doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 January Session Supplementary Material Date: xx Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Introduction This report provides supplementary material related to attending the Jan WG plenary meetings. Refer to the agenda: 11-15/1485r January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report WEDNESDAY January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report W2.2 Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: –Either speak up now or –Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or –Cause an LOA to be submitted January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Leaders of Task Groups, Study Groups, Topic Interest Groups and Standing Committees (or their nominee) should attend the Thursday CAC at 7:30pm. The purpose of the CAC is: –To prepare the agenda and material for the closing WG plenary –To create room requests for the next session –To advise and support the chair in his responsibilities as an EC member W2.3 – Thursday CAC reminder January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report In November, the 802 EC decided to form an ad-hoc to write a new “mission” statement for a regulatory subgroup. The output of (see 11-15/1433r2) was presented to the EC and, in the view of this author, generally well received. This would be an input to the ad-hoc. The WG chair will be on the ad-hoc. The status of the “subgroup” as a TAG (technical advisory group) or a SC (standing committee) has not yet been determined. The /.15 Regulatory SC chair stood down at the last session. So the future of this activity in /.15 is open to question. W5.2 Status & future of regulatory January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report We have a hierarchy of “rules” above us –Applicable Law, IEEE, IEEE-SA, IEEE 802 WG P&P The WG chair, subject to these rules, decides process in –See IEEE 802 WG P&P “duties of the chair” The WG chair is not bound by Robert’s rules, but is wise to stick to them when the going gets sticky. –In IEEE 802 WG P&P: “Robert’s Rules of Order (Revised) is the recommended guide on questions of parliamentary procedure not addressed in these procedures.” WG chair decisions can be appealed. The consensus of the WG members always prevails over the chair over decisions open to the chair. W5.4 A few reminders about process January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report What is the workshop? A chance for the IEEE 802 EC members to spend time working on topics that they don’t have time to give due diligence during the normal plenary meetings. To be held in Hanover “E” – holds 20 + seats at the back Friday afternoon – open to all attendees: 1:00pm to 5:00pm Saturday – IEEE 802 EC only – hosted by hotel, limited to 20 attendees Agenda here: leadership-conference-agenda-worksheet.xlsxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/16/ec EC-jan leadership-conference-agenda-worksheet.xlsx W5.5 – Items for EC Workshop related to January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Friday pm EC workshop January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 9 Review / approve agenda, administration items Nikolich 1501:00 PM Radio regulatory (RR) process plan - discuss results of ad hoc Thaler4501:15 PM Discussion of the impact of updated patent policy on IEEE 802 Nikolich3002:00 PM Attendance requirements for obtaining membership Stephens3002:30 PM Break 1503:00 PM 5G and IMT-2020: What it is, its relevance, and ways to participate Stephens / Marks 9003:15 PM

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Saturday EC workshop January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 10 Review / approve agenda, administration itemsLaw Clarification on 'affiliated block’ textThompson Final clarification of the indemnification policyNikolich A single sentence tag line for 802 projects, press releases, and similar Gilb Discussions on the development of YANG modelsLaw Can a Study Group develop more than one PAR?Law Lunch 2 year backward (actuals) and 2 year forward looking (budgetary estimates) for the 802 treasury Nikolich IEEE 802 plans for IMT-2020Stephens / Marks Draft distribution and USPTOThompson End of Day Wrap upLaw **802 EC Executive Session** Get programMarks

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report IEEE / Wi-Fi Alliance Summit #2 Nov Meeting notes and action items

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report IEEE Dorothy Stanley Jon Rosdahl Adrian Stephens Stephen McCann Wi-Fi Alliance Stephen Palm, Director Andy Davidson, Director Edgar Figueroa, CEO Attendees

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Agenda 1.Introductions (if any are needed) 2.Review actions/suggestions from last meeting 3.Summary of new activities from both organizations A ay – NG60 B az – NGP C.LRLP D.“ as a component” (perhaps handle in same main agenda item as LTE-LAA coex.). Relevance of OmniRAN (802.1CF) – see arc-existing-oam- interface-specifications.pptx arc-existing-oam- interface-specifications.pptx E.Privacy ECSG outcome -> 802E Trials at IETF and 802 F.Local MAC address work in G.Edgar Figueroa will review the list of new task groups in WFA since the last summit meeting 4.from agenda, not actionable 5.Discussion of the roles of and WFA in –Regulatory policy development – for next WRC –IMT / as-imt pptx / as-imt pptx 6.LTE in unlicensed spectrum activity 7.Action items 8.Next meeting 9.AOB

