MICROCATHODE-COLD GAS HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEM – BRICSAT Presenter: MIDN Jacob Pittman United States Naval Academy.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Properties of Matter 2.1 Matter has observable properties. 2.2

Advertisements

Институт прикладной математики им. М.В.Келдыша РАН Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences.

MAE 5391: Rocket Propulsion Overview of Propulsion Systems

Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX

Thruster failure recovery strategies for libration point missions Maksim Shirobokov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics Moscow Institute of Physics.

Delta II –7920 Fitup Study Model TMA-56 f10 optics In-Line configuration Delta II Launch Vehicle 7920 H 10L Composite Fairing.

NEO Surveyor Thomas M. Randolph Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Monopropellant Micro Propulsion system for CubeSats By Chris Biddy 174 Suburban Rd Suite 120 San Luis Obispo CA (805)

AAE450 Spring 2009 Project X pedition Final slides outline for Orbital Transfer Vehicle Propulsion Week 11 Presentation Thursday, March 26, 2009 Brad Appel.

AAE450 Spring 2009 Propellant Requirements Attitude Control Thrusters with Low Thrust Orbit Trajectories [Josh Lukasak] [Attitude Group Lead]

Section 17.0 Propulsion Subsystem Michael S. Rhee Propulsion Lead 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001.

Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.

AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Fred Ricchio Week 2: January 25 th, 2007 Propulsion Team Magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) Thruster Performance Projections.

AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Fred Ricchio Week 8: March 8 th, 2007 Propulsion Group Analysis of MPD Limitations.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

28 October st Space Glasgow Research Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Systems Considerations and Design Options for Microspacecraft Propulsion Systems Andrew Ketsdever Air Force Research Laboratory Edwards AFB, CA Juergen.

On-Orbit Assembly of Flexible Space Structures with SWARM Jacob Katz, Swati Mohan, and David W. Miler MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA

November 21, 2014 Mars Cubesat/Nanosat Workshop Flux-Pinned Interfaces for Martian Applications Laura Jones G&C Systems Engineer, Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

By Will Parnell. * The system creates propulsion using an inert gas such as Nitrogen or Helium as the fuel. * The gas is stored under high pressure, then.

Controlled Autonomous Proximity Technology with flUx pinning & Reconfiguration Experiments CAPTURE: David Bayard, Laura Jones, and Swati Mohan Jet Propulsion.

MY SPACE INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE Kamara Brown The George Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Electrical Engineering.

HokieSat Introduction

Optimal Low-Thrust Deorbiting of Passively Stabilized LEO Satellites Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, RAS Moscow Institute of.

In-Space Propulsion Systems Low Thrust Micropropulsion Michael M. Micci The Pennsylvania State University Presented at the NASA Technology Roadmaps: Propulsion.

1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.

Electric Propulsion.

Electric Propulsion System Setup S From PCDU S/C Communication 9 9 Xenon System Thermal System Power / Intercomm.

JPL AUTONOMOUS RENDEZVOUS OVERVIEW Rob Bailey Jet Propulsion Laboratory Inter-Agency AR&C Working Group Meeting May , 2002 Naval Research Laboratory.

Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.

LIFE: Traceability Matrix Team Members JPL: P. Tsou, I. Kanik NASA Ames: C. McKay UoW: D. Brownlee Mission Cost Since formal costing is yet to be performed,

JPL LASER MAPPER (LAMP) POC Bob Bunker (Task Manager) Jet Propulsion Laboratory Inter-Agency AR&C Working Group Meeting May , 2002 Naval Research.

Electric Propulsion for Future Space Missions Part I Bryan Palaszewski Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field.

SPHERES 0-G Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking Testbed Presented To DARPA Orbital Express December 2000 MIT Space Systems Laboratory David W. Miller (617)

Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,

ROCKET PROPULSION LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION Propulsion Lecture 1 - INTRODUCTION.

SPHERES Reconfigurable Control Allocation for Autonomous Assembly Swati Mohan, David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA Guidance, Navigation,

1 On-Orbit Vehicle Assembly at the International Space Station Charles Powell University of Southern California ASTE 527.

Computational Modeling of Hall Thrusters Justin W. Koo Department of Aerospace Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan

SI System of Units Chapter Background SI System of Units = “metric system” Used worldwide except in US, Liberia, Burma Old Units Bushel = 8.

