B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHENIX Silicon Endcap  Mini-strips (50um*2mm – 50um*11mm)  Will not use ALICE chip  Instead custom design based on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hybrid pixel: pilot and bus K. Tanida (RIKEN) 06/09/03 Si upgrade workshop Outline Overview on ALICE pilot and bus Requirements Pilot options Bus options.
Advertisements

A “BTeV” Hybrid Pixel Telescope for MTest David Christian May 4, 2007.
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Workshop on Silicon Detector Systems, April at GSI Darmstadt 1 STAR silicon tracking detectors SVT and SSD.
Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations.
July 10, 2008 PHENIX RPC review C.Y. Chi 1 RPC Front End Electronics On chamber discriminator  The strips  The CMS discriminator chips  The discriminator.
PHENIX Vertex Tracker Atsushi Taketani for PHENIX collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Over view of Vertex detector 2.Physics.
The SVT in STAR The final device…. … and all its connections … and all its connections.
Brenna Flaugher Oct. 31 th CDF Meeting1 RunIIb Silicon Project Successful Lehman Review Sept Workshop at LBL 10/23-10/25: Wednesday-Thursday  hybrids.
Embedded Pitch Adapters a high-yield interconnection solution for strip sensors M. Ullán, C. Fleta, X. Fernández-Tejero, V. Benítez CNM (Barcelona)
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
3D chip and sensor Status of the VICTOR chip and associated sensor Bonding and interconnect of chip and sensor Input on sensor design and interconnection.
David L. Winter for the PHENIX Collaboration PHENIX Silicon Detector Upgrades RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop 3 RHIC Future: New Physics Through.
March 20, 2001M. Garcia-Sciveres - US ATLAS DOE/NSF Review1 M. Garcia-Sciveres LBNL & Module Assembly & Module Assembly WBS Hybrids Hybrids WBS.
The FVTX Technology Outline Overall Picture Silicon Detector
Leo Greiner IPHC testing Sensor and infrastructure testing at LBL. Capabilities and Plan.
The ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector Gianfranco Segato Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Padova and INFN for the ALICE Collaboration A barrel of two layers.
Gerd J. Kunde - LANL1 The FVTX Technology  Outline Overall Picture Silicon Detector –Geometry, Layout, Process Readout Chip –FNAL Chips, New Chip PHX.
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
September 8-14, th Workshop on Electronics for LHC1 Channel Control ASIC for the CMS Hadron Calorimeter Front End Readout Module Ray Yarema, Alan.
F February 5, 2001 Pixel Detector Size and Shape David Christian Fermilab.
Muon trigger upgrades, missing since not aimed towards DOE funding PHENIX upgrades: view presented to DOE R&D $3.5M Construction $16.6M Au-Au p-p 200 Si-Si.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
VIP1: a 3D Integrated Circuit for Pixel Applications in High Energy Physics Jim Hoff*, Grzegorz Deptuch, Tom Zimmerman, Ray Yarema - Fermilab *
ASIC R&D at Fermilab R. Yarema October 30, Long Range Planning Committee2 ASICs are Critical to Most Detector Systems SVX4 – CDF & DO VLPC readout.
03/12/07 Jon S Kapustinsky LANL Jon S Kapustinsky, LANL Forward Vertex Detector Collaboration Meeting UNM, March 12, 2007 Outline: FVTX Overall Description.
Beam Tests of 3D Vertically Interconnected Prototypes Matthew Jones (Purdue University) Grzegorz Deptuch, Scott Holm, Ryan Rivera, Lorenzo Uplegger (FNAL)
2 Silicon pixel part Done and to be written Written! Under way To be done Introduction 1.Hybrid Pixel Assembly Concept 2.Silicon sensor 1.First thinned.
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
Vertex Detector Options and R&D Requirements Upgrade DC Meeting December 11, 2002 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC) for the Silicon USG.
The BTeV Pixel Detector David Christian Fermilab June 17, 2010.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
BTeV Hybrid Pixels David Christian Fermilab July 10, 2006.
Aug 2003 Craig Ogilvie 1 Landscape/Goals for R&D  Goal: Barrel+structure ready Summer/Fall 06 (run07)  Goal: Endcaps ready Summer/Fall 07 (run08)  RIKEN.
Solid State Detectors for Upgraded PHENIX Detector at RHIC.
U N C L A S S I F I E D Precision Tracking for the PHENIX Muon Arms Gerd J. Kunde ASI Prague 2005.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
Fermilab Silicon Strip Readout Chip for BTEV
Pixel Atsushi Taketani RIKEN RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center 1.Overview of Pixel subsystem 2.Test beam 3.Each Components 4.Schedule 5.Summary.
MIMO  3 Preliminary Test Results. MIMOSTAR 2 16/05/2007 MimoStar3 Status Evaluation of MimoStar2 chip  Test in Laboratory.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
Tracking at the Fermilab Test Beam Facility Matthew Jones, Lorenzo Uplegger April 29 th Infieri Workshop.
Craig Ogilvie1 Silicon Vertex Upgrade for PHENIX  A+A: from discovery to characterizing properties dense phase – Need broad range of early probes: charm,
Rene BellwiedSTAR Tracking Upgrade Meeting, Boston, 07/10/06 1 ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) Rene Bellwied, Wayne State University Layout, Mechanics.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
Atsushi Taketani 2005/06/03 VTX meeting 1 PIXEL BUS status 1.Circuit design 2.Design rule and design 3.Schedule.
Status report Pillar-1: Technology. The “Helmholtz-Cube” Vertically Integrated Detector Technology Replace standard sensor with: 3D and edgeless sensors,
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
An Overview of the FPIX Detector Upgrade – CMS Experiment
H. Krüger, , DEPFET Workshop, Heidelberg1 System and DHP Development Module overview Data rates DHP function blocks Module layout Ideas & open questions.
David M. Lee Los Alamos National Laboratory DOE Review of the Heavy Ion Program Agenda Introduction – Joel Moss 1. David M. Lee – KB02 program.
Draft of 3 year CMOS Strip Programme Need to advise WG3 on likely resource requirement Draft Outline provided at Valencia Discuss and improve basis for.
Si Sensors for Additional Tracker
Evidence for Strongly Interacting Opaque Plasma
INFN Pavia and University of Bergamo
ICHEP02 Chris Parkes ALICE m2 Pixels+Drift+Strips LHCb m2
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
WP microelectronics and interconnections
UNIZH and EPFL at LHCb.
SVT detector electronics
Silicon pixel detectors and electronics for hybrid photon detectors
RPC Front End Electronics
SVT detector electronics
PHENIX forward trigger review
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Perugia SuperB Workshop June 16-19, 2009
Presentation transcript:

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHENIX Silicon Endcap  Mini-strips (50um*2mm – 50um*11mm)  Will not use ALICE chip  Instead custom design based on FPIX and SVX4 components from FNAL for mini-strips  Current discussions on ‘data-pushing’ vs. ‘pipeline’ architecture  Met with Yarema group at FEE2003  Developed concept for data-push and displaced-vertex trigger  Started collaborative effort with University Heidelberg LOGO !!!!!!

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde Si Lampshade Layout  50 mu radial pitch (z vertex reconstruction)  3000 “mini-strips”  3.5 cm < r < 18.5 cm  128 “towers” in phi  mini-strips from 2.2 mm to 11.6 mm  2 rows of strips in one “dual-tower”  16 dual-towers in “wedge”  8 wedges in one “lampshade”  8 lampshades ( ~ 20 degree tilt) r = 3.5 cm r = 18.5 cm Preliminary 6/03

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde FPIX2 Features Advanced mixed analog/digital design 128 rows x 22 columns (2816 channels) 50 µm x 400 µm pixels High speed readout intended for use in Level 1 trigger. Up to 840 Mbits/sec data output. Very low noise Excellent threshold matching DC coupled input Fully programmable device

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde FPIX2 Status Produced 3168 chips in engineering run Minor tweaking of design needed before production Mixed analog/digital design has excellent performance with insignificant interference and cross talk. Chip size is 8.96 mm x 10.2 mm (91 mm 2 ) Yield is high Chip and readout can be used “as is” in other pixel applications First flip-chip assemblies this week Could start comparative testing ……

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde Components for Phenix Chip PHX Use modified FPIX2 front end Use relaxed bump bonding connections Either data-push from FPIX or pipeline from SVX Use backside contact for ground return (as done in SVX4) Use slow programming control from FPIX2 May use modified output drivers from FPIX2

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde Layout Diagram for PHX Chip Bump bonds Programming interface 1 st and 2 nd stage and discriminator Pipeline Digital interface Complete bus on chip

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHX Chip Layout: 2 columns 256 channels/column 3.8 mm x 13 mm = 49.4 mm 2 Bump bonds on 200 um pitch 50 µm dia bumps 512 bumps plus inter-chip bumps FPIX2 Layout for comparison: Chip area = 91 mm 2 Bump bonds on 50 µm pitch 12 µm dia bumps 2816 bumps signals & power

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHX: Tower Section Ray Yarema, FNAL, June 9th Carbon Fiber Support and Cooling

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde Wedge Assembly/ Data Interface 16 wedges/lampshade: receiver for data-push fiber optics to DAQ One wedge Uni Heidelberg 2.5 Gigabit fiber

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHX Schedule Design specifications completed 10/03 Start design 12/03 Submit prototype 7/04 Prototype testing completed 12/04 Redesign completed for engineering run 1/05 Engineering run back 3/05 Ray Yarema, FNAL, June 9th

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHX Cost Chip design/testing – 2 man-years - $275K (includes all overhead costs) Prototype chip fabrication- $40K (small chip) Test board $5K Engineering run (10-12 wafers) $200K 9 Extra wafers using same masks - $45K Production wafer level testing –engineering, tech time, circuit board, probe card - $60K Contingency tbd Ray Yarema, FNAL, June 9th 20 wafers total

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde Trigger on displaced b-vertices ctau ~ 500 mu Started new collaboration with V.Lindenstruth from University Heidelberg –UH designed a displaced vertex trigger for LHCb –UH designed a tracklet processor for ALICE –Has chip to provide LVDS to fiber interface 2.5 Gbit/s Trigger would require –Data-push technology –Barrel and Endcap with same readout technology Trigger tracking software from LHCb project

B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde Endcap Summary Mini-strips on wedges Readout via PHX from Fermilab Same chips for barrel ?! –FPIX for layer 1,2 (two pixel layers !!!) Displaced vertex tracking with 10% occupancy gives too many ghosts, see layout of all LHC trackers –PHX for layer 3,4 (mini- strips) Trigger on displaced vertices ??? !!!!!!!! –We should start collaboration wide discussion on ‘triggers in the upgrade era’