Systematic studies for microbulk detectors E. Ferrer Ribas, A. Giganon, Y. Giomataris, FJ Iguaz, T. Papaevangelou (Saclay) A. Gris, R. de Oliveira (CERN)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results of a R&D Micromegas Bulk Results of a R&D S. Aune a, M. Boyer a, A. Delbart a, R. De Oliveira b, A. Giganon a, Y. Giomataris a A CEA / DAPNIA,
Advertisements

A Brief Report on Characteristic Studies of Micromegas Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, India RD51 Collaboration.
Developments of micromegas detector at CERN/Saclay
Status of test beam data analysis … with emphasis on resistive coating studies Progress and questions 1Meeting at CEA Saclay, 25 Jan 2010Jörg Wotschack,
Parallel Ionization Multiplier (PIM) : a multi-stage device using micromeshes for tracking particles MPGD’s Workshop at NIKHEF April 16th2008 April 16th.
Recent achievements and projects in Large MPGDs Rui de Oliveira 21/01/2009 RD51 WG1 workshop.
RD S. Aune CEA/IRFU Micromegas Bulk for CLAS12 vertex tracker.
Recent R&D workon Micromegas detector Recent R&D work on Micromegas detector Liang Guan University of Science and Technology of China NanChang.
Micro MEsh GASeous Detectors (MicroMegas)
Practical operation of Micromegas detectors
General needs at CERN for special PCB’s Philippe Farthouat CERN.
Read-out boards Rui de Oliveira 16/02/2009 RD51 WG1 workshop Geneva.
CERN PCB workshop activities
-Stephan AUNE- RD51 Bari 2010 CEA DSM Irfu 08/10/20101 Saclay MPGD workshop.
High intensity beam studies of sparks in resistively- coated and standard Micromegas detectors Within the MAMMA collaboration Arizona, Athens(U, NTU, Demokritos),
Practical operation of Micromegas detectors Paul Colas, CEA/Irfu Saclay CERN, Feb.17, 20091Practical operation of Micromegas.
Status of PNPI R&D for choice of the MUCH tracking base detector (this work is supported by INTAS) ■ Introduction ■ MICROMEGAS ■ GEM ■ MICROMEGAS+GEM ■
The work of GEM foil at CIAE
WG1 summary P. Colas, S. Duarte Pinto RD51 Collaboration meeting in Bari October 7-10, 2010.
IHEP, Bejing 9th ACFA ILC Physics and Detector Workshop & ILC GDE Meeting The preliminary results of MPGD-based TPC performance at KEK beam.
GainEnergy resolution DIRECTION DES SCIENCES DE LA MATIERE LABORATOIRE DE RECHERCHE SUR LES LOIS FONDAMENTALES DE L’UNIVERS CENTRE DE SACLAY Contact :
1 The GEM Readout Alternative for XENON Uwe Oberlack Rice University PMT Readout conversion to UV light and proportional multiplication conversion to charge.
PNPI R&D of the detectors for MUCH E. Chernyshova, V.Evseev, V. Ivanov, A. Khanzadeev, B. Komkov, L. Kudin, V.Nikulin, G. Rybakov, E. Rostchin, V.Samsonov,
A real x-y Microbulk Micromegas with Segmented mesh Theo Geralis, NCSR Demokritos TIPP 2014, 2 June T. Geralis RD51 Common Fund Project 2/6/2014.
CERN Rui de OliveiraTS-DEM Rui de Oliveira TS-DEM Large size detectors CERN TS-DEM-PMT Capabilities.
15/07/2010Rui De Oliveira1 Update on large size GEM manufacturing Rui de Oliveira.
PiggyBack: sealed MicroMEGAS with external read-out electronics L. Boilevin-Kayl D. Attié, C. Blondel, L. Boilevin-Kayl, D. Desforges, E. Ferrer Ribas,
EST-DEM R. De Oliveira 20 Dec., ‘04 Production of Gaseous Detector Elements  History of Gas Detectors in Workshop  Fabrication of GEM Detectors  Fabrication.
Stanford, Mar 21, 2005P. Colas - Micromegas TPC1 Results from a Micromegas TPC Cosmic Ray Test Berkeley-Orsay-Saclay Progress Report Reminder: the Berkeley-Orsay-
5 th RD51 meeting (WG1) 25 May 2009 Atsuhiko Ochi ( Kobe University )
Precision GEM Production in Korea Chonbuk National Univ. Hyunsoo Kim, Min Sang Ryu University of Seoul Minkyoo Choi, Younggun Jeng, Inkyu Park.
15th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 18 – 20 March 2015 CERN On the way to sub-100ps timing with Micromegas T. Papaevangelou IRFU / CEA Saclay.
