THE MIDDLE MIOCENE CLIMATE TRANSITION IN LOUISIANA: PALEOENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM UNGULATE ENAMEL STABLE ISOTOPES Hi Lindsey, Thanks again for agreeing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISOTOPES AND LAND PLANT ECOLOGY C3 vs. C4 vs. CAM.
Advertisements

Distributions of C 3 and C 4 Plants Travis Wicks.
Soil Carbonates as a Key to the Past Ca +2 + H 2 O + CO 2 = CaCO 3 + 2H + Calcium derived from weathering or atmospheric inputs C in carbonate from soil.
Bull Creek Paleoenvironment: The Pollen and Archaeoclimate Models R.A. Varney and Linda Scott Cummings PaleoResearch Institute Golden, Colorado.
Meteorology Chapter 21.
Climate Change: Past, Present and Future. Warm up: 1.Sketch a graph (Global Temperature vs. Time) for the past 20,000 years and predict how climate has.
Paleoclimate indicators. Rock types as indicators of climate.
Spruce W. Schoenemann UWHS Atmospheric Sciences 211 May 2013 Dept. of Earth and Space Sciences University of Washington Seattle From Isotopes.
Applications: Carbon Isotopes in Soils (w/ a digression on animals)
OXYGEN ISOTOPES B.C. Schreiber U. Washington Dept. Earth & Space Science To be used only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed.
Proxies for climate reconstructions Geological observations Large fossil indicators of past climates Geochemical indicator Relative abundance of stable.
Discussion Session Lisha M. Roubert University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences.
The Truth about Global Warming As seen through the eyes of a physicist Dr. Suzanne Willis, Ph.D Northern Illinois University June 29,2011.
Fossils, Paleoclimate and Global Climate Change. Global Warming CO 2 levels in the atmosphere rising Average global temperature is rising Polar ice caps.
Mean annual temperature (°F) Mean annual precipitation (inches)
CHAPTER 50 AN INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGY AND THE BIOSPERE Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section B2: Factors Affecting.
NASA. Global Warming 101 Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D Principal Research Scientist The University of Alabama In Huntsville 19 March 2007.
Chapter 7 Climate and Terrestrial Biodiversity
Climate and Climate Change
Climate and Climate Change
June 2012 Teaching about CO 2, Temperature, and Climate Change Beth Caissie 1, 2 with collaboration from Julie Brigham-Grette 1, Laura Schofield 3, Christina.
Paleoclimatology Why is it important? Angela Colbert Climate Modeling Group October 24, 2011.
Climate and Climate Change
What evidence supports the hypothesis that carbon dioxide is linked to average global temperature? 2 main lines of evidence: Direct measurements Indirect.
Proxy Records Ice Cores Dendrochronology Sediment records
Plant physiological responses to precipitation in the Amazon forest, an isotopic approach Universidade de São Paulo: Jean Pierre Ometto; Luiz Martinelli;
HOW SCIENCE WORKS COSMIC UNIFORMITARIANISM. In geology…… UNIFORMITARIANISM is the assumption that the processes we observe today are the same that occurred.
Detecting Past Climates
Rachel Grandpre 1, Elisabeth Sikes 2, Samantha Burgess 3, Thomas Guilderson 4 1 Smith College, Northampton, MA; 2 Rutgers University, Institute of Marine.
Factors That Influence Climate. Terms: Weather: The current state of the atmosphere. Climate: A 30 year average for a particular area.
Climate Data and Paleoclimate Proxies Ruddiman p , Appendices 1 and 2 Paleoclimate at NOAA.
Raise your voice, not the sea level World Environment Day Celebrations NLC, Neyveli - June 5, 2014 Dr. K. Kumaraswamy Chairman, School of Geosciences.
Weather and Climate Chapter 3. Factors Affecting Climate Section 1.
