Better, Faster, Cheaper: Environmental Remediation Process Optimization Building confidence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical basics Marian Scott Dept of Statistics, University of Glasgow August 2008.
Advertisements

Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
1 What is Remediation Process Optimization? How Can It Help Me Identify Opportunities for Enhanced and More Efficient Site Remediation? Mark A. Gilbertson.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Lovers Lane Lead Site Jeffrey A. Lippert, OSC.
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
1 Brave New World Emerging Tools for NAPL Remediation Jim Cummings Technology Innovation Office/USEPA Chicago, Illinois Dec 2002.
Overview of New EPA Superfund Groundwater Guidance and Tools
PREPARED WORKBOOK Kathy Castagna, EPA Region 1 Mark Lewis, CT DEEP John Podgurski, EPA Region 1 March 25, 2015.
Water Contaminants Soluble Contaminants - dissolve in water Particulates/Colloids - carried by the water column Insoluble Contaminants - very low solubility.
B EMIDJI C RUDE O IL S PILL Darren Cartwright Stephen Toone.
Using Quantitation to Develop Sustainable Solutions.
Statistics at the EPA Barry D. Nussbaum, Chief Statistician Presented to COPAFS September 21, U.S. Environmental Protection.
Dounreay Nuclear and Chemical Land Contamination.
Casmalia Wetland Mitigation Group Project Emily Bosanquet  Todd Cooper Ann Hayden  Vicky Krikelas  Michelle Torrent Faculty Advisors: Professor Trish.
Vadose-zone Monitoring System
Employee Presentation p 1
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
WLI REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE WORKSHOP ON DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS AND MODELS SEPTEMBER, 2013, JERBA, TUNISIA Economic analysis of improved water.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
1 Using Excel to Implement Software Reliability Models Norman F. Schneidewind Naval Postgraduate School 2822 Racoon Trail, Pebble Beach, California, 93953,
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Integrating Evaluation into the Design of the Minnesota Demonstration Project Paint Product Stewardship Initiative St. Paul, MN May 1, 2008 Matt Keene,
Present Development of a Regional Guidance Document for Dredged Material Evaluation Christopher McArthur, P.E. (US Environmental.
Aaron Townsend National Renewable Energy Laboratory October 28, 2013 Colorado Rural Electric Association Energy Innovations Summit Energy Storage in the.
What Does a Tribal Air Program Look Like? James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians Environmental Department.
Results Based Management: Logical Framework Matrix (LFM) December 30 th, 2009 Abeer Shakweer, Ph.D., Planning and Monitoring Manager Science and Technology.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
1 Effective Characterization Technologies Deana M. Crumbling, M.S. Technology Innovation Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. (703)
Ch Water Sustainability through Science and Technology.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Environmental Technology Council EPA /State / DOD Region IV Environmental Conference June 2005 Joydeb “Joy” Majumder, EPA Region 4.
1-1© 2007 Prentice Hall Chapter 1 Introduction and Early Phases of Market Research.
Maryland Department of the Environment Harbor Point – Regulatory Overview Horacio Tablada, Director Land Management Administration November 14, 2013.
SERDP- ESTCP- ITRC A PARTNERSHIP Dr. Jeffrey Marqusee ESTCP, Director SERDP, Technical Director.
Flanders Soil Policy Current Flemish policy on soil contamination The Soildecree and VLAREBO Indicators in remediation policy Johan Ceenaeme Head of Unit.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
Waste Program Monitoring Technology Needs and the 21M 2 Effort ETC Brownbag Thursday, May 19, 2005 Daniel Powell, U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation.
1 Selecting Gentle Remediation Approaches – the SUMATECS project Professor Andy Cundy University of Brighton, U.K. and the SUMATECS team.
Feasibility Study.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
Recommendations for Developing Effective Risk Management Policies for Contaminated Site Cleanup An Overview of Risk Management Concepts and How Risk Management.
Regulatory Chemical Risk Assessment From Superfund to Contaminants of Emerging Concern Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Patrick Gwinn November.
Advances in Hydrocarbon Remediation Technology and Water Treatment
Integrating Evaluation into the Design of the Minnesota Demonstration Project Paint Product Stewardship Initiative St. Paul, MN May 1, 2008 Matt Keene,
Welcome to Program Evaluation Overview of Evaluation Concepts Copyright 2006, The Johns Hopkins University and Jane Bertrand. All rights reserved. This.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
RCRA 2020 Vision… A View from a Facility Owner Lloyd E. Dunlap Atlantic Richfield Company, BP.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
Importance of Methods’ Selection in the Geosciences Studies and Exploration Mustafa M Hariri Geosciences Department King Fahd University of Petroleum &
Melissa Boggs California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response.
Life Cycle Approaches for Sustainable Brownfields Cleanup Karen Scheuermann EPA Region 9 April 5, 2011 APRIL 3-5, 2011 | PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.
Is The Marcellus Fairway Also A Pathway To Brownfield Redevelopment? Hull & Associates, Inc. National Brownfields Conference Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
ENERGON ESA – Innovation Triangle Initiative November 21, 2005 Energy / H 2 Storage System.
Staged Electronic Data Deliverable (SEDD): Overview and Implementation Status Dr. Anand R. Mudambi US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) November.
Strategies to manage human activity in deserts 11.
Putting It All Together: A Petroleum Brownfields Revitalization Action Plan Carolyn Hoskinson, OUST Paul Connor, NALGEP.
What’s the Problem: The Vapor Intrusion Issue Brownfields 2008 Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Dry Cleaners Detroit, MI May 5, 2008 Presented by: Henry Schuver,
How can integrated above-ground and underground
Cryogenic assisted machining
Environmental Issues Mapping Field Lab
CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Site Specific Work: Introduction
Modeling Natural Attenuation with GROUNDWATER SERVICES, INC.
Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

