Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulating isoprene oxidation in GFDL AM3 model Jingqiu Mao (NOAA GFDL), Larry Horowitz (GFDL), Vaishali Naik (GFDL), Meiyun Lin (GFDL), Arlene Fiore (Columbia.
Advertisements

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Lab, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 28 October 2013 H. O. T. Pye, R. Pinder,
Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
Uncertainties in the atmospheric oxidation of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) : implications for air quality and climate Jingqiu Mao (Princeton/GFDL)
QUESTIONS 1.Is hexane more or less reactive with OH than propane? 2.Is pentene or isoprene more reactive with OH?
Havala O. T. Pye 1, Rob Pinder 1, Ying Xie 1, Deborah Luecken 1, Bill Hutzell 1, Golam Sarwar 1, Jason Surratt 2 1 US Environmental Protection Agency 2.
Evaluating the impact of recent changes in
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Developing Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Code for the MCM David Johnson (Mike Jenkin and Steve Utembe) Department of Environmental Science and Technology,
A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,
Havala Olson Taylor Pye April 11, 2007 Seinfeld Group Department of Chemical Engineering California Institute of Technology The Effect of Climate Change.
Ozone Production Efficiency in the Baltimore/Washington Urban Plume Presentation by Linda Hembeck Co-Authors: Christopher Loughner, Timothy Vinziguerra,
Sensitivity of U.S. Surface Ozone to Isoprene Emissions & Chemistry: An Application of the 1°x1 ° North American Nested GEOS-CHEM Model GEOS-CHEM Model.
Atmospheric chemistry Day 4 Air pollution Regional ozone formation.
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
Yuzhi Chen 13th CMAS Assessment of SAPRC07 with Updated Isoprene Chemistry against Outdoor Chamber Experiments Yuzhi Chen a, Roger Jerry a, Kenneth Sexton.
Developing chemical mechanisms that are more robust to changes in atmospheric composition Gookyoung Heo, a William P. L. Carter, a Greg Yarwood b a Center.
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
Urban Air Pollution Public and Environmental Health Concerns –Elevated levels of toxic compounds Regional and Global Impacts –Background Chemistry and.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
Assessment of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A synthesis of climate change impacts on ground-level ozone An Interim Report.
Parameterization of Global Monoterpene SOA formation and Water Uptake, Based on a Near-explicit Mechanism Karl Ceulemans – Jean-François Müller – Steven.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division Columbus Day 2010 Prakash Bhave U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Aerosol from Organic Nitrogen in the Southeast United States Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental.
ARCTAS-CA June 2008 Air Quality Simulations. July 1, 2009 ARCTAS-CA Data Analysis Workshop 2 Collaborators Ajith Kaduwela, Chenxia Cai, Dazhong Yin, Jin.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
Deguillaume L., Beekmann M., Menut L., Derognat C.
Southeast US air chemistry: directions for future SEAC 4 RS analyses Tropospheric Chemistry Breakout Group DRIVING QUESTION: How do biogenic and anthropogenic.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Model Performance Evaluation with the.
MOZART Development, Evaluation, and Applications at GFDL MOZART Users’ Meeting August 17, 2005 Boulder, CO Arlene M. Fiore Larry W. Horowitz
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
Diagnosing the sensitivity of O 3 air quality to climate change over the United States Moeko Yoshitomi Daniel J. Jacob, Loretta.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence Matthew Woody and Saravanan Arunachalam Institute.
1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Data Needs for Evaluation of Radical and.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Uncertainties in isoprene-NO x -O 3 chemistry: Implications for surface ozone over the eastern United States TEMP PAR Leaf Area ISOPRENE + NO x  O 3 Arlene.
Using Linked Global and Regional Models to Simulate U.S. Air Quality in the Year 2050 Chris Nolte, Alice Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division,
SAPRC07T Implementation within the CMAQ model.
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
Top-down constraints on emissions of biogenic trace gases from North America Dylan Millet with D.J. Jacob, R.C. Hudman, S. Turquety, C. Holmes (Harvard)
Sensitivity of continental boundary layer chemistry to a new isoprene oxidation mechanism Jingqiu Mao (Harvard), Fabien Paulot (Caltech), Daniel Jacob.
Recent Changes in Eastern U.S. Forests: Implications for Air Quality
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying Xie 1, Fabien Paulot 2, Robert W. Pinder 1, William P.L. Carter 3, Christopher G. Nolte 1, Deborah J. Luecken 1, William T. Hutzell 1, Paul O. Wennberg 2, and Ron Cohen 4 1 US EPA Office of Research & Development; 2 California Institute of Technology; 3 University of California Riverside; 4 University of California Berkeley 9 th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC

2 Outline Introduction –High NO x chemistry and isoprene nitrates –Low NO x chemistry and HO x recycling Methodology Results –Smog chamber evaluation –INTEX-NA 2004 Conclusions Current and future research

3 Introduction Isoprene is the predominant VOC –Global emissions ~500Tg/yr, oxidized within hours by OH –High NO x : NO –Low NO x : HO 2 /RO 2 High NO x : -> RO + NO 2 formaldehyde, methyl vinyl ketone, methacrolein RO 2 + NO -> RNO 3 ISOP + OH -> RO 2 O3O3 yield (4 -15%)? terminal sinks or recycle NO x ?