Sea Level Change Concept Maps. Overview Overarching Concept: Changes in sea level have occurred in the past, are occurring now, and will continue to occur.
What do you know about climate? What do you want to know to understand climate?
Predicting Past Climates Huzaifa and Shajee. We will talk about: Predicting Past Climates: Ice Cores Record temperature data by trapping gases such as.
Chapter 18 The Paleogene World. Guiding Questions Would life in the Paleogene seas have looked familiar to modern humans? Would terrestrial vegetation.
FIELD TRIP: USGS CORE LAB / ICE CORE LAB Friday September 9, 2011 Western Interior Paleontological Society Paul E. Belanger, Ph.D. WIPS Past-President.
March 2008 Davidson | Dan Yakir, Environmental Sciences Ma Bo’er?
Complexities of modern leaf morphology, climate proxies, and applicability in the fossil record Claire Cleveland 1,2, Jennifer Hargrave 1, Betsy Bancroft.
Reconstructing Climate History through Ice Core Proxies Natasha Paterson Econ 331 April 7 th, 2010.
Oxygen isotopes and climate. The long term average of temperature and precipitation (30 years)
Welcome Grant from National Science Foundation: Fire, Atmospheric pCO 2, and Climate as Alternative Primary Controls of C 4 -Grass Abundance: The Late-Quaternary.
Evidence of Global Warming and Consequences
Climate and Climate Change Chapter 21
Open stomata: allows for gas exchange: CO 2 in and water vapor out Atmospheric CO 2.
Photosynthesis Photosynthesis: CO 2 + H 2 O + Energy  CH 2 O + O 2 + H 2 O Photosynthesis is a balance between competing processes.
Oxygen stable isotopes and chloride concentration in the surface waters of Taylor Valley Lakes, Antarctica, during the past 40 years Julie M. Brown*, W.
Earth’s climate and how it changes
Glacial Landscapes.
What is Climate Change?. Climate change refers to any significant change in the measures of climate lasting for an extended period of time. In other words,
The Surface of the Ice-Age Earth
CLIMATE CHANGE. CLIMATE IS: Long term Wide area Seasonal changes Measured over long spans of time CLIMATE is the average of many years of weather observation.
Discovering Past Climates
A Preliminary Stable Isotope Ecology Based On Tooth Enamel For Latest Eocene and Earliest Oligocene Perissodactyls (Mammalia) From The White River Group.
Chapter 25 Climate Chapter 25 What are Climate Zones?
Climate Change Group Dr. G. Midgley (leader) Dr. C. Musil Dr. M. Rutherford Dr. W. Thuiller Mr. Les Powrie Mr. B. Kgope Mr. G. Hughes Technical Staff Mr.
Elements of Climate. Weather  How would you describe the weather today?  How would you describe the climate?  Are they the same?  Are they always?
What makes a good argument? Make a list of things you think contribute to a convincing argument.
Microwear of other groups(Townsend & Croft, 2008; McGrath et al., in prep.) Santa Cruz toxodonts (larger notoungulates) were “dirty” browsers Semi-arid.
University of Pennsylvania
Biomes of the World.
1. LOPEZ, Adrianne, 1. SUAREZ, Marina B. , 2. FREDERICK, Charles and 3
Clues to Past Climate Change
Δ13C in the saprotrophic fungus Amanita thiersii reveal increased C3 productivity of Midwestern lawns since 1982  Erik A. Hobbie1, Brian A. Schubert2,
Section 2 Biomes Chapter 3.
Minimal change in vegetation structure across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary in Nebraska as indicated by isotopes in mammals Grant S. Boardman, Ross Secord.
Paleoclimate Proxies A proxy is a natural data set that mimics an environmental change, e.g. increased tree ring width and increased temperature and moisture.
Journal of the Geological Society
Section 2 Biomes Chapter 3.
Presentation transcript:

THE MIDDLE MIOCENE CLIMATE TRANSITION IN LOUISIANA: PALEOENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM UNGULATE ENAMEL STABLE ISOTOPES Hi Lindsey, Thanks again for agreeing to present this talk for Travis and I. You could quip about how you are neither Me nor Travis here I suppose. *I have left in a lot of the basic isotope background partly to pad out presentation time, but also because many in the session may not be very familiar with what isotopes can tell us.* If anyone has questions at the end, please direct them to email me… Grant Stanley Boardman, Ph.D. Trivium Preparatory Academy, Goodyear, AZ gboardman@triviumprep.org Travis Atwood University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK

Middle Miocene Climate Transition (MMCT; ~14.5-13.0 Ma) Pronounced cooling East Antarctic Ice Sheet The Middle Miocene Climate Transition (MMCT; ~14.5-13.0 Ma) was a pronounced episode of cooling associated with the reestablishment and advance of the Eastern Antarctic ice sheet following the warmest interval since Middle Eocene times. The impacts of this interval of climate change from the warmest since the middle Eocene, to the icehouse regime of the late Miocene to Pleistocene, have been recorded in marine and non-marine sections worldwide and have been especially well characterized in the Southern Ocean, Antarctica, and in Europe. In Spain’s Madrid Basin, for instance, the MMCT seemed to trigger a drop in temperature and an increase in aridity based on enamel and bone isotope values from ungulates. Graphic courtesy of Edward Gasson, UMass Amherst

Gulf Coast during the MMCT? What can we say about the impact of the MMCT on the Gulf Coast? There are a plethora of relevant localities (see MioMap figure on slide), but few have been given much treatment beyond alpha taxonomy and geochronological placement. Produced using Berkeley Mapper on MioMap website. Modified from © Ron Blakey, Colorado Plateau Geosystems

Major Questions What types of vegetative biomes were present? What was the δ18O of meteoric precipitation? What was the temperature seasonality? What was the mean annual precipitation and was it seasonal? We have many questions about the non-marine environments of the Gulf Coast during this interval, including: What types of vegetative biomes were present? What was the δ18O of meteoric precipitation? Which might give us an idea about the primary source of water vapor, during this interval (be it Gulf, Atlantic, or Pacific). What was the temperature seasonality? This interval was still warmer on balance than today, would it have been more tropical-like then? What was the mean annual precipitation (MAP), and was it seasonal? This is a supposedly arid interval, how does it compare to the Gulf Coast today?

MMCT Sites in Louisiana DISC Cluster DISC site TVOR Cluster TVOR SE TVOR S The sites in this study include two clusters (the DISC Cluster, which includes the DISC site; and the TVOR Cluster, which includes the TVOR SE and TVOR S sites) located on Fort Polk, a U.S. Army installation in Vernon Parish, Louisiana. All three sites sit within the Castor Creek Member of the Fleming Formation (FIGURE ON SLIDE); paleomagnetic data from cores indicate a late Barstovian (13.5 to 14 Ma) age for these sites (Jones et al., 1995; Gose et al., 2008). The bulk of fossils from these sites were recovered from conglomeratic beds and lenses interpreted as having been concentrated from the weathering of interfluves (Schiebout et al., 1997). These sites, as with the bulk of the Castor Creek Member, are primarily coastal, non-marine based on sedimentological, paleontological, and geochemical evidence, with the exception of TVOR SE, which has an in situ oyster reef (Schiebout, 1994; Schiebout et al., 1997; Jones et al., 1995; Hinds, 1999; McCulloh and Heinrich, 2000). Hinds (1999) suggested that the Castor Creek Member was deposited primarily during a regression, which fits expectations for the MMCT. Previous paleoecological work done at Fort Polk, based on pollen and phytolith data, indicate a mosaic habitat at most sites, with mixed hardwood including pine and areas of savanna grassland (Stromberg in Schiebout, 1997; Wrenn in Schiebout, 1997; Schiebout and Ting, 2001) Modified from Schiebout, 1997

