Balanced or Slightly Shear Dominant Regions of the QLCS Line Normal 0-3 km Bulk Shear ≥ 30 Knots Surge or Bow in the Line 1 1.Define the Updraft Downdraft.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MOTIVATION Goal: An increased understanding of the types of severe weather systems (lines/clusters) that prompt large warnings. Concern is large polygons.
Advertisements

Radar Climatology of Tornadoes in High Shear, Low CAPE Environments in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast Jason Davis Matthew Parker North Carolina State University.
The 4 Sep 2011 Tornado in Eastern New York: An Example for Updating Tornado Warning Strategies Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, NY NROW XIII 2-3 November.
Chapter 4 Convective Dynamics 4. 5
Squall Lines Loosely defined: A line of either ordinary cells or supercells of finite length (10- hundreds of km) that may contain a stratiform rain region.
mesovortex apex of bow echo Bow Echo: radar-observed features mid-level overhang weak echo notch bookend vortex.
Bow Echoes: A Review of Conceptual Models WITH SPECIAL THANKS TO: GEORGE BRYAN, NOLAN ATKINS,STAN TRIER Matthew Dux NWS-Pleasant Hill/Kansas City March.
Chapter 4 Convective Dynamics 4.5. Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and Mesoscale Convective Complexes Photographs © Todd Lindley.
Prof. Paul Sirvatka ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Severe and Unusual Weather ESAS 1115 Spotter Training and.
SPC Input – EMC GFS Satellite Data Denial Experiment April 2011 Tornado Outbreak Examination of Day 7 and Day 4 Guidance for SPC Severe Weather Outlooks.
Hurricane Frances. MODIS view of Hurricane Frances (Note that eye is present but clouds at base of eye make it look cloudy throughout)
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Convective Dynamics Squall Lines Adapted from material from the COMET Program.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Stability and Severe Storms AOS 101 Discussion Sections 302 and 303.
Severe Weather Radar Features. Weak Echo Region (WER) Region of low radar reflectivities on inflow side of storm o Near the surface High reflectivities.
The Impact of Gravity Wave/Undular Bore Dissipation on the June 22, 2003 Deshler and Aurora Nebraska Tornadic Supercells AARON W. JOHNSON NOAA/NWS Weather.
Weismann (1992) Weisman, M. L., 1992: The role of convectively generated rear- inflow jets in the evolution of long-lived mesoconvective systems. J. Atmos.
A Convective Wind Event over Southeastern Alberta on 15 July 2008 Stephen Knott and Chris Wielki Prairie and Arctic Storm Prediction Centre - Edmonton.
Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro.
Article By: Charles Doswell III Donald V Baker Charles A Liles Presentation By: Jason Tiffany Recognition of Negative Mesoscale Factors for Severe-Weather.
A Study on Convective Modes Associated with Tornadoes in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania Timothy W. Humphrey 1 Michael Evans 2 1 Department.
The supercell storm Anthony R. Lupo Atms 4310 / 7310 Lab 12.
An Examination of the Tropical System – Induced Flooding in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania in 2004.
2.6 Mesoscale Convective Systems Tropics are dominated by MCSs Consist of an amalgamation of individual clouds that form one coherent system – have convective.
Supercell Tornadoes, Non- Supercell Tornadoes, and Gustnadoes.
Section 3.5, 3.5a, 3.5b Overview For Storm-generated Mesoscale processes 1.Local Effects 2.Advective Effects.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Corfidi, et al – convection where air parcels originate from a moist absolutely unstable layer above the PBL. Can produce severe hail, damaging.
Squall Lines. Supercell Thunderstorms.
Bow Echoes By Matthieu Desorcy.
High Resolution Radar Imagery In AWIPS David L. Andra, Jr. WFO Norman, Oklahoma.
George D. Phillips NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Topeka, Kansas.
AN OVERVIEW OF TORNADOGENESIS AND VORTEX STRUCTURE by Ernest M. Agee Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana.
Profilers & Surface Gauges NE Corner of Stuart Hwy & McMillans 2835-MHz Precip. Profiler: km 920-MHz Wind Profiler: km 50-MHz Wind Profiler:
Mesoscale convective systems. Review of last lecture 1.3 stages of supercell tornado formation. 1.Tornado outbreak (number>6) 2.Tornado damage: Enhanced.
NON-MESOCYLONE TORNADOGENESIS IN THE 26 OCTOBER 2006 CLOSED MID LEVEL LOW SEVERE CONVECTIVE EVENT Aaron Johnson NWS Dodge City KS.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell NOAA.
Using Ensemble Probability Forecasts And High Resolution Models To Identify Severe Weather Threats Josh Korotky NOAA/NWS, Pittsburgh, PA and Richard H.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
ORIGINAL PRESENTATION – 11 MAR 2010 NBGSA CONFERENCE – SAN DIEGO UPDATED – 5 APR THIS IS A SAMPLE PRESENTATION KINEMATIC STRUCTURE.
The Garden City, Kansas, storm during VORTEX 95. Part I: Overview of the Storm’s life cycle and mesocyclogenesis Roger M. Wakimoto, Chinghwang Liu, Huaquing.
March 14, 2001 Bow Echo in Southeast Texas – A Mid-Altitude Radial Convergence Case Study Paul Lewis II.
August 4, 2015: Two Rare High End Severe Weather Events Inside 12 Hours In Southern New England Hayden Frank NOAA/National Weather Service Taunton, MA.
