Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility Presenters: Brent Bakken, Chelsea Seeley, Clare Rose, Holly Woodruff, and Corey Fauble 09 May 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Will it Help Me Do My Job?
Advertisements

State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
LYDIA HARKEY EIR ACCESSIBILITY OFFICER TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE FALL Implementing Accessibility Strategically at Your Organization.
SAP Jam Kickoff Meeting (your name here) April 11, 2013 © Copyright All rights reserved.
Lecture 2b: Software Project Management CSCI102 - Introduction to Information Technology B ITCS905 - Fundamentals of Information Technology.
B&O Committee May 2015 iTRAK - Change Management An Agency Adapting to Change.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Lean and (Prepared for) Mean: Application Security Program Essentials Philip J. Beyer - Texas Education Agency John B. Dickson.
OE 3B Roles & Responsibilities New GSMP V15 26 th August 2009.
Roles and Responsibilities
Moving into Design SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 6 TH EDITION DENNIS, WIXOM, AND ROTH © 2015 JOHN WILEY & SONS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1 Roberta M. Roth.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Talent Management Web-Based Systems Diana Rivenburgh President Talent Strategies & Solutions, Inc.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative ANF IT Consolidation Website Publishing / IA Working Group Kickoff.
Roles and Responsibilities
Assessing the Value of Training  Training can result in improved profitability for XYC while lowering staffing costs.  Training can result in a higher.
How to evaluate technology for accessibility Terrill Thompson Technology Accessibility Specialist University of
2.07 Reinforce company’s image to exhibit the company’s brand promise.
Chapter 12: Systems Investigation and Analysis. Agenda  How to Develop a CBIS?  Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC)  Prototyping  Join Application.
1 Project Management Introduction. 2 Chap 1 What is the impact? 1994: 16% of IT projects completed “On-Time” 2004 : 29% of IT projects “On- Time” 53%
Software Requirements Engineering: What, Why, Who, When, and How
Quality Program Roles Quality Council AVC/AVPs Quality Advisor
Microsoft Office Project 2003: Selling EPM in your Organization Matt Wilson Business Solutions Specialist LMR Solutions.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Introduction To Performance Consulting by Dr. James J. Kirk Professor of HRD Western Carolina University.
Club Matters Introduction to Club Matters. What is Club Matters?
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
Web and meeting at unimc Norms in web context for PA Applications of the norms in our websites
Software Maintenance Speaker: Jerry Gao Ph.D. San Jose State University URL: Sept., 2001.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Quentis Scott IT Specialist - Section 508 Coordinator General Services Administration Office of the Chief Information Officer Washington, D.C. Developing.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Software Quality Assurance SOFTWARE DEFECT. Defect Repair Defect Repair is a process of repairing the defective part or replacing it, as needed. For example,
Environmental Management System Implementation. Practices, Aspects, Impacts- Concepts Mission Resource Impact Resource Impact Activities/ Operations Practices.
AccrualNet: A New NCI Tool for Supporting Accrual to Clinical Trials Linda Parreco, RN, MS NCI, Office of Communication and Education September 29, 2010.
Publishing Services Bureau Web Communications Services Tips for managing the publication process Communications Workshop October 23, 2003.
29 th May Agenda 9.15 Arrival – Tea/Coffee served 9.30 Breakfast served 9.45 The importance of the Framework within the world of Service Companies
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
The Marketing Plan Chapter 2. Section 2.1: Marketing Planning  Good marketing requires good planning Research your company Study your business environment.
- 1 - FINAL_NOScript_JDVerificationTraining pptx Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs Assistant: Using knowledge of a functional area(s),
The Buyer Persona: The Basics Managed Marketing Services Karen Levy Newnam.
1 Introducing the ARC: The New Performance Appraisal Tool for RCs and UNCTs March 2016.
NIH Change Management Program Change Management Program Overview March 8,
©SHRM SHRM Speaker Title Bhavna Dave, PHR Director of Talent SHRM member since 2005 Session 2: Relationship Management Competencies for Early-Career.
Planning Engagement Kickoff
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Key features of an effective Compliance Strategy
The New Performance Appraisal Tool for RCs and UNCTs
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Roles and Responsibilities
Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop
Office 365 FastTrack Planning Engagement Kickoff
Reinforce company’s image to exhibit the company’s brand promise
Description of Revision
Making Information Security Manageable with GRC
Where is Your Organization on the Accessibility Maturity Scale
Mary Ziegler, MIT David Sloan, The Paciello Group
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Systems analysis and design, 6th edition Dennis, wixom, and roth
Systems analysis and design, 6th edition Dennis, wixom, and roth
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Zach Wahl and Tatiana Baquero Project Performance Corporation (PPC)
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
Executive Project Kickoff
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Building your Webex adoption dream team
Bridging the ITSM Information Gap
Presentation transcript:

Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility Presenters: Brent Bakken, Chelsea Seeley, Clare Rose, Holly Woodruff, and Corey Fauble 09 May 2016

Session Takeaways 1) Planning Ideas and Strategies 2) Recruiting Others to Help 3) Effectively Analyse WCAG 2.0 4) Build a Responsibility Matrix 5) Network with Others 2 Presentation Title Arial Bold 7 pt Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility 2

Agenda 1 Introductions 2 The Need for Distributed Responsibility 3 Planning from the Start 4 Champions & Advocates 5 Responsibility Matrix 6 Providing Resources 8 Networking 3 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Introductions

Pearson Brent Bakken – Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services Chelsea Seeley – Director, Shared Accessibility Services Clare Rose – Technical Accessibility Project Manager Holly Woodruff – Senior Accessible Assessment Project Manager Corey Fauble – Accessible Materials and Contract Manager 5 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility Participants How many people in your organization are assigned to accessibility efforts? What part of accessibility are you responsible for?

The Need for a Distributed Responsibility Model - Why a team approach?

What is a Distributed Responsibility Model 7 WCAG + Usability 508 Policy / Requirements Content Development User Interface User Testing Customer Support (Call Center) AccessibilityResponsibility Other Marketing & Sales Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Visibility into all Impacts & Factors 1.Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) ‒ Standards are complex ‒ Standards might be “owned” or implemented across multiple teams (Writers, Designers, Developers, Evaluators, Managers, Advocates, Other roles) 2.Usability ‒ Evaluate usability as design decisions are made (embedding skilled users) ‒ When usability and accessibility collide 3.Policy & Directives ‒ Legal Requirements, Customer Requirements, Development Requirements 4.Other Competing Priorities and Balancing Risk ‒ Current product capabilities, deployment schedules, quality, product stability 5.Individual Areas of Expertise, Experience, Job Responsibilities ‒ Subject matter experts weigh in on decisions 8 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

What can happen when you have the wrong approach to Accessibility and Usability

There are many ways to approach accessibility. - The best approach will include a lot of thought, from the start, done right, and maintained.

The Band-Aid approach

The Great design, but not functional approach

The Hey, we added it, you go ahead and try it approach

The We say it is, but it’s really not approach

The Solution that works but ends up being worse approach

The There are still some bugs to be worked out approach

The We don’t really understand the users’ needs approach

The Over thought complicated approach

The We’re just meeting code approach

The We didn’t plan it all the way through approach

The Let’s make an extreme sport out of it approach

The We had it working but forgot to maintain it approach

The We did it right, but we still did it after the fact approach

The Well planned practical approach

Afterthought Fix it any way you can Well Planned With input from all

Small Group Discussion Define your organization Industry Number of employees Accessibility for ? (Web, Products, Online Applications, other) Designated Accessibility Staff (one person, team, added responsibility) How are you defining the accessibility needs of your product and/or website Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility 26

Planning from the Start - or Start Planning

Planning Thoughts and Resources Company Policy – What have you agreed to do? Set goals and make them known Product Capabilities – What can your product do? What can’t it do? Objectives – What is your biggest need? How can you prioritize other gaps Who? – Which stakeholders “own” making the objective happen? Helpful Resource W3C WAI – Planning & Managing Web Accessibility 28 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Develop & Answer Planning Questions  What are the products or services our organization delivers?  Who is the targeted audience for these products and services?  Will people with disabilities potentially access these products and services?  Are there laws and regulations that affect how the organization must address the accessibility of its products and services?  Are there other guidelines and policies that affect the development and delivery of the organization’s products and services?  Who within the organization understands accessibility at a policy level, including all of the laws and regulations that affect the delivery products or services?  How is the organization structured?  What is the level of understanding about accessibility among the organization’s leadership?  What is the level of understanding about accessibility among the people responsible for developing content that is delivered through the organization’s products and services?  What is the level of understanding about accessibility among the staff members who are responsible for the technical development of the products and services? 29 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Building Accessibility Champions and Advocates