Piggyback seal Micromegas D. Attié, A. Chaus, D. Durand, D. Deforges, E. Ferrer Ribas, J. Galán, I.Giomataris, A. Gongadze, F.J. Iguaz, F. Jeanneau, R.
GEM basic test and R&D plan Takuya Yamamoto ( Saga Univ. )
Summary of MM meeting at CEA Saclay, 25/26 Jan 2010 Some selected topics.
IHEP, Beijing 9th ACFA ILC Physics and Detector Workshop & ILC GDE Meeting The preliminary results of MPGD-based TPC performance at KEK beam.
Resistive protections Rui de Oliveira 09/12/15
Snowmass, August, 2005P. Colas - InGrid1 M. Chefdeville a, P. Colas b, Y. Giomataris b, H. van der Graaf a, E.H.M.Heijne c, S.van der Putten a, C. Salm.
Large THGEMs, uniformity and gain largely based on the paper for MPGD13 and some recently obtained results S. Levorato THGEM meeting CERN 13 Nov
S. AUNE 15/09/08 Micromegas Bulk for CLAS12 tracker.
Study of TGEMs and RETGEMs for the possible ALICE upgrade By Himank Anand and Isha Shukla (CERN summer students) Supervisor :Vladimir Peskov.
Thin and high-pitch laser-etched mesh manufacturing and bulking" (INFN Bari, CEA Saclay, CERN) RD51 Common Projects V. Berardi, P. Colas, Rui de Oliveira.
30/09/2010Rui De Oliveira1.  GEM Single mask process  Micromegas  Bulk  Classical  resistive 30/09/2010Rui De Oliveira2.
Numerical Studies on IBF of BULK Micromegas RD51.
EUDET Meeting, Munich – October 18, Ongoing activities at Saclay David Attié D. Burke; P. Colas; E. Delagnes; A. Giganon; Y. Giomataris;
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
INSTR L.Shekhtman 1 Triple-GEM detectors for KEDR tagging system V.M.Aulchenko, A.V.Bobrov,A.E.Bondar, L.I.Shekhtman, E.V.Usov, V.N.Zhilich,
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
Zaragoza, 5 Julyl Construction of and experience with a 2.4 x 1 m² micromegas chambers Givi Sekhniaidze On behalf of the Micromegas community.
R&D ON RESISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR MICROMEGAS BUKL STEPHAN AUNE 03/06/2015. S.Aune.
Recent progress in large THGEM production On behalf of Trieste group and Rui de Oliveira (CERN) S. Levorato RD51 mini week1.
 Large GEM  CMS RE1-1  Kloe  Ns2 ( No stretch No stress)  Large Micromegas  Atlas MAMA project  Large THGEM  Double phase pure argon project 
NoV. 11, 2009 WP meeting 94 1 D. Attié, P. Colas, E. Ferrer-Ribas, A. Giganon, I. Giomataris, F. Jeanneau, P. Shune, M. Titov, W. Wang, S. Wu RD51 Collaboration.
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
R&D Collaboration, CERN – September 10, Micromegas Performance and Ageing studies David Attié MPGD. Towards an R&D Collaboration,
Energy resolution results for Microbulk MICROMEGAS at high energy and pressure. Alfredo Tomás Alquézar Universidad de Zaragoza on behalf of the collaboration.
R&D WITH MICROMEGAS FOR LOW BACKGROUND APPLICATIONS: THE T-REX PROJECT Laura Seguí and Juan Antonio García Universidad de Zaragoza CEA, Saclay December.
MPGD TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTION GEMMicromegas Resistive MSGC (NEW!) Rui De Oliveira 7/12/20111Rui De Oliveira.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO CERN, 13/02/ GDD Meeting - Contribution from Trieste THGEM: TRIESTE LAB. EQUIPMENT AND CONTACTS WITH POSSIBLE PRODUCER Introduction.
R&D activities on a double phase pure Argon THGEM-TPC A. Badertscher, A. Curioni, L. Knecht, D. Lussi, A. Marchionni, G. Natterer, P. Otiougova, F. Resnati,
-Stephan AUNE- RD51 BARI. Saclay MPGD workshop R&D 09/10/20101 Saclay workshop R&D for new Bulk structure.
New MPGDs at CERN PCB Workshop
GEM and MicroMegas R&D Xiaomei Li Science and Technology
Single GEM Measurement
Updates on the Micromegas + GEM prototype
An improved design of R-MSGC
Same geometry, but different size of the rim
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Presentation transcript:

Systematic studies for microbulk detectors E. Ferrer Ribas, A. Giganon, Y. Giomataris, FJ Iguaz, T. Papaevangelou (Saclay) A. Gris, R. de Oliveira (CERN) T. Dafni, A. Tomás, I. Irastorza (Zaragoza) RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

Summary 1) Microbulks characteristics 1) Microbulks characteristics 2) Etching process: going further 2) Etching process: going further 3) Test bench 3) Test bench 4) Measurements in gas (Ar+5%C4H10) 4) Measurements in gas (Ar+5%C4H10) Electron transmission Electron transmission Gain Gain Energy resolution Energy resolution 5) Summary of results 5) Summary of results 6) Conclusion 6) Conclusion RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

1)Microbulks characteristics Three types of Microbulks will be presented (gap mesh/anode: 50 µm) 1) Standard Microbulk (typical capacitance: < 480 pF) holes diameter: 37 µm pitch:100 µm 2)Etched Microbulk (typical capacitance: < 410 pF) 3) Microbulk with pillars (pitch pillars: 0.5 and 1mm) Diameter pillar: 200 µm (typical capacitance: < 240 pF) 1) Double sided Cu-coated (5 µm) polymide Kapton foil (50 µm) 2) Photochemical production of mesh holes 3) Polymide Kapton etching Fabrication at Rui’s workshop RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

Characteristics Standard microbulk (2006) Characteristics Standard microbulk (2006)  40 µm pitch 100 µm copper mesh (thickness 5 µm) kapton pillars PCB FR4 contact mesh (via with silver paste) contact anode (via with silver paste) paste) copper anode (thickness 5 µm) Standard microbulk (2006) 50 µm ( (gap) 34 mm 44 mm 37 µm100 µm (pitch) 1mm

RD51 meeting 26th May 2010 Characteristics Etched Microbulk copper mesh (thickness 5 µm) kapton pillars PCB FR4 contact mesh (via with silver paste) contact anode (via with silver paste) paste) copper anode (thickness 5 µm) Etched microbulk 50 µm (gap) 34 mm 44 mm 37 µm100 µm (pitch) etching 1mm

Characteristics Microbulk with pillars,2010 pillar  200 µm copper mesh (thickness 5 µm) kapton pillars PCB FR4 contact mesh (via with silver paste) contact anode (via with silver paste) paste) copper anode (thickness 5 µm) Microbulk with pillars (2010) 50 µm ( gap) 34 mm 44 mm 25 µm50 µm (pitch) 1mm (pitch) 1mm 200 µm (pitch) RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

Summary of Microbulks characteristics MICROBULK TYPE standard microbulketched microbulkpillars microbulk (v1)pillars microbulk (v2) FABRICATION DATE SUPPORT STRUCTURE epoxy FR4 STRUCTURE THICKNESS 1 mm STRUCTURE DIAMETER 44 mm SENSITIVE AREA 34 mm GAP MESH/ANODE 50 µm MESH THICKNESS 5 µm ANODE THICKNESS 5 µm HOLES MESH DIAMETER 37 µm 30 µm25 µm HOLES PITCH 100 µm 60 µm50 µm CAPACITY 480 to 420 pF410 to 330 pF300 pF240 to 180 pF PILLARS DIAMETER 200 µm PILLARS PITCH 0,5 mm1 mm

