Crab Cavities Failure Mode: Machine Protection Matrix Goals: Identify the most critical failure cases Design mitigation methods Make machine protection.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture 16 -Negative Mass Instability 2 Consider two particles in a bunch. Below transition.

Advertisements

Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.

Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.

Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.

Eric Prebys, FNAL.  As you’ll show in homework, the synchrotron tune (longitudinal oscillations/turn) is generally

Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.

Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.

First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,

History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.

RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.

LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL

Failure modes & Beam loss studies in ILC Bunch compressor and main linac Arun Saini Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory ALCW’15, Tsukuba, KEK, Japan,

Status of halo excitation studies at CERN R. Bruce, D. Banfi, M. Buzio, J. Barranco, O. Bruning, X. Buffat, R. Chritin, R. de Maria, M. Fitterer, M. Giovannozzi,

Regulation of CC field vs. layout revisited P. Baudrenghien With useful comments from R. Calaga May 15 th, 2014HL-LHC Technical Committee meeting1.

2nd Hi-Lumi LHC-LARP Frascati 14/11/2012 B. Yee Rendón Studies of Machine protection for a Crab Cavity in the LHC Bruce Yee Rendón Departamento de Física.

W. 3rd SPL collaboration Meeting November 12, 20091/23 Wolfgang Hofle SPL LLRF simulations Feasibility and constraints for operation with more.

RF Cavity Simulation for SPL

Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.

13 th April 2007FFAG 07 Carl Beard EMMA RF System Carl Beard, Emma Wooldridge, Peter McIntosh, Peter Corlett, Andy Moss, James Rogers, Joe Orrett ASTeC,

W. 5th SPL collaboration Meeting CERN, November 25, 20101/18 reported by Wolfgang Hofle CERN BE/RF Update on RF Layout and LLRF activities for.

Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.

Nominal intensity bunches ● First ramp with nominal intensity bunches suffered from an instability appearing around 1.8 TeV. ● Nominal intensity bunches.

Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson

Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.

1 CC & MP - CC10 - CERN Crab LHC J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department for the LHC Machine Protection Panel.

Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.

Update on Crab Cavity: Impedance (at fundamental), RF noise, operational scenario P. Baudrenghien, R. Calaga, T. Mastoridis March 21 st, th HiLumi.

Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.

The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.

Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.

R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.

POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LHC HARMONIC CAVITIES WITH THE FULL-DETUNING SCHEME P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, CERN BE-RF 2nd LHC Harmonic Cavity meeting,

Compact Crab Cavity Status E. Jensen for WP4 R. Appleby, T. Baer, J. Barranco, I. Ben-Zvi, G. Burt, R. Calaga, E. Ciapala, S. Da Silva, J. Delayen, L.

1 Consequences of RF system failures during LHC beam commissioning T.Linnecar AB-RF.

ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.

Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,

SPS 200 MHz LLRF upgrade Part 2: Implementation Philippe Baudrenghien, Grégoire Hagmann,

P. Baudrenghien CERN-BE-RF T. Mastoridis California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA Nov 19th, th HiLumi LHC-LARP Meeting1.

LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.

13/11/2013 3rd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting B. Yee Rendón Simulations of fast Crab Cavities failures in the HL-LHC Bruce Yee Rendón Departamento.

KEKB crab RF architecture & controls K.Nakanishi KEK Dec. 16, 2010 LHC-CC10 1.

RF measurements during floating MD in Week 40 3 rd of October 2012 LIU-SPS BD WG 25/10/2012 Participants: T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, J. Esteban.

LFB, LLRF, TFB Alessandro Drago Annecy, March 2010.

LIU-SPS Beam Dynamics WG E. Shaposhnikova LIU-SPS coordination meeting

MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.

Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.

RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.

BE-RF-FB THE LINAC4 LOW LEVEL RF 02/11/2015 LLRF15, THE LINAC4 LOW LEVEL RF2 P. Baudrenghien, J. Galindo, G. Hagmann, J. Noirjean, D. Stellfeld, D.Valuch.

WP 4: Crab Cavity Ed Ciapala, Erk Jensen BE-RF, CERN HL-LHC Meeting, CERN, 20 July 2010.

