Susan White-DePace NUFO Executive Administrator NSF Large Facilities Workshop May 24-26, 2016 Washington, DC Introducing the National User Facility Organization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Starting an ESC Chapter in Your State. Energy Services Coalition Mission To promote the benefits of, provide education on, and serve as an advocate for.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
The Next Generation of APWA Players APWA National Overview to College Students and Young Professionals.
Minority Serving Institutions Community of Partners Council.
WSQA PEPD Mentor Training Session 1: Mentoring role and responsibilities.
Robert Gropp, Ph.D. Director of Public Policy Richard O’Grady, Ph.D. Executive Director.
2  A nonprofit, nonpartisan association  Represents highway and transportation departments in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
Advocacy Strategies for New CAN Coordinators How to Grow A Successful Grassroots Network CEC National Legislative Conference June 7, 2014.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
EmergingLeadersAlliance.org. The ELA began as a joint effort of the engineering Founder Societies that was started in 2008 and has remained a collaborative.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Advocacy Strategies for New CAN Coordinators How to Grow A Successful Grassroots Network CEC CAN Summer Policy Series July 2013.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
1 VA-Affiliated Nonprofit Research and Education Corporations (NPCs) Barbara F. West Executive Director National Association of Veterans’ Research and.
NSF Programs That Support Research in the Two-Year College Classroom  V. Celeste Carter, National Science Foundation Jeffrey Ryan, University of South.
BCNET Security Policies Jens Haeusser Information Security Officer, UBC and Chair, Security Working Group, BCNET Internet2 Joint Techs Vancouver, BC July.
DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Leadership I and II February, 2011 Providing Services to Students, Families and Community through.
2014 E DUCATIONAL T ECHNOLOGY P LAN P ROJECT K ICKOFF.
Constraints on International Geoscientific Interaction AGI Geoscience Leadership Forum 2003 National Academy of Sciences 19 May 2003 Peter Folger AGU.
The Future of Ecological Research As Education Network (EREN) Dr. Bob R. Pohlad, Ferrum College Dr. Laurel Anderson, Ohio Wesleyan University.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting March 3, 2010 Overview of the DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program Julie Carruthers, Ph.D.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
April 29, 2004 Slide 1 ANSI Homeland Security Standards Panel ANSI Homeland Security Standards Panel Presented by: Amy Marasco, ANSI VP and General Counsel.
EmergingLeadersAlliance.org. The ELA began as a joint effort of the engineering Founder Societies that was started in 2008 and has remained a collaborative.
ASDA Structure and Leadership. What is ASDA? The American Student Dental Association is a national student-run organization that protects and advances.
In existence since 1981, the Commission for Women identifies areas of concern to women employees and students of Penn State, and suggests changes in existing.
Council on Competitiveness: High Productivity Computing Initiative CASC Members Meeting March 4, 2004 Washington, D.C.
FGFOA STANDING COMMITTEES Established and Evaluated by the FGFOA Board of Directors to Utilize talent and resources of the FGFOA Membership.
Employee Recognition and Wellness Benchmarking Project Healthy Workplace Champions June 29, 2009.
Smart Grid Interoperability Panel & ISO / RTO Council Smart Grid Projects David Forfia SGIP Governing Board Member – Stakeholder Category 21 ISO/RTO Sponsor.
Building relationships and bridging social capital: An inclusive approach to immigrant civic engagement within libraries A PROCESS AND OUTCOME EVALUATION,
Connect to the vibrant association community. ASAE is a membership organization of more than 22,000 association executives and industry partners representing.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
Strategic Plan Update Plymouth Public Schools. Goal 1: “The Whole Child” Objective 1.1: Enhance student social and emotional growth, health and welfare,
Director’s Report 6 h BRDI Meeting Washington, DC 31 January 2012 Paul F. Uhlir, J.D. Director, Board on Research Data and Information National Academy.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team Plenary Agenda Item #14b 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6.
ASHRAE Update ExO Report to Committees. Strategic Plan: Next Step Moving to implement Strategic Plan Initiative 4, Expanding ASHRAE’s Role in Global Community.
Standards Education 18 March 2009 Steve Mills, Chair, SEC Standards Board Forum.
BIO AC November 18, 2004 Broadening the Participation of Underrepresented Groups in Science.
Technology Transfer in The United States Paul Zielinski Director, Technology Partnerships Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology Chair,
History Group of transportation supporters gathered to discuss ideas to address Missouri’s transportation infrastructure investment Reviewed efforts and.
Academy of Medical Educators: An Overview New Faculty Orientation College of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC January 25, 2016.
Susan White-DePace NUFO Executive Administrator NSF Large Facilities Workshop May 24-26, 2016 Washington, DC Introducing the National User Facility Organization.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF BUSINESS AFFAIRS Approved by the Vice President for Business Affairs: December 2,  Provide students.
SAFE Association UNIQUELY FOCUSED IN A CRITICAL DISCIPLINE ORIGINALLY FOUNDED IN 1956 AS SPACE AND FLIGHT EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATION, SAFE ASSOCIATION IS AN.
Engaging the Private Sector through Transparency, Public Consultations, and Advisory Committees 1 Bryan O’Byrne August 2014.
Communities of Practice & L ESSONS L EARNED Budget, Finance, and Award Management Large Facilities Office May 2016 Large Facilities Workshop 2016 S. Dillon.
Founded in 1899, the Society  is a non-profit corporation  has an Executive Office in Washington, DC  is governed by a 19-member Council  elected.
June 23, 2016 Organizational Overview. 2 Automation Federation Background A fragmented community of automation professional associations and societies.
Website Report: America Council on Education Michael A. Smith.
New Director Orientation Child Support Directors Association CSDA.
Orientation Thursday, October 20 Washington Elementary
UNIQUELY FOCUSED IN A CRITICAL DISCIPLINE
Parental Involvement Policy
University Career Services Committee
Governance and Collaboration By-Laws
Introducing the Society for Science User Research Facilities
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Plymouth Public Schools
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Parental Involvement Policy
National Quantum Initiative
Product Stewardship Institute Advisory Council Meeting The Lenox Hotel – Boston, MA September 14, 2012.
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Colorado Special Education Advisory Committee (CSEAC) 2012 Fall Special Education Directors’ Meeting October 12, 2012.
ASPB ASPB is a professional society devoted to the advancement of plant biology through supporting the plant science community The Plant Cell, Plant Physiology,
Presentation transcript:

