Toxic metals speciation in river Tisa D. Vujanovic 1, Z. Plamenac 1, S. Razic 2 & P. Simonovic 3 Farmaceutski Fakultet, Institut za Toksikologiju 1 & Analiticku.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Palestine Faculty of Engineering Environmental Sciences Course.
Advertisements

By: Brian Oldakowski Shane DeStefano Jeff Schmidt & Dustin Schneider
Results of sampling and chemical analyses from several hot spots in Armenia visit of the surroundings of Yerevan, July 22 – 28, 2010 Institute of Chemical.
Romanian Tailings Survey Tisa River Basin. Background In January of 2000 a tailings dam in Baia Mare failed releasing cyanide contaminated water into.
Something Fishy…Do Now
Mercury and the Environment Bio Sci 2B. Mercury: The Element   Liquid at room temperature   Atomic #: 80   Atomic Mass: g   “Quicksilver”
TRACE METALS - FROM DEFICIENCY TO TOXICITY Quest – July 22, 2004 Yeala Shaked, Yan Xu and Francois Morel, Geosciences Dept, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
Water Pollution NATURAL TYPES OF POLLUTANTS Many diseases are transferred by water bodies causing harmfull effects on human health, i.e. cholera,
Vitamins, Minerals, and Water By Jennifer Turley and Joan Thompson © 2016 Cengage.
Copper localization in Cannabis sativa grown in a copper-rich solution Piera Bonatti, Laura Arru, Sara Rognoni, Micaela Baroncini, Pierdomenico Perata.
29 th International conference SEGH, 8-12 July Toulouse, FRANCE 2013 Health risk estimate for groundwater and soil contamination in the.
Mercury, Arsenic, Cyanide
Water Pollution Mercury.
(c) McGraw Hill Ryerson Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems Amphibians (like frogs) live on both land and in the water.  They are also sensitive.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems  Amphibians are valuable indicators of environmental health because they’re sensitive to chemical changes.
Effects of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
Randall Wentsel, Ph.D. 7 September, Background  Problems  PBT process is based on principles developed for organic substances that do not apply.
1 Major Issues in Community Health: Environmental Health John Krezoski, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Dept. of Environ. Health, Safety and.
TRAINING FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
MINERALS REQUIRED IN LIVESTOCK DIETS Major minerals (Required in large quantities) Beef Dairy Swine Chicken Finishing Cow Dry Lactating Finishing Sow Broiler.
(c) McGraw Hill Ryerson 2007 Chapter 2 Energy Flow & Nutrient Cycles 2.3 Effects of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems p Words to Know: Bioaccumulationkeystone.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
Environmental Hazards & Human Health
ALEXANDRA ZILL Ackerly Creek and Glenburn Pond Chromium Contamination.
Pollution.
Effects of Air Pollution
Pesticides SNC1D. Pest Pests are living organisms that are not wanted around us. Examples of pests include unwanted dandelions growing in the lawn; rodents.
A Pollution Case Study: The Black Sea. Background  Enclosed sea with only the Bosphorus as communicating waterway with Aegean and Mediterranean Bosphorus.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
Chapter 4 Pharmacokinetics Copyright © 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning.
MAIN TOXICITY TESTING. TESTING STRATEGIES A number of different types of data are used in order to establish the safety of chemical substances for use.
Effects of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) on Nesting Tree Swallows.
Advanced Higher DDT.
Chapter 11 Section 3 Water Pollution Environmental Science Spring 2011.
Chapter 2 Using Science to Address Environmental Problems.
Environmental and Health Impacts of Uranium Mining.
“What we Eat” A Study From The National Research Council Cindy Millan ES 408.
Human impact on the Environment
EHS 507 Food Exposures: Fruits and Vegetables  Fruits and vegetables may become contaminated by multiple pathways –Purposeful spraying or soil treatment.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution, and Toxicology.
Food environment Relations between and. FOOD CHAIN.
What “we” need A growing concern Acid vs. Base Dealing with crap Good bugs Bad bugs Hodge Podge.
Pollution the presence of harmful substances (chemicals) in the environment these potentially harmful chemicals are called pollutants they change the make.
2.3 - Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems Amphibians (ie. frogs) live both on land and in water. They are sensitive to chemicals changes in the environment,
Toxic waste is generally described as many discarded material that is dangerous to any life form, including humans, animals and plant life. Toxic waste.
Students type their answers here
Removal of Heavy metal by Biological Method Seung-yun Yang Block-copolymer self-assembly center.
Human Impact of Methylmercury in the Water
Lecture 5 Minerals Minerals are inorganic elements that originate in the earth and cannot be made in the body. They play important roles in various body.
Vitamins, Minerals, and Water Module 1.5
A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification
Romania: The Aquatic Chernobyl
UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Assessing the impact of human activities on Ecosystems 2 -Water Quality Lesson 12 September 13th, 2010.
ENV 310 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com
Environmental Toxicology
Unit C Week 3.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
Eutrophication A Review of Its Process and Ecological Impacts
Pharmacologic Principles – Chapter 2
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
Bioaccumulation vs Biomagnification
Unit C Week 3.
Apes Ch 11 Risk, Toxicology, and Human Healthy
What is bioaccumulation?
Presentation transcript:

Toxic metals speciation in river Tisa D. Vujanovic 1, Z. Plamenac 1, S. Razic 2 & P. Simonovic 3 Farmaceutski Fakultet, Institut za Toksikologiju 1 & Analiticku hemiju 2, Biloski Fakultet 3 Univerzitet u Beogradu

Introduction (Short dates about pollution from the mine “Aurul” in Baira-Mare in Romania) 19 mines (hot spots) in Tisa river basin… -during the night January 30/31, 2000 the dam of flotation dump site in the gold mine “Aural” was broken; m 3 of muddy water containing cyanide, heavy metals and other pollutants spilled to the stream Lapus, reached rivers Somes, Tisza and finally Danube (official Romanian data); First traces of cyanide at “Martonos” detected in february 10 th, at 6 a.m.; max. CN - conc. was observed (2.5 mg/l) in February 11 th ; increased conc. of Cu (13 times higher than MPL), Mn and Fe (12 times higher); Consequence: havoc in the rivers Lapus, Somes and Tisa serious destruction of aquatic life in Danube River-largest fresh water environmental catastrophe in Central and Eastern Europe so far… Baia Borsa–Romania- 10 th March 2000-accident caused new pollution with heavy metals tons of mineral waste with big concentration of Pb and Zn)…

Environmental consequences of cyanide and heavy metals spill on Tisa (and Danube) Severe decrease of number of plankton-important component in the nutrition of fish (80-90% phytoplankton has been destroyed); further disintegration on river bottom- secondary pollution; further pollution in the life chain… Fish –bioaccumulation of toxic substances (final stage of nutrition chain); about 15 tons of died fish was collected in Yu; Long term consequences of this ecological catastrophe are difficult to estimate!

Our results… Metals differ from other toxic substances in that they are neither created nor destroyed by humans. Nevertheless, their utilization by humans influences the potential for health effects in at least two major ways: first, by environmental transport, that is, by human anthropogenic contribution to air, water, soil, and food, and second, by altering the speciation or biochemical form of the element. Mechanism of toxicity and toxic effects of cyanides and metals are quiet different: site of effects, t 1/2 of elimination, biotransformation processes…; Pollution of rivers by toxic metals is permanent problem! (metals are not degradabile, their effects are cumulative with long t 1/2 of elimination);

Contents of toxic metals in fish of river Tisa (March, 2000) We found that fishes from river Tisa have more toxic metals (we analyzed all important organs in a means of metal toxocinetic and toxodinamic) then controls (the same species of fishes from fish pond). Values for muscles were not over MAC (Maximum Avaluilable Concentration) and if we have law and roles in our mind we can say: "Analyzed fish are good for use". Values applies only for muscle, which is not representative organ for evaluation the state of intoxication fish by toxic metals…