Building a Team - Official or Unofficial 31 Start with who you know and currently work with Explain the problem Talk about the users – All users (build specific use cases and personas) Build understanding and advocates Show how those who understand (or see the challenge) can help Keep in touch – Keep supporting Resources, guidance, assistance, acknowledgment, etc. Communicate publicly efforts being made Help change business processes Helpful Resource W3C WAI – How People with Disabilities Use the Web Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Brent Bakken 32 as – Senior Implementation Project Manager Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Chelsea Seeley 33 as - Publishing Services Manager I can MacGyver that! += Success! Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Holly Woodruff 34 as - Senior Project Manager Even Old Dogs Can Learn New Tricks Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Clare Rose 35 as - Publishing Implementation Manager Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Corey L Fauble 36 as – Requirements and Forecast Analyst Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Small Group Discussion Recruitment of Champions & Advocates Describe your experiences and roadblocks Share strategies of getting others involved Brainstorm new strategies Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility 37

Components to Add to Your Planning Developing Objectives and Goals Roadmap new features, remediate gaps in legacy code Identifying All Inputs & Outputs Requirements, Content (text, art, media), Resources Address both Internal and External Inputs Developing Use Cases and Personas Keep in mind combination disabilities Analysis of Identified Guidelines (WCAG +) What standards are you targeting? Compliance level? Gradual approach? Distributing the Responsibility Define the owners, provide visibility Accountability & Monitoring Defining the business process What are the checkpoints How do you report feedback 38 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Building a Responsibility Matrix

Pearson’s Approach Defined Target – WCAG 2.0 AA Conducted Assessment Platform Evaluation Identified Accessibility Gaps Implement Remediation Content responsibilities Publishing responsibilities Analyzing each WCAG Success Criteria What is the W3C language What does the it mean What does it mean to Pearson Assessments Determine relevance and exceptions What does the criteria consideration mean for specific job duties What is the impact on work processes Update job responsibilities and work processes Implement and monitor 40 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Sample of Pearson WCAG Matrix Contrast (Minimum) Abbreviations & Reading Level Parsing & Name, Role, Value 41 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Small Group Discussion Building You Own Responsibility Matrix How would this work in your organization What difficulties would you have creating or implementing Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility 42

Resources for Responsibilities 43

Find or Develop Resources for Responsibility Owners Secure leadership buy in (directives are not as important – lack impact) Identify existing resources W3C WAI Planning & Managing - Tips for Getting Started Accessibility Responsibility Breakdown - engage/wiki/Accessibility_Responsibility_Breakdownhttps:// engage/wiki/Accessibility_Responsibility_Breakdown Evaluation Tools List - Easy Checks - Accessibility Organizations Advocacy Groups Development and Usability Tools & Groups 44 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Develop needed resources Checklists Work Process Documents Templates Organizational Guidelines Etc. Develop and deliver training Understanding disabilities & assistive technologies Understanding accessibility guidelines Developing accessible content UX design Developer coding & resources Update core business processes 45 Find or Develop Resources for Responsibility Owners Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Small Group Discussion Resources What other resources can be developed or identified to help those responsible for accessibility What are the best ways to distribute or share those resources Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility 46

Networking 47

Take a Moment to Network Exchange contact information with Those in your small group Others in the room Pearson presenters Tell someone why you like their idea From whom do you want to learn more 48 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

49 Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility

Contact Information 50 Brent Bakken – Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services Chelsea Seeley – Director, Shared Accessibility Services Clare Rose – Technical Accessibility Project Manager Holly Woodruff – Senior Accessible Assessment Project Manager Corey Fauble – Accessible Materials and Contract Manager Making Accessibility a Distributed Responsibility