Susan White-DePace NUFO Executive Administrator NSF Large Facilities Workshop May 24-26, 2016 Washington, DC Introducing the National User Facility Organization

Overview  Introduction to NUFO  What is NUFO’s role?  What does NUFO do?  How is NUFO changing?  What’s in it for you? 2

Introduction to NUFO  1997 first formal meeting of user administrators to share best practices  2003 user representatives were included in meeting  2006 formally became NUFO  Currently has 47 member facilities (materials science, astrophysics, computing, high-energy, nuclear energy, neutron, etc.)  Two-branch organization: user administrators and user representatives  Primary mission is to provide a unified message at a national level on issues for science done at federally-funded user facilities  Current NSF-funded facilities are: NSCL, NOAO, NRAO, Maglab, & CHESS – Love to have broader NSF membership and participation 3

NUFO’s Unique Role  Only professional association dedicated to the user science community  Provides a forum for multiple communities of practice  Only unified voice for the user science community in Washington, DC  BUT: NUFO is not a lobbying organization 4

NUFO Activities  Annual Membership Meetings  Science Expositions on Capital Hill  Congressional Testimony  Expert input to federal agencies (e.g., DOE Order on Foreign Visits, Immigration)  Public outreach (e.g. Science & Engineering Expo)  Share Benchmarking 5

 Congress invites NUFO to hold yearly Exhibitions on Capital Hill about User Facility science 6 NUFO on Capital Hill Providing a unified message at the national level …