Study Sites Castor Creek Member of Fleming Formation Conglomeratic beds and lenses concentrated by weathering of interfluves Coastal, nonmarine TVOR SE in situ oyster reef Regressive sequence Sampled 29 specimens Horses, rhinos, protoceratid we analyzed recovered from three sites in two clusters (the DISC Cluster, which includes the DISC site; and the TVOR Cluster, which includes the TVOR SE and TVOR S sites) located on Fort Polk, a U.S. Army installation in Vernon Parish, Louisiana. All three sites sit within the Castor Creek Member of the Fleming Formation (FIGURE ON SLIDE); paleomagnetic data from cores indicate a late Barstovian (13.5 to 14 Ma) age for these sites (Jones et al., 1995; Gose et al., 2008). The bulk of fossils from these sites were recovered from conglomeratic beds and lenses interpreted as having been concentrated from the weathering of interfluves (Schiebout et al., 1997). These sites, as with the bulk of the Castor Creek Member, are primarily coastal, non-marine based on sedimentological, paleontological, and geochemical evidence, with the exception of TVOR SE, which has an in situ oyster reef (Schiebout, 1994; Schiebout et al., 1997; Jones et al., 1995; Hinds, 1999; McCulloh and Heinrich, 2000). Hinds (1999) suggested that the Castor Creek Member was deposited primarily during a regression, which fits expectations for the MMCT. tooth enamel carbonate from 29 ungulates specimens (horses, rhinos, and the protoceratid, Prosynthetoceras francisi) Previous paleoecological work done at Fort Polk, based on pollen and phytolith data, indicate a mosaic habitat at most sites, with mixed hardwood including pine and areas of savanna grassland (Stromberg in Schiebout, 1997; Wrenn in Schiebout, 1997; Schiebout and Ting, 2001)

Taxa Sampled 29 specimens Horses, rhinos, protoceratid Merychippus Cormohipparion Prosynthetoceras we analyzed recovered from three sites in two clusters (the DISC Cluster, which includes the DISC site; and the TVOR Cluster, which includes the TVOR SE and TVOR S sites) located on Fort Polk, a U.S. Army installation in Vernon Parish, Louisiana. All three sites sit within the Castor Creek Member of the Fleming Formation (FIGURE ON SLIDE); paleomagnetic data from cores indicate a late Barstovian (13.5 to 14 Ma) age for these sites (Jones et al., 1995; Gose et al., 2008). The bulk of fossils from these sites were recovered from conglomeratic beds and lenses interpreted as having been concentrated from the weathering of interfluves (Schiebout et al., 1997). These sites, as with the bulk of the Castor Creek Member, are primarily coastal, non-marine based on sedimentological, paleontological, and geochemical evidence, with the exception of TVOR SE, which has an in situ oyster reef (Schiebout, 1994; Schiebout et al., 1997; Jones et al., 1995; Hinds, 1999; McCulloh and Heinrich, 2000). Hinds (1999) suggested that the Castor Creek Member was deposited primarily during a regression, which fits expectations for the MMCT. tooth enamel carbonate from 29 ungulates specimens (horses, rhinos, and the protoceratid, Prosynthetoceras francisi) Previous paleoecological work done at Fort Polk, based on pollen and phytolith data, indicate a mosaic habitat at most sites, with mixed hardwood including pine and areas of savanna grassland (Stromberg in Schiebout, 1997; Wrenn in Schiebout, 1997; Schiebout and Ting, 2001)

Stable isotopes Stable isotope analysis (more to come) Bulk sampling One sample Parallel to growth axis Serial sampling Multiple samples Perpendicular to growth axis LTYann

Carbon Isotopes - Photosynthesis Matters C3 Plants Cool season grasses Trees Shrubs C4 Plants Warm season grasses Rare shrubs Why does photosynthesis matter? Well the way plants take in carbon dioxide - or Carbon – varies based on the photosynthetic pathway. I am interested in C3 and C4 plants but there are also CAM plants like cacti. C3 plants are cool season grasses, trees like Oklahoma’s state tree-the redbud, and shrubs and during photosynthesis a chain of 3 carbons is produced C4 plants are warm season grasses and a few shrubs such as corn and salt bush LTYann

Carbon Isotopes - Photosynthesis Matters Our atmosphere 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 13C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C 12C CO2 Ok C3 and C4 plants are different. Great. But why should I care? It turns out C Water + Oxygen LTYann

Carbon Isotopes - Photosynthesis Matters Our atmosphere C3 plant Redbud C4 plant Corn Slowly brings in air Favors the smaller 12C GULPS in air Reflects ratio of 13C to 12C in air Ok C3 and C4 plants are different. Great. But why should I care? It turns out C LTYann

Oxygen Isotopes – Location, Location, Location Very negative About 0 LTYann Ehleringer, 1999