The most important results and comments 1. Enhanced content of Cu were in liver (the place of accumulation), in muscle and skin, contrary to controls (fishes from ponds); 2. Differences in Fe contents (gills, brain, skin, bones); 3. Mn was significantly higher in analyzed skills, brain (the largest t 1/2 ), liver and skin; 4. Zn was enhanced in skills, brain, liver and muscle; 5. Hg was enhanced in all analyzed tissues, especially in skills, skin and bones; 6. As was enhanced, too, and the differences between Tisa fish and controls were the biggest;

The most important results and comments -results from single measurements may reflect recent exposure or long term exposure or past exposure,depending of the retention time in particular tissue; -a critical determinant of the metabolism and toxic behavior of metal is dose (or estimate of exposure to a metal -it may be function of time as well as the concentration of metal) and it’s biological half time (t ½) – the time it takes the body to excrete half an accumulated amount (different for different metals and organs); *the most precise definition of dose is the amount of metal within cells of organs manifesting of toxicological effects: of our interest – in analyzed species (fish) and in men (which is only a small segment of aquatic contamination by toxic metals)

Results and comments Fishes & other aquatic life:-the evolution of the ecological risk assessment process is so new that currently there are relatively few examples…; it is imperative in the problem formulation phase that an appropriate overview be considered for the ecological issue of concern, to answer the question of what toxic substance and/or other stressors might have an impact on important species and/or their population; Men:-The element of risk evaluation: the dose (chemical form of metals), % of absorption of examined metal; the other nutrition factors (proteins, bioelements, vitamins) at the absorption level; T 1/2 ; interactions with bioelements and other metals at the biologand level (enterocit-absorption, proteins- hormone, enzymes, molecular or other membranes e.t.c.)

Contents of Cu (mg/kg) in some analyzed tissues of fish Cu-essential element; absorption- about 50% from GIT; t 1/2 - 4 weeks; liver and muscle (the biggest content); Mo can influence on the Cu metabolism; (dates for men); -aquatic life is very sensitive on enhanced Cu level; significant inhibition of mycrosomal enzymes in liver and some other enzymes in fish…The similar effect show Zn…

Contents of Fe (mg/kg) in some analyzed tissues of fish 5% of all elements present in the ground of the Earth; Essential element (a lot of enzymes-oxide-reduced processes and active proteins- hem); Absorption from GIT 5-15%; t ½ years; FeO –co carcinogen (animal study) Co, Cu and Zn reduce absorption of Fe;

Content of Mn (mg/kg) in some analyzed tissues Mn presents in Fe ores; Essential element in men, but without observe deficiency; 1-3% GIT absorption;(liver, kidney and brain –highest conc.); brain-the highest t ½… rice and wheat can accumulate Mn from soil… Mn presents only in the tissue of fish from river Tisa…

Content of Zn (mg/kg) in some analyzed tissues Essential metal (in 200 enzymes); Git absorption 10-90%; t ½ -1 year (highest level in liver bones, muscle); Observed antagonism between Zn and Cd, Zn and Cu…(resorption level) Carcinogen effects on experimental animals…(human dates); More toxic effects for aquatic life than for people…

Content of Hg (mg/kg) in some analyzed tissues Organic Hg is more toxic for water plants ( times more); Hg accumulate in the algae and stop mitosis process; Organic Hg- better resorption (case of biomagnification in shells and crayfish); Young organisms are more sensitive; (inhibition of mitochondrial and lisosomal functions-connection with SH groups of enzymes);

Content of As (mikrog/kg) in some analyzed tissues Inorganic As-in the sediment of the river; organic As-influence of anaerobic microorganisms; Organic As easy enter in the chain of the food (very toxic); case of biomagnification in shells and crayfish; Inhibition of enzymes by connection with SH groups; inhibition ATP syntheses (similarity with P)

Assessment toxicity of metals Metals have different toxic effects on water plants and animals; combination of presence metals have synergistic or antagonistic effects on living world in the rivers: additive effects - Cr and Zn; Cu and Ni; Cd and Pb enhance toxic effect of Zn… The influence of toxic metals from fish to men dependents of many factors: % of fish meat in nutrition; properties of ingested metals-chemical form and presence of different nutrition factors; individual health conditions and age, life style factors…