2016-17 Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

Are You (Click).
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
Differentiated Supervision
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Volusia System For Empowering Teachers (VSET)
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
MODIFIED CURRENT PRACTICE MODEL (SAVING THE BABY!!!) Olde English Consortium Teacher Evaluation Plan – Modified Current Practice Model May 15, 2015.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
SAFE-T NET Introduction
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
SCDE Expanded ADEPT Advisory Team Meeting April 23, 2015.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Three Summative Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Two Mid-Course Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
New Teacher Program for Induction Contract Teachers
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Dissemination Training
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Georgia Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016

New Resources Student Learning Objectives Forms A & B Scoring Feedback Rubric (Form C) Informal Observation Form (Form D) Modified ET3 (Form E)

SLO Form A Induction, Annual, and CC Summative

LRP additions

SLO Section X: Growth Targets

SLO Form B Annual GBE, CC GBE and CC recertification

SLO Feedback Rubric

Scoring Example Score = 2.5

Informal Observation Form Annual GBE, CC GBE, and CC up for Recertification

Modified ET3 Form

Modified ET3 Form Continued

Reporting to SCDE Report as “met” /“not met” Exemplary, Proficient = Met Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory = Not met

Induction Teachers: Observation Expectations Induction Each induction contract year: >1 –Integral Classroom Observation per semester with feedback to be provided within the mid-year and end year consensus conference. Additional informal observation and feedback at the evaluator’s discretion. Induction Year 1: Depending on district procedures, mentors may provide informal observation and formative feedback Additional Induction Years: Mentors at option of district Principal or trained administrative designee Trained Mentor School district employment; number of induction years; contents of the professional development plan

Induction Teachers: SLO Expectations Assessment of professional practice using SAFE-T or an SCDE approved formative assessment process If using SAFE-T, the teacher will produce the following artifacts: SLO Template Form A (this will suffice the LRP requirement), Unit Work Sample, Reflection on Instruction and Student Learning, and the Professional Self-Assessment The SLO may serve as the Professional Growth and Development Plan Induction I teachers only: the SLO can be started second interval Results are formative

Annual Summative Teachers: Observation Expectations Annual Formal, Summative >1 – Integral Classroom Observation per semester done separately by at least two observers (4 total) (at least one unannounced) with feedback to be provided within the mid-year and end- of-year consensus conference (at a minimum). Additional informal observation and feedback at the evaluator’s discretion. (See separate rules for certified teachers from out-of- state.) Additional Informal or Walk-Through Classroom Observation per semester is encouraged. Principal or trained administration designee Trained Observer School district employment; SC certification; possible highly consequential evaluation; contents of the professional development plan.

Annual Summative Teaches: SLO Expectations Assessment of professional practice using SAFE-T or an SCDE approved alternative instrument If using SAFE-T, the teacher will produce the following artifacts: SLO Template Form A (this will suffice the LRP requirement), Unit Work Sample, Reflection on Instruction and Student Learning, and the Professional Self-Assessment Sections I-VIII & Section X of the SLO template will be scored as part of the summative SAFE-T process Section IX of the SLO template (growth targets) will be scored formatively and will not be part of the SAFE-T process The SLO may serve as the Professional Growth and Development Plan

Annual Diagnostic Assistance Teachers: Observation Expectations Annual Diagnostic Formal, Formative >1 – Comprehensive Classroom Observation per semester done separately by at least two observers (4 total) (at least one unannounced) with feedback to be provided within the mid-year and end-of-year consensus conference (at a minimum). Additional informal observation and feedback at the evaluator’s discretion. (See separate rules for certified teachers from out-of- state.) A dditional Informal or Walk-Through Classroom Observation per semester is encouraged. Principal or trained administration designee Trained Observer School district employment; SC certification; possible highly consequential evaluation; contents of the professional development plan.

Annual Diagnostic Assistance Teachers: SLO Expectations Assessment of professional practice using SAFE-T or an SCDE approved alternative instrument If using SAFE-T, the teacher will produce the following artifacts: SLO Template Form A (this will suffice the LRP requirement), Unit Work Sample, Reflection on Instruction and Student Learning, and the Professional Self-Assessment The SLO may serve as the Professional Growth and Development Plan Results are formative

Annual GBE Teachers: Observation Expectations Annual GBE Informal Informal Classroom Observation(s) and feedback during Annual GBE years are recommended for all educators every semester to provide continuous feedback. Informal can include: walkthrough and peer observations. Feedback related to practice can be given at the time of required SLO/GBE conferences. Principal or trained administration designee Trained Observer School district employment; SC certification; possible highly consequential evaluation; contents of the professional development plan.

Annual GBE Teachers: SLO Expectations Professional practice may be assessed using an informal observation tool The teacher will complete SLO Form B The SLO can serve as the Professional Growth and Development Plan Results are formative

Continuing Contract Teachers in their year of recertification: Observation Expectations Continuing Contract Recertification Year 2017 Informal classroom observation(s) and feedback each semester using the *Informal Observation Form. Feedback to be provided within the mid-year and end-of-year consensus conference at a minimum during recertification year. Principal or trained administration designee Trained observer School district employment; additional, formal evaluation; contents of the professional development plan. Note: If continuing contract teacher is to be formally evaluated for reasons other than a formative review the year of the recertification cycle, they must be notified according to R , Section V (A).

Continuing Contract Teachers in their year of recertification: SLO Expectations Professional practice will be assessed using the SCDE Informal Observation Tool, or an SCDE approved alternative The teacher will complete SLO Form B The SLO can serve as the Professional Growth and Development Plan Results are formative

Continuing Contract GBE Teachers: Observation Expectations Continuing Contract Informal years Classroom Observation(s) and feedback during informal years of the recertification cycle are encouraged for all educators every semester to provide continuous feedback. Observations can include: walkthrough and peer observations. Feedback related to practice can be given immediately or at time of required SLO/GBE conferences. Principal, trained administration designee, or peer review School district employment; additional, formal evaluation; contents of the professional development plan. Note: If continuing contract teacher is to be formally evaluated for reasons other than a formative review the year of the recertification cycle, they must be notified according to R , Section V (A).

Continuing Contract GBE Teachers: SLO Expectations Professional practice may be assessed using an informal observation tool The teacher will complete SLO Form B The SLO can serve as the Professional Growth and Development Plan Results are formative

Office of Educator Effectiveness Kris Joannes, Director, Joseph Tadlock Rinice Sauls Tria Grant Libby Ortmann,