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Carbon Isotopes Reconstructing biomes. Carbon isotope compositions in plants are primarily a function of the photosynthetic pathway utilized in fixing atmospheric CO2 for metabolism Distinguishing between mammals feeding on C3 vegetation (trees, most shrubs and herbs, and cool-season grasses) and C4 (some shrubs and herbs, and warm-season grasses) is fairly readily accomplished because C4 plants have higher δ13C values than C3 plants, and have a nearly non-overlapping range The late Barstovian fauna used in this study occurred before the expansion of C4 grasslands therefore the variation in carbon isotope values in C3-dominated biomes is necessary for characterizing the vegetative environment in this study. δ13C values in plants generally increase from denser and wetter habitats to more open and drier ones, due to differences in light intensity, temperature, nutrient availability, and water stress (Ehleringer et al., 1986; Heaton, 1999; Diefendorf et al., 2010; Kohn, 2010). This trend is exhibited in the tooth enamel of herbivorous mammals, with low δ13CE values representing more closed, wetter habitats and high δ13CE values representing more open, drier habitats (O’Leary et al., 1992; Koch, 1998; Cerling and Harris, 1999; Feranec, 2003, 2007; Nelson, 2007). Illustrative habitat model modified from Boardman et al. (2013)

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Carbon Isotopes Reconstructing biomes. 1700 mm/yr Using indicated model results (Model on Slide), we base biome interpretations for the late Barstovian at Fort Polk on the following boundaries and ranges for mean δ13CE faunal values: closed canopy forest (rainforest and monsoon forest): ≤–14.1‰; Illustrative habitat model modified from Boardman et al. (2013)

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Carbon Isotopes Reconstructing biomes. ~900 mm/yr ~500 mm/yr open canopy biomes (“dry” and “wet” woodland-savanna, “dry” woody scrubland, “dry” forest, and “dry” C3 grassland): >–14.1‰ to –8.3‰; Illustrative habitat model modified from Boardman et al. (2013)

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Carbon Isotopes Reconstructing biomes. mixed C3/C4 biomes: –8.3‰ to 0.5‰; and pure C4 grasslands: ≥0.5‰. Following the logic outlined in Kita et al. (2014), it is possible that a component of C4 vegetation could be included in the diets of ungulates with values lower than –8.3‰, ranging to about –10.5‰. In this study, only values exceeding –8.3‰ will be attributed to a component of C4 in the diet. Illustrative habitat model modified from Boardman et al. (2013)

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Carbon Isotopes Reconstructing Mean Annual Precipitation Model factors Effect of latitude Effect of elevation Diet-enamel enrichment Atmospheric CO2 A model was developed following Boardman and Secord (2013) and Kita et al. (2014) to predict expected δ13CE values in herbivores for a variety of late Barstovian biomes. Data from extant plants were used as the basis of this model because the full range of δ13C values in extant mammals is not adequately documented. Diet enameFactors incorporated in this model were: (1) The effects of latitude on δ13C values in vegetation; 31°N, the approximate latitude of Vernon Parish, Louisiana (2) The effects of elevation on δ13C values in vegetation; normalized to 0.0 km, as all Fort Polk sites were at or very near sea-level during the late Barstovian (3) Diet-enamel enrichment; 14.1‰ was used, (4) Changes in composition of atmospheric CO2 between the late Barstovian and present day. determined that late Barstovian atmospheric δ13C was ~1.1‰ more positive than present day. Partial pressure of atmospheric CO2 has also been postulated to have an impact on model interpretation, it has recently been shown to be negligible. Illustrative habitat model modified from Boardman et al. (2013)