Better, Faster, Cheaper: Environmental Remediation Process Optimization Building confidence starts early Paul NATHANAIL, Eurodemo Consortium & LQM, University of Nottingham, UK US EPA Brownfields 2006, November 2006

The challenge of innovation “And it ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. The innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new” »- Machiavelli,1505

The need for innovation –“If you always do what you did, you will always get what you got, which is fine if that’s what you want, but isn’t if it’s not.” - Anon -

to make demonstration of promising soil and groundwater technologies easier to implement, to harmonise performance evaluation of demonstrated technologies and to generate an overview of existing funding opportunities and already demonstrated technologies

The conventional roadmap from research to market START Innovative Technology / Technique Lab/Pilot-scale assessment conducted? Regulatory conflicts? Other End User Conflicts? Site characteristics defined? Funding obtained? Conduct Demonstration (Successful) Report Disseminate information Make available at the market GOAL 8

Tackled Milestones (1) START Innovative Technology / Technique Lab/Pilot-scale assessment conducted? Regulatory conflicts? Other End User Conflicts? Site characteristics defined? Funding obtained? Conduct Demonstration (Successful) Report Disseminate information Make available at the market GOAL 8

Tackled Milestones (2) START Innovative Technology / Technique Lab/Pilot-scale assessment conducted? Regulatory conflicts? Other End User Conflicts? Predicted Operating Window & Site characteristics defined? Funding obtained? Conduct Demonstration (Successful) Report Disseminate information Make available at the market GOAL 8 Operating Window Defined? 7a

Tackled Milestones (3) START Innovative Technology / Technique Lab/Pilot-scale assessment conducted? Regulatory conflicts? Other End User Conflicts? Predicted Operating Window & Site characteristics defined? Funding obtained? Conduct Demonstration (Successful) Report Disseminate information Make available at the market GOAL 8 Operating Window Defined? 7a

