Legislative Update June 27, 2013 Iowa ASCD Representative Cindy Winckler

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Advertisements

Iowa Department of Education Teacher Leadership & Compensation Task Force Iowa Department of Education.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Welcome! Day with GaPSC West Georgia RESA February 7, 2013.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
October 28 & 29 Great Prairie AEA TEACHER LEADERSHIP SYSTEM (HF 215)
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 The importance of school leadership on the quality of schools and the achievements of pupils:
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
The Teacher Leadership & Compensation System AEA 267 Planning Meeting Iowa Department of Education.
Teachers Lead, Students Learn A landmark teacher contract that takes the transformation of Baltimore City Public Schools to the next level September 29,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
2012 Task Force on Teacher Leadership & Compensation Teacher Leadership & Compensation Task Force.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Iowa’s Statewide Approach to Performance Evaluation & Compensation Judy Jeffrey, Director.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Governor Christie’s Educator Effectiveness Task Force Report March 1, 2011.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Building World-Class Schools for Iowa Iowa Department of Education.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP AND COMPENSATION SYSTEM OVERVIEW.
Administrator-Association Collaboration-from MOUs to Problem-solving SIOUX CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP & COMPENSATION IN THE WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FEBRUARY 2015.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Evaluation: An Opportunity to leverage learning at all levels School Board Presentation – May 22, 2013.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
“TEACHER EDUCATION FOR 21ST CENTURY TEACHERS ” Reforming Teacher Preparation: Meeting the Challenges of the 21 st Century Dr. Adriane E. L. Dorrington.
Arizona’s Performance Based Compensation National Conference on Teacher Compensation and Evaluation Chicago, IL November 21-22, 2002 Penny Kotterman, President.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
At-Risk Updates School Board Report,
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Legislative Update June 27, 2013 Iowa ASCD Representative Cindy Winckler

Highlights of HF 215 – Ed Reform 2% allowable growth for FY14 plus $120/student in one time money 4% allowable growth for FY15 Extended Early Intervention Block Grant for 5 years $10 million in FY15 for High Need School pilots $425,000 to continue Competency-Based Education task force

Allowable Growth 2 plus 2 does not equal 4 – although it’s nice to get 2 2% plus 2% one time money in FY14 $6121 per student in allowable growth plus $120 in one time money. In FY15, building off 2% Allowable Growth and computing 4% growth, the SCPP would be $6366. If Allowable Growth was 4% in FY14, the FY15 SCPP would be $6491, a difference of $125 per student in FY15.

ED REFORM - THE JOURNEY TO DATE….

McKinsey Report – version_Final.pdf

Although the four “wrong” components have a place in the reform constellations, they can never be successful drivers. It is, in other words, a mistake to lead with them. Countries that do lead with them (efforts such as are currently underway in the US and Australia, for example) will fail to achieve whole system reform. Even worse, chances are that such strategies will cause backward movement relative to other countries that are using the right drivers.” April Choosing the Wrong Drivers for Whole System Reform – Michael Fullan (P. 5) “ In the rush to move forward, leaders, especially from countries that have not been progressing, tend to choose the wrong drivers. Such ineffective drivers fundamentally miss the target. There are four main “wrong driver” culprits, that I discuss with their matched pairs that refer to the more effective alternative. In all cases choosing a combination of the wrong drivers makes matters significantly worse (or better). The culprits are: 1.accountability: using test results and a teacher appraisal, to reward or punish teachers and schools vs. capacity building; 2.individual teacher and leadership quality: promoting individual vs. group solutions; 3.technology: investing in and assuming that the wonders of the digital world will carry the day vs. instruction; 4.fragmented strategies vs. integrated or systemic strategies.

Building Professional Capital “Our message is that teachers and teacher leaders, along with system leaders who want to build an effective and highly charged profession, need to seize the crucial moment, confront the core problems, present and develop clear alternatives, and turn those alternatives into an energizing reality. It is time to change the game.” Hargreaves, Andy and Fullan, Michael, Professional Capital – Transforming Teaching in Every School, p.xv

Building Professional Capital “Professional capital is about collective responsibility, not individual autonomy; about scientific evidence as well as personal judgment; about being open to one’s clients rather than standing on a pedestal above them; and ultimately about being tough on those colleagues who after every effort and encouragement, fall short of their professional mission and let their peers as well as their students down.” Hargreaves, Andy and Fullan, Michael, Professional Capital – Transforming Teaching in Every School, p.xv-xvi

Teacher Leadership Pathways Per pupil funding: Funding level of $ per pupil in supplemental funding Pathways are optional District can request a waiver if the funding is not sufficient to complete their plan

Teacher Leadership Pathways Funding and Timelines District allocation during implementation based on $ per pupil. Allocation must raise beginning salaries to $33,500 first. These dollars are supplemental and are not added to the base. FY 14FY 15FY 16FY 17 Planning Grants to all districts $3,500,000 Implementation Grants for 1/3 of districts each year $49,300,000

Minimum components Move minimum salary to $33,500 Multiple teacher leader roles, goal of at least 25% of teachers in leadership roles Increased support for new teachers, such as additional coaching, mentoring, and opportunities for observing excellent instructional practice. Teacher-Leader experience, move from 2 to 3 years, with one year in district. A rigorous selection process for placement into and retention of teacher leadership positions. Teachers must have three years of experience, with at least one year experience in the district. Pathway Options Instructional coaches (full or part-time), Peer coaches, Curriculum and professional development leaders, Framework (Initial teachers, Model teachers, Mentor teachers, Lead teacher) Build your own model meeting minimum components Teacher Leadership Pathways

The plan must utilize the Iowa professional development system adopted by the state board of education and facilitated by educators. Commission on Educator Leadership and Compensation shall evaluate the applications and monitor the implementation of models. The DE Director or School District may appeal commission decision to the State Board of Education. The make-up of the Commission is 7 teachers, 5 of which are members of their local bargaining unit; 3 administrators, 2 school board members, 1 AEA, 1 parent, 1 business leader, 1 higher education, ED/President of ISEA, SAI, IASB; DE Director – non-voting member.

