WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Pendulum Equations and Low Gain Regime Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 4. High-gain FELs X-Ray Free Electron Lasers Igor Zagorodnov Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron TU Darmstadt, Fachbereich May 2014.
Advertisements

Lecture 3. Low-gain and high-gain FELs X-Ray Free Electron Lasers Igor Zagorodnov Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron TU Darmstadt, Fachbereich May.
Optical sources Lecture 5.
Chapter 1 Electromagnetic Fields
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 8. Semiclassical Radiation Theory 8.1 Introduction Semiclassical theory of light-matter interaction (Ch. 6-7)
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Evan Walsh Mentors: Ivan Bazarov and David Sagan August 13, 2010.
Stephen Benson U.S. Particle Accelerator School January 17, 2011 The FEL as a Diagnostic* * This work was supported by U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-84-ER40150,
Physics of fusion power Lecture 11: Diagnostics / heating.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Absorption and emission processes
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
Suprit Singh Talk for the IUCAA Grad-school course in Inter-stellar medium given by Dr. A N Ramaprakash 15 th April 2KX.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Anharmonic Oscillator Derivation of Second Order Susceptibilities
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Oscillations & Waves IB Physics. Simple Harmonic Motion Oscillation 4. Physics. a. an effect expressible as a quantity that repeatedly and regularly.
Simulating Electron Dynamics in 1D
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Average Lifetime Atoms stay in an excited level only for a short time (about 10-8 [sec]), and then they return to a lower energy level by spontaneous emission.
Chapter 10. Laser Oscillation : Gain and Threshold
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
1 Chapter 3 Electromagnetic Theory, Photons and Light September 5,8 Electromagnetic waves 3.1 Basic laws of electromagnetic theory Lights are electromagnetic.
+ SwissFEL Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Bolko Beutner, Sven Reiche
Absorption and Emission of Radiation:
Free Electron Lasers (I)
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
1 Three views on Landau damping A. Burov AD Talk, July 27, 2010.
and Accelerator Physics
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
Chapter 28:Atomic Physics
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
B. FEL theory. B. FEL theory B.1 Overview B.2 Low-gain FEL theory B.3 High-gain FEL theory.
1D-FEL Without Approximations motivation, capabilities 1D theory  1D-solver for waves implementation (without and with Lorentz transformation) excitation.
Summary Kramers-Kronig Relation (KK relation)
Chapter 11 Vibrations and Waves.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
DEVELOPMENT OF A STEADY STATE SIMULATION CODE FOR KLYSTRONS
Electromagnetism Around 1800 classical physics knew: - 1/r 2 Force law of attraction between positive & negative charges. - v ×B Force law for a moving.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our earlier lectures, we found the general equations of motion  We initially considered only the linear fields, but now we will.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Sven Reiche, PSI.  1 st Generation: Synchrotron radiation from bending magnets in high energy physics storage rings  2 nd Generation: Dedicated storage.
Prebunching electron beam and its smearing due to ISR-induced energy diffusion Nikolai Yampolsky Los Alamos National Laboratory Fermilab; February 24,
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Motion in an Undulator Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN Accelerator School.
Shanxi University Atomic Physics Chapter 7 The interaction of atoms with radiation Atomic Physics.
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
§8.4 SHG Inside the Laser Resonator
7. Electromagnetic Waves 7A. Plane Waves Consider Maxwell’s Equations with no sources We are going to search for waves of the form To make things as general.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Three-dimensional effects in free-electron laser theory Panagiotis Baxevanis 9 th ILC school,
Free Electron Laser Studies
Quantum Mechanics for Applied Physics
Quantum optics Eyal Freiberg.
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Free Electron Sources of CoherentRadiation: FREE ELECTRON LASERS
Why I wanted to learn more about coupling:
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Sven Reiche UCLA ICFA-Workshop - Sardinia 07/02
R.A.Melikian,YerPhI, , Zeuthen
SASE FEL PULSE DURATION ANALYSIS FROM SPECTRAL CORRELATION FUNCTION
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Accelerator Physics Synchrotron Radiation
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Presentation transcript:

WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Pendulum Equations and Low Gain Regime Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN Accelerator School – FELs and ERLs

Superimpose a circular co-propagating plane wave with frequency  and wavenumber k: Interaction with Radiation Field in Helical Undulator Page 2 For now we are leaving the polarization undefined So far the wave number k has been undefined. Is there a preferred wave number to maximize the energy change? To change the Energy T, the particle has to move with or against the field lines.

Energy change is resonant if the phase of the cosine function does not change: The Resonance Condition Page 3 The resonance condition is: Because the normalized velocity is always smaller than unity only the case with the plus-sign can be fulfilled:  The minus-sign term oscillates as cos(k u z) or faster and averages out to zero  The polarization of B- and E- field are opposite

The transverse oscillation allows to couple with a co-propagating field The electron moves either with or against the field line, depending on the radiation phase and the injection time of the electron After half undulator period the radiation field has slipped half wavelength. Both, velocity and field, have changed sign and the direction of energy transfer remains. The Resonance Condition The net energy change can be accumulated over many period.