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Precipitation Key factor controlling vegetative biome distribution. Reconstructing Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) based on biome. Serial sampling of tooth enamel can give us an idea about precipitation seasonality for the same reasons. As precipitation is a key factor controlling vegetative biome, Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) can be calculated based on δ13CE using the following equation provided by Kohn (2010) and rearranged by Kohn and McKay (2012):   𝑀𝐴𝑃 𝑚𝑚 𝑦𝑟 = 10 − 𝛿 13 C 𝐶3 +10.29+(0.0124 × Abs. Latitude)−(1.9× 10 −4 × Altitude) 5.61 −300.             Using a value of 14.1‰ for the enrichment between enamel and diet for the ungulates sampled, and offsets of 1.1‰ between the δ13C of modern and late Barstovian CO2 (Tipple et al., 2010) to determine δ13CC3 (i.e. δ13CC3 = δ13CE –14.1‰ – 1.1‰), a value of 31.1° for the Abs. Latitude (absolute latitude) and 0 m for the altitude, we could calculated a MAP value for the late Barstovian of Louisiana. *Resolution of this large range of calculation-related uncertainty and lower than expected MAP values in open habitats requires further resolved modern study and perhaps considerably larger fossil sample sizes.* We can use serial δ13CE values to observe seasonal variability in vegetative biome δ13C, which can give us an idea about the potential for seasonality of precipitation. Though at this point this is purely qualitative. High variability High seasonality Low variability Low seasonality

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Oxygen Isotopes Determine meteoric water values and source of water vapor. Oxygen isotopes in tooth enamel have seen wide use in reconstructing aspects of continental paleoclimate based on the correlation between the oxygen isotope composition of local meteoric precipitation and the composition of mammalian tooth enamel. Composition of meteoric precipitation at mid-latitudes correlates with a number of factors including mean annual temperature (MAT), source of water vapor mass, and the trajectories of said masses. A number of other factors have an effect on δ18OE; the most critical of these factors appears to be the degree of water dependence of the animal (Kohn, 1996; Levin et al., 2006). Obligate drinkers have δ18OE values tracking the composition of meteoric precipitation, whereas non-obligate drinkers usually have much higher values because they get most of their water from the plants they eat, which are more affected by enrichment due to evapotranspiration. Obligate drinkers are “evaporation insensitive” (EI), whereas non-obligate drinkers are “evaporation sensitive” (ES) because enrichment is inversely proportional to relative humidity (Levin et al., 2006). In this study, we use the δ18OE of perissodactyls (horses and rhinos), which we assume to be EI following Levin et al. (2006) and Kohn and Fremd (2007), to reconstruct the composition of meteoric precipitation in Louisiana during the MMCT. Given the many factors besides MAT affecting precipitation δ18O, we do not use δ18OE to estimate MAT during the late Barstovian in Louisiana. Instead, we use serial δ18OE values to estimate seasonal variability in precipitation δ18O, which can in turn be equated to temperature seasonality (Fricke et al., 1998; Zanazzi et al., 2007, 2015). Picture © by Karen Carr Based on the physiology of modern taxa, we assume Equids to be obligate drinkers, and thus Evaporation Insensitive (EI).

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Oxygen Isotopes Determine meteoric water values and source of water vapor. Determine temperature seasonality, and even mean annual temperature when used with other proxies. Oxygen isotopes in tooth enamel have seen wide use in reconstructing aspects of continental paleoclimate based on the correlation between the oxygen isotope composition of local meteoric precipitation and the composition of mammalian tooth enamel. Composition of meteoric precipitation at mid-latitudes correlates with a number of factors including mean annual temperature (MAT), source of water vapor mass, and the trajectories of said masses. A number of other factors have an effect on δ18OE; the most critical of these factors appears to be the degree of water dependence of the animal (Kohn, 1996; Levin et al., 2006). Obligate drinkers have δ18OE values tracking the composition of meteoric precipitation, whereas non-obligate drinkers usually have much higher values because they get most of their water from the plants they eat, which are more affected by enrichment due to evapotranspiration. Obligate drinkers are “evaporation insensitive” (EI), whereas non-obligate drinkers are “evaporation sensitive” (ES) because enrichment is inversely proportional to relative humidity (Levin et al., 2006). In this study, we use the δ18OE of perissodactyls (horses and rhinos), which we assume to be EI following Levin et al. (2006) and Kohn and Fremd (2007), to reconstruct the composition of meteoric precipitation in Louisiana during the MMCT. Given the many factors besides MAT affecting precipitation δ18O, we do not use δ18OE to estimate MAT during the late Barstovian in Louisiana. Instead, we use serial δ18OE values to estimate seasonal variability in precipitation δ18O, which can in turn be equated to temperature seasonality (Fricke et al., 1998; Zanazzi et al., 2007, 2015). Picture © by Karen Carr Based on the physiology of modern taxa, we assume Equids to be obligate drinkers, and thus Evaporation Insensitive (EI).