RD51 meeting 26th May 2010 Aim of the R&D Aim of the R&D Measurements Electron transmission Electron transmission Maximal Gain Maximal Gain Energy resolution (55Fe) Energy resolution (55Fe) Optimize detector performances in terms of maximal gain and energy resolution and decrease the capacitance ( decrease the noise) Comparison of non etched / etched / Microbulks with pillars

RD51 meeting 26th May ) Etching process at CERN Cleaning process 5 microbulks : (4 cleaned) and 1 used as a reference. 5 microbulks : (4 cleaned) and 1 used as a reference. Cleaning : washing powder + deionized water at 30 o C/2mn, rinsing/2mn, Nitrogen blowing then baking at 80 o C/10mn. Cleaning : washing powder + deionized water at 30 o C/2mn, rinsing/2mn, Nitrogen blowing then baking at 80 o C/10mn.

RD51 meeting 26th May ) Etching process at CERN Chemical attack After cleaning, kapton is chemically etched in a solution at 65 o C After cleaning, kapton is chemically etched in a solution at 65 o C (solution: Ethylene Diamine,with deionized water and Potassium regulated in temperature). 1 microbulk (M8) as reference (no etched) 1 microbulk (M8) as reference (no etched) 2 microbulks etched 30 sec 2 microbulks etched 30 sec 1 microbulk etched 45 sec 1 microbulk etched 45 sec 1 microbulk etched 60 sec 1 microbulk etched 60 sec

RD51 meeting 26th May ) Etching process at CERN (pre-tests) Check the chemical attack (microscope) Check the chemical attack (microscope) Capacity measurement (comparison before/after etching) Capacity measurement (comparison before/after etching) high voltage tests in the air (check the ramp up at 600 V without residual current) high voltage tests in the air (check the ramp up at 600 V without residual current)

RD51 meeting 26th May 2010 Pre-tests (check) Kapton residual Microbulk before etching Kapton residual Microbulk after cleaning and etching (60sec)

RD51 meeting 26th May ) Test bench at Saclay

RD51 meeting 26th May ) Measurements in gas (before etching) maximal gain:8000

RD51 meeting 26th May 2010 Measurements (before/after etching) M28 before etching FWHM: 15.3% M28 after etching FWHM: 12.4% maximal gain: 8000 maximal gain:20000

Measurements in gas (microbulks with pillars) Energy resolution 55Fe FWHM: 11% maximal gain:60000 RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

Comparison of gains for the 3 different type of Microbulks

RD51 meeting 26th May 2010 Comparison of the energy resolution for the 3 different type of Microbulks

5) Summary of results reference numberM8 (reference)M 11M17M22M 28M capacity before etching474 pF431 pF449 pF458 pF427 pF193 pF capacity after etching 375 pF388 pF327 pF371 pF capacity difference after etching -53 pF-57 pF-123 pF-51 pF etching time 30 s 60 s45 s voltage in the air 600 V (1 nA)610 V (2 nA)640 V (2 nA)600 V (1 nA)600 V(0 nA) gain max in Ar+5%iso (before V gain max ( Ar+5%iso) after etching V difference gain after etching 8,5%32%43%41% difference energy resolution after etching 8,5%19%19,5%9% RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

6) Conclusion Microbulk provides excellent resolution Microbulk provides excellent resolution Additional etching allows: Additional etching allows: 1. Decreases the capacity (=>decrease of noise) 2. Improves the gain 3. Improves energy resolution R & D will continue to optimise the parameters of the etching process R & D will continue to optimise the parameters of the etching process Best performance obtained with pillar Microbulks Best performance obtained with pillar Microbulks RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

Back up slides RD51 meeting 26th May 2010

11) Annexe results (electron transmission)

RD51 meeting 26th May ) Annexe result Gas test (gap 25 and 50 µm)

RD51 meeting 26th May ) Etching Copper mesh kapton