL relationships to the use of language Dense, multiplex networks & VERNACULAR norms Building on earlier work: Provides more information about the community being studied Allows us to explain language behaviour in relation to local social factors Not just gender or class, but social network

Modelling local communities: Communities of Practice Community of Practice (CofP): “an aggregate of people who come together around mutual engagement in an endeavor” (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet 1992:464). “The people at the Jones’s breakfast table, in Mrs. Constock’s Latin class, or in Ivan’s garage band get together fairly regularly to engage in an enterprise. Whether the enterprise is being a family, learning (or not learning) Latin, or playing music, by virtue of engaging over time in that endeavour, the participants in each of these groups develop ways of doing things together. They develop activities and ways of engaging in those activities, they develop common knowledge and beliefs, ways of relating to each other, ways of talking – in short, practices. Such a group is what Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger (1991) have termed a community of practice” (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet 2003: 57).

How is a CofP different to a social network? Social networks: who is connected to who in a community Communities of Practice: who shares social practice with who in a community Not just about connectivity, but quality of connectivity Studying CofPs require ethnography

Eckert’s (2000) study of Detroit High school community in Detroit, US Two years of ethnographic participant observation Speakers classified by their CofP membership Practices: territory, clothing, substance use, language

Eckert (2000): Jocks and Burnouts Two oppositional CofPs: Jocks: institutionally-orientated Burnouts: rebellious, anti-school Variables studied: Six phonetic variables (vowels); one syntactic variable (Negative concord)

Variable distribution and CoPs Distribution of linguistic variants best explained by the Jock-Burnout split Social class relevant BUT not as strong an explanation as practice …and especially interesting findings with gender

Burnout girls > Burnout boys > Jock boys > Jock girls CofPs and gender Raising of (ay): right /aɪ/ to /ɔɪ/ Burnout girls > Burnout boys > Jock boys > Jock girls

Significance of Eckert (2000) The importance of LOCAL relationships to the use of language CofP membership (i.e. local social practice) constrains linguistic behaviour more than abstract social categories Building on earlier work: Provides more information about the community being studied Allows us to explain language behaviour better Not just gender or class, but how local speakers LIVE gender & class

Summing up… Early variationist studies provide a broad view of sociolinguistic variation BUT to explain variation, we sometimes need closer analysis of communities Prevents overgeneralisation Allows us to explore competing norms Gets us closer to the precise social correlates of variation The social network & the CofP approach provide frameworks for more local analyses

Reading and selected references Cheshire, Jenny (1982) Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eckert, Penelope (2000) Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity at Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell. Milroy, Lesley (1980) Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Rickford, John (1986) “The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics”. Language and Communication 6: 215-221. Required reading: Meyerhoff (2006: Chapter 9)