Mammal Tooth Enamel and Stable Isotopes Stable Oxygen Isotopes Determine meteoric water values and source of water vapor. Determine temperature seasonality, and even mean annual temperature when used with other proxies. Water dependence Evaporation sensitive Evaporation insensitive Oxygen isotopes in tooth enamel have seen wide use in reconstructing aspects of continental paleoclimate based on the correlation between the oxygen isotope composition of local meteoric precipitation and the composition of mammalian tooth enamel. Composition of meteoric precipitation at mid-latitudes correlates with a number of factors including mean annual temperature (MAT), source of water vapor mass, and the trajectories of said masses. A number of other factors have an effect on δ18OE; the most critical of these factors appears to be the degree of water dependence of the animal (Kohn, 1996; Levin et al., 2006). Obligate drinkers have δ18OE values tracking the composition of meteoric precipitation, whereas non-obligate drinkers usually have much higher values because they get most of their water from the plants they eat, which are more affected by enrichment due to evapotranspiration. Obligate drinkers are “evaporation insensitive” (EI), whereas non-obligate drinkers are “evaporation sensitive” (ES) because enrichment is inversely proportional to relative humidity (Levin et al., 2006). In this study, we use the δ18OE of perissodactyls (horses and rhinos), which we assume to be EI following Levin et al. (2006) and Kohn and Fremd (2007), to reconstruct the composition of meteoric precipitation in Louisiana during the MMCT. Given the many factors besides MAT affecting precipitation δ18O, we do not use δ18OE to estimate MAT during the late Barstovian in Louisiana. Instead, we use serial δ18OE values to estimate seasonal variability in precipitation δ18O, which can in turn be equated to temperature seasonality (Fricke et al., 1998; Zanazzi et al., 2007, 2015). Picture © by Karen Carr Based on the physiology of modern taxa, we assume Equids to be obligate drinkers, and thus Evaporation Insensitive (EI).

Bulk Isotope Results Bulk results from DISC Locality The δ13CE data presented in this study are consistent with a pure C3 diet for all investigated ungulates. The sampled fauna as a whole has a range of δ13CE values consistent with feeding in an open C3 biome, such as “dry” woodland-savanna or C3 grassland according to our model. This interpretation is concordant with previous biome interpretations for Fort Polk during the late Barstovian indicative of fairly open habitats (Schiebout, 1997; Schiebout and Ting, 2001; Schiebout et al., 2004). Though there was not a statistically significant difference between Prosynthetoceras francisi and equid δ13CE values at DISC, there is some separation, suggesting that P. francisi preferred a slightly more closed habitat by comparison. Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) can be calculated based on δ13CE using an equation provided by Kohn (2010); in this case upper end estimates from the calculation yield values around 500 mm/yr…which is considerably lower than 1400 mm/yr the area experiences today, but well within expectations based on biome interpretation.

Serial Isotope Results The low variability in serial δ13CE for both horses (1.37‰) and rhinos (0.79‰) from Fort Polk may suggest little seasonal variation in precipitation in the region during the MMCT. In this study we used the relationship between rainwater δ18O and δ18OE calculated for modern horses from Zanazzi et al., 2007 to estimate a value for rainwater δ18O in Louisiana during the MMCT. Using this equation, the mean δ18OE for horses (31.99±1.22‰, n=17), yields a value for local water δ18O in Louisiana of 0.71‰ during the MMCT. Variability in serial δ18OE for both horses and rhinos is marked, suggesting either temperature seasonality or seasonal changes in water vapor source. If we attribute this variability solely to temperature seasonality, we can utilize the following equation provided by Zanazzi et al. (2015) to estimate MART. Using the 5-95 percentile interval for Fort Polk perissodactyls (r=3.53‰), we estimate a MART for Louisiana during the MMCT of 12.55°C. This range is more than 6°C lower than the thirty-year average for the area (18.80°C; IAEA/WMO, 2006), suggesting considerably more tropical-like seasonality during the MMCT compared to today, though we should note uncertainty associated with this estimate is large.