Operating Window Combination of contaminant, environmental and site circumstance in which A given remediation technology will Almost certainly achieve Project remedial objectives Operating Wall Combination of contaminant, environmental and site circumstance in which A given remediation technology will Almost certainly FAIL TO achieve Project remedial objectives

Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) Natural attenuation (NA): combined effect of physical, chemical and biological subsurface processes (no human intervention) to reduce contaminant mass and/or concentration and/or toxicity MNA: use of NA processes to demonstrably meet site- specific remediation objectives 1996 MNA at 17,000 USA sites where shallow groundwater contaminated with BTEX from LUSTs - free online introduction to MNAhttp://

Operating windows aka operating envelopes the region bounded by upper and lower operational limits for one or more critical variables within which a technology or process is likely to operate most effectively with respect to a desired purpose. can be used as both a performance optimisation tool and a decision support tool ProcessOperating Window Type Operating Window Description AviationEnvironmentalRun-way conditions suitable to land a plane safely Offshore Drilling EnvironmentalSea conditions suitable to drill safely Marine Oil Spill Clean-Up TemporalTime periods in which clean-up methods are effective Examples where concept was used to assist decision making:

Defining Operating Windows for MNA Steps Involved: Step 1: Collecting the data for sites with contaminant plumes Step 2: Developing a statistical model to predict the viability of MNA Step 3: Validating the predictive model Step 4: Using the predictive model to define operating windows for MNA Current status of the research

Step 1: data collection Petroleum Storage FacilitySoutheast EnglandEnglandYes Service StationNorth CarolinaUSAYes George Air Force BaseCaliforniaUSAYes Patrick Air Force BaseFloridaUSAYes Hill Air Force BaseUtahUSAYes U.S. Coast Guard Air StationMichiganUSANo Bemidji Crude Oil Spill SiteMinnesotaUSAYes Gas Manufacturing FacilityColoradoUSAYes Fort McCoyWisconsinUSANo Service StationPerthAustraliaNo Service StationSouthern TaiwanTaiwanNo Service StationSouthern TaiwanTaiwanYes U.S. Coast Guard Support CentreNorth CarolinaUSAYes U.S. Marine Corps Air StationSouth CarolinaUSAYes U.S. Naval BaseCaliforniaUSAYes Service StationNorth CarolinaUSAYes Vandenberg AFB Site 60CaliforniaUSAYes Eglin Air Force BaseFloridaUSANo Myrtle BeachSouth CarolinaUSANo Gas Manufacturing FacilityDusseldorfGermanyNo Vandenberg AFB BXSS SiteCaliforniaUSAYes Mobile Home ParkNorth CarolinaUSANo Chemical Manufacturing FacilityNew JerseyUSAYes Electric Generator PlantAlaskaUSAYes Wurtsmith AFB Crash SiteMichiganUSAYes Service Station-USANo Service StationWashingtonUSANo Paint Production FacilityNorthern ItalyItalyNo FactorySoutheast AustraliaAustraliaNo Gas Manufacturing FacilityAlbertaCanadaNo

Step 2: statistical model Wald'sexp(β) PredictorβSE βX2X2 dfp(odds ratio) Constant MAXBTEX (mg/l) GWV (m/day) DIST (m) INT (GWV x DIST)

Step 3: validation SiteFacilityLocationCountryMNAPrimary Reference Viable 1Arvida Research SiteNorth CarolinaUSANoBorden et al., (1995) 2Service StationMichiganUSANoWilson et al., (1994) 3LandfillMichiganUSAYesRavi et al., (1998) 4Manufacturing FacilityEastern SeaboardUSAYesDavis et al., (1994) 5Fuel Depot--YesSlenders et al., (2005)

MNA operating window for BTEX Operating window within which >50 % probability MNA viable remediation option for the protection of a downgradient receptor when GWV is 1.0 m/day

If you would like copies of this presentation, of either tool or further information please me (thanks to blackberry, I can reply promptly!)