 As a direct result of the 2012 User Science Exhibition, NUFO was invited to testify to Congress about User Facility science  The U.S House of Representatives Science Space & Technology Committee, Subcommittee on Energy & Environment hearing on Utilizing the Tools of Science to Drive Innovation through Fundamental Research” was held on June 21, 2012, discussing: – The role that the Department of Energy’s (DOE) national scientific user facilities play in enabling basic research that drives innovation and economic growth. – Challenges and opportunities associated with user facility planning and management.  Dr. Tony Lanzirotti (U. of Chicago) testified as Chair of NUFO. Also on the panel were – Dr. Stephen Wasserman from Eli Lilly – Dr. Persis Drell (director of SLAC), – Dr. Suzy Tichenor (ORNL), and – Dr. Ernest Hall (GE Global). 7 NUFO Testifies to Congress Providing a unified message at the national level …

 NUFO involvement led to modification of DOE Order 142.3: Foreign Visits and Assignments – facilitating access for non‐US citizen users – Enhances accountability within the security function – Removed requirements that did not advance national interest or laboratory security – Improved efficiency in administering processing – Minimized administrative barriers to scientific research 8 NUFO Support the DOE Providing a unified message at the national level…

 USA Science & Engineering Festival in Washington, DC – NUFO conducted hands-on demonstrations to stimulate interest in science. – children, parents, high school students, and teachers participated in activities at the NUFO booth 9 NUFO Promoting science to the public…

NUFO advances and promotes industry access to User Facilities – NUFO 2009 workshop focused on industrial use of national user facilities – NUFO Report led to a BESAC study – BESAC report recommended changes that directly tracked NUFO recommendations – This has the direct potential to increase “industrial friendliness” of the facilities 10 NUFO Supports Industry Providing a unified message on industrial user access….

Enhancing Immigration Procedures for International Users Supporting a unified message on international collaborations…  Discussions with the Democratic Counsel on the Judiciary Committee and private law firms  NUFO conducted two surveys on the immigration experiences of international users  Based on the survey results, NUFO sent formal communications to Dept. of State, Dept. of Homeland Security, and Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, seeking to improve access to U.S. user facilities to better meet the needs of international scientists. 11

 NUFO conducts benchmarking studies to enable facilities to adopt best practices – DOE User Agreements – Calls for Proposals – Shipping Policies and Procedures – Multilingual Websites – Housing for Users – Multi-facility proposals – APS/ATR, APS/CNM – Complementary research by users at two different facilities with different capabilities  Planned benchmarking – Federated Systems – Training Programs 12 NUFO Benchmarking Communities support communities

NUFO’s Future  NUFO will soon become the Society for Science at User Research Facilities (SSURF)  SSURF will be a 501c3 non-profit corporation  SSURF will be a member-oriented, professional society dedicated to all aspects of user facility research  More inclusive membership categories with membership benefits  Incorporation will allow growth, programmatic expansion, fundraising opportunities, employees 13

SSURF’s Mission Advance the science performed at user research facilities by (1) supporting their professional communities and research networks through the sharing of best practices and facilitation of professional development, and (2) promoting public awareness about the benefits and significance of the facilities and their research 14

Building a Larger Community of Practice In December 2015, the National Academy of Public Administration recommended: “NSF formally establish communities of practice to share best practices and implement a “lessons learned” requirement for all MREFC projects.” NUFO can help you; please join us in our mission. 15

What’s in it for you? SSURF plans to:  Host annual meetings on topics of importance to it membership – “Power in Numbers: Building Partnerships and Common Standards across User Facilities” will challenge attendees to develop shared practices for improving users’ experience, and create community performance standards to facilitate easier multi-facility use and collaboration. – Examples of previous meeting themes: Industrial Usage, Educational Outreach, Bridging Science Across User Facilities, Big Data – Community-determined parallel workshops and breakout sessions are always welcome 16

What’s in it for you?  Continue the Annual Science Exhibitions on Capital Hill  Coordinate Congressional staff visits to facilities  Organize Congressional home district office visits  Facility adoption of unique identifiers for all users to enable data sharing  Training reciprocity  Other plans as staff and resources allow (e.g., speaker series, or professional societies forums) What would you need, what do you want, what can we help you with? 17

Questions and Comments 18

National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory – Interactions with Users David J. Morrissey NSCL Associate Director for Operations

