A Study of the Effects of English Accleration and Enrichment Curriculum of Gifted Students in Junior High School of Kaohsiung City. Li-Ching Ko, Chien-Hung.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Advertisements

Differentiating Math Instruction Challenge the Stars, Reach the Strugglers NCTM Annual Meeting 2006 Susan Phillips Meadow Lane Elementary Lee ’ s Summit,
To Challenge all Learners
What is Differentiation?
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
By Michael Morris Samika Thompson Integrating and Implementing Technology Fall 2009.
DED 101 Educational Psychology, Guidance And Counseling
Mrs. Karen Schick East, Forbes, Southwest, Torringford & Vogel-Wetmore Schools
Effingham County Who is a Gifted Student? A student who demonstrates a high degree of intellectual and/or creative ability, exhibits an exceptionally.
FTCE 3.3 Identify and Apply Motivational Theories and Techniques That Enhance Student Learning Learning – Relatively permanent improvement in performance.
Gifted and Differentiation Forum Nov. 1, 2010 Julian Middle School Commons.
Differentiated Curriculum What does differentiation mean to teachers and to students? LCPS AES FACILITATORS K-12.
1 CURRICULUM COMPACTING No More “B” Word Office of Teaching and Learning TAG Department December 6, 2007 TAG Office
CURRICULUM COMPACTING A STRATEGY FOR “RESPONSIVE TEACHING” Material drawn from It’s About Time by Alane J. Starko, copyright 1986 Reproduced with permission.
Curriculum Compacting Differentiation Strategies for teachers of Gifted Students Chantal Cravens GATE Specialist
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Middle School Talent Development Program at Northwest School of the Arts Janice Bernier Academic Facilitator.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Elementary High Ability Programming Information for Parents and Students April 2, 2013.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
 Christine Hartland, Grade 5 S/C  Julie Perks, Grade 4 S/C  Jenny Dow, Grade 3 S/C  Kristy Whigham, Grade 2 S/C.
Learning Contracts. Objectives : Define learning contracts. Why use learning contracts? Important components of learning contracts. How to assess using.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Gifted Education West Linn-Wilsonville School District West Linn-Wilsonville School District.
Gifted Education in the Elementary Schools Swarthmore-Rutledge School E.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
 HUA- LIN TSAI  WEN-JIUH CHIANG  RONG-JYUE FANG  ZHEN-GANG CHEN.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
Where Excellence is a Tradition. Preparation for first grade. Preparation for the future. Community Presentation January 30, 2014.
CURRICULUM COMPACTING A STRATEGY FOR “RESPONSIVE TEACHING” Material drawn from It’s About Time by Alane J. Starko, copyright 1986 Reproduced with permission.
 Christine Hartland, Grade 5 S/C  Julie Perks, Grade 4 S/C  Jenny Dow, Grade 3 S/C  Kristy Whigham, Grade 2 S/C.
ENRICHMENT AND GROUPING EDUC 4420 Pam Price Instructor.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
Assuring Gifted Program Quality Through Self-Study. Gail Hanninen, Ed. D.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Teaching Strategies Accommodations and Modifications.
Curriculum Compacting A Bright Idea To Engage Gifted Students A Bright Idea To Engage Gifted Students Presented by April Coleman.
Overview of Programs and Service Models at the Elementary Level Dr(s) Jennifer Scrivner & Georgann Toop RESA Model and Curriculum Course.
Chandler Unified School District CATS Program Chandler Academically Talented Students.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
New Pathways to Academic Achievement for K-12 English Learners TESOL March 26, 2009 Anna Uhl Chamot The George Washington University.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
 Christine Hartland, Grade 5 S/C  Julie Perks, Grade 4 S/C  Jenny Dow, Grade 3 S/C  Kristy Whigham, Grade 2 S/C.
Curriculum Compacting GUIDELINES, PRACTICE AND NEXT STEPS COACHES MEETING MARCH 6, 2015.
1 Working Smarter, Not Harder: Pat Holliday Angela Szakasits Differentiating Instruction.
What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated instruction is the theory that allows teachers to face this challenge by taking diverse student factors.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 4 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309.
SEM-R The Schoolwide Enrichment Model for Reading By: Julie Burt.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 4 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
The Holland Opus “I have not met any students who do not want to learn. What we as teachers need to do is to find ways for them to show us what they are.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
COMPACTING, CONTRACTS, AND INDEPENDENT STUDY: USING TIME EFFICIENTLY BASED ON VBCPS GRT TRAINING, 2007 Princess Anne Middle School February, 2016 Mrs.
INFORMATION SESSION: GIFTED EDUCATION IN GVSD Great Valley School April 5,
Differentiation Presented by Redwood Teachers. Differentiation in a Nutshell Differentiated Instruction is multiple ways to structure a lesson so that.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
Unit 3 The National English Curriculum
Curriculum Compacting
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
WELCOME   Background information on me PHYSICS Room 65.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
SAAEA Conference: 19 – 22 May Gaborone, Botswana
Presentation transcript:

A Study of the Effects of English Accleration and Enrichment Curriculum of Gifted Students in Junior High School of Kaohsiung City. Li-Ching Ko, Chien-Hung Lin, Jian-Feng Lin

Motivation In order to satisfy the students’ learning needs, let them avoid repeating to learn what they have learned, and make them feel bored in class, the curriculum should be designed according to the individual student’s current abilities in different subjects. Nowadays, the tendency that the students learn English in advance is more and more popular. Some students even start to learn English when they are very young. Therefore, how the teachers help the students who have passed the identification of English competence to compact and accelerate their curriculum, how the teachers develop the English enrichment curriculum, and if the curriculum are effective for the students are worthy of investigating.

questions The research questions are as the following: 1.What is the effect of English acceleration and enrichment curriculum for the students who have passed the identification of English competence? 2.What is the pressure of the gifted students who participated in the English acceleration program? 3.What are the opinions and suggestions of the parents, the English teachers, and the home teachers of the gifted students who participated in the English acceleration program? The purpose of the study is to analyze the effects of English acceleration and enrichment curriculum for the students who have passed the identification of English competence.