Progress Report on the Ultra-fast Harmonic Kicker Cavity Design and Beam Dynamic Simulation Yulu Huang 1,2 H. Wang 1, R. A. Rimmer 1, S. Wang 1 1.Thomas.

Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.

CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.

RF interlocks for higher intensities (LMC 15 June)

Potential failure scenarios that can lead to very fast orbit changes and machine protection requirements for HL-LHC operation Daniel Wollmann with input.

Longitudinal beam parameters and stability

MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection

Developments on Proposed

Update on multi-turn particle debris tracking

WP10.3 LHC Crab Cavities Overview EUCARD SRF Annual Review

M. Mehler1), H. Klingbeil1), B. Zipfel2)

Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions

LHC impedance: Comparison between phase 1 and IR3MBC – follow-up

Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration

CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)

Crab crossing plan Optimize the crabbing system for best beam stability and minimum emittance impact Study and specify tolerances on cavity multipole components.

Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC

Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC

Powering scheme for Hollow Electron Lens

RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design

Presentation transcript:

Crab Cavities Failure Mode: Machine Protection Matrix Goals: Identify the most critical failure cases Design mitigation methods Make machine protection experiments on the SPS ring Method: Determine realistic hardware failure mode Model the effect on the field Derive the effect of each failure mode on the beam Track the particles along the machine during a failure scenario with nominal HL-LHC beam parameters and collimator settings Obtain time-dependent loss maps Check the effect of combined failures Estimate (and measure) occurrence frequency Propose experiments to verify effects of failures and mitigations in SPS or LHC

Failure modeTime constants (µs) Maximum amplitude (degrees, MV, Hz, …) Beam kick (mrad) Bunch angle and rotation (θ yz, θ yz ’) … Phase jump Voltage drop Frequency shift (phase slip) Quench Loss-induced multiple Quench Phase feedback failure Klystron failure Coupler failure LLRF failure... … Failure modeTime constants (µs) Maximum amplitude (degrees, MV, Hz, …) Beam kick (mrad) Bunch angle and rotation (θ yz, θ yz ’) … Phase jump Voltage drop Frequency shift (phase slip) Quench Loss-induced multiple Quench Phase feedback failure Klystron failure Coupler failure LLRF failure... … -Determine realistic hardware failure mode -Model the effect on the field and then the beam (some can be the sum of others)

Failure mode…After 1 turn: Beam displ. (σ) Head-Tail oscillations (θ yz ) Particles lost (%) …After 3 turns: … … Phase jump Voltage drop Frequency shift (phase slip) Quench Loss-induced multiple Quench Phase feedback failure Klystron failure Coupler failure LLRF failure... … Track the particles along the machine during a failure scenario Obtain time-dependent loss maps Failure mode…After 1 turn: Beam displ. (σ) Head-Tail oscillations (θ yz ) Particles lost (%) …After 3 turns: … … Phase jump Voltage drop Frequency shift (phase slip) Quench Loss-induced multiple Quench Phase feedback failure Klystron failure Coupler failure LLRF failure... …

Failure mode…After 3 turns: Beam displ. (σ) Head-Tail oscillations (θ yz ) Particles lost (%) …After 10 turns: … … Phase jump Voltage drop Frequency shift (phase slip) Quench Loss-induced multiple Quench Phase feedback failure Klystron failure Coupler failure LLRF failure... … Track the particles along the machine during a failure scenario Obtain time-dependent loss maps

Failure mode…After 10 turns: … Combined failure effect Est. frequency (cavity -1 s -1 ) Meas. frequency (cavity -1 s -1 ) Phase jump Voltage drop Frequency shift (phase slip) Quench Loss-induced multiple Quench Phase feedback failure Klystron failure Coupler failure LLRF failure... … Check the effect of combined failures Estimate (and measure) occurrence frequency Failure mode…After 10 turns: … Combined failure effect Est. frequency (cavity -1 s -1 ) Meas. frequency (cavity -1 s -1 ) Phase jump Voltage drop Frequency shift (phase slip) Quench Loss-induced multiple Quench Phase feedback failure Klystron failure Coupler failure LLRF failure... …