4 Introduction Isoprene is the predominant VOC –Global emissions ~500Tg/yr, oxidized within hours by OH –High NO x : NO –Low NO x : HO 2 /RO 2 High NO x : -> RO + NO 2 formaldehyde, methyl vinyl ketone, methacrolein RO 2 + NO -> RNO 3 ISOP + OH -> RO 2 γ*secondary isoprene nitrates + (1- γ)*NO 2 O3O3 yield (4 -15%)? terminal sinks or recycle NO x ?

5 Isoprene nitrates (INs) have large impact on O 3 production – Increase INs yield by a factor 3 decrease global O 3 production by 10% (Wu et al. 2007) Represent a major uncertainty in determining the response of O 3 to future changes in biogenic emissions – Wu et al. (2008a) found lack of sensitivity of O 3 to climate change in southeastern US (12% INs, no NO x recycling) – Racherla and Adams (2006) reported a large O 3 sensitivity for the same area (no INs) Introduction Isoprene is the predominant VOC –Global emissions ~500Tg/yr, oxidized within hours by OH –High NO x : NO –Low NO x : HO 2 /RO 2 High NO x : -> RO + NO 2 formaldehyde, methyl vinyl ketone, methacrolein RO 2 + NO -> RNO 3 ISOP + OH -> RO 2 γ*secondary isoprene nitrates + (1- γ)*NO 2 O3O3

6 Introduction Low NO x: –Gap between modeled and measured OH levels ISOP + OH -> RO 2 RO 2 + HO 2 -> ROOH (Ren et al. 2008) deposition INTEX Modeled

7 Introduction Low NO x: –Gap between modeled and measured OH levels ISOP + OH -> RO 2 RO 2 + HO 2 -> ROOH (Ren et al. 2008) INTEX Modeled deposition x x

8 Objective Incorporate the recent advancements in isoprene photooxidation chemistry into the SAPRC07 photochemical mechanism within the CMAQ model –isoprene nitrates –HO x recycling Evaluate the new scheme with chamber experiment data Compare CMAQ predictions to observations from the summer 2004 INTEX-NA campaign

9 Methodology 2004 INTEX-NA campaign –NASA DC8 (regional scale), NOAA WP-3D (local plumes) –The most spatially extensive observations of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates (∑AN), 12-20% of NO y CMAQ domain and simulation period –36 km US, 148 x 112 horizontal grid cells –July 1 - Aug 15, 2004 Chemical mechanism – BASE: SAPRC07 – ISOP: SAPRC07 + new isoprene scheme CMAQ simulation based on sensitivity studies results

10 Comparisons of the mechanisms

11 Smog chamber evaluation 34 experiments (UCR, UNC, CSIRO) covering ranges of VOC/NO x concentrations –11 with initial NO x below 200 ppb Results: –Higher and improved methyl vinyl ketone –Better O 3 under NO x -limited conditions Bias reduced from -14% to -5%

12 CMAQ model evaluation – isoprene, formaldehyde, NO x NO x (ISOP – BASE) Layer 1, averaged over INTEX-NA isoprene formaldehyde NO x (isop > 300 ppt)

13 Model evaluation – alkyl nitrates all dataisop > 300 ppt

14 Model evaluation – O 3 all dataisop > 300 ppt ISOP – BASE Layer 1, averaged over INTEX-NA 90 th percentile 2-3 ppb increase

15 Biogenic SOA (AISO + ATRP + ASQT+ AOLGB + AORGC) ISOPBASE (ISOP – BASE)/BASE

16 OH all dataisop > 300 ppt isoprene vs OH (Ren et al. 2008) INTEX Modeled

17 OH isoprene vs OH (Ren et al. 2008) INTEX Modeled

18 Conclusions Smog chamber study –Better methyl vinyl ketone –Better O 3 CMAQ simulation –Better Science improvement in alkyl nitrates and almost all species –Slightly higher NO x and O 3 concentrations due to more efficient NO x recycling –Improved O 3 more confidence in predicting the response of O 3 to changes in biogenic emissions Improved OH, but levels are still too low at high isoprene levels –Need mechanism which results in net formation of OH instead of just recycling (Peeters et al. 2009)?

19 Current and future Research Testing Peeters isoprene scheme –Impact on OH level –Reduce its uncertainties based on observational constrains (alkyl nitrates, methyl vinyl ketone, methacrolein) Investigation of new SOA precursors (Epoxide, MPAN) Smog chamber evaluation for low NO x conditions when additional source of data is available Model future emission scenarios