The Cold War and the Space Race  At the conclusion of World War 2 both the United States and Russia set themselves up to be super powers  This rivalry.

Dawn NASA’s Dawn Mission Journey to the Asteroid Frontier Lucy McFadden, Co-Investigator Goddard Space Flight Center July 8, 2011 PA3 MSP 3 Summer Workshop.

SPACE TAXI Marcel Milanes December 14 th, 2010

Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)

ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

AAE 450 – Spacecraft Design 1 Solar Power & Docking Options Eric Gustafson 1/18/2005 Power group & docking sub-committee Solar power and autonomous docking.

Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.

Ares V an Enabling Capability for Future Space Science Missions H. Philip Stahl, Ph.D. NASA MSFC.

Wayfarer Ryan Stelzer Dr. David Gaylor April 16 th, 2016 Arizona Space Grant Symposium.

MIDN 2/C Lange United States Naval Academy. USNA | Proprietary 2.

An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.

Jeremy Straub University of North Dakota Samudra Haque* George Washington University Christopher Kenji Dinelli*, MIDN US Naval Academy.

Engineering and Science Directorate Organization Structure June 2016.

1. 課程大綱 OUTLINE Line Integrals （曲線積分） Surface Integral （曲面積分） 2.

USNA Standard CubeSat Bus USNA-P1 CubeSat (USNA-14)

Breaking the Tyranny of the Rocket Equation with Photons

Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.

The Space Race How it all Began.

The Space Race How it all Began.

ФОНД ЗА РАЗВОЈ РЕПУБЛИКЕ СРБИЈЕ

Propulsion – Attitude Control Casey Kirchner

Бази от данни и СУБД Основни понятия инж. Ангел Ст. Ангелов.

'III \-\- I ', I ,, - -

Week 4 Presentation Thursday, Feb 5, 2009

Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.

QUESTION: Compare and contrast the policies of Alexander II ( ) and Alexander III ( ) of Russia. (May 2006) Topic: Time Frame: Argument: Analyse:

Propulsion Jon Lewis Mike Rhee 8/19/99

Presentation transcript:

MICROCATHODE-COLD GAS HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEM – BRICSAT Presenter: MIDN Jacob Pittman United States Naval Academy

AMODS  Autonomous Mobile On-Orbit Diagnostic System  Concept  Mission  Spacecraft Proprietary – United States Naval Academy2

Rendezvous and Docking Proprietary – United States Naval Academy3 Russian Soyuz TMA Spacecraft

BRICSat  Operational Objective  Constraints Proprietary – United States Naval Academy4

Operational Outline Proprietary – United States Naval Academy5

Requirements for Propulsion  Volume  Mass  Total Δ V  Control  Force Proprietary – United States Naval Academy6

Current Cold Gas Systems - Δ V ModelSizeMassI sp Force AFRL- Vacco AFRL PUC1U+835 (dry)167 m/s70 s5.4 mN Vacco MiPS1U+1420 (wet)78 m/s40 s10 mN TethersHydros1U-100+ m/s300 s< 800 mN 7 [i] [i] Vacco.com, [ii] [ii] Vacco.com, [iii] [iii] Tethers.com, Proprietary – United States Naval Academy

Current Cold Gas Systems - Maneuvering Proprietary – United States Naval Academy 8 ModelSizeMassI sp Force Vacco NASA CPOD 0.8U1244 g~50 m/s40 s0.025 N Busek Micro Resistojet 1U1250 g60 m/s N Vacco/ JPL MarCO MIPS 2U3490 g188 m/s-- [i] [i] Vacco.com, [ii] [ii] Busek.com, [iii] [iii] Vacco.com,

Electric Propulsion  Micro-Cathode Arc Thruster  Developed By the Micro-Propulsion and Nanotechnology Laboratory at The George Washington University Proprietary – United States Naval Academy9

BRICSat - P Proprietary – United States Naval Academy10

Thruster Performance Proprietary – United States Naval Academy11

Integration Proprietary – United States Naval Academy12

Analysis Proprietary – United States Naval Academy13

Analysis Proprietary – United States Naval Academy14

Operational Modes  Close Proximity  Solo  Composite Unit  Phasing Proprietary – United States Naval Academy15

Conclusion  BRICSat’s Propulsion System  Accurate  Precise  Controllable  Small Proprietary – United States Naval Academy16

Questions? Proprietary – United States Naval Academy17