Because the phase in the cosine function is considered a “slowly” changing parameter, we define it as a new variable, the ponderomotive phase: Ponderomotive Phase Page 5 The resonant energy change becomes: For small deviation from the resonant energy the ponderomotive phase changes slowly with The resonance condition links an electron energy for a given wavenumber Because we must allow the case that an electron might not be in resonance, we have energy and resonant energy as two independent parameters

The particle motion in a helical undulator with presence of an external field is: The Pendulum Equations Page 6 Transform the equations in a more handy-form:  Assume only small deviation from the resonant energy:  Use new variables: Classical Pendulum equations

Electron Trajectories There are two fix points:  Stable   Unstable:  Page 7 Subscript “s” indicates the similarity to synchrotron oscillation in storage rings For small amplitude around stable point the motion is a simple oscillation with the frequency “Energy” (Hamiltonian) of the system is: Bound and unbound motion are split by the separatrix:

Trajectories in Longitudinal Phase Space Page 8 Energy Gain Forward Motion Backward Motion Energy Loss Separatrix Unbound Bound

The dynamic of a system with many electrons is best described by a phase space density function f. We know the Hamilton function. Therefore the density function is a constant of motion according to Liouville’s theorem: Ensemble of Electrons Page 9 We know the expression for  ’ and  ’ from the Hamilton function With the distribution function we can calculate the mean energy of the system:

We assume that the electric field is small and therefore the synchrotron frequency  s 2 can be use as a perturbation parameter: Small Signal Approximation I Page 10 Sorting powers of  s 2 yields recursive equation: Formal 1 st order solution is: The initial beam is uniformly distributed in  the first order term includes the initial energy distribution g(  ): Function g is unspecified so far

The first order term does not show any change in the mean energy: Small Signal Approximation II Page 11 We have to go to second order. Here we are only interested in the terms which have no explicit dependence on  (zero order in Fourier series): The term (1-cos  z) enforces that at z=0 there is no contribution from this coeficient

Intensity Spectrum of spontaneous undulator radiation Calculating the mean energy change (2 nd order term): Small Signal Approximation III Page 12 Integration by parts: with

FEL Gain Converting back the gain formula  Transfer energy from electron beam to radiation field: Small Signal Gain Page 13  Express electric field E 0 by energy density:  Assume no energy spread: g(  )=  (  - ) with

1 st Theorem: Small signal FEL gain is proportional to derivative of spontaneous undulator spectrum 2 nd Theorem: Connects the induced energy spread to the energy spread Madey’s Theorems Page 14

Various initial mean energies Numerical Examples Page 15

Optimum detuning at around half the separatrix height Even particles outside of separatrix can transfer energy to field if undulator is short enough Energy change is cubic with undulator length in start up. Mean Energy and Energy Spread Page 16 Mean Energy Energy Spread

A very crude argumentation, why the FEL can be considered a laser. A Quantum Level Point of View Page 17 The intensity distribution can be considered as the population density of the virtual states Spontaneous emission ~ density of state N density In presence of external field the photon can either be absorbed or stimulate the emission of another one. Emission Absorption Assuming photon energy much smaller than electron energy

The interaction occurs with a radiation field of same polarization as the undulator The maximum phase change is given by Planar Undulator Page 18 As in the helical case, the cos((k-k u )z-  t) term cannot be fully in resonance (  z <1). However we cannot drop it yet due to the longitudinal oscillation The resonance condition is:

The longitudinal oscillation has to be taken into account: with Planar Undulator Page 19

For the fundamental wavelength on the term for m=0 is resonant Harmonics Page 20 However if we choose a harmonic of the fundamental with k n =nk: The resonance condition is then: Odd harmonics can be in resonance as well, though with a reduced coupling J m (  )-J m+1 (  )

HelicalPlanar Polarization B- and E- Field Opposite, circularSame, planar HarmonicsNoneOdd harmonics Resonance Condition Coupling with E-Field1 Synchrotron Frequency Low Gain Function Comparison Helical vs Planar Undulator Page 21

Because the gain can be rather small it needs to be accumulated in an optical cavity: FEL Oscillator Page 22 Reflectivity R 1 Reflectivity R 2 Gain G The bunch repetition rate needs to match the round trip frequency of the cavity or a harmonic of it. Out-coupled field For amplification it requires:

Saturation effects occurs once the length of the undulator matches the period length of the synchrotron oscillation: Saturation-Effects Page 23 Normalized Vector Potential of Radiation Field: A r More radiation power can be achieved if the undulator is shorter. However it makes the FEL oscillator more difficult to laser because the small signal gain drops.

FEL Oscillator model gets more complicated in reality:  Slippage of the radiation field with respect to electron beam  Detuning of the optical cavity  Mode selection in the cavity Numerical Simulations Page 24 Field Growth Growth Rate Limit of Small Signal Gain

The small signal low gain FEL model is limited in its applicability by: Model Limitations Page 25  Scaling with more number of particles the transferred energy can be become larger than the assumption that the electric field is constant.  On resonance the beam can be strongly bunched and should emit coherently.  For large field values the analytical solution is not valid anymore. In addition the requirement of being in resonance is diminished. Model must include Maxwell equation as well High Gain FEL Model

Page 26 Outlook Continuation with High Gain FEL Theory by K.-J. Kim (tomorrow and Monday) More info on FEL Oscillators XFELO (Monday)