Analysis of the 2 April 2006 Quasi-Linear Convective System (QLCS) over the Mid- Mississippi Valley Region: Storm Structure and Evolution from WSR-88D.
Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis & Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS Albany, New York.
Meteo 3: Chapter 14 Spawning severe weather Synoptically-forced storms Read Chapter 14.
Quasi-Linear Convective System Tornado Warnings
WFO Huntsville, Alabama A Review of the North Alabama Violent Tornado Outbreak February 6, 2008 Brian Carcione & David Nadler NWS Huntsville, Alabama.
BP-31 Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis and Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/National.
Jennifer Belge And Mike Baker ESC 452 4/20/06
A Case Study of Two Left-Moving Mesoanticyclonic Supercells on 24 April 2006 Chris Bowman National Weather Service – Wichita, KS.
Principles of Convection. BACKGROUND When vertical shear is weak, the main influence on convective updrafts & downdrafts is bouyancy. As the vertical.
A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.
Multicells, Lines, and Mesoscale Convective Systems
Kenneth R. Cook James Caruso Mickey McGuire National Weather Service, Wichita, KS.
The 1 November 2004 tornadic QLCS event over southwest Illinois Ron W. Przybylinski Science and Operations Officer National Weather Service – St. Louis.
Supercells Eric A. Pani The University of Louisiana at Monroe.
Tornadoes – forecasting, dynamics and genesis Mteor 417 – Iowa State University – Week 12 Bill Gallus.
Mesoscale Convective Systems. Definition Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) refer to all organized convective systems larger than supercells Some classic.
Conducted by: Robert Frye & Jason Schaumann NWS Springfield, MO
2.5 Mesoscale Convective Systems
Downdraft Storms Lecture 12a
Background and Definitions
Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. and Christopher Gitro
CAE Tornado Cases Hunter Coleman Anthony Petrolito Michael Cammarata
Supercells and Tornadoes
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
…or… Why Everyone Needs a TDWR (in 25 Slides or Fewer)
Presentation transcript:

Balanced or Slightly Shear Dominant Regions of the QLCS Line Normal 0-3 km Bulk Shear ≥ 30 Knots Surge or Bow in the Line 1 1.Define the Updraft Downdraft Convergence Zone (UDCZ): Convergence zone coincident with gust front 2.Along UDCZ, look for: Deep, nearly vertical updraft Tight reflectivity gradient Trailing stratiform, also possibly thin leading stratiform Inflection point Solve for component of 0-3 km bulk shear that is perpendicular to the UDCZ Look for values ≥ 30 knots A rear inflow jet or enhanced outflow are likely candidates to cause a surge or bowing When all three ingredients are co-located in a QLCS, there is an increased likelihood for mesovortex genesis and intensification, along with increased tornado potential. 2 3 (1) Enhanced Surge - Tip of local surge is displaced more than 5 nm from the rest of the line OR larger bow is accelerating. - Located where the UDCZ curls from the leading edge back into the precipitation. - FIN on front & often northern side of surge. RIN location is typically directly behind FIN, but depends on trajectory of the RIJ/outflow. 1. Enhanced Surge 2. Inflection Point 3. Paired Front & Rear Inflow Notch (FIN/RIN) Michael Mathews NOAA/NWS Bismarck, ND (2) Inflection Point (3) FIN (3) RIN - Synoptic front or convective outflow ingested by surge. Front is typically stationary. 4. Boundary Interaction - May be variation of coupled FIN/RIN and local surge. - Low level Vr ≥ 25 kts. 8. TDS 5. Front End “Nub” 6. Contracting Bookend Vortex with Increasing Rotational Velocity 7. Tight & Strong Mesovortex [5] “Nub” UDC Z [6] Bookend Vortex Any one of the 8 scenarios met with the 3 ingredients is often worthy of a Tornado Warning. Multiple scenarios should further confidence. 1. Reflectivity Tag About to Intersect Surge - Often ahead of line and may only be viewable at higher slices km ML CAPE ≥ 40 J/kg 4. History of TDS’s 3. Reflectivity Spiking Up Near Surge Nudgers are secondary, and should add confidence to a Tornado Warning when one of the scenarios and the three ingredients are present. Jason Schaumann NOAA/NWS Springfield, MO 2240 UTC 2351 UTC 2311 UTC 2255 UTC Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line X Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line Balanced or slightly shear dominant 0-3 km line normal bulk shear ≥ 30 kts RIJ or enhanced outflow causing surge in line X QLCS forming…cold pool has yet to fully conglomerate. 35 kts 0-3 km bulk shear X X QLCS formed…RIJ impacting line from southwest. Marginal North side of surge is close to fulfilling three ingredients. Report: 80 mph winds flipped pontoon and snapped trees. Reports: Over the following 30 minutes this section of the QLCS produced multiple wind gusts from 65 to 90 mph. Inflection Point Null Event for a Central North Dakota QLCS on 7/21/2014 More on the three ingredients, scenarios, and nudgers at the NWS Springfield, MO office Google Site. This includes one pagers and a brief training video. Courtesy Doug Cramer WFO SGF Courtesy Doug Cramer WFO SGFBenefits Can be used at long ranges from the radar where developing mesovortices are not visible Improved lead time and probability of detection of tornadoes (Stanford et al, 2013) Marginal Marginal