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Actions items from last meeting - Notes 1.IEEE could make WFA aware of new process for an org to contribute comments into an IEEE standard 1.Opportunity only available on first draft 2.60 day public review window

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Notes WFA could allow in its SRD, or in other step in WFA spec dev process, option to have.11 develop the spec or a portion thereof 1.This happens through individuals. 2.There may be IPR reasons that prevent this.

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Notes 1.IEEE could detail option to have WFA contribute a WFA spec into an IEEE standard 1.One hurdle is IP policy discrepancy 2.Another obstacle is the possibility that a spec would change 3.Another obstacle is making the document public where it had been private previously 4.This is called an “adoption” and all it includes is changing the front matter. 1.Ballot is open and comments received 2.Comments are made to the source and resolved there. 3.After comment window IEEE votes—no guarantee it would pass if comments are not addressed 5.Are there any obstacles to obtaining the Wi-Fi Alliance specs now— they are available as per the IEEE understanding of available. No unsurmountable issues.

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Update from (1 of 6) ay – NG60 (Next generation 60GHz) A.Evolutionary update to.11ad B.Targeting November 2019 C.The.11ay-NG60 group will update the relevant Wi-Fi Alliance TG once.11 converges/stabilizes its high level technical direction. TGay will determine this timing

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Update from (2 of 6) az – NGP (Next Generation Positioning) A.Requirements less “stable” than ay. Targets angle, accuracy, and scalability B.Similar to TGay, update to WFA-relevant TG at appropriate time

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Update from (3 of 6) LRLP (Long Range Low Power) A.First Topic interest group (TIG as opposed to study group). B.How does this relate to.ah? It potentially addresses different bands C.Bands TBD D.Standards pipeline slide 16 ieee /1218r2 E.Similar to TGay, update to WFA-relevant TG at appropriate time

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Update from (4 of 6) “ as a component” (perhaps handle in same main agenda item as LTE-LAA coex.). Still a discussion topic in.11—pre study group phase Relevance of OmniRAN (802.1CF) – see existing-oam-interface-specifications.pptx existing-oam-interface-specifications.pptx –Survey of existing OEM (non MAC/PHY) –Addresses issues of managing large systems with thousands of nodes Address market confusion with 5G. Not a study group right now but simply a discussion topic. Had a tutorial and discussion in different groups

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Update from (5 of 6) “ as a component” (perhaps handle in same main agenda item as LTE-LAA coex.). Still a discussion topic in.11—pre study group phase Related to LWA in 3GPP—LWA scope is not clear right now, and some changes in.11 may bring benefit to LWA This could be a good topic for the WFA OMTG—how to promote LWA adoption See Matt Fischer submission on throughout estimation /653r2. This is a good example of 3GPP coordination with will determine whether to send LS to 3GPP asking whether there is additional specification needed in.11 to support LWA requirements ( RAN1 and SA2) WFA will determine whether to send LS to 3GPP regarding any requirements in support of LWA, including testing

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Update from (6 of 6) Privacy ECSG (Executive Committee Sub Study Group) outcome -> 802E –Trials at IETF and 802 MAC address randomization Manufacturers can choose to randomize MAC addresses without impact to network Microsoft and Apple have incorporated various methods to randomize MAC addresses now –Recommendations on privacy to used by future 802 standards groups Local MAC address work in –PAR submitted protocol to manage MAC addresses –The protocols are for data center rather than Wi-Fi network

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report Wi-Fi Alliance Activities Initiated Since February 2015 Application Specific Platform Infrastructure Task Group— renamed recently to Pre-Association Infrastructure Service Discovery Dedicated Short Range Communications Marketing Task Group Sensor Net Task Group renamed “IoT for the Connected Home” Task Group includes elements of –.11v power save mechanisms –IPV6 For a comprehensive list of work areas please refer to:

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report 5. Discussion of the roles of and WFA in WRC and IMT 2020 Impact on Wi-Fi Alliance regulatory related processes 802 is trying to become more effective in its regulatory submissions Top level is EC (executive committee) regulatory TAG (technical advisory group) interacts with ITU-R –WG have numbers e.g..11 –.18 has its own membership, focused on regulatory for all 802 wireless tech –.19 is focused on coex –.11/.15 regulatory standing committee exclusively for unlicensed spectrum (Rich had been chairing now intends to step down). If this group hibernates then work would go into to maintain Wi-Fi Alliance informed about ongoing contact for regulatory topics (.11 chair).11 will look at its rules to see if EC can approve submissions in short window (5 days?). If this is cleared, then.11 could inform Wi-Fi Alliance about it will investigate if there is a way to allow voting by its regulatory standing committee via teleconferences will notify Wi-Fi Alliance if there is a mechanism for.11 to endorse Wi-Fi Alliance regulatory submissions Depending on the two action items 1 and 2 above, Wi-Fi Alliance could outreach to.11 when it seeks endorsements if time allows

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report IMT 20/20.11 standards, 3gpp, ITU ITU is where IMT designation lives. Now working on IMT 20/20 Certain advantages to be included in IMT 20/20 e.g., global spectrum allocations ITE-U R is most official source for 5G (NGMN and 3GPP others) Continue to consider IMT 20/20 Liaison statements as necessary Each org to coordinate as/if necessary

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report 6. LTE in unlicensed activity.19 may contact Wi-Fi Alliance with request to engage in.19 test effort Wi-Fi Alliance test effort already underway

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report FRIDAY January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 27

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report F2.2 Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: –Either speak up now or –Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or –Cause an LOA to be submitted January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 28

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report F2.4 Administrative Reminders Next Full WG Session: March st CAC telecon – Feb 8 th at noon ET (-5 weeks) –Initial objectives/agendas should be uploaded as mentor documents (.ppt format) or send to chair (.xls tab format) before the telecon. –Meeting date set to meet 30-day agenda submission deadline. 2 nd CAC telecon – Feb 29th at noon ET (-2 weeks) –Date chosen to avoid those travelling to Wi-Fi Alliance meeting –Snapshots to be send to Dorothy Stanley before this telecon. January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 29

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report F2.5 Letters of Assurance Database is herehere 5 requests for LoA have not been responded to: –Nokia (802.11ai) –HP (802.11ai) –Microsoft (802.11ai) Detailed status is here: register-of-loa-requests.xlsxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/ register-of-loa-requests.xlsx January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 30

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 31 F2.6 Availability of documents- Nov 2015 Publication Draft in TechStreet Draft in Members Area Published in Get 802Get 802? Published by ISO? IEEE P802.11REVmcD4.0 $600 pdfD5.0 IEEE P802.11aiD6.0 $165 pdfD6.3 IEEE P802.11ahD5.0 $302 pdfD5.1 IEEE P802.11akD1.4 IEEE P802.11aqD3.1 IEEE Std af-2013$201 printYes IEEE Std ac-2013$309 printYes IEEE Std ad-2012$371 printYes IEEE Std ae-2012$108 printYes IEEE Std aa-2012$185 printYes IEEE Std $556 printYes ** = request pending

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report F drafts to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 Drafts are sent to ISO during sponsor ballot to solicit comments. Approved drafts may also be sent during working group ballot. Any comments received from ISO are processed by the comment resolution committee No comments outstanding REVmc D5.0 will be liaised when Sponsor Recirc completes January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 32

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report F Wireless Chairs meeting The wireless chairs meeting makes decisions related to the operation of the wireless interim meetings, such as location and cost. The meeting is open to all. If you are interested in these topics, please attend. The wireless chairs meeting takes place at 4:00pm local time on the Sunday of 802 Plenary and 802 Wireless Interim sessions. January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 33

doc.: IEEE /1487r0 Report F7.2 Next Meeting – LMSC Interim to at Sands Venetian Hotel, Macau, PRC –IEEE LMSC (802) Plenary –Meeting Registration and Hotel Registration are open For information and registration links, see January 2016 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 34