Loren Abell 1, Gayle Brewer 1 and Minna Lyons 2 1 University of Central Lancashire 2 Liverpool Hope University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Do We Form Relationships?
Advertisements

Intimacy and distance in relational communication
Chapter 5: Intimacy: Developing and Experiencing Affectionate Bonds
Chapter 8: Gendered Close Relationships Copyright © 2005 Wadsworth 1 Chapter Eight: Gendered Close Relationships gendered lives.
Interpersonal Communication in Close Relationships
Interpersonal Communication
Relationship formation (and breakdown) Dr. Fenja Ziegler Student Office Hours:Thursdays: 1 – 3pm Psychology, C54 Foundations in Psychology (C80FIP)
Early Adulthood: Psychosocial Crisis: Intimacy vs. Isolation.
Intimacy and Distance in Relationships
INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP
Marital Satisfaction and the Development of Autonomy and Close Friendships in Early Adolescence Jessica R. Meyer L. Wrenn Thompson Kathleen Boykin McElhaney.
1 Interpersonal Relationships.  Scientists believe that ALL relationships – both impersonal and personal – are based on the social exchange theory. ◦
Friendships.  Think back to your childhood. What did you do with friends?  Boys generally plays games with lots of rules and hierarchy/competition 
RELIGIOSITY AND SPIRITUALITY’S INFLUENCE ON CLOSENESS IN ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS Ally Cooke, Kate Eipl, & Rachel Jacobs Hanover College “Almost every single.
Sharing Personal Information
Inter-Act, 13th Edition Chapter 6 Relationships.
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad Study on Personality and Loneliness among the students of IIT Hyderabad -Jayashankar ( ES12B1011) Under the guidance.
Learning outcome: By the end of this 25 minutes you will be able to discuss a strength and a limitation of using qualitative methods to study children’s.
FUNDAMENTALS OF PUBLIC SPEAKING Instructor: Shelby Reigstad Student: Haddish Abadi 06 November 2012 Self-Disclosure.
Friendship and Support. Overview of Friendship Nature of Friendship Rules of Friendship Theories of Friendship Balance Theory Developmental Theory Theories.
Emotion and Relationship Effects on Gender Differences in Empathy Method Participants were 60 women and 24 men. Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis,
1]Knoll, N., Burkert, S., & Schwartzer, R. (2006). Reciprocal support provision: Personality as a moderator? European Journal of Personality, 20,
True or False? The breadth of information you self disclose is related to the person with whom you are talking. The depth of information you self disclose.
Study 1: Method Demographics 346 men and 299 women 41.1% Dating, 18.2% Cohabiting, 4.2% Engaged or 18.9 Married Mean age of sample was 31.7 years Procedure.
Ch. 2: An Interpersonal Communication Process. All slides based on Interviewing: Principles and Practices, by Charles J.Stewart and William B. Cash, Jr.
Instagram: Uses and Gratification of Users
The Role of Communication in Maintaining Relationships
* Unhealthy and healthy relationships Could depend on how they communicate (and if at all!) Attributional style – behaviours – are they dispositional.
THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN MAINTAINING RELATIONSHIPS.
The Effects of Eye Contact and Gender on Leadership Perception Kristy Fedde Minnesota State University Moorhead Introduction Leadership styles are classified.
Environmentalism and Personality Simon Cohen Jeff Edgar Chris Latham-Warde Sanni Kujala.
Gender and Sex Sex is a designation based on biology Gender is socially and psychologically constructed.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Friendship: 1. Are there sex differences in friendship? (continued)
Affiliation: Beneficial or Detrimental? Linnea M. Heintz, University of Wisconsin-Stout Advisor: Jennifer Byrd-Craven, Oklahoma State University Introduction.
Chapter Six: Developing and Maintaining Relationships  What is Interpersonal Communication?  At least two people who are interdependent.  Allows for.
Duffy/Atwater © 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter 8 You and Your Friends.
By;David Salinas Adolescent communication. Introduction An adolescent is considered to be the teen years between the ages of This long period is.
Supervisor-Subordinate Friendships The Effects of Promotion on Peer Relationships Katie Nichols, Stefanie Ress, Jessica Rudd with Dr. Martha Fay Department.
6: Inter-Act, 13th Edition Relationships.
Module Three 1. * The image of who you are. It’s how you perceive yourself. It develops through * Others’ images of you * Social comparisons * Cultural.
BUILDING HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS Key Standard 8 : Family Life.
COMMUNICATION AND THE SELF
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 33.
(hungarywilsons). Self Disclosure. (hungarywilsons). Self Disclosure.
Chapter 8 Making and Keeping Friends. Chapter Overview Keeping Friends Friendships Are Precious When Friends Get Together Self-Disclosure--Those Little.
Personal Control over Development: Effects on the Perception and Emotional Evaluation of Personal Development in Adulthood.
Human Relationships Unit: Interpersonal Relationships Learning Objective: Discuss the role of communication in maintaining relationships.
1 6: Inter-Act, 13 th Edition 6: Inter-Act, 13 th Edition RelationshipsRelationships.
The Motive Perspective
Chapter 6 Communication and Conflict Resolution. Chapter Outline  Verbal and Nonverbal Communication  Nonverbal Communication  Gender Differences in.
INTERPERSONALCOMMUNICATION IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS
Page 1 Gender Differences.
Bullying: A Growing Epidemic in Today’s Youth. ✦ Take out a piece of paper ✦ Write down something you have done that you are not proud of ✦ Fold your.
Chapter Three The Self in Interpersonal Communication.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 32.
Friendship, Love, Family. The role of Interdependence Three criteria are critical to interdependence in our relationships. We have to interact frequently.
QUIZ No quiz this week 100% if you are in class and on time! Write your name on the quiz slip and pass it up There WILL be a quiz next week (Chapter 9)
Selfishness and Self-Mattering: Do I Fit In? Leah Burke Advisors: Ellen Cohn, Ph.D. & Alexander Blandina, M.A. The University of New Hampshire INTRODUCTION.
Body Image and Body Change Strategies Within Best Friend Dyads and Friendship Groups: Implications for Adolescent Appearance-RS Haley J. Webb & Melanie.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 31.
1 Intimacy and Distance in Relational Communication Looking Out, Looking In 12 th Edition  Chapter Summary Intimacy in Relationships Self-Disclosure in.
Are masculine males attractive
Chapter 2 Entrepreneurial Intentions and Corporate Entrepreneurship.
Intimacy and Distance in Relationships
Introduction Hypotheses Results Discussion Method
MEN & WOMEN SIMILARITIES & DIFFERENCES
ABSTRACT PROCEDURE CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
Introduction Discussion Results Method References
Communication’s role in maintaining relationships
Relationship formation (and breakdown)
Presentation transcript:

Loren Abell 1, Gayle Brewer 1 and Minna Lyons 2 1 University of Central Lancashire 2 Liverpool Hope University

Friendships Source of social support, predict happiness, increase self-esteem and reduce loneliness Gender differences : Females tend to form dyads and form more empathic and supportive friendships Males tend to form group friendships and participate in group activities Personality differences: Extroverted individuals feel closer to their friends Individuals higher in neuroticism experience more friendship conflict Individuals high in agreeableness are more likely to be selected as friends

Machiavellianism Characterised by a manipulative interpersonal style, emotional detachment and lack of concern with morality (Christie & Geis, 1970) Machiavellian individuals place little importance on friendship and report friendships of poor quality (Lyons & Aitken, 2010) Those high in Machiavellianism may not want (or need) the emotional intimacy and support provided by friendships

Self-Disclosure Self-disclosure develops and reinforces intimacy, trust and liking within friendship Self-disclosure is also associated with power, and the potential abuse of that power Machiavellian individuals intentionally use self-disclosure as a manipulation strategy Gender differences: O’Connor and Simms (1990) and Brown and Guy (1983) reported Machiavellian females use self-disclosure to manipulate others When the situation is manipulated (influential/affiliative) males, but not females use self-disclosure (Dingler-Duhon & Brown, 1987)

Competition Competition in a experimental situation with strangers influenced the intentional use of self-disclosure by Machiavellian males (Jones, Nickel & Schmidt, 1979) Competition decreased self-disclosure whilst cooperation increased Machiavellian males use of self-disclosure Research has not considered the influence of competition on the use of self-disclosure in real world relationships such as friendships.

The Current Study Aim: To investigate the influence of Machiavellianism and friendship competition on the use of self-disclosure, considering both the amount and type of information disclosed Method: 236 participants completed: The Mach IV (Christie & Geis, 1970) Self-Disclosure Scale (Wheeless, 1978) Amended Interpersonal Competition Index (Singleton & Vacca, 2007)

Results Machiavellianism and Self-Disclosure Subscales

Male and Female Self-Disclosure Men: Machiavellianism and Competition predicted honesty-accuracy of self-disclosure (F (3,60) = 8.90, p <.001) Women: Machiavellianism x Competition predicted honesty-accuracy of self disclosure (F (3,167) = 2.99, p <.05) Machiavellianism x Competition predicted intent to self-disclosure (F (3,166) = 3.77, p <.05) Machiavellianism x Competition predicted depth of self-disclosure (F (3,166) = 4.27, p <.01)

Conclusions High Mach men and women and those in competitive friendships do not reduce the amount of information that they disclose which could be detrimental to the friendship or raise suspicion (Sermat & Smyth, 1973) The friendship dyads experienced by high Mach individuals and those in competitive friendships are characterised by less honest - accurate self-disclosure Machiavellianism and competition predicted intent to self-disclose and depth of information disclosed in women only. This may reflect the greater focus on friendship dyads for women

References Brown, E.C., & Guy, R.F. (1983). The effects of sex and Machiavellianism on self-disclosure patterns. Social Behaviour and Personality, 11, Christie, R., & Geis, F.L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. London: Academic Press. Dingler-Duhon, M., & Brown, B.B. (1987). Self-disclosure as an influence strategy: Effects of Machiavellianism, androgyny, and sex. Sex Roles, 16, 109–123. Jones,W.H., Nickel,T.W., & Schmidt, A. (1979). Machiavellianism and self-disclosure. The Journal of Psychology, 10, Lyons, M., & Aitken, S. (2010). Machiavellian friends? The role of Machiavellianism in friendship formation and maintenance. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 4, O’Connor, E.M., & Simms, C.M. (1990). Self-revelation as manipulation: The effects of sex and Machiavellianism on self-disclosure. Social Behaviour and Personality, 18, Singelton Jr, R.A., & Vacca, J. (2007).Interpersonal competition in friendships. Sex Roles, 57, Wheeless, L.R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4,