FUSE Frequent Users System Engagement Hunter Snellings, Virginia Housing Alliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

Select Committee on Homelessness Hearing, The Road Home: Step Two Mental Health Systems Laura V. Otis-Miles, Ph.D., CPRP Vice President.
Preparing for Lease Up: Staff Training for Successful MHSA Supportive Housing Operations MHSA Operations TA Call January 5, 2011 Anne Cory, CSH
Hearing: The Road Home Testimony Before the CA Assembly Select Committee on Homelessness Peggy Bailey Senior Policy Advisor Corporation for Supportive.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
The HUD-VASH Program: Permanent Supportive Housing For Chronically Homeless Veterans Nancy Campbell, National Director HUD-VASH.
Equal Justice Works: Veteran Homelessness Jesse K. Vazzano, LICSW National Director HUD-VA Supportive Housing October 2014.
The Source for Housing Solutions NASCSP Conference Charlene M. Flaherty Director, Southwest September 11, 2013.
A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.
Session II: Convening Stakeholders and Conducting Cross System Data Matches Moderator: Kim Keaton, Corporation for Supportive Housing Panelist: Brad Kaeter,
The Source for Housing Solutions Targeting and Prioritization: Best Practices for Serving the Most Vulnerable Kim Walker Senior Program Manager, CSH September.
Determining Your Program’s Health and Financial Impact Using EPA’s Value Proposition Brenda Doroski, Director Center for Asthma and Schools U.S. Environmental.
1 Housing First Opportunities and Barriers South Central Pennsylvania Housing Recovery Summit April 29, 2014 Presented by: Presented by: Diana T. Myers,
The Source for Housing Solutions Arizona Housing Forum Charlene Flaherty – Corporation for Supportive Housing Kelli Donley – Arizona Department of Health.
The Source for Housing Solutions Creating a Medicaid Supportive Housing Services Benefit Washington State Conference on Ending Homelessness. May 22, 2014.
Ending the Cycle of Homelessness and Incarceration Through Supportive Housing June 7, 2012 Andy McMahon, CSH.
Central Receiving Center Update (CRC) 5 Years of Operation June 10, 2008.
Central Receiving Center (CRC) System of Care Donna P. Wyche, MS, CAP Manager, Mental Health and Homeless Issues Division Orange County Family Services.
Permanent Supportive Housing: Impact on Hospital and Jail Usage for High Utilizers Virginia Supportive Housing Kristin Yavorsky Supportive Services Director.
Criminal Justice Mental Health and Substance Abuse Reinvestment Grant Housing Strategies Ellen Piekalkiewicz Department of Children and Families Florida.
Ending the Cycle of Homelessness and Incarceration Through Supportive Housing Grantmakers in Health November 17, 2006 Carla I. Javits, President and CEO.
Health Care for the Homeless Training Hawaii Primary Care Association June 27, 2013 Brenda Goldstein, MPH
Setting a Path to Ending Family Homelessness Presentation to the Early Childhood Cabinet July 30, 2015 Lisa Tepper Bates, CCEH Executive Director Think.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
In Crisis: Clinical Solutions for the Revolving Door Mary Ruiz MBA, CEO Melissa Larkin Skinner LMHC, CCO Florida's Premier Behavioral Health Annual Conference.
Supportive Housing Strategies: AB 2034 Evaluation -- Implications for the MHSA Emphasize that these are PRELIMINARY results; we wanted to share them.
Permanent Supportive Housing MHSA Webcast Training Series Leslie Wise Program Manager Corporation for Supportive Housing October 13, 2005.
Strategic Plan DRAFT January Homelessness is: A crisis in King County. Cost-effective to solve Transforming lives 10,000 households per year  50%
September 25, 2014 DUAL DIAGNOSIS CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT 2 nd Annual Report-Out Session.
Mental Health Crises & Police Contact in Midtown Detroit Bart W. Miles, PhD MSW Assistant Professor Wayne State University School of Social Work Center.
1 Jan Eldred Karen W. Linkins Lisa Mangiante December 10, 2008.
Thinking About Reentry & Supportive Housing Georgia Supportive Housing Association 2013 Annual Conference Ryan Moser.
1 Strategies for Serving the Chronically Homeless …
Scattered Site Housing Leveraging the Private Market to End Chronic Homelessness.
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Georgia Housing Voucher and Bridge Funding Programs SFY 2013 A Year in Review.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
A cross-system collaborative approach to serving frequent users of emergency health services Frequent Users Systems Engagement (FUSE) Initiative of Washtenaw.
The Source for Housing Solutions Engaging At-Risk Families and Children with Supportive Housing October 21, 2014.
REGIONAL CONFERENCE NORFOLK, VA MARCH 16, 2009 CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 South Hampton Roads Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
Mental Health Services Act Oversight and Accountability Commission June, 2006.
Education and Workforce Development Capacity Planning Lindsay Koshgarian, UMass Donahue Institute Western Mass Network to End Homelessness Leadership Council.
March 12,  May 2010 Governor Bob McDonnell signed Executive Order 10 calling for a Housing Policy Framework  The Homeless Outcomes Policy Report.
A LEGISLATIVE UPDATE ON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Mental Health Needs Council by Amanda Jones, J.D. Legislative.
Supportive Housing: Community and Economic Impacts
The Source for Housing Solutions Supportive Housing 101 NAMI November 7 th 2015.
The Indiana Supportive Housing Institute. What is Supportive Housing? A cost-effective combination of permanent, affordable housing with flexible services.
SSVF Best Practice Standards. Background 2 Released April Developed by SSVF TA team and VA SSVF Program Office, in consultation with SSVF grantees,
NY START Systemic, Therapeutic, Assessment, Resources, and Treatment January 2016.
Opportunities to Address Homelessness in California Sharon Rapport, CSH.
Trish Marsik, Executive Director March 31, 2016 THE MAYOR’S TASKFORCE ON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
1 Landlord Presentation (insert date of presentation)
Homelessness: Policy Opportunities CSAC Institute Course: Homelessness Emerging Issues April 14, 2016.
VIRGINIA’S RESPONSE TO HOMELESSNESS. Virginia’s Efforts to Reduce Homelessness  Executive Order 10 in May 2010 Established a housing policy framework.
ARLINGTON COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE (C0C) 10 YEAR PLAN TO END HOMELESSNESS THE ROAD TO FUNCTIONAL ZERO Total Veterans housed since January 2015: 25 Median.
Breaking the Cycle of Criminal Justice Involvement and Homelessness May 10, 2016 Presented by Joe N. Savage, Jr., PhD Regional Coordinator (USICH)
The Source for Housing Solutions Supportive Housing = Health Care May 3, 2016 Indiana Primary Health Care Association Conference.
Cost of Rural Homelessness: Rural Permanent Supportive Housing Cost Analysis MHSA Small County TA Call September 15, 2010.
The Research Behind Successful Supportive Housing September 2016.
Hudson County Division of Housing and Community Development
Turning Challenges into Opportunities
Health Care for Homeless Veterans Programs (HCHV)
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
Housing As Health Care NPH Conference
Home for Good Mayor Bonnie Crombie April 9, 2018
Data Sharing and FUSE: The National Landscape Kim Keaton, Director of Data and Analytics Prepared for Hamilton County 3/18/2019.
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Behavioral Wellness Community Housing and Support Services
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
A home for everyone is key
Presentation transcript:

FUSE Frequent Users System Engagement Hunter Snellings, Virginia Housing Alliance

What is FUSE? A framework for creating and targeting supportive housing. It combines data-driven targeting, stakeholder engagement, and quality supportive housing for the most vulnerable frequent users of public systems. A signature initiative of the Corporation for Supportive Housing (CSH), created in 2007 and replicated in nearly 30 communities around the US, including Fredericksburg and Richmond Answer to the question, “Can permanent supportive housing reduce the cost and frequency with which public institutions serve the most vulnerable in our community?” Aimed at improving life outcomes for tenants, more efficiently utilizing public resources, and identifying cost avoidance measures in crisis systems like jails, hospitals, and shelters.

The Institutional Circuit “Murray Barr was a bear of a man, an ex-marine, six feet tall and heavyset, and when he fell down – which he did nearly every day – it could take two to three grown men to pick him up. He had straight black hair and olive skin. On the street, they called him Smokey. He was missing most of his teeth. He had a wonderful smile. People loved Murray.” “I’ve been a police officer for fifteen years,” said Steve Johns of the Reno Police Department. “I’ve picked up Murray my whole career. Literally.” “Often, he was too intoxicated for the drunk tank at the jail, and he’d get sent to the emergency room at either Saint Mary’s or Washoe Medical Center. Marla Johns, who was a social worker in the emergency room at Saint Mary’s, saw him several times a week. ‘The ambulance would bring him in. We would sober him up, so he would be sober enough to go to jail. And we should call the police to pick him up. In fact, that’s how I met my husband.’ Marla Johns is married to Steve Johns.”

Million Dollar Murray They found that if you totaled up all of his hospital bills for the ten years that he had been on the streets – as well as substance- abuse treatment costs, doctor’s fees, and other expenses – “It cost us one million dollars not to do something about Murray,” - Officer O’Bryan

Typical FUSE Client FUSE clients cycle between systems, with little opportunity for engagement in each. Outcomes for this client are poor, and typically they have many issues stemming from mental illness, substance use, and chronic health conditions Without housing, they cannot access or make effective use of treatment and supportive services (“But for” rule of thumb) Supportive housing can break cycle of homelessness and incarceration among individuals who are known “frequent flyers” of jail and shelter

