Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June 2008 1 Dark Energy Survey Motivation Dark Energy is the dominant constituent of the Universe Dark Matter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Will the Dark Energy Survey measure neutrino masses? Will the Dark Energy Survey measure neutrino masses?
Advertisements

Brenna Flaugher Sept. 26, The Dark Energy Survey Camera: DECam 1.1 Management 1.2 Focal Plane Detectors 1.3 Front End Electronics 1.4 Optics 1.5.
UCL’s interests: photo-z, mass-obs calibration, systematics Granada, Sep 2010 Ofer Lahav, University College London Ofer Lahav, Stephanie Jouvel, Ole Host.
The Dark Energy Survey The Big Questions The Discovery of Dark Energy The Dark Energy Survey – The telescope – The camera – The science Expected Results.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
The Dark Energy Survey and The Dark Energy Spectrograph Josh Frieman DES Project Director
DES Meeting in Michigan April Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO, Barcelona, UCL, Cambridge, Edinburgh 1 Dark Energy Survey 5000 sq-deg.
The Dark Energy Survey and The Dark Energy Spectrograph Josh Frieman DES Project Director Portsmouth, June 2011.
The Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey D. L. Tucker 1, S. S. Allam 1, J. T. Annis 1, R. Armstrong 2, J. P. Bernstein 3, E. Bertin 4, D.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
Construction of the Dark Energy Camera Brenna Flaugher, DECam Project Manager CTIO Nov John Peoples (1 st DES Director ) Symmetry Magazine.
1 B. Flaugher P5 April 2006 The Dark Energy Survey From Scientific Goals to Science Quality Data Brenna Flaugher Fermilab April 2006 P5 Meeting.
August '04 - Joe Mohr Blanco Instrument Review Presentations to Blanco Instrument Review Panel Intro and Science 1 Mohr Intro and Science 1 Mohr Science.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Brenna Flaugher Fermilab What the Cosmos can teach us.
October 3rd 2013 Rogerio Rosenfeld The Dark Energy Survey: an overview Rogerio Rosenfeld IFT-UNESP ICTP-SAIFR LIneA 1.
Each 6” wafer contains: four 2k×4k, one 2k × 2k, eight 512 × 1k Follows SNAP model: Foundry performs first 8 steps on 650  m high resistivity wafers (10.
Studying Cosmic acceleration and neutrino masses with DES. Studying Cosmic acceleration and neutrino masses with DES.
Each 6” wafer contains: 4 2k×4k, 1 2k × 2k, & × 1k Follows SNAP model: Foundry performs first 8 steps on 650  m high resistivity wafers (10 kohm-cm)
March 2, 2007 DESDM Director's Review - Mohr Director’s Review of DESDM NCSA Director’s Review took place at NCSA on February 20, 2007 NCSA Director’s.
The Dark Energy Survey Fundamental Physics at Fermilab James Annis Experimental Astrophysics.
THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY Science Goals: Perform a 5000 sq. deg. survey of the southern galactic cap Map the cosmological density field to z=1 Constrain the.
1 SDSS Supernova Survey Josh Frieman Supernova Rates 2008, Florence May 19, 2008.
Brenna Flaugher July 25-27,2006 Directors Review 1 The Dark Energy Survey Camera: DECam 1.1 Management 1.2 Focal Plane Detectors 1.3 Front End Electronics.
Brenna Flaugher Dark Energy Symposium StSci May The Dark Energy Survey (DES) Proposal: –Perform a 5000 sq. deg. survey of the southern galactic.
Each 6” wafer contains: 4 2k×4k, 1 2k × 2k, & × 1k Follows SNAP model: Foundry performs first 8 steps on 650  m high resistivity wafers (10 kohm-cm)
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Brenna Flaugher FRA Oct Dark Energy Survey (DES) Motivation Dark Energy is the dominant constituent of the Universe Dark Matter is next 95% of.
Brenna Flaugher DES presentation to the Fermilab PAC Nov. 12, 2004 Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 DES Technical Progress, Cost and.
3.1 Optomechanical systems (1) Scientific and engineering resources are available to carry out the optomechanical work on DECam. The highly distributed.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Brenna Flaugher July 20, DECam Project Summary Outline –WBS 1.1 Management –WBS 1.2 Focal Plan Detectors –WBS 1.3 Front End Electronics –WBS 1.4.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DETF Recommendations I 2.1Science (Charge questions 1, 2, 7) Andy Albrecht & Nicholas Suntzeff 2.1.2Comments.
Dark Energy Survey Status John Peoples Presentation to the Fermilab PAC 6 March 2009.
Weak Lensing from Space with SNAP Alexandre Refregier (IoA) Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (IoA) Richard Massey (IoA) Gary Bernstein (Michigan) Tim.
The Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey D. L. Tucker 1, S. S. Allam 1, J. T. Annis 1, R. Armstrong 2, J. P. Bernstein 3, E. Bertin 4, D.
7/26/2006 Wyatt Merritt 1 DECam CD1 Documentation DOE Critical Decision Process Documentation Requirements.
The Dark Energy Survey The Big Questions The Discovery of Dark Energy
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Huan Lin 1FNAL ECcmbC Workshop 26 May 2006 The Dark Energy Survey (DES) Huan Lin Experimental Astrophysics Group Fermilab On behalf of the Dark Energy.
1 The DES Calibrations Effort Douglas L. Tucker (DES Calibrations Scientist) DES NSF/DOE Review, 8-9 June 2009 The DES Calibrations Effort has connections.
Tim McKay, Fermilab Users Meeting, June 6, Dark Energy Experiments: DES and Beyond Tim McKay University of Michigan Presented for the Dark Energy.
John Peoples October 3, The Dark Energy Survey Structure, Management, and Oversight A presentation to the Directors of Fermilab, NCSA and NOAO.
Brenna Flaugher Fermilab What we can learn from the Cosmos.
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
LSST and Dark Energy Dark Energy - STScI May 7, 2008 Tony Tyson, UC Davis Outline: 1.LSST Project 2.Dark Energy Measurements 3.Controlling Systematic Errors.
From photons to catalogs. Cosmological survey in visible/near IR light using 4 complementary techniques to characterize dark energy: I. Cluster Counts.
1 DECam in Chile Intro to Dark Energy Survey & DECam Project Status of arrivals in Chile Instrument checkout in Chile Schedule for first light.
The Instrument The focal plane is like an HEP detector, larger than any present astronomical camera, but smaller than a vertex detector. ½ Billion pixels.
Brenna Flaugher October 30, 2007 Preliminary Directors Review 1 Outline This talk will describe progress on DECam since the joint NSF/DOE CD-1 review in.
Photometric Redshifts: Some Considerations for the CTIO Dark Energy Camera Survey Huan Lin Experimental Astrophysics Group Fermilab.
Brenna Flaugher July 25-27,2006 Directors Review 1 The Dark Energy Survey Camera: DECam 1.1 Management 1.2 Focal Plane Detectors 1.3 Front End Electronics.
Gravitational Lensing
Brenna Flaugher July 6, DECam Project Summary Outline –WBS 1.1 Management –WBS 1.2 Focal Plan Detectors –WBS 1.3 Front End Electronics –WBS 1.4.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration BIRP Meeting August 12, 2004 Tucson Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 DES Instrument Project.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Brenna Flaugher, PMG, April 6, 2007 DECam Funding Need Profile (Dec 06) (then yr $, Overhead included) This gave a technically driven schedule resulting.
Oct. 19, 2006V. Scarpine1 DES Posters to AAS 2007, Seattle 1.Brenna Flaugher – “The Dark Energy Survey instrument” 2.Tom Diehl – “Characterization and.
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
TR33 in the Light of the US- Dark Energy Task Force Report Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Holger Israel Emmy Noether Research Group Argelander-Institut.
1 Brenna Flaugher Fermilab Dark Energy: The missing 70% of the Universe.
SDSS Stripe 82 and the Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Douglas L. Tucker (FNAL), for the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration DES Collaboration:
Seeing the Invisible: Observing the Dark Side of the Universe Sarah Bridle University College London.
Quantifying Dark Energy using Cosmic Shear
DECam The Dark Energy Survey Camera
The Dark Energy Survey Probe origin of Cosmic Acceleration:
Complementarity of Dark Energy Probes
Presentation transcript:

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Dark Energy Survey Motivation Dark Energy is the dominant constituent of the Universe Dark Matter is next 95% of the Universe is in Dark Energy and Dark matter for which we have no understanding 1998 and 2003 Science breakthroughs of the year

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Probes of Dark Energy: Map the cosmological density field The rate of growth of structure is determined by the amount and distribution of dark matter, dark energy and by the expansion rate of the universe z>30z=0 Count the Galaxy Clusters as a function red shift and cluster mass Measure the spatial clustering of galaxies as a function of red shift (angular power spectrum) Measure the distortion in the apparent shape of galaxies due to intervening galaxy clusters and associated clumps of dark matter (weak lensing) Use supernovae as standard candles to measure the expansion rate

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Cluster of Galaxies: Largest gravitationally bound objects Size ~ cm ~ Megaparsec (Mpc); Mass ~ Msun What is the cluster redshift? What is the cluster mass? not completely different from jet clustering in collider physics but also have depth (red shift) info. SDSS data

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June The Dark Energy Survey (DES) Proposal: –Perform a 5000 sq. deg. survey of the southern galactic cap –Measure dark energy with 4 complementary techniques New Instrument (DECam): –Replace the PF cage with a new 2.2 FOV, 520 Mega pixel CCD camera + optics Time scales: –Inst. Construction –Survey: 525 nights during Oct.–Feb Funding: –DOE, NSF, STFC (UK), Ministry of Education and Science (Spain), FINEP (Brazil), and the 11 Collaborating Institutions Use the Blanco 4M Telescope at the Cerro-Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO)

