Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.

Advertisements

2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.

LGBT-Friendly Campus Index Presented to: President’s Diversity Council Friday, February 19, 2010 NDSU.

Sophomore Success Program- A Residential Model with Graduation in Mind Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Housing & Residential Life October 2006.

Academic Advising Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment and Faculty Governance UNC Charlotte Office of Academic Affairs.

Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.

1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.

Student Satisfaction Inventory Results Saint Joseph’s College March 12, 2013.

1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.

1 Strategic Planning Workshops February 23, 2007.

Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.

University Surveys and Assessments Department Chair and Dean Retreat.

University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.

A Climate Study vs. A Weather Report For the purposes of a climate study, the unit of analysis is the institution. We can also look separately at segments.

Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.

Academic Assessment Workshop: A Review of the Student Satisfaction Inventory Implementation & Implication Liz Baldizan, Ed.D., Assistant Dean, Academic.

Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.

1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)

1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.

A Coach’s Communication Strategy and its Relationship to a Collegiate Player’s Motivation to Perform as an Athlete Dana Neil, Andrea Pendergast, Amy Schmidt,

DIT STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY 2010 Dr Rachel O Connor Mark Russell Campus Life & Student Retention Office DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

2007 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Bruce Schultz, Dean of Students and Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Development Michael Votava, Associate.

Registration Satisfaction Survey FAS Report, Fall Presented by: K. El Hassan, PhD. Director, OIRA.

Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.

What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.

All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, LLC. Permission is required to reproduce information. Adult.

Exploring College Students’ Perceptions of Their Peers With Disabilities Katie Beck a and Kellie Risberg a, Faculty Mentor: Mary Beth Leibham b, Ph.D.

March Staff Survey Results. STATE OF THE STAFF (2010 Staff Survey Results)

1 Spartan Experience Questionnaire Selected Results Spring 1999 Office of Institutional Research September 1999 UNCG Planning Council September 22, 1999.

The Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA SM ).

Understanding Belonging to Improve Persistence: A Gender Study Tamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University Denise Wilson (Project Lead) and Diane Jones, University.

Climate for Minorities at UK A Summary of Various Survey Findings (1997 – 2001)

Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.

Achieving the Dream Baseline Data – What does it tell us? Presented by the ATD Data Team February 24, 2015.

Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.

Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience

Partnering for Student Success The Bridge to Clemson University Program Sue Whorton Clemson University National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students.

* Number before each statement is the item number in the survey. Number with “S” prefix in parentheses indicates the scale the statement is under. Institutional.

ACUHO-IEBI Resident Study 2009 Highlights from the Executive Summary.

Student Satisfaction Report: Pacific Oaks College: Addendum: Instructional Sites Vs. Cohorts Office of Institutional Research TCS Education System September.

The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.

Comparing Senior And Sophomore Knowledge and Confidence Concerning Academic Advising Anecdotal evidence suggested that a discrepancy existed between what.

UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.

ACUHO-IEBI Resident Study 2010 Highlights from the Executive Summary.

1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,

Knowing Our Students, and Helping Them Succeed. 54.8% Latino Students (38.8% college-wide) 67.6% Female v. 32.4% Male (61.4% v. 38.6% college-wide) Average.

Institutional Effectiveness: Sophomores’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Sophomore Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.

Promote a diverse, inclusive learning environment by recruiting and retaining students, faculty and staff who reflect the demographic changes in our society.

An Institutional Look at Students’ Satisfaction with NWTC Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.

Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.

Cañada Noel-Levitz Results Spring 2010 Semester. What is the Noel-Levitz Survey? National survey of students conducted by hundreds of colleges every year.

UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.

Recruiting and Retaining Diverse Students: Why it’s Different and The Same Presented by Sylvia R. Carey-Butler, PhD Assistant Vice Chancellor, Academic.

First Generation Students Standing in the Doorway of Success.

Humboldt State University Divisional Budget Presentations.

Institutional Effectiveness: Seniors’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Senior Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office.

Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012

ACT Student Opinion Survey Results

Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment

Student Experience Survey Spring 2009 Report

Your Institutional Report Step by Step

McPherson College, Fall 2017

Final findings of climate survey

Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends

Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2019 Undergraduate Trends

Final findings of climate survey

College of Computing & Informatics Scorecard

College of Health & Human Services Scorecard

College of Education Scorecard

Presentation transcript:

Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002

About the Four-Year Public version: Measures two critical dimensions: importance and satisfaction – Students answered each question on a Likert scale to show level of importance & satisfaction Compares our students with those from other four-year public institutions Proven to be statistically reliable when compared to other similar surveys

Each Report Includes: Demographic Summary – 2002: 128 Institutions & 115,595 student records Scale Summary Graphs Institutional Summary Summary Items Target Group Reports Optional Comparison Reports

U of L Student Participation 1995 – 729 Surveys completed 1999 – 820 Surveys completed 2002 – 1658 Surveys completed

Fall 2002 U of L Participants 62% female 38% male 41% Freshmen 27% Sophomores 17% Juniors 14% Seniors 54% female 46% male 35% Freshmen 21% Sophomores 20% Juniors 25% Seniors Overall U of L Demographics (2000)

Fall 2002 U of L Participants 76% Caucasian 12% African-American 3% Asian/Pacific Islander 1% Hispanic 54% Arts & Sciences 20% Business 13% Speed 9% Education 8% Nursing 1% Music 81% Caucasian 13% African-American 3% Asian/Pacific Islander 1% Hispanic 55% Arts & Sciences 20% Business 10% Speed 5% Education 4% Nursing 2% Music Overall U of L Demographics (2000)

12 categories used by Noel-Levitz: (4 to 17 questions included in each category) Academic Advising Recruitment and Financial Aid Campus Life Campus Support Services Concern for the Individual Student Centeredness Instructional Effectiveness Campus Climate Registration Effectiveness Responsiveness to Diverse Populations Safety and Security Service Excellence

(Includes: Institution's concern for individual academic success) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Institution's concern for individual academic success)

(Includes: Open communication channels, strong campus community, sense of belonging) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.01 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Open communication channels, strong campus community, sense of belonging)

(Includes: Social activities, organizations, residential life and athletic opportunities) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Social activities, organizations, residential life and athletic opportunities)

(Includes: Availability of staff, services and resources) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Availability of staff, services and resources)

(Includes: Exhibition of individual care, concern and fairness) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Exhibition of individual care, concern and fairness)

(Includes: Faculty commitment and accessibility and quality of instruction) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Faculty commitment and accessibility and quality of instruction)

(Includes: Quality of services provided by admission and financial aid offices) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Quality of services provided by admission and financial aid offices)

(Includes: Quality of services provided by registrar and bursar offices) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Quality of services provided by registrar and bursar offices)

(Includes: Institution’s commitment to various subcultures) No statistical significance in this category

(Includes: Institution’s commitment to various subcultures)

(Includes: Campus safety services and security responsiveness) †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.01 level †

(Includes: Student parking and student safety at night)

(Includes: Customer service to students) *Difference between U of L 2002 results and overall 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level * †

(Includes: Customer service to students)

(Includes: Concern and care shown toward students) †Difference between 199 results and 2002 results is statistically significant at the.001 level †

(Includes: Concern and care shown toward students)

University of Louisville African-American Students Comparison of Satisfaction Levels 200 African-American Participants (12%)

(Includes: Institution’s concern for individual academic success)

(Includes: Open communication channels, strong campus community, sense of belonging)

(Includes: Social activities, organizations, residential life, athletic opportunities)

(Includes: Availability of staff, services and resources)

(Includes: Exhibition of individual care, concern, and fairness)

(Includes: Faculty commitment and accessibility, quality instruction)

(Includes: Quality of services provided by admission and financial aid offices)

(Includes: Quality of services provided by registrar and bursar offices)

(Includes: Institution’s commitment to various subcultures)

(Includes: Student parking and student safety at night)

(Includes: Customer service to students)

(Includes: Concern and care shown toward students)

Noel-Levitz Summary Student expectations continue to rise Compared to 128 Institutions: – Student satisfaction above the mean in eleven areas – Student satisfaction lowest in Student Centeredness Satisfaction in Advising at U of L increased African-Americans satisfaction increased overall