Literature Review Curriculum Compacting is an instructional technique that is specifically designed to make appropriate curricular adjustments for students in any curricular area and at any grade level. Essentially, the procedure involves (1) defining the goals and outcomes of a articular unit or segment of instruction, (2) determining and documenting which students have already mastered most or all of a specified set of learning outcomes, and (3) providing replacement strategies for material already mastered through the use of instructional options that enable a more challenging and productive use of the student's time (Tsai, 2001 ; Reis, Burns & Renzulli, 1992 ; Reis & Renzulli, 1989 ; Reis & Westberg, 1994). The theory of curriculum compacting-1

Literature Review The theory of curriculum compacting-2 Renzulli and Reis(1986) proposed that the purpose of curriculum compacting for the gifted students are: 1.Let the gifted students participate in the research which they are interested in. 2.Reduce the opportunities to let the gifted students feel bored. 3.Avoid repeating to learn what they have mastered. 4.Help the gifted students to learn with their own intellectual progress.

Literature Review The related researches of curriculum compacting-1 According to the literature of the researches in Taiwan and in other countries, the results of the researches said that curriculum compacting brought many benefits to the high ability students with specific strengths in normal classes. If they spend much of their time in school practicing skills and learning content they already know without any curriculum compacting, all of these factors may be causing the most capable children to learn less and proceed haltingly in their development, thereby creating or encouraging their underachievement (Chen,1996 ; Archambault, Westberg, Brown, Hallmark, Zhang & Emmons,1993;Purcell, 1993;Renzulli & Reis, 1991;Westberg, Archambault, Dobyns & Salvin,1993).

Literature Review The related researches of curriculum compacting-2 Resi, Westberg, Kulikowich and Purcell(1998) stated that using the compacting process with a much broader segment of their other high ability students is positive for their learning needs. In addition, when teachers eliminated as much as 50% of regular curricular activities and materials for targeted students, no differences were observed in post test achievement scores between treatment and control groups in math concepts, math computation, social studies, and spelling. Reis(1993) also found that the students with high achievements have mastered 40%-50% of the curriculum before the teachers implement curricular instruction (cited from Reis et al.,1998).

Literature Review The related researches of curriculum compacting-3 Schultz(1991) also found that when teachers implemented curriculum compacting for targeted students in the fourth grade, no differences were observed in post test achievement scores between treatment and control groups in math. According to the results, if the teachers can help the gifted students in their classes implement curriculum compacting to avoid the boredom with the repetition of the materials that they have mastered and increase the challenging learning content, these ways may be very helpful for their learning.

Methodology The study utilized qualitative analysis. The subjects in this study sampled two gifted junior high school students participating in the program, their mothers, their English teacher in the gifted class, and their home teachers, as well as their English teachers in the regular classes. The researchers interviewed with all of the subjects profoundly and investigated the research questions through analyzing and inducing the data from the interview.

Results and Discussion 1.The students developed more positive learning attitudes and overcame the learning difficulties actively and seriously. 2.The students owned better interpersonal interactions and increased the width and depth of English learning. 3.The students made a big progress on the ability of English reading, writing, and grammar efficiently. 4.The students became more interested in learning English. 5.The students were satisfied with the challenging curriculum. I. The analyses of the effects of English acceleration and enrichment curriculum for the students who have passed the identification of English competence.

Results and Discussion II. The pressure of the gifted students who participated in the English acceleration program. 1.The homework of the curriculum was too much for the students, and the more difficult and challenging homework took them more time to finish it. 2.The multiple learning activities were too many for the students to have a good balance on all of the learning tasks.

Results and Discussion III. The opinions and suggestions of the parents, the English teachers, and the home teachers of the gifted students who participated in the English acceleration program. 1.All of the people who participated in the English acceleration program support the English differentiated enrichment curriculum. 2.The teacher’s professional abilities and enthusiasm are the successful important keys of the program. 3.The content of the English enrichment curriculum should include wide, multiple, and challenging learning activities. 4.All of the people who participated in the English acceleration program suggest that the program should be implemented in advance to satisfy the gifted students’ learning needs.

Conclusion-1 According to the findings of the study, the researcher thinks that the English enrichment curriculum should be planned based on the following principles: 1.Put more emphasis on the students’ intellectual needs; choose and provide plenty and well-organized reading materials. 2.Plan leaning activities which can help facilitate the students’ critical and creative thinking. 3.Emphasize the literature based teaching materials which integrated reading and writing well. 4.Develop students’ meta-awareness and meta-monitor. 5.Encourage the students to learn actively.

Conclusion-2 6.Guide the students to be aware of and appreciate the multiple cultures. 7.Apply the technique of cooperative learning. 8.Help the students to develop the independent ability. 9.Encourage the students to apply the multiple research methods and understand the importance of investigating issues. 10.Apply the principle of authentic assessment.

Conclusion-3 All of the parents, the English teachers, and the home teachers of the gifted students who participated in the English acceleration program suggest that the program should be implemented in advance to satisfy the gifted students’ learning needs. The study may provide the staff of administration and the teachers in junior high school a practical model of developing curriculum and good references when they have to provide the students who have passed the identification of English competence with the curricular adjustments.