Serial Isotope Results The low variability in serial δ13CE for both horses (1.37‰) and rhinos (0.79‰) from Fort Polk may suggest little seasonal variation in precipitation in the region during the MMCT. In this study we used the relationship between rainwater δ18O and δ18OE calculated for modern horses from Zanazzi et al., 2007 to estimate a value for rainwater δ18O in Louisiana during the MMCT. Using this equation, the mean δ18OE for horses (31.99±1.22‰, n=17), yields a value for local water δ18O in Louisiana of 0.71‰ during the MMCT. Variability in serial δ18OE for both horses and rhinos is marked, suggesting either temperature seasonality or seasonal changes in water vapor source. If we attribute this variability solely to temperature seasonality, we can utilize the following equation provided by Zanazzi et al. (2015) to estimate MART. Using the 5-95 percentile interval for Fort Polk perissodactyls (r=3.53‰), we estimate a MART for Louisiana during the MMCT of 12.55°C. This range is more than 6°C lower than the thirty-year average for the area (18.80°C; IAEA/WMO, 2006), suggesting considerably more tropical-like seasonality during the MMCT compared to today, though we should note uncertainty associated with this estimate is large. Low variability 0.79‰ 1.37‰

Serial Isotope Results The low variability in serial δ13CE for both horses (1.37‰) and rhinos (0.79‰) from Fort Polk may suggest little seasonal variation in precipitation in the region during the MMCT. In this study we used the relationship between rainwater δ18O and δ18OE calculated for modern horses from Zanazzi et al., 2007 to estimate a value for rainwater δ18O in Louisiana during the MMCT. Using this equation, the mean δ18OE for horses (31.99±1.22‰, n=17), yields a value for local water δ18O in Louisiana of 0.71‰ during the MMCT. Variability in serial δ18OE for both horses and rhinos is marked, suggesting either temperature seasonality or seasonal changes in water vapor source. If we attribute this variability solely to temperature seasonality, we can utilize the following equation provided by Zanazzi et al. (2015) to estimate MART. Using the 5-95 percentile interval for Fort Polk perissodactyls (r=3.53‰), we estimate a MART for Louisiana during the MMCT of 12.55°C. This range is more than 6°C lower than the thirty-year average for the area (18.80°C; IAEA/WMO, 2006), suggesting considerably more tropical-like seasonality during the MMCT compared to today, though we should note uncertainty associated with this estimate is large. δ 18OE = 31.99 ± 1.22‰ δ 18Ow = 0.71‰ Mean annual range in temperature: 12.55℃

Serial Isotope Results

Gulf Coast during the MMCT Fort Polk environment Mosaic “dry” Woodland-savanna Low mean annual precipitation (~300-500 mm/yr) with no marked “dry” season. Experiencing more tropical-like temperature seasonality than today. In summation, our preliminary isotopic work indicate that the area in and around Fort Polk during the MMCT was likely covered in mosaic Woodland-savanna, experiencing low MAP with no defined dry season and more tropical-like temperature seasonality than today. Considerably more work is needed to fully characterize the area during this interval, and we hope to extend study to other coeval localities across the Gulf Coast.

Acknowledgments We thank: Drs. B.J. MacFadden, J. Curtis, and G. Kamenoc (University of Florida) for assistance with sample analysis, Dr. A. Engel (formerly of Louisiana State University) for use of lab space and equipment during sampling and pretreatment Drs. H.-M. Bao, B. Dutrow, and S.-Y. Ting (Louisiana State University) for helpful comments on this project. We also thank J. Grafton (formerly at Fort Polk) and other environmental staff that have worked at Fort Polk over the years for their assistance in collecting fossils. Funding was provided to T. Atwood by the Gulf Coastal Association of Geological Societies, LSU Museum of Natural Science, and the LSU Department of Geology and Geophysics. Dr. Yann (Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences) for giving this presentation. Any Questions may be addressed to Dr. Boardman…