2016 A&P Workshop Evaluation Rob Leeds. III. EVALUATION –Include all peer teaching letters as per OSUE guidelines beginning with 2011 –You will have to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for Administrators
Learner-Centered Information Science and Librarianship Programs Exemplary Standards and Guidelines VI.
ULS FACULTY LIBRARIAN PEER REVIEW AND MENTORING Margarete Bower Chemistry Library.
 UAFT *Collective Bargaining Agreement – Article 5  UNAC * Collective Bargaining Agreement – Article 9 Can access through Faculty Services website at:
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Sameh Abul-Ezz, M.D. Carmelita Pablo, M.D.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Format for Promotion Review Portfolio KCTCS Faculty Hired 2004 and thereafter; all other full-time faculty who select this criteria.
TRC RFA WEBINAR Thursday, January 16, :00 a.m.
Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2013 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.
Advanced Writing 2010 ETP NCCU Business Communication Skills II Lecturer: Yang Chien-wei.
Month, XX YEAR (Arial 10) Understanding Adjunct Faculty Promotion.
“Finding and Hiring High Quality CTE Teachers” Kevin E. Rice, Assistant Director Brad Elwood, Supervisor of CTE Central Westmoreland Career & Technology.
Student Evaluation Workshop How To’s and Don’t Do’s Kerri L Ford Institutional Research Unit Coordinator Mary Elkins Institutional Research Unit Manager.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
Kim Gingerich, Assistant to V-P, Academic & Provost Lisa Weber, Administrative Secretary, Dean of Science Marie Armstrong, Associate University Secretary.
2015 JABSOM Promotion and Tenure Dossier Mentoring Program Presented by the JABSOM Faculty Development Program June 2 – July 28, 2015 (Tuesdays, weekly)
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
The P&T Process Roles of the Candidate, Supervisor and P&T Committee.
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
Educator’s Portfolio NAW Workshop 2012 Gloria Kuhn, DO, Ph.D,
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Amendments to Chapter III (Personnel) of the General Standards Comparison between the GS document and the one prepared by the GT-RVPP.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator Georgia Tech ADVANCE Conference March 2005 NSF ADVANCE Research Program.
LECTURER’S EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (LEO) REVIEW PROCESS.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure Guidelines 2008 edition.
Sr. Scientist Promotion Process - Orientation For Division Directors and Deputies September 15, 2015.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former UK Personnel System or prior to 2004 in a Community College Grandfathered under Format.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
Teacher Assessment in Lithuania Dalia Brazienė, The Senior specialist of Culture, Education and Sports Department of Kaunas Region, Lithuania 12 / 04 /
Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)
COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES PROMOTION AND TENURE DOSSIER ASSEMBLY WORKSHOP FALL 2016.
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop spring 2017.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
2017 JABSOM Promotion and Tenure Dossier Mentoring Program
Start Planning Early and Review Often: Developing a Long Range Plan to prepare for the P&T Process and Getting your Dossier Organized Andy Londo.
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
Lecturer’s employee organization (leo)
Faculty Toolkit: Promotion & Tenure
2016 JABSOM Promotion and Tenure Dossier Mentoring Program
Faculty Evaluation Faculty Workshop on Retention April 2, 2010
TIPS: Faculty Advancement, Success, and Tenure (FAST)
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Assembly Notes.
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
Continuing Contract & Promotion Using the MENTOR MODEL
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Objectives What is the P & T process?
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Faculty Senate January 2013
Faculty Senate January 2013
External Reviewers/Peer Evaluations
Presentation transcript:

2016 A&P Workshop Evaluation Rob Leeds

III. EVALUATION –Include all peer teaching letters as per OSUE guidelines beginning with 2011 –You will have to upload them –Peer teaching letters as per OSUE guidelines 1-2 peer evaluation, be completed annually. Faculty guidelines to obtain 1-2 narrative letters of peer evaluation from an educator or faculty of higher rank.

III. EVALUATION –Also include EEET summary tables received from Program Development and Evaluation Unit. To request your Cumulative EEET Summary Report go to: and request a 5 year EEET comparative report for promotion purposes. The PDE Unit will summaries to you in early March. After review by the candidate, EEET summaries will be sent to the Department Chair by the PDE Unit. –EEET 5 year summary tables 3-5 group evaluations annually

EEETs Group – Forms I, II, IV –When should it be used? At the end of a meeting / teaching session / teaching event. This form is intended to be used with groups of 5 or more individuals Group Form III –When should it be used? At the end of a meeting / teaching session / teaching event. This form is intended to be used with groups of 5 or more individuals -- either those with low- literacy skills or children.

Evaluation Narrative Make sure the person collecting the forms fills out the cover sheet before mailing the EEET s Be sure the Presentation Title matches the subject taught in your teaching table

Evaluation Narrative 7) Evaluation of Teaching What Tools did you use? Should be the shortest part of narrative What knowledge did you gain? What did you do well What variables need work How did you use the knowledge? What did you change because of the EEET results

LETTERS OF EVALUATION The Regional Director / Associate Chair and Department Chair will be responsible for identifying colleagues, clientele and external program users as evaluators. –At least six (6) evaluators will be contacted. –Internal evaluators should be OSU professionals at least one Extension specialist, and a person who serves/leads a team on which candidate is an active member. –A majority must be solicited from individuals not suggested solely by the candidate Unsolicited letters of evaluation or letters of evaluation solicited by someone other than the Department Chair or Regional Director / Associate Chair will not be included.