Teacher Leadership Pathways A. Framework - includes five career or leadership roles for teachers. Defines minimum salaries and time expectations for purposes of the career ladder in Iowa Code or Includes a residency year for the first year of teaching. Each school board must appoint a site-based review council for each of the district’s attendance centers that is comprised of equal numbers of teachers, and administrators. Teacher members will include teachers who will conduct peer group reviews and who have been nominated by the collective bargaining organization, if one exists, that represent teachers. The council must accept and review applications submitted to the school’s or the school district’s administration for assignment as a model, mentor, or lead teacher, and make recommendations.

Teacher Compensation – Level 1 New Code Initial Beginning teaching career between 0-3 years of experience Must complete a 1-year residency Participate in mentoring and induction program 5 additional days of professional development Starting salary $33,500 Current Iowa Code (To be repealed in FY17) Beginning Teacher Completed practitioner preparation program Holds initial teacher license or intern license Participates in the mentoring and induction program 2-year process to meet expectations of 8 teaching standards and 43 criteria through portfolio evaluation and observations Minimum salary $28,000 ($33,500 if used as a pathway)

Level 2 Current Iowa Code (To be repealed in FY17) Career Teacher Statement of professional recognition Completed beginning teacher mentoring and comprehensive evaluation Demonstrates competencies of a career teacher Holds valid license (standard license) Participates in PD and demonstrates continuous improvement Minimum $30,000 salary (+ $2,000 increase) New Code Career Holds a statement of professional recognition and is licensed under chapter 272 Successful completion of mentoring and induction program Demonstrates competencies of a career teacher as determined by comprehensive evaluation Participates in professional development and demonstrates continuous improvement (No salary increase recommended and no designation of supplemental pay)

Level 3 Current Iowa Code (To be repealed in FY17) Career II Teacher Has met requirements of Career Teacher and demonstrates competencies of a Career II Teacher Completed performance review Minimum Salary +$5,000 of minimum Career Teacher salary New Code Model Meets Career Teacher requirements Demonstrates competencies of a model teacher Participates in a rigorous review process and recommended for 1 year assignment District must designate at least 10% model teachers 5 extra days to strengthen instructional leadership +2,000 salary supplement

Level 4 Current Iowa Code (To be repealed in FY17) Advanced Teacher Receives recommendation of the review panel identifying superior teaching skills - reviewed by the review panel. Evidence from classroom-based portfolio Holds valid license Participates in teacher PD and demonstrates continuous improvement in teaching Possess skills and qualifications to assume leadership roles Minimum salary +$13,500 greater than minimum career teacher salary New Code Mentor Meet all criteria of Model teacher and demonstrate superior teaching skills Possess skills and qualifications to assume leadership roles Participates in a rigorous review process and recommended for 1 year assignment District must designate at least 10% of teachers as mentors Teach 75% of the day, then mentor other teachers 10 extra days to strengthen instructional leadership +$5,000 salary supplement

Level 5 No criteria in New Code Lead Meet all criteria of Mentor teacher, demonstrate superior teaching skills, ability to lead adult learners, and assume leadership roles Participates in a rigorous review process and recommended for 1 year assignment District must designate at least 5% of teachers as lead teachers Teach 50% of the day, then co-teach, co-planning, peer reviews, observe career, model and mentor teachers and other duties as assigned 15 extra days to strengthen instructional leadership +$10,000 salary supplement

Teacher Leadership Pathways B. Instructional Coach Model Instructional or peer coach who meets the requirements specified for a career teacher and engages in full-time or part-time instructional coaching (specifies coaching duties) and limits stipend to not less than $5,000 plus 10 days. Requires one instructional coach at each attendance center or at least one for every 500 students enrolled in the attendance, whichever is greater A curriculum and PD leader (receives training over the summer at the expense of the school district including time for the teacher beyond the contract) 15 additional days, plus $10,000

Transfer to Classroom Practice Percent of Participants Attaining Transfer Theory/Information Only 0% Theory & Demonstration 0% Theory, Demonstration & Practice 5% Theory, Demonstration, Practice & Peer Coaching 95% Percent of Participants Attaining Transfer Theory/Information Only 0% Theory & Demonstration 0% Theory, Demonstration & Practice 5% Theory, Demonstration, Practice & Peer Coaching 95% Student Achievement Through Staff Development by Bruce Joyce and Beverly Showers, p. 78

Iowa, Did You Know?

Resources Hargreaves, Andy and Fullan, Michael, Professional Capital – Transforming Teaching in Every School, Teachers College Press, 2012 “Choosing the Wrong Drivers for Whole System Reform,” Fullan, Michael Iowa Professional Development Model w&id=232&Itemid= w&id=232&Itemid=1286 NOBA for HF Iowa, Did You Know? outu.be outu.be