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June The DES Instrument: DECam To meet the DES science requirements, within the allocated time period DECam must have: 3 sq. deg. field of view (~ 0.5 meter diameter focal plane) excellent optical image quality red sensitive CCDs (from LBNL) g,r,i,Z,Y filters low noise electronics (readout with < 10 e noise!) cryogenic cooling system DECam Focal Plane 62 2kx4k Image CCDs: 520 MPix 8 2kx2k Alignment/focus CCDs 4 2kx2k Guide CCDs

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June DES Timeline 2004: Fermilab and National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) approvals –April: 1 st presentation to the FNAL PAC –July: Stage 1 approval by the FNAL director, –September: NOAO approved the DES proposal 2005: Nov. DOE approved CD-0 (Mission Need) for a ground based DE project 2006: P5 and the Dark Energy Task Force –April: DES presentations to P5 –July: Dark Energy Task Force report recommended projects like DES –July/Sept. P5 recommendation to proceed with DES. Reiterated this in : May CD-1 NSF/DOE Review of DES; Oct. CD-1 approval 2008: Jan. CD-2/3a NSF/DOE Review of DES –CD-2 approval for DECam April 29 th (Baseline cost and schedule) –CD-3a approval for DECam May 19 th (Construction start, long lead procurements) –CD-3b review scheduled for Sept. 2008

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June DECam overview CCD focal plane is housed in a vacuum vessel (the imager) which is supported by the barrel LN2 is pumped from the telescope floor to a heat exchanger in the imager: cools the CCDs to -100 C CCD readout electronic crates are mounted to the outside of the Imager and are actively cooled (UIUC). Filter changer (8 filter capacity) and shutter form one mechanical unit (UMichigan). Hexapod provides focus and lateral alignment capability for the corrector-imager system Barrel supports the lenses and imager DECam weighs about 4 tons (load limit is ~ 6 tons)

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June DECam Project Key People Wyatt Merritt is DECam deputy project manager Level 2 managers –CCDs: Tom Diehl and Juan Estrada –Front End Electronics: Terri Shaw, Spanish coordinator: Manel Martinez (Barcelona) –Optics: Peter Doel (University College London) –Opto-Mechanical: Andy Stefanik –SISPI (~ DAQ): Jon Thaler (UIUC) and Klaus Honscheid (OSU) –Survey Planning and Simulations: Huan Lin and Jim Annis Andy and Terri are also the mechanical and electrical project engineers, respectively STFC has committed funds for polishing of the lenses (~ $2.5M) Spanish funding agencies committed funds for the FEE; the preproduction boards are already in fabrication All the universities kicked in cash for early R&D and the lens blanks

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Current Work at Sidet: CCD Packaging and Testing

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Future work at Sidet (Lab A): Telescope Simulator

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Conclusions By April 2011 (< 3 years from now!) we plan to have 62 DECam CCDs in a new camera on the Blanco April 2008 –1 DECam CCD –with prototype electronics –in a small test dewar –on the CTIO 1m (next to the Blanco)

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Extras

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June DES Participating Institutions Fermilab University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign University of Chicago Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Michigan NOAO/CTIO Spain-DES Collaboration: Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC/ICE), Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies (IFAE), CIEMAT-Madrid: United Kingdom-DES Collaboration: University College London, University of Cambridge, University of Edinburgh, University of Portsmouth, University of Sussex The University of Pennsylvania Brazil-DES Consortium The Ohio State University Argonne National Laboratory 12 participating institutions and >100 participants DES Funding from DOE, NSF, STFC (UK), Ministry of Education and Science (Spain), FINEP (Brazil), and the Collaborating Institutions

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Baseline Obligations and Funding Tables for DOE funds (overhead included, then yr $) FY07 Funding includes $0.77M of carry-over from the R&D proposal and funds spent before Aug.1 (EVMS reporting started) FY08 Funding is $5.5M from FNAL, 0.1M from UIUC Base Grant Obligations Funding

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Blank inspection at Corning C2 The next step, polishing, will remove only ~ 1 mm per side C1

DES Forecasts: Power of Multiple Techniques Assumptions: Clusters:  8 =0.75, z max =1.5, WL mass calibration BAO: l max =300 WL: l max =1000 Statistical+photo-z systematic errors only Spatial curvature, galaxy bias marginalized, Planck CMB prior Factor 4.6 relative to Stage II w(z) =w 0 +w a (1–a) geometric geometric+ growth DETF Figure of Merit: inverse area of ellipse Stage II not included here

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June Forecast Constraints DES+Stage II combined = Factor 4.6 improvement over Stage II combined Large uncertainties in systematics remain, but FoM is robust to uncertainties in any one probe, and we haven’t made use of all the information. Further detail of these forecasts is contained in the Dark Energy Science Program. DETF FoM

Brenna Flaugher FNAL All Experimenters Meeting June DES Photometric Redshifts Measure relative flux in grizY filters and track the 4000 A break Estimate individual galaxy redshifts with accuracy  (z) < 0.1 (~0.02 for clusters) Good detector response in z band filter needed to reach z~1.5 Elliptical galaxy spectrum