The NSCL is Operated to Facilitate Nuclear Science Originally an NSF sponsored laboratory on a university campus that evolved into a national user facility. NSCL produces and provides beams of “rare isotopes” for nuclear science research (present incarnation ~1990) Operation of NSCL user facility is supported by NSF Physics Division NSCL Facility As a national user facility the NSCL supports a broad scientific community: The user group of NSCL has approximately 1350 members (98 U.S. colleges and universities represented) Past 4 years 359 publications, 79 were letter-like, 4 in Nature Including a local research group, 41 faculty 73 graduate students 100 undergraduates djm NSCL Overview at NSF-LFW,

External Program Advisory Committee Statistics (April 2016) djm NSCL Overview at NSF-LFW, PAC41 is expected to take place in Spring, 2017 Written Proposals Submitted to PAC40 (no oral presentations) 44 Proposals, for a total of 7515 hrs 33 proposals led by an Outside Spokesperson 365 Proposers from 75 institutions in 17 countries 118 Students Proposals Approved at PAC40 19 Proposals (43%), for a total of 2744 hrs (37%) [468 hrs on reserve] 8 GRETINA, 2 ReA3, 3 Low Energy Area, 6 Other 16 proposals led by an Outside Spokesperson 233 Experimenters from 52 institutions in 14 countries 70 Students

Scheduled NSCL User Program during last ~4 years djm NSCL Overview at NSF-LFW, From October 1, 2011 – October 1, 2015: 68 scheduled experiments 41 (60%) were led by Outside Spokespersons 63 (93%) involved collaborations between outside groups and NSCL faculty and staff. 61 (90%) required secondary beams from the A1900 fragment separator 35 (51%) used the S800 spectrometer 23 (34%) were part of the 2012/13 campaign with the S800+GRETINA 33 (49%) experiments formed part of a Ph.D. Thesis Involved 413 scientists from 81 institutions in 16 countries 300 (73%) scientists from outside institutions 131 students were involved (117 graduate students, 54 of those from NSCL)

Communication with Users is Critical Web Presence and Single Point of Contact at Lab djm NSCL Overview at NSF-LFW, Dr. Jill Berryman, Manager for User Relations reports directly to NSCL Director handles all user interactions, coordinates experiment schedule, collects statistics nscl.msu.edu

External User Organization djm NSCL Overview at NSF-LFW, Jill Berryman (Manager for User Relations) is the point of contact with NSCL users FRIB (nee NSCL) Users Organization (FRIBUO) members from 98 US Universities/Colleges, 12 National Labs, in 50 countries Quarterly newsletters “FRIB Laboratory Update for Users” Announcements of important conferences, workshops, Call for Proposals Executive Committee of the FRIBUO contains an Operations Subcommittee, with three members focused on operations at NSCL NSCL Laboratory Management has quarterly conference calls with Operations Subcommittee and chair of Executive Committee One member of the Operations subcommittee attends the PAC meeting and records his/her observations. Annual Low Energy Community Meeting Opportunity for users to come together annually, next at Notre Dame, Aug 11-13, NSCL receives and acts on “Consensus Statements” on scientific thrusts and equipment or facility development plans created at these meetings User survey for feedback at the completion of each experiment

Experiment Feedback djm NSCL Overview at NSF-LFW,  As part of the dedication to delivering world-class beams of rare isotopes to enable our users to achieve their scientific objectives the NSCL has a quality management system that was registered as compliant with the ISO 9001 standard and continues with external audits. Part of that quality management system is getting feedback from our users.  Experiment Feedback survey is on-line the NSCL website (here).here Since 2012, the response rate to survey has been 100%

Summary djm NSCL Overview at NSF-LFW,  The NSCL is a national user facility that provides RIB’s for nuclear science experiments proposed by users.  PAC-approved beam time is scheduled and run by the NSCL in close coordination with the experiment spokesperson. ~Twenty experiments per year with several hundred (unique) experimenters.  Large user community with various forms of engagement: User Manager (scientist) Large web utilization User oversight of PAC and Operations Annual meeting Feedback on completed experiments