Breaking the Institutional Circuit Million Dollar Murray and the thousands of other chronically homeless individuals like him currently caught in the institutional circuit: Indicate the complex, co-occurring social, health, and behavioral health problems that plague so many experiencing homelessness Reflect the failures of mainstream systems of care to adequately address needs Demand more comprehensive, targeted intervention with coordinated system response

Breaking the Institutional Circuit: The FUSE Approach Cross-system, data-driven identification of target population Assertive targeting, outreach, in-reach, and recruitment Permanent Supportive Housing Enhanced service coordination and care management Measure reductions in use and cost effectiveness

CSH’s FUSE Blueprint Data-Driven Problem- Solving Cross-system data match to identify frequent users Track implementation progress Measure outcomes/impact and cost-effectiveness Policy and Systems Reform Convene interagency and multi-sector working group Troubleshoot barriers to housing placement and retention Enlist policymakers to bring FUSE to scale Targeted Housing and Services Create supportive housing and develop assertive recruitment process Recruit and place clients into housing, and stabilize with services Expand model and house additional clients

Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) FACT: At least 80 percent of tenants in permanent supportive housing are stably housed and do not return to homelessness. Permanently ends chronic homelessness and closes the costly revolving institutional door for people with multiple, severe mental and physical conditions – providing a secure home and the ongoing supports that seriously ill people need. Prioritized for the hardest to serve, most vulnerable, chronically homeless Affordable – ideally household pays no more than 30% of its income toward rent Permanent – no limits on length of tenancy

Permanent Supportive Housing Voluntary Services – Case manager proactively engages members of the tenant household in a flexible and comprehensive array of supportive services, without requiring participation in services as a condition of ongoing tenancy Connects with clinicians and community-based experts to address issues resulting from substance abuse, mental health and other crises, with a focus on fostering housing stability Supports tenants in connecting with community-based resources and activities, interacting with diverse individuals including those without disabilities, and building strong social support networks

PSH Impact on Costs

FUSE Results New York, NY, FUSE Approximately 200 tenants housed between 2008 and 2010 using city and state-funded support services paired with Section 8 vouchers. 2-year evaluation by Columbia University found 40% reduction in jail days, 90% reduction in shelter days, and 50% fewer psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations – a $15k savings per year per tenant. Established regular data matching between corrections and homeless system; increased access of community agencies to shelters to engage clients.

FUSE Results Mecklenburg County, NC, MeckFUSE Community provider has housed 45 participants using county mental health jail diversion funds. Two-year results: 90% retention rate and reductions in jail use. 52% report improved family relationships. Evaluation is in process. Collaboration between Mecklenburg Criminal Justice Services, Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office, Mecklenburg County Community Support Services, Behavioral Health, Housing Authority, Shelters, Urban Ministry Center, UNC Charlotte.

FUSE Phases Project Planning Establish roles and responsibilities Develop and finalize MOU/Data sharing agreement Establish evaluation goals/process Conduct data match(es) Phase 1: Pre Move-In Locate, engage, and screen potential clients Phase 2: Move-In Place program clients into supportive housing units and assess to determine care/supportive service needs Phase 3: Post Move-In Develop client service plans and provide each with housing-based case management Evaluate program effectiveness and client experience Maintain ongoing case conferencing to discuss occupancy/vacancy information, client well-being, participation in structured activities, health status, crises intervention, etc.

FUSE in Virginia Richmond FUSE – Reentry supportive housing program for individuals with chronic medical or behavioral health challenges leaving jails or prisons Developed in partnership with CSH in The City’s Criminal Justice Services Division received HUD funds to provide PSH for 15 homeless offenders off of the court’s mental health docket. Beginning in October 2015, the City’s Department of Justice and VSH began the process to house 12 individuals. Partners: Department of Justice Services, Department of Social Services, Sheriff’s Office, Homeward, VSH, and RBHA. Results: VSH currently has seven participants in housing and three in the process with the goal of serving 12 by the end of the first year. Service Connections: Units prioritized and matched by the GRCoC’s Singles Housing Team by the results of interview and assessment gauging vulnerability, chronicity, and medical needs. Participants are provided ongoing stabilization support and 24- hour crisis response.

FUSE in Virginia FredFUSE – Supportive housing program for chronically homeless individuals with histories of frequent incarceration and healthcare system involvement Developed in partnership with CSH and VHA. Currently in the initial planning phases, VHA is working with the George Washington Regional Commission to develop a MOU that will guide the pilot implementation later in Micah Ecumenical Ministries will house and provide services for up to 10 of the region’s justice-involved chronically homeless individuals. The University of Mary Washington will evaluate the program’s effectiveness over a two-year period following move-in. Partners: Regional stakeholder collaborative, GWRC, Micah Ecumenical Ministries, Mary Washington Healthcare, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Fredericksburg Police Department, Rappahannock Area Community Services Board. Service Connections: Initial data match; assertive engagement process; ongoing stabilization services and program evaluation.

Questions? Hunter Snellings Director of Programs Virginia Housing Alliance P: E: vahousingalliance.org